Introduction: American media-accessibility pioneers in the 1970s and 1980s not only sparked interest in the academic study of audio description, they also originated many practical techniques, protocols, theoretical perspectives, guidelines, and standards that persist in the fabric of this type of work decades later. In this study, we located and analyzed source documents for two oft-mentioned innovators—Gregory Frazier and Margaret Pfanstiehl—to shine light on their individual perspectives through a historiography of their foundational writings and associated media. Method: This analysis was conducted on publicly available source documents, such as Frazier’s landmark thesis and also included a trove of Pfanstiehl’s personal correspondence, as a way to establish particular points of theoretical and historical interest. Results: We found that despite the prominent place of Frazier and Pfanstiehl in audio description lore, neither actually published much writing about what they did and why they did it. Some of what they wrote has been selectively repeated, but other parts have been forgotten. In that respect, this research method could be used to more precisely trace and identify where particular practices emerged, under which theoretical perspectives, and complications. It also can help to show how these ideas were documented and tested during their emergence and domestication, as a way to gauge procedural rigor as well as validity of related findings. Discussion: Audio description scholarship needs theoretical anchors, but it also needs systematic testing of assumptions inherent in those theoretics, which this study helps to identify. Implications for Practitioners: Audio describers invariably will encounter the moment when an assertion of “this is the way we do it” collides with the curiosity of “why?” To promote best practices, the field has to understand where practices came from, how they developed, and as Frazier recommended, put those ideas to “objective” tests.
CroninB.KingS. (1990). The development of the descriptive video services. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84(10), 503–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x9008401003
Directions for Program Notes. (1990, May). The metropolitan washington ear audio description service. Directions for Program Notes.
8.
DolmageJ. T. (2014). Disability rhetoric. Syracuse University Press.
9.
EllisF. (1991). A picture is worth a thousand words for blind and visually impaired person too!: An introduction to audiodescription. American Foundation for the Blind.
10.
EllisK.KentM.LockeK. (2018). The preferred user: How audio description could change understandings of Australian television audiences and media technology. Cultural Science Journal, 10(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.105
11.
FrazierG. (1975). The autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman: An all-audio adaptation of the teleplay for the blind and visually handicapped [Unpublished master’s thesis]. San Francisco State University.
12.
FrazierG.Coutinho-JohnsonI. (1995). The effectiveness of audio description in providing access to educational AV media for blind and visually impaired students in high school. San Francisco: AudioVision.
13.
FryerL. (2016). An introduction to audio description: A practical guide. Routledge.
14.
GabrenyaF. (1987, June 26). Audio Description gives theater a boost. The Columbus Dispatch, 8E.
15.
GrossB. (1985, September 11). Setting the stage for the visually impaired. The Washington Post, F7.
16.
GrossmanT.GrossmanM. (2007). California audio describers alliance formed. The Blind Californian, 51(1), 2–5.
JankowskaA. (2015). Translating audio description scripts: Translation as a new strategy of creating audio description. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.
PackerJ.VizenorK.MieleJ. (2015). An overview of video description: History, benefits, and guidelines. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1510900204
28.
PeregoE. (2018). Audio description. Evolving recommendations for usable, effective, and enjoyable practices. In Pérez-GonzálezL. (Ed.), The routledge handbook of audiovisual translation (pp. 114–129). Routledge.
29.
PfanstiehlM. (1985, October 8). [Letter to Gerald Yoshitomi]. Copy in possession of Joel Snyder.
30.
PfanstiehlM.PfanstiehlC. (1985). The play’s the thing. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 3(3), 91–92.
31.
PfanstiehlM.PfanstiehlC. (1988, January 4). Preparation and formatting of scripts. The Washington Ear. Copy in possession of Joel Snyder.
32.
PiperM. (1988). Audio description: Pioneer’s progress. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 2(6), 75–76.
33.
Procedures for describers of American Playhouse Television programs. (n.d.). The Washington ear. Copy in possession of Joel Snyder.
34.
Reviewer Log. (1987, November 18). The metropolitan Washington ear. Copy in possession of Joel Snyder.
35.
RockwellM.BorisA. (1982). Theater and television come to life through audio description. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 76(8), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x8207600805
36.
ScanlonT. (2015). Greek historiography. John Wiley & Sons.
37.
SchmeidlerE.KirchnerC. (2001). Adding audio description: Does it make a difference?Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95(4), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x0109500402
38.
ShakespeareT. (2010). The social model of disability. In DavisL. J. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 197–204). Routledge.
39.
SnyderJ. (2014). The visual made verbal: A comprehensive training manual and guide to the history and applications of audio description. American Council of the Blind.
40.
StikerH. (2019). A history of disability. University of Michigan Press.
