The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of reciprocal peer teaching (RPT) on the music performance skills of fourth grade string students using quasi-experimental, between-subjects designs. Students from a fourth grade orchestra class (N = 36) were grouped into one of the three conditions: (1) a free interaction RPT group, (2) an identical group, receiving an expert model of interaction strategies prior to RPT, and (3) a control group receiving traditional, whole-class instruction. Students in the experimental groups worked in pairs over six weeks, after which all students completed a performance of French Folk Song for evaluation. Group mean comparisons indicated a significant difference in performance scores between the RPT-only and control groups, with the RPT-only group scoring significantly higher, raising questions regarding the ineffectiveness of the modeling intervention. Results prompt further questions regarding the efficacy of expert modeling during RPT. Music educators, particularly those who work with beginning instrumentalists, are encouraged to implement RPT as an instructional tool to help promote student skill development and pro-social classroom behaviors while being mindful of teacher behaviors that may interfere with the efficacy of the RPT process.
AlexanderL.DorowL. G. (1983). Peer tutoring effects on the music performance of tutors and tutees in beginning band classes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345108
2.
AndrieuxM.ProteauL. (2016). Observational learning: Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00051
3.
AsendorpfJ. B.BaudonniereP. M. (1993). Self-awareness and other-awareness: Mirror self-recognition and synchronic imitation among unfamiliar peers. Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 88–95. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.1.88
4.
DarrowA. A.GibbsP.WedelS. (2005). Use of class-wide peer tutoring in the general music classroom. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 24, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233050240010103
5.
DuranD.RibosaJ.SánchezG. (2020). Peer tutoring for improvement in rhythm reading fluency and comprehension. International Journal of Music Education, 38(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419898313
6.
ElpusK. (2022). Middle school music uptake and achievement: Evidence from the 2016 Arts National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(3), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294221078512
7.
ElpusK.AbrilC. R. (2019). Who enrolls in high school music? A national profile of U.S. students, 2009–2013. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419862837
8.
FantuzzoJ.Ginsburg-BlockM. (1998). Reciprocal peer tutoring: Developing and testing effective peer collaborations for elementary school students. In ToppingK. J.EhlyS. (Eds.), Peer assisted learning (pp. 121–143). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
Fernández-BarrosA.DuranD.ViladotL. (2023). Peer tutoring in music education: A literature review. International Journal of Music Education, 41, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221087761
10.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.SimmonsD. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034001174
11.
Ginsburg-BlockM. D.RohrbeckC. A.FantuzzoJ. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.732
12.
GoodladS.HirstB. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. Nichols Publishing.
13.
GoodrichA. (2018). Peer mentoring and peer tutoring among K–12 students: A literature review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123317708765
14.
GoodrichA. (2021). Peer mentoring in an extracurricular music class. International Journal of Music Education, 39, 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761420988922
15.
GoodrichA. (2022). Peer mentoring in music education: Developing effective student leadership. Taylor & Francis.
16.
GopalanM.RosingerK.AhnJ. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
17.
GrahamM. F. (2024). The effects of peer-assisted learning on rhythmic and melodic sight-reading in a middle school chorus. International Journal of Music Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614241288957
18.
HattieJ. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
19.
HickenL.DukeR. A. (2023). Differences in attention allocation in relation to music teacher experience and expertise. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294221096701
20.
HoweC. (2010). Peer groups and children’s development. John Wiley.
21.
IsmailH. N.AlexanderJ. M. (2005). Learning within scripted and nonscripted peer-tutoring sessions: The Malaysian context. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.2.67-77
22.
JellisonJ.BrownL.DraperE. (2015). Peer-assisted learning and interactions in inclusive music classrooms: Benefits, research, and applications. General Music Today, 28(3), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371314565456
23.
JellisonJ. A. (2015). Including everyone: Creating music classrooms where all children learn. Oxford University Press.
24.
JellisonJ. A.BrooksB. H.HuckA. M. (1984). Structuring small groups and music reinforcement to facilitate positive interactions and acceptance of severely handicapped students in the regular music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(4), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344923
25.
