The purpose of this article is to explore the disclosure of corporate sustainability (CS) practices and to examine the association between sustainability performance and financial performance in Asian context considering firms from India and Japan.
Design/methodology/approach
The present study is based on secondary data collected from annual reports and CS reports of 28 and 35 listed non-financial firms from India and Japan from 2009 to 2014. Content analysis (binary coding system) is employed to calculate the sustainability disclosure score based on Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) framework. Market-to-book ratio is used to measure the financial performance. These scores are further used to examine the impact of CS performance on financial performance employing both the panel data model and logit regression model.
Findings
The study finds that the average level of disclosure is more in case of Japanese firm as compared to Indian firms. Using both the regression model, the study finds the influence of CS performance on financial performance is positive and significant for both the nations. However, the influence of CS performance is more in case of Japan than that of India. Moreover, the study also reveals that environmental factor is more dominating in influencing the financial performance in Japan. Whereas, in India, it is the social factor that dominates the financial performance.
Originality/value
It is the first comprehensive study in Asia analyzing the CS practices using both the panel data regression model and logit regression model.
AggarwalR.S. (2001). Corporate social information disclosure: A comparative study, social accounting and disclosure. Retrieved 12September2015, from http://www.caclubindia.com/forum/files-for-students-66006.asp
2.
AhmedN.A., SulaimanM., & SiswantoroD. (2003). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in Malaysia: An analysis of annual reports of KLSE listed companies. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 11(1), 1–37.
3.
AmeerR., & OthmanR. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations, Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79.
4.
AndrewB.H., GulF.A., GuthrieJ.E., & TeohH.Y. (1989). A note on corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: The case of Malaysia and Singapore. British Accounting Review, 16(1), 12–26.
5.
BelalA.R. (2001). A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(5), 274–289.
6.
BhatiaA., & ChanderS. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure by SENSEX companies in India. Management and Labour Studies, 39(1), 1–17.
7.
BoyleE.J., HigginsM.M., & RheeS.G. (1997). Stock market reaction to ethical initiatives of defence contractors: Theory and evidence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8(6), 541–561.
8.
BrammerS., BrooksC., & PavelinS. (2006). Corporate social performance and stocks returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.
9.
BurhanA.H.N., & RahmantiW. (2012). The impact of sustainable reporting on companies performance. Journal of Economics Business and Accountancy Ventura, 15(2), 257–272.
10.
Carrots and Sticks. (2013). Promoting transparency and sustainability: An update on trends in voluntary and mandatory approaches to sustainability reporting. Retrieved 12September2015, from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/carrots-and-sticks.pdf
11.
CarvalhoF.M., & SiqueiraJ.R.M. (2007). Analysis of the use of the key indicators of the Global Reporting Initiative in social reports of Latin American companies, Think Accounting. Retrieved 12March2015, from http://www.atena.org.br/revista/ojs-2.2.3-06/index.php/pensarcontabil/article/viewFile/113/113
12.
ChenL., FeldmannA., & TangO. (2015). The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 170(B), 445–456.
13.
ChoC.H., & PattenD.M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organization and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647.
14.
ChoiJ., KwakY., & ChoeC. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291–311.
15.
ClarkeM., SengD.R., & WhitingH. (2011). Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 505–530.
16.
ClarksonM.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
17.
CortezM., & CudiaC. (2011). The virtuous cycles between environmental innovation and financial performance: Case study of Japanese automotive and electronic companies. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 15(2), 31–44.
18.
DienesD., SassenR., & FischerJ. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154–189.
19.
DobbsS., & StadenC.V. (2016). Motivations for corporate social and environmental reporting: New Zealand evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 449–472.
20.
EkwuemeC.M., EgbunikeC.F., & OnyaliC.I. (2013). Benefits of triple bottom line disclosures on corporate performance: An exploratory study of corporate stakeholders. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(2), 79–91.
21.
ElkingtonJ. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
22.
Garcia-CastroR., CanelaM.A., & ArinoM.A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126.
23.
GhoshA. (2002). Corporate social accounting: Empirical research and studies in India and abroad. Retrieved 12September2015, from http://www.caclubindia.com/forum/files-for-students-66006.asp
24.
GladwinT.N., KennellyJ.J., & KrauseT.S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.
25.
GuthrieJ., & ParkerL. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3(2), 159–175.
26.
HahnR., & KühnenM. (2013, November). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
27.
