This article examines the relationship between structural integration and perceived discrimination among young people with migration backgrounds in Germany. Assimilation theories expect ethnic boundaries to lessen through minority groups’ upward mobility, while the recently proposed integration paradox asserts that structural integration increases perceptions of discrimination. Using longitudinal data from the German National Educational Panel Study, this article investigates how a successful transition from school to the training market affects young people’s perceptions of ethnic discrimination. Results of propensity score matching and linear probability models show that perceptions of discrimination increase only in response to unsuccessful entry into the training market, partially due to occupational aspirations and personal discrimination experiences. Findings also show that perceptions of discrimination do not increase for young people who are well integrated in the educational system, even if they take up a training position that is not in accordance with their desired profession. These findings highlight the importance of considering perceptions of discrimination in longitudinal and life-course perspectives to better understanding dynamics in these perceptions.
AlanyaA.BaysuG.SwyngedouwM.. 2015. “Identifying City Differences in Perceived Group Discrimination among Second-Generation Turks and Moroccans in Belgium.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(7):1088–10.
2.
AlbaR.2005. “Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1):20–49.
3.
AlbaR.FonerN.. 2015. Strangers No More: Immigration and the Challenges of Integration in North America and Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
ArpinoB.AassveA.. 2013. “Estimating the Causal Effect of Fertility on Economic Wellbeing: Data Requirements, Identifying Assumptions and Estimation Methods.” Empirical Economics44(1):355–85.
5.
AtheyS.ImbensG. W.. 2006. “Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models.” Econometrica74(2):431–97.
6.
BailC. A.2008. “The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries against Immigrants in Europe.” American Sociological Review73(1):37–59.
BlossfeldH.-P.1985. Bildungsexpansion und Berufschancen: empirische Analysen zur Lage der Berufsanfänger in der Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
9.
BlossfeldH.-P.RoßbachH.-G.von MauriceJ., eds. 2011. Education as a Lifelong Process: The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). Vol. 14. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
10.
ÇelikÇ.2015. “‘Having a German Passport Will Not Make Me German’: Reactive Ethnicity and Oppositional Identity among Disadvantaged Male Turkish Second-Generation Youth in Germany.” Ethnic and Racial Studies38(9):1646–62.
11.
CrockerJ.VoelklK.TestaM.MajorB.. 1991. “Social Stigma: The Affective Consequences of Attributional Ambiguity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60(2):218–28.
12.
de VroomeT.MartinovicB.VerkuytenM.. 2014. “The Integration Paradox: Level of Education and Immigrants’ Attitudes towards Natives and the Host Society.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology20(2):166–75.
13.
de VroomeT.VerkuytenM.MartinovicB.. 2014. “Host National Identification of Immigrants in the Netherlands.” International Migration Review48(1):76–102.
14.
di Saint PierreF.MartinovicB.de VroomeT.. 2015. “Return Wishes of Refugees in the Netherlands: The Role of Integration, Host National Identification and Perceived Discrimination.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(11):1836–57.
15.
DiehlC.Fischer-NeumannM.MühlauP.. 2016. “Between Ethnic Options and Ethnic Boundaries: Recent Polish and Turkish Migrants’ Identification with Germany.” Ethnicities16(2):236–60.
16.
DiehlC.LiebauE.. 2017. “Perceptions of Discrimination: What Do They Measure and Why Do They Matter?” SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No. 945. Berlin: DIW.
17.
DollmannJ.2017. “Positive Choices for All? SES- and Gender-Specific Premia of Immigrants at Educational Transitions.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility49(Supplement C):20–31.
18.
FloresR. D.2015. “The Resurgence of Race in Spain: Perceptions of Discrimination among Immigrants.” Social Forces94(1):237–69.
19.
GanglM.2015. “Matching Estimators for Treatment Effects.” The SAGE Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference, edited by BestH.WolfC., 251–76. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
20.
