This article expands on the discussion of social and cultural factors for refugees’ feelings of belonging in the receiving society and assesses democratic, civic, and moral values as predictors of belonging. On the one hand, existing research considers shared values between refugees and the receiving society as hallmarks of integration. From this perspective, shared values (or value consensus) are considered predictors of refugees’ feelings of belonging and the formation of social bonds with host-country citizens. On the other hand, values are seen as part of refugees’ cultural capital. From this perspective, liberal and civic value contents, in particular, may promote feelings of belonging, irrespective of whether these values are widely shared with citizens of the host society. This article investigates these contrasting hypotheses, using data from a representative panel of refugees in Germany. Results show that refugees holding liberal democratic values are more likely to experience feelings of welcome in the receiving society. When operationalizing belonging also in terms of refugees spending time with host-country citizens, shared democratic and secular values become more important. Finally, this article suggests that the effect of value consensus on refugees’ feelings of welcome is mediated by how much time refugees spend with host-country citizens members. Taken together, our findings emphasize that in the context of international migration, values are important hallmarks of social integration, although this should not be reduced to popular calls for shared values between immigrants and host-country citizens.
AgerA.StrangA.. 2008. “Understanding Integration: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Refugee Studies21(2): 166–91.
2.
AnantS.1966. “Need to Belong.” Canadas Mental Health14(2): 21–7.
3.
AnthiasF.2006. “Belongings in a Globalising and Unequal World: Rethinking Translocations.” In The Situated Politics of Belonging, edited by Yuval-DavisN.KannabiranK.VietenU., 17–31. London: Sage.
4.
AntonsichM.2010. “Searching for Belonging–An Analytical Framework.” Geography Compass4(6): 644–59.
5.
AppaduraiA.ed.1988. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Banulescu-BogdanN.BentonM.. 2017. In Search of Common Values Amid Large-Scale Immigrant Integration Pressures. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.
7.
BaumeisterR.LearyM.. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin117(3): 497–529.
8.
BerryJ. W.1980. “Acculturation as Varieties of Adaptation.” In Acculturation: Theory, Models and Some New Findings, edited by PadilhaA., 9–23. Boulder, United States: Westview Press.
9.
BondR.2006. “Belonging and Becoming: National Identity and Exclusion.” Sociology40(4): 609–26.
10.
BrückerH.CroisierJ.KosyakovaY.KrögerH.PietrantuonoG.RotherN.SchuppJ.. 2019. “Language Skills and Employment Rate of Refugees in Germany Improving with Time.” DIW Weekly Report9(4/6): 49–61.
11.
BrückerH.KosyakovaY.VallizadehE.. 2020. “Has There Been a ‘Refugee Crisis'? New Insights on the Recent Refugee Arrivals in Germany and Their Integration Prospects.” Soziale Welt71 (1-2): 24–53.
12.
———, RotherN.SchuppJ.. 2016. “IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung von Geflüchteten: Überblick und erste Ergebnisse”. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge Forschungsbericht, 29, Nürnberg.
13.
———, ———, and ———. 2018. “IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung von Geflüchteten 2016: Studiendesign, Feldergebnisse sowie Analysen zu schulischer wie beruflicher Qualifikation, Sprachkenntnissen sowie kognitiven Potenzialen.” Forschungsbericht / Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ)30: 1–77.
CaselliF.ColemanW.. 2013. “On the Theory of Ethnic Conflict.” Journal of the European Economic Association11(1): 161–92.
18.
CouperM.De LeeuwE.. 2003. “Nonresponse in Cross-Cultural and Cross-National Surveys.” In Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, edited by HarknessJ.van de VijverF.MohlerP., 157–77. New York: Wiley.
19.
CoutinS.2011. “Falling Outside: Excavating the History of Central American Asylum Seekers.” Law & Social Inquiry36(3): 569–96.
20.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.. 2004. “Dislocating Identity: Desegregation and the Transformation of Place.” Journal of Environmental Psychology24(4): 455–73.
21.
DragolovG.IgnáczZ.LorenzJ.DelheyJ.BoehnkeK.UnzickerK.. 2016. Social Cohesion in the Western World: What Holds Societies Together: Insights from the Social Cohesion Radar. Basingstoke: Springer.
22.
FisherR.KatzJ.. 2000. “Social-Desirability Bias and the Validity of Self-Reported Values.” Psychology and Marketing17(2): 105–20.
23.
FortierA.1999. “Re-membering Places and the Performance of Belonging(s).” Theory, Culture & Society16(2): 41–64.
FozdarF.HartleyL.. 2014. “Civic and Ethno Belonging among Recent Refugees to Australia.” Journal of Refugee Studies27(1): 126–44.
26.
FuchsL. M.JacobsenJ.WaltherL.HahnE.TaT. M. T.BajboujM.Von ScheveC.. 2021. “The Challenged Sense of Belonging Scale (CSBS)—A Validation Study in English, Arabic, and Farsi/Dari among Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Germany.” Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences3(1): 1–16.
27.
