Reciprocal peer teaching (RPT) is an instructional strategy rooted in collaborative learning principles, wherein students take on the roles of both tutor and tutee. It has been examined in several music education contexts, including elementary, secondary, and university ensembles; however, group piano has yet to be examined. The purpose of this study was to determine what effects there were, if any, between the duration of training for RPT tutors and achievement on four piano performance skills: repertoire, sight-reading, harmonization, and transposition. Thirty-three non-piano music majors completed pretesting and engaged in 2 to 6 days of RPT training, followed by 8 weeks of RPT interactions in their group piano class, after which a posttest was administered. Results from four separate Kruskal Wallis H tests found significant differences between groups for all areas of assessment. Post hoc testing determined that the 4-day training group scored significantly higher on the repertoire, harmonization, and sight-reading tasks, and the 6-day training group scored significantly higher in sight-reading and transposition tasks; however, the limited sample size should caution broad interpretation. Further analysis determined that the results of all tests were correlated with one another, suggesting that as the facility in one assessed skill increases, so do others. Implications for RPT tutor training and group piano teachers are discussed.
ChapmanE. S. (1998). Key considerations in the design and implementation of effective peer-assisted learning programs. In ToppingK.EhlyS. (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 67–84). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
2.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
DukeR. A. (2005). Intelligent music teaching: Essays on the core principles of effective instruction. Learning and Behavior Resources.
4.
DuranD.RibosaJ.SánchezG. (2020). Peer tutoring for improvement in rhythm reading fluency and comprehension. International Journal of Music Education, 38(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419898313
5.
FalchikovN. (2001). Peer tutoring in higher education. Routledge.
6.
FantuzzoJ.Ginsburg-BlockM. (1998). Reciprocal peer tutoring: Developing and testing effective peer collaborations for elementary school students. In ToppingK.EhlyS. (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 121–144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
7.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
8.
Fernández-BarrosA.DuranD.ViladotL. (2023). Peer tutoring in music education: A literature review. International Journal of Music Education, 41(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221087761
9.
FisherC. (2010). Teaching piano in groups. Oxford University Press.
10.
FosterL. P. (2014). Student to student: Reciprocal peer mentoring in a postsecondary piano lab (Publication No. 3581024) [Doctoral dissertation, Boston University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Global.
11.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.BentzJ.PhillipsN. B.HamlettC. L. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163268
12.
Ginsburg-BlockM.FantuzzoJ. (1997). Reciprocal peer tutoring: An analysis of “teacher” and “student” interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088955
13.
Ginsburg-BlockM. D.RohrbeckC. A.FantuzzoJ. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.732
14.
GoodladS.HirstB. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. Kogan Page.
15.
HankenI. M. (2016). Peer learning in specialist higher music education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 15(3–4), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022216647389
16.
HudsonT. L. (2015). Do we HAVE to take piano? Motivating collegiate class piano students. MTNA E-Journal, 7(1), 2-–19.
17.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
18.
JohnsonE. A. (2011). The effect of peer-based instruction on rhythm reading achievement. Contributions to Music Education, 38(2), 43–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24127190
19.
JohnsonE. (2017). The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical peer-assisted learning structures on music achievement and learner engagement in seventh-grade band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417712486
20.
LancasterE. L.RenfrowK. D. (2008). Alfred’s group piano for adults: Book 2. Alfred Music.
21.
LeungK. C. (2015). Preliminary empirical model of crucial determinants of best practice for peer tutoring on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 558–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037698
22.
LeungK. C. (2019). An updated meta-analysis on the effect of peer tutoring on tutors’ achievement. School Psychology International, 40(2), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318808832
23.
LightseyS.DillM.TemplesM.YeaterT.FurtneyS. (2024). Leveraging near-peer and collaborative learning for a graduate student-led cell culture workshop. Biomedical Engineering Education, 4, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00132-4
24.
McMasterK. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560500203491
25.
MorrisonM. (2024). Class piano: A review of literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 43(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233231188673
26.
National Association of Schools of Music. (2024). Standards for baccalaureate and graduate degree-granting institutions. National Association of Schools of Music Handbook. National Association of Schools of Music.
27.
OverlandC. (2014). Statistical power in the Journal of Research in Music Education (2000-2010): A retrospective power analysis. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 201, 43–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.201.0043
28.
PalinscarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
29.
PikeP. (2017). Dynamic group-piano teaching: Transforming group theory into teaching practice. Routledge.
30.
PikeP. D. (2013). Profiles in successful group piano for children: A collective case study of children’s group-piano lessons. Music Education Research, 15(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2012.754416
31.
PikeP. D. (2014). The differences between novice and expert group-piano teaching strategies: A case study and comparison of beginning group piano classes. International Journal of Music Education, 32(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413508065
32.
RichardsW. H. (1962). Trends in piano class instruction 1815 to 1962. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 1(1), 50–52.
33.
RohrbeckC. A.Ginsburg-BlockM. D.FantuzzoJ. W.MillerT. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240
34.
RoscoeR. D.ChiM. T. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920
35.
RosethC. J.GarfieldJ. B.Ben-ZviD. (2008). Collaboration in learning and teaching Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2008.11889557
36.
RussellJ. A. (2018). Statistics in music education research: A reference for researchers, teachers, and students. Oxford University Press.
37.
SaccardiD. J. (2023a). Research-to-resource: Peer-assisted learning in the music program. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 41(2), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221084366
38.
SaccardiD. J. (2023b). Observation and analysis of reciprocal peer teaching in university guitar classes. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 235, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.5406/21627223.235.03
39.
SheldonD. A. (2001). Peer and cross-age tutoring in music. Music Educators Journal, 87(6), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399690
40.
SkrochD. (1991). A descriptive and interpretive study of class piano instruction in four-year colleges and universities accredited by the National Association of Schools of Music with a profile of the class piano instructor. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 52, 3854.
41.
SnappC.BassettC.BaldwinA.HillJ. R.DeBuskR. (2023). Peer-assisted learning in undergraduate medical education for resilience and well-being. Medical Science Educator, 33(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01702-x
42.
ToppingK. (2001). Peer-assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Brookline Books.
43.
ToppingK.EhlyS. (1998). Peer-assisted Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
ToppingK. J.ToppingK.BuchsC.DuranD.van KeerH.Van KeerH. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. Routledge.
45.
VanWeeldenK.Heath-ReynoldsJ.LeamanS. (2017). The effect of a peer mentorship program on perceptions of success in choral ensembles: Pairing students with and without disabilities. Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316675480
YoungM. M. (2016). A national survey of university-level group piano programs. MTNA E-Journal, 7(3), 13–35.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