GordonM. M.1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
HeathA.2014. “Introduction: Patterns of Generational Change: Convergent, Reactive or Emergent?” Ethnic and Racial Studies37(1):1–9.
22.
HeathA.DemirevaN.. 2014. “Has Multiculturalism Failed in Britain?” Ethnic and Racial Studies37(1):161–80.
23.
HeathA.RothonC.KilpiE.. 2008. “The Second Generation in Western Europe: Education, Unemployment, and Occupational Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology34(1):211–35.
24.
HeckmanJ. J.IchimuraH.ToddP.. 1998. “Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator.” The Review of Economic Studies65:261–94.
25.
HillmertS.JacobM.. 2010. “Selections and Social Selectivity on the Academic Track: A Life-Course Analysis of Educational Attainment in Germany.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility28(1):59–76.
26.
HoltmannA. C.MenzeL.SolgaH.. 2017. “Persistent Disadvantages or New Opportunities? The Role of Agency and Structural Constraints for Low-Achieving Adolescents’ School-to-Work Transitions.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence46(10):2091–113.
27.
HunklerC.2016. “Ethnische Unterschiede beim Zugang zu beruflicher Ausbildung.” In Ethnische Ungleichheiten im Bildungsverlauf: Mechanismen, Befunde, Debatten, edited by DiehlC.HunklerC.KristenC., 597–641. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
28.
ImbensG. W.2015. “Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples.” Journal of Human Resources50(2):373–419.
29.
JacobM.SolgaH.. 2015. “Germany’s Vocational Education and Training System in Transformation: Changes in the Participation of Low- and High-Achieving Youth over Time.” European Sociological Review31(2):161–71.
30.
Jasinskaja-LahtiI.LiebkindK.SolheimE.. 2009. “To Identify or Not to Identify? National Disidentification as an Alternative Reaction to Perceived Ethnic Discrimination.” Applied Psychology58(1):105–28.
31.
KaasL.MangerC.. 2012. “Ethnic Discrimination in Germany’s Labour Market: A Field Experiment.” German Economic Review13(1):1–20.
32.
KalterF.GranatoN.. 2007. “Educational Hurdles on the Way to Structural Assimilation in Germany.” In Unequal Chances. Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets, edited by HeathA.CheungS. Y., 271–319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
KleinertC.JacobM.. 2012. “Strukturwandel des Übergangs in eine berufliche Ausbildung.” In Soziologische Bildungsforschung, edited by BeckerR.SolgaH., 211–33. Wiesbaden: Springer.
34.
KoganI.2007. “A Study of Immigrants’ Employment Careers in West Germany Using the Sequence Analysis Technique.” Social Science Research36(2):491–511.
35.
KrauseA.RinneU.SchüllerS.. 2015. “Kick It Like Özil? Decomposing the Native-Migrant Education Gap.” International Migration Review49(3):757–789.
36.
KristenC.GranatoN.. 2007. “The Educational Attainment of the Second Generation in Germany.” Ethnicities7(3):343–66.
37.
LamontM.2009. “Responses to Racism, Health, and Social inclusion as a Dimension of Successful Societies.” In Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health, edited by HallP. A.LamontM., 151–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MaxwellR.2015. “Perceived Discrimination across Institutional Fields: Racial Minorities in the United Kingdom.” European Sociological Review31(3):342–53.
39.
McGinnityF.GijsbertsM.. 2016. “A Threat in the Air? Perceptions of Group Discrimination in the First Years after Migration: Comparing Polish Migrants in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK and Ireland.” Ethnicities16(2):290–315.
40.
McGinnityF.GijsbertsM.. 2017. “The Experience of Discrimination among Newly Arrived Poles in Ireland and the Netherlands.” Ethnic and Racial Studies40(10):1–19.
41.
MorganS. L.WinshipC.. 2015. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research (Second Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
OlczykM.SeuringJ.WillG.ZinnS.. 2016. “Migranten und ihre Nachkommen im deutschen Bildungssystem: Ein aktueller Überblick.” In Ethnische Ungleichheiten im Bildungsverlauf: Mechanismen, Befunde, Debatten, edited by DiehlC.HunklerC.KristenC., 33–70. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
43.
