Recent findings in music research are increasingly confirming the embodied nature of music cognition. Assuming that a bodily engagement with music may affect the children’s musical meaning formation, we investigated how young children’s interaction with music, based on verbal description after listening versus body movement description while listening, may be reflected in the verbal explanation of their own visual representations of the music they listened to. In this study, 47 children (aged 9–10) without any formal music education participated in a verbal-based versus movement-based intervention. Before and after the interventions, children created a visual representation of the music and provided a verbal explanation of their drawing. Thematic analysis and statistical tests on the verbal data revealed a significant change in semantic themes, time dimension, and the number of music parameters gathered by children involved in body movement description of the music. Our results offer interesting insights on the role of body movement on children’s pattern perception and musical meaning formation.
Abril, C. R. (2011). Music, Movement, and Learning. In R. Colwell and P. Webster(Eds.), MENC Handbook of Research on Music Learning (vol 2, pp. 92--129). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Addessi A.R. (1999). Prospettive psicologiche sulle scritture musicali spontanee [Psychological perspectives on spontaneous musical notations]. In F. Ferrari (Ed.), Scrivere la musica (pp. 91--118). Turin: EDT.
3.
BambergerJ. (1998). Coming to hear in a new way. In AielloR.SlobodaJ. (Eds.), Musical perceptions (pp. 131–151).
Oxford University Press.
4.
BambergerJ. (2013). Discovering the musical mind: A view of creativity as learning.
Oxford University Press.
5.
BarrettM. (2000).
Windows, mirrors, and reflections: A case study of adult constructions of children’ s musical thinking.Council for Research in Music Education,
145, 43–61.
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006).
Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,
3(2), 77–101.
7.
CarrollD. (2017).
Children’s invented notations: Extending knowledge of their intuitive musical understandings using a Vygotskian social constructivist view. Psychology of Music,
46(4), 521–539.
8.
CoatesE.CoatesA. (2006).
Young children talking and drawing. International Journal of Early Years Education,
14(3), 221–241.
9.
CreswellJ. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
10.
DavidsonJ. (2012). The role of bodily movement in learning and performing music: Applications for education. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (
Vol. 1, pp. 769–782).
Oxford University Press.
11.
DavidsonL.ScrippL. (1988). Young children’s music representation: Windows on music cognition. In SlobodaJ.(Ed.), Generative processes in music (pp. 195–230).
Oxford University Press.
12.
Delalande, F. (1993). Le condotte musicali [The musical conduct]. Bologna: CLUEB
13.
Delalande, F. (1989). La terrasse des audiences du clair de lune: essai d'analyse esthesique [The terrace of the listeners of clair the lune: essay of aesthetic analysis]. Analyse Musicale, 15, 75--85.
14.
De SouzaJ. (2017). Music at hand: Instruments, bodies, and cognition.
Oxford University Press.
15.
diSessaA. A. (2002). Students’ criteria for representational adequacy. In GravemeijerK.LehrerR.van OersB.VerschaffelL. (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 105–129).
Kluwer Academic.
16.
EitanZ.GranotR. Y. (2004). Musical parameters and images of motion. In ParncuttR.KesslerA.ZimmerF. (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on interdisciplinary musicology CIM04 (pp. 1–10).
Graz University.
17.
EitanZ.GranotR. Y. (2006).
How music moves. Music Perception,
23, 221–247.
18.
EitanZ.RothschildI. (2011).
How music touches: Musical parameters and listeners’ audio-tactile metaphorical mappings. Psychology of Music,
39(4), 449–467.
19.
ElliottD. J. (1995). Music matters a new philosophy of music education.
Oxford University Press.
20.
FortunaS.NijsL. (2020).
Children’s representational strategies based on verbal versus bodily interactions with music: An intervention-based study. Music Education Research,
22(1), 107–127.
21.
FuchsT. (2012).
The phenomenology of body memory.Body Memory, Metaphor and Movement,
84, 9–22.
22.
FusaroliR.DemuruP.BorghiA. M. (2009).
The intersubjectivity of embodiment. Cognitive Semiotics,
4(1), 1–5.
23.
GaultB. (2005).
Music learning through all the channels: Combining aural, visual, and kinesthetic strategies to develop musical understanding. General Music Today,
19(1), 7–9.
24.
