Facilitating the development of employable graduates is an important part of initial teacher education (ITE) courses globally. School administrators seek to employ high quality teachers who will contribute positively to student learning and the school community. The perception of a candidate’s level of employability in a job interview though, will influence the outcome of their application significantly. ITE graduates should therefore endeavour to be interview ready as this is a crucial step towards being employed. We investigated the impact that a student-led artistic project had on the development of Australian ITE music teachers’ interview readiness and employability. Data were collected via three focus groups and one semi-structured individual interview. The data indicated that the artistic project experience contributed positively to the development of relevant skills and understandings which supported participants’ interview readiness and employability. Two major themes emerged- the authenticity of the artistic project and the transferability of the skills and understandings learned into an imagined or current school context, including the job interview process. The findings suggest that ITE music courses should include more authentic experiences to develop their students’ professional ‘soft’ skills and interview readiness. This will support their preparation for the employment process and their professional duties.
AbrilC. R.GaultB. M. (2006). The state of music in the elementary school: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3653452
BennettD. (2018). Graduate employability and higher education: Past, present and future. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 5, 31–61.
6.
BennettD.RichardsonS. (2016). Enacting strategies for graduate employability: How universities can best support students to develop generic skills. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
BrinkmanD.MallettC. (2000). Questions asked in job interviews of music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/105708370001000104
9.
CampbellM. R.ThompsonL. K. (2001). Preservice music educators’ images of teaching. In HammanD. L. (Ed.), Desert Skies Symposium on Research in Music Education, (pp. 24–28). University of Arizona, School of Music and Dance.
10.
ClarkM.ZukasM. (2013). A bourdieusian approach to understanding employability: Becoming a ‘fish in water’. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 65(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2013.782887
11.
CrawfordR.JenkinsL.E. (2018). Making pedagogy tangible: Developing skills and knowledge using a team teaching and blended learning approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n1.8
12.
CreswellJ. O. H. N. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
13.
DavisV. W. (2006). Beginning music education students’ and student teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Contributions to Music Education, 33(1), 27–40.
14.
DendlerD.EdwardsK. L. (2011). The tipping point: Mentoring the general music student teacher through the job-seeking process with a technology edge. General Music Today, 25(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371311409218
15.
DravesT. J. (2014). Under construction: Undergraduates’ perceptions of their music teacher role-identities. Research Studies in Music Education, 36(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x14547982
GhazaliG.BennettD. (2017). Employability for music graduates: Malaysian educational reform and the focus on generic skills. International Journal of Music Education, 35(4), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761416689844
18.
GillR. J. (2018). Building employability skills for higher education students: An Australian example. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 9(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2018vol9no1art739
19.
GriffithsG. (1985). Doubts, dilemmas and diary-keeping: Some reflections on teacher-based research. In BurgessR. (Ed.), Issues in educational research: Qualitative methods (pp. 120–210). Falmer Press.
20.
JuchniewiczJ. (2016). An examination of music teacher job interview questions. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083715613590
21.
KellyS. N.MatthewsK. (2014). An investigation of hiring practices of music teachers by secondary school principals. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 16(1), 44–54.
22.
LubV. (2015). Validity in qualitative evaluation: Linking purposes, paradigms, and perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621406
23.
MaxwellJ. (2013). Qualitative research design; an interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
24.
OraisonH. M.KonjarskiL.HoweS. T. (2019). Does university prepare students for employment? Alignment between graduate attributes, accreditation requirements and industry employability criteria. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 10(1), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2019vol10no1art790
25.
O’LearyS. (2017). Graduates’ experiences of, and attitudes towards, the inclusion of employability-related support in undergraduate degree programmes; trends and variations by subject discipline and gender. Journal of Education and Work, 30(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1122181
26.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE.
27.
PowellS. R.ParkerE. C. (2017). Preservice music teachers’ descriptions of successful and unsuccessful teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(3), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083716662689
28.
RohwerD.HenryW. (2004). University teachers’ perceptions of requisite skills and characteristics of effective music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 13(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837040130020104
SouthcottJ. (2005). ‘Much ado about teaching’: Music theatre, authenticity and experiential learning in music education. Australian Association of Research in Music Education Proceedings of the XXVIIth Annual Conference, Sydney: Australia, pp. 126–133.
32.
SouthcottJ.SellD. (2014). Introduction to historical research in music education. In HartwigK. (Ed.), Research methodologies in music education (pp. 9–34). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
33.
StakeR. E. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 435–453). SAGE Publications.
34.
TeachoutD. J. (1997). Preservice and experienced teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345464
35.
ThorntonL. C. (2015). Important others: Music teachers’ perceived roles in music teacher recruitment. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24(3), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713512836
WilliamsS.DoddL. J.SteeleC.RandallR. (2016). A systematic review of current understandings of employability. Journal of Education and Work, 29(8), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1102210
38.
WiseS. (2014). Mixed methods; the third research community. In HartwigK. (Ed.), Research methodologies in music education (pp. 183–198). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
39.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
