This study, grounded in the meritocracy theory, examined the role of merit in the recruitment process of volunteers for Nigeria’s Youth Empowerment Schemes. We adopted mixed methods of data collection and triangulated sampling techniques. It was discovered that very few volunteers were recruited based on merit. Our findings revealed that applicants with personal connections to recruiters, such as shared state or origin, religion, or political affiliation, were favoured over others. Also, some applicants secured their appointments through monetary transactions. Bivariate analyses revealed that this lack of meritocracy significantly contributed to the scheme’s ineffectiveness and hindered the productivity and development of labour. This absence of merit in recruitment led to various negative job-related attitudes that prevented professionalism and rendered volunteers even less employable. Participants were further disadvantaged because of the scheme’s policies, which strongly correlated with alienation, financial instability and unprofessionalism. The study recommended that the scheme should employ merit in its selection process and pay more attention to human capital development.
AdeyemiO. S., DumadeE. O., & FadareO. M. (2015). The influence of recruitment and selection on organizational performance the influence of recruitment and selection on organizational performance. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research. https://www.studocu.com/row/document/lagos-state-university/strategic-business-reporting/the-influence-of-recruitment-and-selection-on-organizational-performance/30967246
2.
AkhigbeO. J. (2013). Human resource planning: A key factor in ensuring the effectiveness and efficiency of organization. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 4(4), 64–99.
3.
AkinwaleE. J. (2015). Civil service recruitment: Problems connected with Federal Character Policy in Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(2), 12–36.
4.
AuW. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
5.
BellowsT. J. (2009). Meritocracy and the Singapore political system. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 24–44.
6.
BilesG., & HolmbergS. (2000). Strategic human resource planning. Thomas Horton and Daughters.
7.
BlytheB. T., & StivariusT. B. (2004). Defusing threats of workplace violence. Employment Relations Today, 30(4), 63–70.
8.
BoruvkaE., & PerryJ. (2020). Understanding evolving public motivational practices: An institutional analysis. Governance, 33(3), 565–584.
9.
CastillaE. J., & BenardS. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–676.
10.
ChidiO. C. (2014). Human capital selection practices and performance of unionized organizations in the food, beverage and tobacco industry in Lagos State, Nigeria. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 22(1), 614–636.
11.
ClarkC. (2012). Modern sociological theories. Perfect Touch Prints.
12.
Cobb IIF., & RussellN. M. (2015). Meritocracy or complexity: Problematizing racial disparities in Mathematics assessment within the context of curricular structures, practices, and discourse. Journal of Education Policy, 30(5), 631–649.
13.
CorbettR. J. (2013). The fading promise of a more meritocratic society. Perspectives on Political Science, 42(4), 212–216.
14.
DibieR. A. (2014). Public administration: Theory, analysis and application. Babcock University Press.
15.
GamageA. S. (2014). Recruitment and selection practices in manufacturing SMEs in Japan: An analysis of the link with business performance. Ruhuna Journal of Management and Finance, 1(1), 37–52.
16.
Global Education Monitoring Report Team. Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all; EFA global monitoring report, 2013-2014 (2nd ed.). UNESCO Publishing. www.efareport.unesco.org
17.
Igbokwe-IbetoC. J., & AgbodikeF. (2015). Recruitment policies in the Nigerian federal civil service and their implications on employees performance. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(3), 34–48.
18.
ImbroscioD. (2016). Urban policy as meritocracy: A critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(1), 79–104.
19.
IshaqR. M. (2013). Civil service and the problem of productivity in Nigeria. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(7), 157–163.
20.
LipseyD. (2014). The meretriciousness of meritocracy. The Political Quarterly, 85(1), 37–43.
21.
ManiamV. A. (2004). Volunteerism for youth development. INTI Journal, 15, 306–317.
22.
MufuG. F. (2015). Recruitment and selection: The case of National Oil Refinery Company, SO.NA.RA (Sarl), Cameroon (Unpublished master thesis in Strategic Human Resources Management & Labour Relations).
23.
MullinsJ. L. (2017). Impact of recruitment and selection on employees’ innovation. Prentice Hall.
24.
National Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Poverty and unemployment rate in Nigeria: Statistical analysis. NBS Press.
25.
NivenM. A. (2016). Impact of recruitment and selection on employees’ innovation: A case of readymade garment manufacturers and exporters in Lahore. Pakistan Report. HMS.
26.
NwakaireO. (2016). Volunteerism for sustainable community development in Nigeria. REK Books.
27.
NwokammaA. O. (2017). Staff recruitment and management. In AmaewhuleW. A., AbrahamN. M., & AsodikeJ. D. (Eds.), School business management: Theoretical and practical approach. Pearl Publishers.
28.
OgunbameruO. A. (2004). Organizational dynamics. Spectrum Books Ltd.
29.
OkerekaO. P. (2015). The ecology of recruitment and selection of personnel and the quest for efficiency in the Delta State Civil Service. Global Journal of Political Science and Administration, 3(5), 9–20.
30.
OnweS. O., AbahE. O., & NwokwuP. M. (2015). Politics of recruitment and selection in the Nigerian Civil Service—An Ebonyi State experience. Public Policy and Administration Research, 5(2), 92–99.
31.
OnyeaghalaO. H., & HyacinthM. I. (2016). Effects of employee selection process on productivity in the public and private sectors: A case of Benue State. Business and Economics Journal, 7(4), 1–8.
32.
Osun State Youth Empowerment Programme. (2020). Revision of activities in OYES programme. Osun Printing Press.
33.
OtooI. C., AssumingJ., & AgyeiP. M. (2018). Effectiveness of recruitment and selection practices in public sector higher education institutions: Evidence from Ghana. European Scientific Journal, 14(13), 199–214.
34.
PoocharoenO., & BrillantesA. (2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, issues, and challenges. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(2), 140–163.
35.
RandhawaG. (2004). Job satisfaction and work performance: An empirical study. IBAT Journal of Management, 4(1), 54–64.
36.
RitzA., BrewerG., & NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426.
37.
RochesterC., EllisP., HowlettS., & ZimmeckM. (2010). Volunteering for the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
SalawuB., & HassanA. (2015). Ethnic politics and its implication for the survival of democracy in Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 3(2), 28–37.
39.
SoB. W. Y. (2015). Exam-centred meritocracy in Taiwan: Hiring by merit or examination?Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(3), 312–323.
40.
TalibN., & FitzgeraldR. (2015). Inequality as meritocracy: The use of the metaphor of diversity and the value of inequality within Singapore’s Meritocratic Education System. Critical Discourse Studies, 12(4), 445–462.
41.
ThebeT. P., & Vander-WaldtG. (2014). A recruitment and selection process model: The case of the department of justice and constitutional development. Administration Publica, 22(3), 6–29.
42.
UsmanE., & OkaforM. (2015). A critical analysis of the recruitment policy of the Nigerian civil service. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Reviews, 5(1), 26–33.
43.
VandenabeeleW. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556.
44.
ZhangZ. (2015). Crowding out meritocracy: Cultural constraints in Chinese public human resource management. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(3), 270–282.