Godøy, R. I., & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning.
Routledge.
25.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Singer, M. A. (2003). From children's hands to adults' ears: Gesture's role in the learning process. Developmental psychology, 39(3), 50.
26.
GordonE. (2007). Learning sequences in music: A contemporary music learning theory.
GIA Publications.
27.
GrittenA.KingE. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on music and gesture.
Ashgate.
28.
GromkoJ. E. (1994).
Children’s invented notations as measures of musical understanding. Psychology of Music,
22(2), 136–147.
29.
HanY. J. (2016).
Expanding music listening experience through drawing. General Music Today,
29(3), 12–18.
Imberty, M. (1981). Acculturation tonale et structuration perceptive du temps musical chez l'enfant [Tonal acculturation and perceptual structuring of musical time in children.]. In Basic musical functions and musicals ability (pp. 81--107). Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
32.
ImbertyM.GratierM. (2008).
Narrative in music and interaction editorial. Musicae Scientiae,
12, 3–13.
33.
JakobsonR. (1959).
On linguistic aspects of translation. On Translation,
3, 30–39.
34.
Jaques-DalcrozeE. (1921). Rhythm, music and education (H. Rubinstein, Trans.). The Dalcroze Society.
35.
JohnsonM. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason.
University of Chicago Press.
36.
JohnstonR. (1986). Kodály and education: Monograph III.
Avondale.
37.
JolleyR. P. (2010). Children and pictures: Drawing and understanding.
John Wiley.
38.
JuntunenM. L. (2016). The Dalcroze approach: Experiencing and knowing music through embodied exploration. In C. Abril & B. Gault (Eds.), Approaches to teaching general music: Methods, issues, and viewpoints (pp. 141–167). Oxford University Press.
39.
JuntunenM. L.HyvönenL. (2004).
Embodiment in musical knowing: How body movement facilitates learning within Dalcroze eurhythmics. British Journal of Music Education,
21(2), 199–214.
40.
JuntunenM. L.WesterlundH. (2001).
Digging Dalcroze, or, dissolving the mind-body dualism. Music Education Research,
3(2), 203–214.
41.
Kerchner, J. L. (2014). Music across the Senses: Listening, Learning, and Making Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
KimJ. Y.BelkinN. J. (2002). Categories of music description and search terms and phrases used by non-music experts. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on music information retrieval (Vol. 2, pp. 209–214). https://archives.ismir.net/ismir2002/paper/000027.pdf
43.
KozakM. (2015).
Listeners’ bodies in music analysis: Gestures, motor intentionality, and models.Music Theory Online,
21(3), 1–21.
44.
KühlO. (2008). Musical semantics (
Vol. 7).
Peter Lang.
45.
KussnerM. B.Leech-WilkinsonD. (2013).
Investigating the influence of musical training on cross-modal correspondences and sensorimotor skills in a real-time drawing paradigm. Psychology of Music,
42(3), 448–469.
46.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by.
The University of Chicago Press.
47.
LakoffG.NúñezR. E. (2000).
Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. American Mathematics Competitions,
10(12), 720–733.
48.
LemanM. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology.
MIT Press.
49.
LemanM. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment.
MIT Press.
50.
LesaffreM.MaesP. J.LemanM. (2017). The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction.
Routledge.
51.
MaesP. J.LemanM. (2013).
The influence of body movements on children’s perception of music with an ambiguous expressive character. PLOS ONE,
8(1), Article e54682.
52.
MalchiodiC. A. (1998). Understanding children’s drawings.
Guilford Press.
MatthewsJ. (2003). Drawing and painting: Children and visual representation.
SAGE.
55.
McNeillD. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought.
University of Chicago Press.
56.
MercerN.LittletonK. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach.
Routledge.
57.
MooreC.-L.YamamotoK. (2011). Beyond words: Movement observation and analysis.
Routledge.
58.
NattiezJ. J. (1990a).
Can one speak of narrativity in music?Journal of the Royal Musical Association,
115(2), 240–257.
59.
NattiezJ. J. (1990b). Music and discourse: Toward a semiology of music.
Princeton University Press.
60.
Nattiez, J. J. (2011). La narrativisation de la musique. La musique: récit or proto-réci? [The narrativization of music. Music: recit or proto-recit?] Cahiers de Narratologie: Analyse et Theorie Narratives, 21, 1--19.