FuhseJ.2022. Social Networks of Meaning and Communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
GaleraG.GiannettoL.NoyaA.. 2018. “The Role of Non-State Actors in the Integration of Refugees and Asylum Seekers.” OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Papers 2018/02. Paris.
29.
GunzlerD.ChenT.WuP.ZhangH.. 2013. “Introduction to Mediation Analysis with Structural Equation Modeling.” Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry25(6): 390–5.
30.
HagertyB.Lynch-SauerJ.PatuskyK.BouwsemaM.CollierP.. 1992. “Sense of Belonging: A Vital Mental Health Concept.” Archives of Psychiatric Nursing6(3): 172–7.
31.
HalmD.SauerM.. 2015. Soziale Dienstleistungen der in der Deutschen Islam Konferenz vertretenen religiösen Dachverbände und ihrer Gemeinden [Social Services of the Religious Umbrella Organizations Represented in the German Islam Conference and Their Communities]. Studie im Auftrag der Deutschen Islam Konferenz. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.
32.
HalmanL.SiebenI.Van ZundertM.. 2011. Atlas of European Values. Trends and Traditions at the Turn of the Century. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
33.
HamannU.KarakayaliS.. 2016. “Practicing Willkommenskultur: Migration and Solidarity in Germany.” Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics2(4): 69–86.
34.
HartmannJ.SteinmannJ. P.. 2020. “Do Gender-Role Values Matter? Explaining New Refugee Women’s Social Contact in Germany.” International Migration Review55 (3): 688–717.
35.
HellgrenZ.2019. “Class, Race–and Place: Immigrants’ Self-Perceptions on Inclusion, Belonging and Opportunities in Stockholm and Barcelona.” Ethnic and Racial Studies42(12): 2084–102.
36.
HofstedeG.2001. Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
37.
HovilL.2016. Refugees, Conflict and the Search for Belonging. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
InglehartR.2000. “Globalization and Postmodern Values.” The Washington Quarterly23(1): 215–28.
39.
———, R., and W. Baker. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review65(1): 19–51.
40.
———, R., HaerpferC.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Diez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB.. 2014. World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
41.
———R.WelzelC.. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Jones-CorreaM.MarrowH.OkamotoD.TroppL.. 2018. “Immigrant Perceptions of US-Born Receptivity and the Shaping of American Identity.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences4(5): 47–80.
43.
KaltenbachE.HärdtnerE.HermenauK.SchauerM.ElbertT.. 2017. “Efficient Identification of Mental Health Problems in Refugees in Germany: The Refugee Health Screener.” European Journal of Psychotraumatology8(sup2): 1389205.
44.
KluckhohnC.1951. “Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action.” In Toward a General Theory of Action, edited by ParsonsT.ShilsE., 388–433. New York: Harper.
45.
KotzurP. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.. 2018. “Welcoming the Unwelcome: How Contact Shapes Contexts of Reception for New Immigrants in Germany and the United States.” Journal of Social Issues74(4): 812–32.
46.
KrohM.KühneS.JacobsenJ.SiegertM.SiegersR.. 2017. “Sampling, Nonresponse, and Integrated Weighting of the 2016 IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey of Refugees (M3/M4).” SOEP Survey Papers, No. 477.
47.
KrzyzanowskiM.WodakR.. 2007. “Multiple Identities, Migration and Belonging: ‘Voices of Migrants’.” In Identity Troubles, edited by Caldas-CoulthardC.IedemaR., 95–119. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
48.
KunzE.1981. “Exile and Resettlement: Refugee Theory.” International Migration Review15(1-2): 42–51.
49.
LanceeB.DronkersJ.. 2008. “Ethnic Diversity in Neighborhoods and Individual Trust of Immigrants and Natives: A Replication of Putnam (2007) in a West-European Country.” International Conference on Theoretical Perspectives on Social Cohesion and Social Capital, Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts, Brussels, 77–103.
50.
———, B., and DronkersJ.2011. “Ethnic, Religious and Economic Diversity in Dutch Neighbourhoods: Explaining Quality of Contact with Neighbours, Trust in the Neighbourhood and Inter-Ethnic Trust.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies37(4): 597–618.
51.
LizardoO.2021. “Culture, Cognition, and Internalization.” Sociological Forum36(S1): 1177–206.
52.
LuthraR.SoehlT.WaldingerR.. 2018. “Reconceptualizing Context: A Multilevel Model of the Context of Reception and Second-Generation Educational Attainment.” International Migration Review52(3): 898–928.
53.
MadsenK.Van NaerssenT.. 2003. “Migration, Identity, and Belonging.” Journal of Borderlands Studies18(1): 61–75.
54.
MilesA.2015. “The (Re)genesis of Values: Examining the Importance of Values for Action.” American Sociological Review80(4): 680–704.
55.
MillerD.2004. “Social Justice in Multicultural Societies.” In Cultural Diversity Versus Economic Solidarity, edited by Van ParijsP., 13–31. Brussels: De Boeck University Press.
56.
NagelA.2019. “Religiöse Akteure in der Flüchtlingshilfe: Positionierung, Mobilisierung, Kooperation [Religious Actors in Refugee aid: Positioning, Mobilization, Cooperation].” Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik3(2): 283–305.