HidemichiF., KazuyukiI., ShinjiK., & ShunsukeM. (2012). Corporate Environmental and Economic Performances of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development. Retrieved 13September2014, from http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/39564/pdf
28.
HillmanA.J., & KeimG.D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: Whats the bottom line?Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.
29.
HoL.J., & TaylorM.E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 18(2), 123–150.
30.
HussainN. (2015). Impact of sustainability performance on financial performance: An empirical study of Global Fortune (N100) firms. Working Papers No. 1. Venezia, Italy: Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
31.
ImamS. (2000). Corporate social performance reporting in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(3), 133–141.
32.
IsabelC.L., CasteloM.B., CurtoD.J., & TeresaE. (2012). How does the market value corporate sustainability performance?Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 417–428.
33.
KrishnaR., & LucusW.G. (2010). The effect of sustainability reporting on financial performance: An empirical study using listed companies. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 6(2), 19–42.
34.
KPMG. (2008). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting. Retrieved 12October2015, from https://www.kpmg.com/EU/en/Documents/KPMG_International_survey_Corporate_responsibility_Survey_Reporting_2008.pdf
35.
KPMG. (2011). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting. Retrieved 12October2015, from https://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/India-corporate-Responsibility-Reporting-Survey-2011.pdf
36.
KPMG. (2013). Indian corporate responsibility reporting survey. Retrieved 12October2015, from https://www.kpmg.com/IN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/India-corporate-Responsibility-Reporting-Survey-2013.pdf
37.
LaskarN., & MajiS.G. (2016). Corporate sustainability reporting practices in India: Myth or reality?Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 625–641.
LevB.I., PetrovitsC., & RadhakrishnanS. (2008). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Retrieved 3August2015, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=920502
40.
LoS., & SheuH. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business?Journal Compilation, 15(2), 345–358.
41.
LopezM.V, GarciaA., & RodriguezL. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(3), 285–300.
42.
LunguC.I., CarauabuC., & DasceluC. (2011). Research on corporate social responsibility. Amfiteatru Economic, 13(29), 117–131.
43.
MajiS.G., & LaskarN. (2014). Corporate sustainability performance and financial performance: Empirical evidence from India. Journal of Banking Information Technology and Management, 11(2), 62–71.
44.
MartiC.P., Rovira-ValM.R., & DrescherL.G.J. (2015). Are firms that contribute to sustainable development better financially?Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 305–319.
45.
MatjazM., DamjanM., JensJ.D., SuM.D., & BoštjanG. (2014). The relationship between sustainability-oriented innovation practices and organizational performance: Empirical evidence from Slovenian organizations. Organizacija, 47(1), 3–13.
46.
McWilliamsA., & SiegelD. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal, 2(5), 603–609.
47.
MurthyV. (2008). Corporate social disclosure practices of top software firms in India. Global Business Review, 9(2), 173–188. Retrieved 11November2015, from http://gbr.sagepub.com/content/9/2/173
48.
NgwakweCollins C. (2008). Environmental responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Retrieved 16October2015, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.193.3293andrep=rep1andtype=pdf
49.
OrtasE., Gallego-AlvarezI., & EtxeberriaI.A. (2015). Financial factors influencing the quality of corporate social responsibility and environmental management disclosure: A quantile regression approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 362–380.
50.
PorterM.E. and KramerM.R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
51.
RussoM.V., & FoutsP.A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
52.
StewartT. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of nations. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
53.
ThomA., & DecoutereR. (2009). CSR reporting: How are targets transformed into actions. Thesis of Masters in Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghant University, Ghent, Belgium.
54.
TracyA., LeeD., NelsonD., & WalkerJ. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting and Finance, 50(1), 31–51.
55.
TsangE.W.K. (1998). A longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in Singapore: The case of the banking, hotel industries. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(5), 624–635.
56.
UllmanA. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure and economics performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.
57.
WaddockS.A., & GravesS.B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.
58.
WagnerM., & WehrmeyerW. (2002). The relationship of environmental and economic performance at the firm level: A review of empirical studies in Europe and methodological comments. European Environment, 12(3), 149–159.
59.
WarhurstA. (2000). Tri-sector partnerships for social investment: Business drivers. Working Paper 4, Natural Resources Cluster of the Business Partners for Development. London: CARE International UK.
60.
WCED (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 10June2014, from http://conspect.nl/pdf/Our_Common_Future-Brundtland_Report_1987.pdf
61.
ZhaoN., & PattenD.M. (2016). An exploratory analysis of managerial perceptions of social and environmental reporting in China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 80–98.
