Using textual and visual media framing analysis, this research examines contemporary depictions of yoga in U.S. general interest women’s magazines. Critique of narrative and images from three leading magazines demonstrates how the representation of yoga depicts and positions tropes of female objectification that reify values of commodity, consumerism, and divisive exclusionary identity. Narrative and images dominated by bodies of slim, White, upper-class women perpetuate not only the commodification of yoga but also media framing of its appropriation and negotiation to support a multimillion-dollar industry. Two threads of research dominate this study: (1) how do today’s media representations of yoga practice in the United States foster critical and cultural understanding in light of yoga’s long history, and (2) how does the objectification of women’s bodies in this context contribute to ongoing conversations about commodification, exclusion, and identity in contemporary media depictions of women?
AbrahamL.AppiahO. (2006).
Framing news stories: The role of visual imagery in priming racial stereotypes. TheHoward Journal of Communications,
17(3), 183–203.
AronsonA. (2010).
Still reading women’s magazines: Reconsidering the tradition a half century after the feminine mystique.American Journalism,
27(2), 31–61.
4.
AtkinsonN. L.Permuth-LevineR. (2009).
Benefits, barriers, and cues to action of yoga practice: A focus group approach. American Journal of Health Behavior,
33(1), 3–14.
5.
AubreyJ. S. (2010).
Looking good versus feeling good: An investigation of media frames of health advice and their effects on women’s body-related self-perceptions.Sex Roles,
63(1–2), 50–63.
6.
AyresT. C.JewkesY. (2012).
The haunting spectacle of crystal meth: A media-created mythology?Crime, Media, Culture,
8(3), 315–332.
7.
BasuS. (2001).
The blunt cutting-edge: The construction of sexuality in the Bengali feminist magazine Sananda.Feminist Media Studies,
1(2), 179–196.
8.
BazziniD. G.PepperA.SwoffordR.CochranK. (2015).
How healthy are health magazines? A comparative content analysis of cover captions and images of women’s and men’s health magazine.Sex Roles,
72(5–6), 198–210.
BirdeeG. S.LegedzaA. T.SaperR. B.BertischS. M.EisenbergD. M.PhillipsR. S. (2008).
Characteristics of yoga users: Results of a national survey.Journal of General Internal Medicine,
23(10), 1653–1658.
De GraziaV.FurloughE. (Eds.). (1996). The sex of things: Gender and consumption in historical perspective.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
19.
DohntH. K.TiggemannM. (2006).
Body image concerns in young girls: The role of peers and media prior to adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
35(2), 135–145.
20.
ElliottD. (2011). Ethical responsibilities and the power of pictures. In S. D. Ross & P. M. Lester (Eds.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media (pp. 9–19). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
21.
EntmanR. M.RojeckiA. (2000). The black image in the white mind: Media and race in America.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
22.
EvansP. C. (2003).
“If only I were thin like her, maybe I could be happy like her”: The self-implications of associating a thin female ideal with life success.Psychology of Women Quarterly,
27(3), 209–214.
23.
FahmyS. (2004).
Picturing Afghan women a content analysis of AP wire photographs during the Taliban regime and after the fall of the Taliban regime.Gazette,
66(2), 91–112.
24.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997).
Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks.Psychology of Women Quarterly,
21(2), 173–206.
25.
FyfeG.LawJ. (1988). Picturing power. Visual depiction and social relations.
London, England:
Routledge.
GibsonR.ZillmannD. (2000).
Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,
77(2), 355–366
29.
GoffmanE. (1979). Gender advertisements.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
GordonM. (2008).
Media contributions to African American girls’ focus on beauty and appearance: Exploring the consequences of sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
32, 245–256.
32.
GraberD. A. (1990).
Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news.Journal of Communication,
40(3), 134–156.
GuillenE. O.BarrS. I. (1994).
Nutrition, dieting, and fitness messages in a magazine for adolescent women, 1970–1990.Journal of Adolescent Health,
15(6), 464–472.
35.
HarperB.TiggemannM. (2008).
The effect of thin ideal media images on women’s self-objectification, mood, and body image.Sex Roles,
58(9–10), 649–657.
36.
HawkinsB. (1998). The dominant images of black men in America: The representation of O.J. Simpson. In SailesG. (Ed.), African Americans in sport (pp. 39–52).
New Brunswick, NJ:
Transaction Publishers.
HortonC. A.HarveyR. (2012). 21st century yoga: Culture, politics, and practice.
