A growing number of studies have recently postulated a so-called local turn in the study of immigrant and refugee integration policy. A fundamental, yet untested, assumption of this body of research is that local (sub-national) policies and administrations shape how migrants and refugees integrate into society. We develop and apply an analytical model using multilevel modeling techniques based on large-N, longitudinal survey data (N > 9000) with refugees (2012–2018) in a highly decentralized country (Germany) to estimate the scope for local policy effects net of individual-level and state- and district-level characteristics. We show that region and district-level variation in integration outcomes across multiple dimensions (employment, education, language, housing, social) is limited (∼5%) within 4–8 years after immigration. We find modest variation in policy indicators (∼10%), which do not appear to directly translate into outcomes. We discuss implications for the study of local policies and the potential for greater convergence between administrative and political science, interested in governance structures and policy variation, and sociology and economics, interested primarily in integration outcomes.
AdamF.FöbkerS.ImaniD.PfaffenbachC.WeissG.WiegandtC. -C.. 2020. “Municipal Housing Strategies for Refugees. Insights from Two Case Studies in Germany.” In Geographies of Asylum in Europe and the Role of European Localities, edited by GloriusB.DoomernikJ., 201–23. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
2.
AgerA.StrangA.. 2008. “Understanding Integration: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Refugee Studies21(2): 166–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016 .
3.
AksoyC. G.PoutvaaraP.SchikoraF.. 2020. First Time Around: Local Conditions and Multi-Dimensional Integration of Refugees. Center for Open Science.
4.
AlbaR.NeeV.. 1997. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration.” International Migration Review31(4): 826. https://doi.org/10.2307/2547416 .
5.
Aksoy, C. G., Poutvaara, P. and F. Schikora. (2023). “First Time Around: Local Conditions and Multi-Dimensional Integration of Refugees.” Journal of Urban Economics, 137: 103588.
6.
ÅslundO.RoothD.-O.. 2007. “Do When and Where Matter? Initial Labour Market Conditions and Immigrant Earnings.” The Economic Journal117(518): 422–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02024.x.
7.
AuerD.2018. “Language Roulette – the Effect of Random Placement on Refugees’ Labour Market Integration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(3): 341–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1304208.
8.
BansakK.FerwerdaJ.HainmuellerJ.DillonA.HangartnerD.LawrenceD.WeinsteinJ.. 2018. “Improving Refugee Integration Through Data-Driven Algorithmic Assignment.” Science (New York, N.Y.)359(6373): 325–29. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4408 .
9.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS.. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
10.
BäuerleJ. F.BandauF.. 2022. “Die Anwendung landesinterner Wohnsitzauflagen für Asylberechtigte in Deutschland nach der sogenannten “Flüchtlingskrise”.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft16(2): 325–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-022-00532-w.
11.
BogumilJ.KuhlmannS.. 2020. “Integrationsverwaltung Im Föderalismus.” In Reformbaustelle Bundesstaat, edited by KnüplingF.KöllingM.KroppS.SchellerH., 459–83. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
12.
BogumilJ.KuhlmannS.. 2022. “Verwaltungsverflechtung Als “Missing Link” Der Föderalismusforschung: Administrative Bewältigung Der Flüchtlingskrise Im Deutschen Mehrebenensystem.” dms15(1-2022): 84–108. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v15i1.06.
13.
BrückerH.HauptmannA.JaschkeP.. 2020. Beschränkungen Der Wohnortwahl Für Anerkannte Geflüchtete: Wohnsitzauflagen Reduzieren Die Chancen Auf Arbeitsmarktintegration. IAB-Kurzbericht, No. 3/2020. Nuremberg: Institute for Employment Research (IAB).
BrückerH.KrohM.BartschS.GoebelJ.KühneS.LiebauE.TrübswetterP.TucciI.SchuppJ.. 2014. The New IAB-SOEP Migration Sample: An Introduction into the Methodology and the Contents.SOEP Survey Papers 116. Berlin: DIW/SOEP. https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=0_lb-l0aaaaj&hl=de&oi=sra.
16.
BrückerH.RotherN.SchuppJ.. 2017. “IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung Von Geflüchteten 2016: Studiendesign, Feldergebnisse Sowie Analysen Zu Schulischer Wie Beruflicher Qualifikation, Sprachkenntnissen Sowie Kognitiven Potenzialen.” IAB Forschungsbericht13: 1–76. https://doku.iab.de/forschungsbericht/2017/fb1317.pdf.
17.
CaponioT.BorkertM.. 2010. The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking.Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
18.
CaponioT.PonzoI., eds. 2022. Coping with Migrants and Refugees: Multilevel Governance Across the EU. Routledge Studies in Governance and Public Policy. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003129950.
19.
CarejaR.2019. “Making Good Citizens: Local Authorities’ Integration Measures Navigate National Policies and Local Realities.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(8): 1327–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1441613.
20.
ChiswickB. R.MillerP. W.. 1996. “Ethnic Networks and Language Proficiency Among Immigrants.” Journal of Population Economics9(1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013277 .
21.
