The study examines the corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies and activities of firms as disclosed in annual reports, and explores its linkages to accounting and market performance of firms. The study examines the annual reports of a sample of 30 firms (out of 50) belonging to the benchmark index of the National Stock Exchange of India and tracks these reports for evidence of CSR activities over a 5-year period from 2007 to 2011. The study employs content analysis to study CSR disclosure and classifies and rates these activities using items from an established scale followed by construction of category-wise CSR indexes. The association of these indexes with firm performance is explored through a pooled regression model after provisioning for control variables and lag effects. The study finds that CSR reporting may not have any significant impact on accounting and market performance of the firm in the short term but environment-oriented CSR disclosure may be negatively related to the market performance of the firm. The study also finds that firms focus heavily on employee- and customer-oriented CSR and the modes of CSR investments are more contributory rather than participative in nature.
AbbottW.F., & MonsenR.J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 510–515.
2.
AlexanderG.J., & BuchholzR.A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 479–486.
3.
BermanS.L., WicksA.C., KothaS., & JonesT.M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.
4.
BowmanE.H., & HaireM.A (1975). Strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18(2), 49–58.
5.
BragdonJ.H., & MarlinJ.T. (1972). Is pollution profitable?Risk Management, 19(2), 9–18.
6.
CarrollA.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility—evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.
DavisK., & BlomstromR.L. (1975). Business and society: Environment and responsibility. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
10.
DyeR.A. (1985). Disclosure of nonproprietary information. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 123–145.
11.
FreemanR.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
12.
FriedmanM. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 32(13), 1–5.
13.
GodfreyP.C. (2004). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.
14.
HarrisonJ.S., & FreemanR.E. (1999). Stakeholder, social resonsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspetives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485.
15.
HeinzD.C. (1976). Financial Correlates of a Social Measure. Akron Business and Economic Review, 7(1), 48–51.
16.
JainP., VyasV., & ChalasaniD.P. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in SMEs: A structural equation modelling approach. Global Business Review, 17(3), 1–24.
17.
KolkA. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: The dynamics of MNC responses and code development. European Management Journal, 23(2), 228–236.
18.
KuruczE., ColbertB., & WheelerD. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In CraneA., McWilliamsA., MattenD., MoonJ., & SiegelJ. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 83–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
LindgreenA., SwaenV., & JohnstonW.J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 303–323.
20.
MackeyA., MackeyT.B., & BarneyJ.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.
21.
MattenD., & MoonJ. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 404–424.
22.
McGuireJ.B., SundgrenA., & SchneeweisT. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Joumal, 31(4), 854–872.
23.
McWilliamsA., & SiegelD. (2001). Corporate Social responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
24.
McWilliamsA., Van FleetD.D., & CoryK. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of the resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 707–723.
25.
MilneM.J., & AdlerR.W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.
26.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2011, December11). National voluntary guidelines on social, environmental and economic responsibilities of business. Retrieved 3April2011, from http://www.mca.gov.in/:http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf
27.
MoskowitzM. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.
28.
MurthyV. (2008). Corporate social disclosure practices of top software firms in India. Global Business Review, 9(2), 173–188.
29.
NagT., & BhattacharyyaA. (2012). Does corporate social responsibility yield returns? A study of Indian firms. Financial Management, 51–53.
30.
NagT., & BhattacharyyaA. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting in India: Exploring linkages with firm performance and development. 11th Annual Conference, Asia-Pacific Economic Association, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Retrieved 1July2015, from http://www.apeaweb.org/confer/tw15/papers/Nag_T.pdf
31.
OrlitzkyM., SchmidtF.L., & RynesS.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
32.
ParketR., & EilbertH. (1975). Social responsibility: The underlying factors. Business Horizons, 16, 5–10.
SolomonR.C., & HansonK. (1985). Its Good Business. New York: Atheneum.
36.
SturdivantF., & GinterJ. (1977). Corporate social responsiveness: Management attitudes and economic performance. California Management Review, 19(3), 71–79.
37.
SutantoputraA.W. (2009). Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms’ CSR reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(1), 34–48.
38.
The Companies Bill 2012. (2012, December27). As passed by Lok Sabha. Retrieved 5May2012, from http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry_hn/pdf/The_Companies_Bill_2012.pdf
39.
TurkerD. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427.
40.
UllmannA. (1985). Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, & Economic Performance. Academy of Management Review, 10, 450–477.
41.
VurroC., & PerriniF. (2011). Making the most of corporate social responsibility reporting: Disclosure structure and its impact on performance. Corporate Governance, 11(4), 459–474.
42.
WheelerD., & SillanpaaM. (1997). The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximazing stakeholder value. London: Pitman.
43.
WhertherW.B., & ChandlerD. (2006). Responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. California, USA: SAGE Publications.