OperarioD.FiskeS. T.. 2001. “Ethnic Identity Moderates Perceptions of Prejudice: Judgments of Personal versus Group Discrimination and Subtle Versus Blatant Bias.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(5):550–61.
44.
PettigrewT. F.HewstoneM.. 2017. “The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory1.” Social Issues and Policy Review11(1):8–37.
45.
PortesA.RumbautR. G.. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait: Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
PortesA.ZhouM.. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530:74–96.
47.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B.. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika70(1):41–55.
48.
SchaefferM.2019. “Social Mobility and Perceived Discrimination: Adding an Intergenerational Perspective.” European Sociological Review35(1):65–80.
49.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.PostmesT.GarciaA.. 2014. “The Consequences of Perceived Discrimination for Psychological Well-Being: A Meta-analytic Review.” Psychological Bulletin140(4):921.
50.
SchneiderJ.YemaneR.WeinmannM.. 2014. Diskriminierung am Ausbildungsmarkt. Ausmaß, Ursachen und Handlungsperspektiven. Berlin: Forschungsbereich beim Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration.
51.
SchulzB.LeszczenskyL.. 2016. “Native Friends and Host Country Identification among Adolescent Immigrants in Germany: The Role of Ethnic Boundaries.” International Migration Review50(1):163–96.
52.
SilbermanR.AlbaR.FournierI.. 2007. “Segmented Assimilation in France? Discrimination in the Labour Market against the Second Generation.” Ethnic and Racial Studies30(1):1–27.
53.
SkrobanekJ.2009. “Perceived Discrimination, Ethnic Identity and the (Re-)Ethnicisation of Youth with a Turkish Ethnic Background in Germany.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(4):535–54.
54.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS.. 2012. “Relative Deprivation.” Personality and Social Psychology Review16(3):203–32.
55.
SolgaH.ProtschP.EbnerC.Brzinsky-FayC.. 2014. “The German Vocational Education and Training System: Its Institutional Configuration, Strengths, and Challenges.” WZB Discussion Paper SPI2014–502.
56.
SteinmannJ.-P. 2018. “The Paradox of Integration: Why Do Higher Educated New Immigrants Perceive More Discrimination in Germany?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1480359
57.
TaylorD. M.WrightS. C.MoghaddamF. M.LalondeR. N.. 1990. “The Personal/Group Discrimination Discrepancy: Perceiving My Group, but Not Myself, to Be a Target for Discrimination.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin16(2):254–62.
58.
TjadenJ. D.HunklerC.. 2017. “The Optimism Trap: Migrants’ Educational Choices in Stratified Education Systems.” Social Science Research67:213–28.
59.
TolsmaJ.LubbersM.GijsbertsM.. 2012. “Education and Cultural Integration among Ethnic Minorities and Natives in the Netherlands: A Test of the Integration Paradox.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38(5):793–813.
60.
van de WerfhorstH. G.MijsJ. J. B.. 2010. “Achievement Inequality and the Institutional Structure of Educational Systems: A Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology36(1):407–28.
61.
VerkuytenM.2016. “The Integration Paradox.” American Behavioral Scientist60(5–6):583–96.
62.
VerwiebeR.SeewannL.WolfM.HaciogluM.. 2016. “‘I Have to Be Very Good in What I Do’: Marginalisation and Discrimination in the Career-Entry Phase: Experiences and Coping Strategies among University Graduates with a Migrant Background in Austria.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(15):2468–90.
63.
ZhouM.1997. “Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the New Second Generation.” International Migration Review31(4):975–1008.
64.
ZschirntE.RuedinD.. 2016. “Ethnic Discrimination in Hiring Decisions: A Meta-analysis of Correspondence Tests 1990–2015.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(7):1115–34.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