ColemanJ. S.1994. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
CrulM.SchneiderJ.. 2010. “Comparative Integration Context Theory: Participation and Belonging in New Diverse European Cities.” Ethnic and Racial Studies33(7): 1249–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419871003624068 .
23.
DammA. P.2009. “Ethnic Enclaves and Immigrant Labor Market Outcomes: Quasi-Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Labor Economics27(2): 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/599336.
24.
DekkerR.EmilssonH.KriegerB.ScholtenP.. 2015. “A Local Dimension of Integration Policies? A Comparative Study of Berlin, Malmö, and Rotterdam.” International Migration Review49(3): 633–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12133.
DimitriadisI.HajerM. H. J.FontanariE.AmbrosiniM.. 2021. “Local “Battlegrounds”. Relocating Multi-Level and Multi-Actor Governance of Immigration.” Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales37(1–2): 251–75. https://doi.org/10.4000/remi.18552.
27.
EdinP.-A.FredrikssonP.AslundO.. 2003. “Ethnic Enclaves and the Economic Success of Immigrants–Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics118(1): 329–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535225.
28.
ElwertF.2013. “Graphical Causal Models.” In Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, edited by MorganS. L., 245–73. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
29.
EmilssonH.2015. “A National Turn of Local Integration Policy: Multi-Level Governance Dynamics in Denmark and Sweden.” Comparative Migration Studies3(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-015-0008-5.
30.
ErsanilliE.KoopmansR.. 2011. “Do Immigrant Integration Policies Matter? A Three-Country Comparison Among Turkish Immigrants.” West European Politics34(2): 208–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.546568.
31.
EsserH.2008. “Assimilation, Ethnische Schichtung Oder Selektive Akkulturation. Neuere Theorien Der Eingliederung Von Migranten Und Das Modell Der Intergenerationalen Integration.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie1(Special Issue): 81–107.
32.
FasaniF.FrattiniT.MinaleL.. 2021. “Lift the Ban? Initial Employment Restrictions and Refugee Labour Market Outcomes.” Journal of the European Economic Association19(5): 2803–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvab021.
33.
FasaniF.FrattiniT.MinaleL.. 2022. “(The Struggle for) Refugee Integration into the Labour Market: Evidence from Europe.” Journal of Economic Geography22(2): 351–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab011.
34.
FerrisE.2020. “Making Sense of Public Policy on Refugee Integration.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science690(1): 200–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220941577.
GloriusB.GaschS.. 2022. “The Multilevel Governance of Asylum Seekers’ Reception in Germany and the Role of the Local Level: A Local-to-Local Comparison.” In Coping with Migrants and Refugees: Multilevel Governance Across the EU, edited by CaponioT.PonzoI., 120–49. Routledge studies in governance and public policy. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
GordonM. M.1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins.New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.LawrenceD.. 2016. “When Lives Are Put on Hold: Lengthy Asylum Processes Decrease Employment Among Refugees.” Science Advances2(8): e1600432. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600432.
45.
HernesV.2021. “The Case for Increased Centralization in Integration Governance: The Neglected Perspective.” Comparative Migration Studies9(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00247-z.
46.
HernesV.ArendtJ.JoonaP. A.TronstadK.. 2022. “Rapid or Long-Term Employment? A Scandinavian Comparative Study of Refugee Integration Policies and Employment Outcomes.” Journal of European Public Policy29(2): 238–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1824011.
47.
HuddlestonT.FalckeS.. 2020. “Nationality Policies in the Books and in Practice: Comparing Immigrant Naturalisation Across Europe.” International Migration (Geneva, Switzerland)58(2): 255–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12656.
48.
KaidaL.HouF.StickM.. 2020. “Are Refugees More Likely to Leave Initial Destinations Than Economic Immigrants? Recent Evidence from Canadian Longitudinal Administrative Data.” Population, Space and Place26(5): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2316.
49.
KanasA.KosyakovaY.. 2022. “Greater Local Supply of Language Courses Improves Refugees’ Labor Market Integration.” European Societies, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2022.2096915.
50.
KhalilS.KohlerU.TjadenJ.. 2022. “Is There a Rural Penalty in Language Acquisition? Evidence From Germany's Refugee Allocation Policy.” Frontiers in Sociology7 (1): 1–11.
51.
KoganI.KalterF.. 2020. “An Empirical–Analytical Approach to the Study of Recent Refugee Migrants in Germany.” Soziale Welt (SozW)71(1–2): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2020-1-2-3.
52.
KoopmansR.2010. “Trade-Offs Between Equality and Difference: Immigrant Integration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903250881.
53.
KristenC.MühlauP.SchachtD.. 2016. “Language Acquisition of Recently Arrived Immigrants in England, Germany, Ireland, and the Netherlands.” Ethnicities16(2): 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796815616157.
54.
KristiansenM. H.MaasI.BoschmanS.VroomanJ. C.. 2022. “Refugees’ Transition from Welfare to Work: A Quasi-Experimental Approach of the Impact of the Neighbourhood Context.” European Sociological Review38(2): 234–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcab044.
55.
KronenbergVolker. 2017. Integration at the Municipal Level. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
56.
KuhlmannS.ProellerI.SchimankeD.ZiekowJ.. 2021. Public Administration in Germany.Cham: Springer International Publishing.