Chicago, IL:
Kleio Books.
40.
IgartuaJ.ChengL. (2009).
Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on immigration: Is the framing effect a heuristic process?Journal of Communication,
59(4), 726–749.
41.
JainA. R. (2015). Selling yoga: From counterculture to pop culture.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
42.
KeanL.PrivideraL.HowardJ. W.IIIGatesD. (2014).
Health, weight, and fitness messages in Ebony and Essence: A framing analysis of articles in African American women’s magazines. Journal of Magazine & New Media Research,
15(1), 1–25.
43.
KitchC. L. (2001). The girl on the magazine cover: The origins of visual stereotypes in American mass media.
Chapel Hill, NC:
University of North Carolina Press.
NewtonJ. H.WilliamsR. (2011). Archetypes: Transcending stereotypes of feminine and masculine in the theatre of mediatypes. In RossS. D.LesterP. M. (Eds.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media (pp. 197–210).
Santa Barbara, CA:
Praeger.
54.
NichterM. (2000). Fat talk: What girls and their parents say about dieting.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
55.
NielsenA. C. (2014).
North American yoga culture: An interdisciplinary vehicle for female empowerment. Journal of Integrated Studies,
5(2), 1-8.
56.
OehlhofM. E. W.Musher-EizenmanD. R.NeufeldJ. M.HauserJ. C. (2009).
Self-objectification and ideal body shape for men and women.Body Image,
6, 308–310.
57.
OgletreeS. M.WilliamsS. W.RaffieldP.MasonB.FrickeK. (1990).
Female attractiveness and eating disorders: Do children’s television commercials play a role?Sex Roles,
22(11–12), 791–797.
58.
PanZ.KosickiG. (1993).
Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse.Political Communication,
10(1), 55–75.
59.
ParameswaranR.CardozaK. (2009).
Melanin on the margins: Advertising and the cultural politics of fair/light/white beauty in India. Journalism & Communication Monographs,
11(3), 213–274.
60.
ParkC. L.BraunT.SiegelT. (2015).
Who practices yoga? A systematic review of demographic, health-related, and psychosocial factors associated with yoga practice. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,
38(3), 460–471.
PowersD.GreenwellD. M. (2017).
Branded fitness: Exercise and promotional culture.Journal of Consumer Culture,
17(3), 523–541.
64.
Reynolds-DobbsW.ThomasK. M.HarrisonM. S. (2008).
From mammy to superwoman: Images that hinder black women’scareer development. Journal of Career Development,
35(2), 129–150.
65.
RobertsT. A.GettmanJ. Y. (2004).
Mere exposure: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state of self-objectification.Sex Roles,
51(1–2), 17–27.
RossS. D. (2011). Marking and demarking: Images, narratives, and identities (part-1). In S. D. Ross & P. M. Lester (Eds.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media (pp. 5–8). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
68.
SamuelG. (2008). The origins of yoga and tantra.
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
69.
SchwalbeC. B.DoughertyS. M. (2015).
Visual coverage of the 2006 Lebanon War: Framing conflict in three U.S. news magazines.Media, War & Conflict,
8(1), 141–162.
SypeckM. F.GrayJ. J.AhrensA. H. (2004).
No longer just a pretty face: Fashion magazines’ depictions of ideal female beauty from 1959 to 1999.International Journal of Eating Disorders,
36(3), 342–347.
TiggemannM.WilliamsonS. (2000).
The effect of exercise on body satisfaction and self-esteem as a function of gender and age. Sex Roles,
43(1–2), 119–127.
78.
VatsA. (2016).
(Dis)owning Bikram: Decolonizing vernacular and dewesternizing restructuring in the yoga wars.Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies,
13(4), 325–345.
79.
VinoskiE.WebbJ. B.Warren-FindlowJ.BrewerK. A.KiffmeyerK. A. (2017).
Got yoga?: A longitudinal analysis of thematic content and models’ appearance-related attributes in advertisements spanning four decades of Yoga Journal.Body Image,
21, 1–5.
80.
WadeL.SharpG. (2011). Selling sex. In RossS. D.LesterP. M. (Eds.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media (pp. 163–172).
Santa Barbara, CA:
Praeger.
81.
WebbJ. B.VinoskiE. R.Warren-FindlowJ.BurrellM. I.PutzD. Y. (2017).
Downward dog becomes Fit Body, Inc.: A content analysis of 40 years of female cover images of Yoga Journal.Body Image,
22, 129–135.