57.
NibbsF.2014. Belonging: The Social Dynamics of Fitting in as Experienced by Hmong Refugees in Germany and Texas. Durham: Academic Press.
58.
NorrisP.InglehartR.. 2012. “Muslim Integration into Western Cultures: Between Origins and Destinations.” Political Studies60(2): 228–51.
59.
ParsonsT.1968. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
60.
PartridgeP.1971. Consent and Consensus. New York: Praeger.
61.
PettigrewT.TroppL.. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751.
62.
Pfaff-CzarneckaJ.2013. “Multiple Belonging and the Challenges to Biographic Navigation.” MMG Working Paper 13-05. Göttingen: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.
63.
PhillimoreJ.2011. “Refugees, Acculturation Strategies, Stress and Integration.” Journal of Social Policy40(3): 575–93.
64.
PortesA.BöröczJ.. 1989. “Contemporary Immigration: Theoretical Perspectives on its Determinants and Modes of Incorporation.” International Migration Review23(3): 606–30.
ProbynE.1996. Outside Belongings. New York: Routledge.
67.
RosenthalG.KöttigM.. 2009. “Migration and Questions of Belonging. Migrants in Germany and Florida.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung10(3), Art. 19.
68.
SavageM.BagnallG.LonghurstB.. 2004. Globalization and Belonging. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
69.
SchwartzS. H.1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by ZannaM., 1–65. New York: Academic Press.
70.
———, S. 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture2(1): 1–20.
71.
———, S., and Sagie. 2000. “Value Consensus and Importance: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology31(4): 465–97.
72.
———, S., UngerJ.Lorenzo-BlancoE.des RosiersS.VillamarJ.SotoD.PattarroyoM.Baezconde-GarbanatiL.SzapocznikJ.. 2014. “Perceived Context of Reception among Recent Hispanic Immigrants: Conceptualization, Instrument Development, and Preliminary Validation.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology20(1): 1–15.
73.
———, S., ———, ZamboangaB.SzapocznikJ.. 2010. “Rethinking the Concept of Acculturation: Implications for Theory and Research.” American Psychologist65(4): 237–51.
74.
SicakkanH.LithmanY.. 2005. “Theorizing Identity Politics, Belonging Modes and Citizenship.” In Changing the Basis of Citizenship in the Modern State. Political Theory and Political Diversity, edited by SicakkanH.LithmanY., 197–225. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
75.
SOEP (Socio-Economic Panel). 2018. “Data for years 1984-2016, version 33, SOEP.”
76.
SteinmannJ. P.2020. “Religiosity and Natives’ Social Contact with new Refugees. Explaining Differences Between East and West Germany.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations74: 189–205.
77.
StrangA.AgerA.. 2010. “Refugee Integration: Emerging Trends and Remaining Agendas.” Journal of Refugee Studies23(4): 589–607.
78.
SVR (Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration). 2019. “Andere Länder, andere Sitten? Welche kulturellen Unterschiede Flüchtlinge wahrnehmen – und wie sie damit umgehen [Other Countries other Manners? What Cultural Differences Refugees Perceive - And How They Deal with Them].” Policy Brief des SVR-Forschungsbereichs und der Robert Bosch Stiftung, Berlin.
79.
TauschA.2016a. “Muslim Immigration Continues to Divide Europe: A Quantitative Analysis of European Social Survey Data.” Middle East Review of International Affairs20(2): 37–50.
80.
———. 2016b. “The Civic Culture of the Arab World: A Comparative Analysis Based on World Values Survey Data.” Middle East Review of International Affairs20(1): 35–59.
81.
TroppL.OkamotoD.MarrowH.Jones-CorreaM.. 2018. “How Contact Experiences Shape Welcoming: Perspectives from US-Born and Immigrant Groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly81(1): 23–47.
82.
TuanY.1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
83.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2012. Operational Manual for ISCED 2011 (International Standard Classification of Education). 1st ed.Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK.. 2011. “Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R.” Journal of Statistical Software45(3): 1–68.
86.
VerkuytenM.2016. “The Integration Paradox: Empiric Evidence from the Netherlands.” American Behavioral Scientist60(5-6): 583–96.
87.
VollmerB.KarakayaliS.. 2018. “The Volatility of the Discourse on Refugees in Germany.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16(1-2): 118–39.
88.
WaltherL.FuchsL.SchuppJ.von ScheveC.. 2020. “Living Conditions and the Mental Health and Well-Being of Refugees: Evidence from a Large-Scale German Survey.” Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health22(5): 903–13.
89.
WelzelC.2013. Freedom Rising. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press.
90.
WimmerA.SoehlT.. 2014. “Blocked Acculturation: Cultural Heterodoxy among Europe’s Immigrants.” American Journal of Sociology120(1): 146–86.
91.
Yuval-DavisN.2006. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice40(3): 197–214.
92.
Yuval-DavisN.AnthiasF.KofmanE.. 2005. “Secure Borders and Safe Haven and the Gendered Politics of Belonging: Beyond Social Cohesion.” Ethnic and Racial Studies28(3): 513–35.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
