The aim of this study, whose theoretical framework is based on Bandura’s social cognitive theory, was to investigate the effectiveness of including a metacognitive approach in teaching expressivity at the piano. Questions addressed the perceived effect of metacognition by investigating the processes allowing young pianists to elicit an expressive musical idiom through the use of aural modeling and esthetic and stylistic mental representations, by exploring the mechanisms triggering the translation from felt emotions to expressive performance, and by assessing the resulting overall pianistic performance. A case study design was employed. Five intermediate piano students were recruited. Data were collected through teachers’ questionnaires, adjudicators’ assessments, students’ interviews, students’ diaries, and students’ performance recordings. Findings highlighted the central role played by aural modeling. The esthetic and stylistic mental representations in the metacognitive process allowed young pianists to elicit an expressive musical idiom through a mental conversion process. The constructs of aural modeling and of esthetic and stylistic mental representations, along with that of musical phraseology, appeared to function both independently and in conjunction with each other. Results also indicated a positive influence of the above constructs on the overall performance of young pianists.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
2.
Berardi-ColettaB.BuyerL. S.DominowskiR. L.RillingerE. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.205
3.
BigandE.ParncuttR.LerdahlF. (1996). Perception of musical tension in short chord sequences: The influence of harmonic function, sensory dissonance, horizontal motion, and musical training. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205482
4.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
5.
BroomheadP. (2005). Shaping expressive performance: A problem-solving approach. Music Educators Journal, 91(5), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/3400145
De PoliG. (2004). Methodology for expressiveness modeling of and for music performance. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0929821042000317796
8.
DukeR. A. (1999). Teacher and student behavior in suzuki string lessons: Results from the international research symposium on talent education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(4), 293–307. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.bu.edu/stable/3345485
9.
FlavellJ. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
FrewenK. G. (2010). Effects of familiarity with a melody prior to instruction on children’s piano performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57(4), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429409351178
11.
GabrielssonA. (1987). Once again: The theme from Mozart’s piano sonata in A major (K. 331): A comparison of five performances. In GabrielssonA. (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 81–103). Royal Swedish Academy of Music (No. 55).
12.
GabrielssonA. (1999). The performance of music. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 501–602). Academic Press.
13.
GabrielssonA.JuslinP. N. (1996). Emotional expression in music performance: Between the performer’s intention and the listener’s experience. Psychology of Music, 24(1), 68–91. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0305735696241007
14.
GibbonsM. (2002). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. Jossey-Bass.
HallamS. (2001a). The development of expertise in young musicians: Strategy use, knowledge acquisition and individual diversity. Music Education Research, 3(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800020029914
17.
HallamS. (2001b). The development of metacognition in musicians: Implications for education. British Journal of Music Education, 18(1), 27–39.
18.
HultbergC. (2007). Instrumental students’ strategies for finding interpretations: Complexity and individual variety. Psychology of Music, 36(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607079719
19.
JørgensenH. (2000). Student learning in higher instrumental education: Who is responsible?British Journal of Music Education, 17(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051700000164
20.
JuslinP. N.FribergA.SchoonderwaldtE.KarlssonJ. (2004). Feedback learning of musical expressivity. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 247–270). Oxford University Press.
21.
JuslinP. N.PerssonR. S. (2002). Emotional communication. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 219–236). Oxford University Press.
22.
KarlssonJ.JuslinP. N. (2008). Musical expression: An observational study of instrumental teaching. Psychology of Music, 36(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607086040
23.
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. (1983). An overview of hierarchical structure in music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285257
24.
LindströmE.JuslinP. N.BresinR.WilliamonA. (2003). “Expressivity comes from within your soul”: A questionnaire study of music students’ perspectives on expressivity. Research Studies in Music Education, 20(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X030200010201
25.
McPheeE. A. (2011). Finding the muse: Teaching musical expression to adolescents in the one-to-one studio environment. International Journal of Music Education, 29(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411421084
26.
McPhersonG. E.DavidsonJ. W.FaulknerR. (2012). Music in our lives: Rethinking musical ability, development, and identity. Oxford University Press.
27.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800120089232
28.
MeissnerH. (2021). Theoretical framework for facilitating young musicians’ learning of expressive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 584171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584171
29.
MithenS. (2005). The singing Neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind and body. Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
PalmerC. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(12), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.331
32.
ReppB. H. (1990). Patterns of expressive timing in performances of a Beethoven minuet by nineteen famous pianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(2), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399766
33.
RostvallA. L.WestT. (2001). Interaktion och kunskapsutveckling: En studie av frivillig musikundervisning [Interaction and learning: A study of music instrument teaching, Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Stockholm.
34.
RostvallA. L.WestT. (2003). Analysis of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. Music Education Research, 5(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461380032000126319
35.
StakeR. E.TrumbullD. (1982). Naturalistic generalizations. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7(1–2), 1–12.
VygotskyL. S. (1934/1987). Thinking and speech. In RieberR. W.CartonA. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). Plenum Press.
38.
VygotskyL. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
39.
WellsG. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.
40.
WestT.RostvallA. L. (2003). A study of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. International Journal of Music Education, 40(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/025576140304000103
41.
WoodyR. H. (2002). The relationship between musicians’ expectations and their perception of expressive features in an aural model. Research Studies in Music Education, 18(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X020180010701
42.
WoodyR. H. (2003). Explaining expressive performance: Component cognitive skills in an aural modeling task. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345648
43.
WoodyR. H. (2006). The effect of various instructional conditions on expressive music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(1), 21–36.
44.
YinR. K. (2005). Introduction. In YinR. K. (Ed.), Introducing the world of education: A case study reader (pp. xiii–xxii). SAGE.