61.
NijsL. (2017).
Dalcroze meets technology: Integrating music, movement and visuals with the Music Paint Machine. Music Education Research,
20(2), 163–183.
62.
NijsL.LemanM. (2014).
Interactive technologies in the instrumental music classroom: A longitudinal study with the music paint machine. Computers & Education,
73, 40–59.
63.
NijsL.LemanM. (2015). Performing with the Music Paint Machine: Provoking an embodied approach to educational technology. In KingA.HimonidesE.(Eds.), Psychology of music series. Music, technology & education: Critical perspectives (pp. 225–242).
Ashgate.
64.
OdgaardE. C.AriehY.MarksL. E. (2004).
Brighter noise: Sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,
4(2), 127–132.
65.
OrffC. (1977). Orff-Schulwerk: Past & future. In CarleyI. M. (Ed.), Orff re-echoes (Book 1, pp. 3–9).
American Orff Schulwerk Association.
66.
PanhoferH.PayneH. (2011).
Languaging the embodied experience.Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy,
6(3), 215–232.
67.
Phillips-SilverJ.TrainorL. J. (2005).
Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science,
308(5727), 1430–1430.
68.
Phillips-SilverJ.TrainorL. J. (2007).
Hearing what the body feels: Auditory encoding of rhythmic movement. Cognition,
105(3), 533–546.
69.
PolanyiM. (1966). The tacit dimension.
Doubleday & Company.
70.
PolanyiM. (1969). Knowing and being.
University of Chicago Press.
71.
PramlingN. (2009).
External representation and the architecture of music: Children inventing and speaking about notations. British Journal of Music Education,
26(3), 273–291.
72.
PramlingN.WallerstedtC. (2009).
Making musical sense: The multimodal nature of clarifying musical listening. Music Education Research,
11(2), 135–151.
73.
ReybrouckM. (2010).
Music cognition and real-time listening: Denotation, cue abstraction, route description and cognitive maps. Musicae Scientiae,
14(Suppl. 2), 187–202.
74.
RoelsJ. M.Van PetegemP. (2014).
The integration of visual expression in music education for children. British Journal of Music Education,
31(3), 297–317.
75.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.
Basic Books.
76.
SchönD. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.
Jossey-Bass.
77.
ScrutonR. (1997). The aesthetics of music.
Clarendon Press.
78.
Sheets-JohnstoneM. (1999). The primacy of movement.
John Benjamins Publishing Company.
79.
SimsW. L. (1988).
Movement responses of pre-school children, primary grade children, and pre-service classroom teachers to characteristics of musical phrases. Psychology of Music,
16(2), 110–127.
80.
Stefani, G. (1976). Introduzione alla semiotica della musica [Introduction to the semiotics of music]. (Vol. 4). Sellerio.
81.
TaggP. (2012). Music’s meanings: A modern musicology for non-musos.
Mass Media Music Scholars’ Press.
82.
VerschaffelL.ReybrouckM.DegraeuweG.Van DoorenM. (2013).
The relative importance of children’s criteria for representational adequacy in the perception of simple sonic stimuli. Psychology of Music,
41(6), 691–712.
83.
VerschaffelL.ReybrouckM.JanssensM.Van DoorenM. (2010).
Using graphical notations to assess children’s experiencing of simple and complex musical fragments. Psychology of Music,
38(3), 259–284.
84.
WalkerM. E. (2000).
Movement and metaphor: Towards an embodied theory of music cognition and hermeneutics.Council for Research in Music Education,
145(145), 27–42.
85.
WalkerR. (1987).
The effects of culture, environment, age, and musical training on choices of visual metaphores for sound. Perception & Psychophysics,
42(5), 491–502.
86.
WallerstedtC. (2013).
“Here comes the sausage”: An empirical study of children’s verbal communication during a collaborative music-making activity. Music Education Research,
15(4), 421–434.
87.
WashburnK. D. (2010). The architecture of learning: Designing instruction for the learning brain.
Clerestory Press.
88.
YoungS.GloverJ. (1998). Music in the early years.
Routledge.
89.
ZahaviD. (2006). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person.
MIT Press.
90.
ZbikowskiL. M. (2008). Metaphor and music. In GibbsR. W. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 502–524).
Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