57.
Lara-GarcíaF.2022. “Components of Context: Respecifying the Role of Context in Migration Research.” International Migration Review56(4): 992–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211061506.
58.
LiebigS.BrückerH.Leistner-RoccaR.GoebelJ.GrabkaM. M.RotherN.SchröderC., et al. 2021. “IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung Geflüchteter 2019.”
59.
LuthraR.SoehlT.WaldingerR.. 2018. “Reconceptualizing Context: A Multilevel Model of the Context of Reception and Second-Generation Educational Attainment.” International Migration Review52(3): 898–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12315.
60.
LutzP.2017. “Two Logics of Policy Intervention in Immigrant Integration: An Institutionalist Framework Based on Capabilities and Aspirations.” CMS5(1): 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-017-0064-0.
61.
MarbachM.HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.. 2018. “The Long-Term Impact of Employment Bans on the Economic Integration of Refugees.” Science Advances4(9): eaap9519. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9519.
62.
MarténL.HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.. 2019. “Ethnic Networks Can Foster the Economic Integration of Refugees.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116(33): 16280–85. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820345116.
63.
MossaadN.FerwerdaJ.LawrenceD.WeinsteinJ.HainmuellerJ.. 2020. “In Search of Opportunity and Community: Internal Migration of Refugees in the United States.” Science Advances6(32): eabb0295. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb0295.
64.
MyrbergG.2017. “Local Challenges and National Concerns: Municipal Level Responses to National Refugee Settlement Policies in Denmark and Sweden.” International Review of Administrative Sciences83(2): 322–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315586309.
65.
NuisslH.DomannV.EngelS.. 2019. “Integration as a Task of Municipal Policy. The Exploration of an Emerging Field of Local Politics.” Raumforschung und Raumordnung77(4): 319–31. https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2019-0016.
66.
ParkR. E.MillerH. A.. 1921. Old World Traits Transplanted (Americanization Studies).New York: Harper.
67.
PhillimoreJ.2021. “Refugee-Integration-Opportunity Structures: Shifting the Focus from Refugees to Context.” Journal of Refugee Studies34(2): 1946–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa012.
68.
PlattL.PolaviejaJ.RadlJ.. 2022. “Which Integration Policies Work? The Heterogeneous Impact of National Institutions on Immigrants’ Labor Market Attainment in Europe.” International Migration Review56(2): 344–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211032677.
69.
PortesA.ZhouM.. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530(1): 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293530001006.
70.
RitgenK.2018. “Integration in Ländlichen Räumen – Die Rolle Der Landkreise.” In Handbuch Lokale Integrationspolitik, edited by GesemannF.RothR., 407–31. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
71.
SchammannH.2015. “Wenn Variationen Den Alltag Bestimmen. Unterschiede Lokaler Politikgestaltung in Der Leistungsgewährung Für Asylsuchende.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft9(3): 161–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-015-0267-4 .
72.
SchammannH.2017. “Stadt, Land, Flucht. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen Zum Vergleich Städtischer Flüchtlingspolitik in Deutschland.” In Variationen Des Städtischen – Variationen Lokaler Politik, edited by BarbehönM.MünchS., 91–117. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
73.
SchammannH.KühnB.. 2017. Kommunale Flüchtlingspolitik in Deutschland. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
74.
ScholtenP.PenninxR.. 2016. “The Multilevel Governance of Migration and Integration.” In Integration Processes and Policies in Europe, edited by Garcés-MascareñasB.PenninxR., 91–108. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
75.
SolanoG.ConinckD. De. 2023. “Explaining Migrant Integration Policies: A Comparative Study Across 56 Countries.” Migration Studies11(1): 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac036.
76.
UNHCR. 2023. Refugee Statistics - Refugee Data Finder.Geneva: United Nations.
77.
van TubergenF.MaasI.FlapH.. 2004. “The Economic Incorporation of Immigrants in 18 Western Societies: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects.” American Sociological Review69(5): 704–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900505.
78.
VogiazidesL.MondaniH.. 2021. “Geographical Trajectories of Refugees in Sweden: Uncovering Patterns and Drivers of Inter-Regional (Im)Mobility.” Journal of Refugee Studies34(3): 3065–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa074.
79.
WaldingerR.2001. Strangers at the Gate: New Immigrants in Urban America.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
80.
WatersM. C.PineauM. G., eds. 2015. The Integration of Immigrants into American Society.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
81.
WolffhardtA.ConteC.HuddlestonT.. 2019. The European Benchmark for Refugee Integration.Warsaw: Migration Policy Group and in Warsaw by Institute of Public Affairs.
82.
Zapata-BarreroR.CaponioT.ScholtenP.. 2017. “Theorizing the ‘Local Turn’ in a Multi-Level Governance Framework of Analysis: A Case Study in Immigrant Policies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences83(2): 241–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316688426.
83.
ZhouM.2005. “Ethnicity as Social Capital: Community-Based Institutions and Embedded Networks of Social Relations’.” In Ethnicity, Social Mobility and Public Policy in the US and UK, edited by LouryG.ModoodT.TelesS., 135–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