JellisonJ. A.DraperE. A.BrownL. S. (2017). Learning together: The instinct to do good and peer-assisted strategies that work. Music Educators Journal, 104(2), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432117713823
JohnsonE. (2015). Peer-teaching in the secondary music ensemble. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.906
28.
JohnsonE. (2017). The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical peer-assisted learning structures on music achievement and learner engagement in seventh-grade band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(2), 163–178. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417712486
29.
JohnsonE. A. (2011). The effect of peer-based instruction on rhythm reading achievement. Contributions to Music Education, 38(2), 43–60. https://10.1177/0027432111423440
30.
KardasM.O’BrienE. (2018). Easier seen than done: Merely watching others perform can foster an illusion of skill acquisition. Psychological Science, 29(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617740646
31.
LeungK. C. (2015). Preliminary empirical model of crucial determinants of best practice for peer tutoring on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037698
32.
LeungK. C. (2019). An updated meta-analysis on the effect of peer tutoring on tutors’ achievement. School Psychology International, 40(2), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318808832
33.
LiuJ.SaccardiD. J. (2025). Does length of training period impact the effectiveness of reciprocal peer teaching in university group piano students?International Journal of Music Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614251323665
34.
MacLeodR. B.BlantonC.LewisJ.OrtizD. (2020). Near-peer mentorship: A model for private music instruction in an underserved community. String Research Journal, 10(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948499220924420
35.
MadsenC. K.SmithD. S.FeemanC. C. (1988). The use of music in cross-age tutoring within special education settings. Journal of Music Therapy, 25(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/25.3.135
36.
McMasterK. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Research on Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560500203491
37.
NielsenS. G.Gravem JohansenG. (2021). The role of peers in supporting learning in music. In CreechA.HodgesD. A.HallamS. (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of music psychology in education and the community (pp. 269–285). Routledge.
38.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 115–175.
39.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 771–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605300203
40.
PalincsarA. S.RansomK.DerberS. (1988). Collaborative research and development of reciprocal teaching. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 37.
41.
RohbanfardH.ProteauL. (2011). Learning through observation: A combination of expert and novice models favors learning. Experimental Brain Research, 215(3–4), Article 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2882-x
42.
RohrbeckC. A.Ginsburg-BlockM. D.FantuzzoJ. W.MillerT. R. (2003). Peer- assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240
43.
RoscoeR. D.ChiM. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge- building and knowledge-telling in peer Tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920
44.
SaccardiD. J. (2023a). Observation and analysis of reciprocal peer teaching in university guitar classes. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 235, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.5406/21627223.235.03
45.
SaccardiD. J. (2023b). Research-to-resource: Peer-assisted learning in the music program. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 41(2), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221084366
46.
SaccardiD. J. (2023c). The power of peers: Integrating peer-assisted learning in the orchestra. American String Teacher, 73(2), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031313231166021
47.
SaccardiD. J.DockanD. (2025). Reciprocal peer teaching in elementary general music classrooms using Orff Schulwerk and Modern Band. Journal of General Music Education, 38(3), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527646251319767
48.
ScottL. P. (1992). Attention and perseverance behaviors of preschool children enrolled in Suzuki violin lessons and other activities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40(3), 225–235.
49.
ScottL.P.JellisonJ.ChappelE.StandridgeA. (2007). Talking with music teachers about inclusion: Perceptions, opinions, and experiences. Journal of Music Therapy, 44(1), 38–56.
50.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
51.
SidawayB.HandM. J. (1993). Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(1), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1993.10608786
52.
SuzukiS. (1969). Nurtured by love. Alfred.
53.
SuzukiS. (2007). Suzuki violin school volume 1 violin part (Revised edition). Alfred.
54.
ToppingK. J.BuchsC.DuranD.van KeerH. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. Routledge.
VanWeeldenK.Heath-ReynoldsJ.LeamanS. (2017). The effect of a peer mentorship program on perceptions of success in choral ensembles: Pairing students with and without disabilities. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316675480
57.
WrigleyW. J.EmmersonS. B. (2013). Ecological development and validation of a music performance rating scale for five instrument families. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611418552
58.
ZdzinskiS. F.BarnesG. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345801
