The 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and resulting tsunami that devastated the nation created a situation that, through the global flows of media content, necessitated a response from the international anime fan community. This response was shaped by the ethical framework of caring for the community. Performances of fan citizenship reflected this existing community value and the community’s identification with other fans and the people of Japan. Reflecting these identifications, fans took civic action in the form of the ethical modalities of donating money to relief efforts and critiquing community discourse that diverted attention from the disaster. Institutions, like the streaming service Crunchyroll, served to rhetorically define the ethical modalities at play in this context through their institutional role of amplifying performances of fan citizenship.
BrownJ. A. (1997).
Comic book fandom and cultural capital. Journal of Popular Culture,
30(4), 13–31.
5.
Burke, K. (1969). A Rhetoric of Motives. University of California Press.
6.
ButlerJ. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative.
Routledge.
7.
ClementsJ. (2013). Anime: A history.
Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
CondryI. (2013). The soul of anime: Collaborative creativity and Japan’s media success story.
Duke University Press.
9.
Darling-WolfF. (2015). Imagining the global: Transnational media and popular culture beyond east and west.
University of Michigan Press.
10.
EarlJ.KimportK. (2009).
Movement societies and digital protest: Fan activism and other nonpolitical protest online. Sociological Theory,
27(3), 220–243.
11.
EngL. (2012a). Anime and manga fandom as networked culture. In M.ItoD.OkabeI.Tsuji (Eds.), Fandom unbound: Otaku culture in a connected world (pp. 158–178).
Yale University Press.
12.
EngL. (2012b). Strategies of engagement: Discovering, defining, and describing otaku culture in the United States. In M.ItoD.OkabeI.Tsuji (Eds.), Fandom unbound: Otaku culture in a connected world (pp. 85–104).
Yale University Press.
FlewT. (2007), Understanding global media.
Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
HadasL.ShifmanL. (2013).
Keeping the elite powerless: Fan-producer relations in the ‘Nu Who’ (and New YOU) era. Critical Studies in Media Communication,
30(4), 275–291.
HinckA. (2016).
Ethical frameworks and ethical modalities: Theorizing communication and citizenship in a fluid world. Communication Theory,
26(1), 1–20.
19.
HinckA. (2019). Politics for the love of fandom: Fan-based citizenship in a digital world.
Louisiana State University Press.
IwabuchiK. (2015).
Pop-culture diplomacy in Japan: Soft power, nation branding and the question of “international cultural exchange.” International Journal of Cultural Policy,
21(4), 419–432.
23.
JenkinsH. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory culture.
Routledge.
JensonJ. (1992). Fandom as pathology: The consequences of characterization. In LewisL. A. (Ed.), The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media (pp. 9–29).
Routledge.
LeonardS. (2005).
Progress against the law: Anime and fandom, with the key to the globalization of culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies,
8(3), 281–305.
MillerL. (2017).
Access and the construction of fan identity: Industry images of anime fandom. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies,
14(1), 49–66.
38.
NakanoY. (2002).
Who initiates a global flow? Japanese popular culture in Asia. Visual Communication,
1(2), 229–253.
39.
NapierS. J. (2007). From impressionism to anime: Japan as fantasy and fan cult in the mind of the West.
Palgrave Macmillan.
