Drawing from a variety of disciplines, this article examines some of the tensions reflected and reproduced by the global hegemony of English. It does so by way of critical interpretation of accounts of the global spread of English published in five American-owned prestige press publications. Part of a 275-text data pool, the texts analyzed in this article wrap the story of the global hegemony of English around Anglo-Franco competition and rivalry. They embrace what the author calls the French Foil narrative, or a story about the global rise of English that pits English against French, the United States against France, and Americans against “the” French. The story told is one in which English is seen as triumphing over French because of its superior status as a popular language. This antielitist plot relies heavily on the consummate antagonist of American populism, the French intellectual.
Ahmad, A. (1992). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. London: Verso.
2.
Augelli, E., & Murphy, C. (1993). Gramsci and international relations: A general perspective and example from recent US policy toward the Third World. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, historical materialism, and international relations (pp. 127-147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bernstein, R. (1994, March 20). What if the soup du jour was just wet noodles?The New York Times, sec. 4, p. 2. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic database.
4.
Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In J. Blommaert (Ed.), Language ideological debates (pp. 1-38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
5.
Campbell, A. (1849). Address on the Anglo-Saxon language: Its origin, character and destiny. Retrieved April 9, 2005, from http://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/acampbell/pla/PLA01.HTM
6.
Columbia Journalism Review. (n.d.). Who owns what? Retrieved March 31, 2004, from http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners
7.
Cox, R. (1996). Gramsci, hegemony, and international relations: An essay in method. In R. Cox (Ed.), Approaches to world order (pp. 124-143). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Daley, S. (2001, April 16). In Europe, some fear national languages are endangered. The New York Times, p. A1. Retrieved October 7, 2004, from ProQuest database.
10.
de Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
12.
Farnsworth, C. (1993, May 14). Gordon McIntyre v. Quebec: He wins for English. The New York Times, p. A4. Retrieved October 7, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic database.
13.
Fiske, J. (1900). American political ideas viewed from the standpoint of universal history. New York: Harper & Brothers.
14.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. New York: Routledge.
15.
Gill, S. (1993). Epistemology, ontology, and the Italian School . In S Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, historical materialism, and international relations (pp. 21-48). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English: A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London: The British Council.
17.
Graddol, D. (2006). English next: Why global English may mean the end of `English as a foreign language.'London: The British Council. Retrieved Sept. 19, 2006, from http://www.britishcouncil.org/files/documents/learning-research-english-next.pdf
18.
Gramsci, A. (1971). The intellectuals. In Q. Hoare & G. Nowell (Eds. & Trans.), Selections from the prison notebooks (pp. 3-23). New York: International Publishers.
19.
Grigg, P. (1997). Toubon or not Toubon: The influence of the English language in contemporary France. English Studies, 78, 368-384.
20.
Hall, S. (1975). Introduction. In A. C. H. Smith (Ed.), Paper voices: The popular press and social change, 1935-1965 (pp. 11-24). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
Hall, S. (1980). Introduction to media studies at the Centre. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 117-121). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
22.
Hall, S., Chritcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1981). The social production of news: Mugging in the media. In S. Cohen & J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news: Social problems, deviance and the mass media. London: Sage.
23.
Hartman, A. (2003). Language as oppression: The English-only movement in the United States. Socialism and Democracy, 17(1), 187-208.
24.
Holborow, M. (1999). The politics of English: A Marxist view of language . London: Sage.
25.
Husting, G., & King, L. (2005). Francophobia, anti-Americanism: Narratives of the trans-Atlantic Other in French and U.S. news on abortion-related issues . Cultural Studies ⇔ Critical Methodologies, 5, 447-471.
26.
Ives, P. (2004). Language & hegemony in Gramsci. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
27.
James, B. (1999, August 5). English here, there and everywhere: Corporate and institutional Europe accelerates move to one tongue. International Herald Tribune, p. 22. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic database.
28.
Kachru, B. (1992). Teaching world Englishes. In B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
Kuisel, R. (2003). Debating Americanization: The case of France. In U. Beck, N. Szaider, & R. Winter (Eds.), Global America? (pp. 95-113). Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.
30.
Mathy, J.-P. (2000). French resistance: The French-American culture wars. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
Murphy, P., & Kraidy, M. (2003). International communication, ethnography, and the challenge of globalization. Communication Theory, 13, 304-323.
32.
Parameswaran, R. (1999). Western romance fiction as English-language media in postcolonial India. Journal of Communication, 49, 84-105.
33.
Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
34.
Pennycook, A. (2001). English in the world/The world in English. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context (pp. 78-89). London: Routledge.
35.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
Riding, A. (1992a, March 3). Coffee with roll, garçon, and hold your tongue. The New York Times, p. A4. Retrieved September 28, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic database.
37.
Riding, A. (1992b, July 11). A bas Anglais! From now on, it's the law!The New York Times, p. 3. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from LexisNexis Academic database.
38.
Schiffman, H.F. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.
39.
Schiller, H. (2000). Living in the number one country: Reflections from a critic of American empire. New York: Seven Stories Press.
40.
Schmidt, R. (2000). Language policy and identity politics in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41.
Simons, M. (1994, March 15). Ban English? French bicker on barricades . The New York Times, p. A1. Retrieved March 3, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic database.
42.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education-Or worldwide diversity and human rights. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Sonntag, S. (2003). The local politics of global English: Case studies in linguistic globalization. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
44.
Stempel, G.H. (1961). The prestige press covers the 1960 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 38, 157-163.
45.
Stephens, B. (2001, April 20)Taste-de gustibus: Ach! That English, it seduces tout le Monde. The Wall Street Journal, p. 17. Retrieved September 19, 2004, from ProQuest database.
46.
Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
The Wall Street Journal. (n.d.). Print: Circulation/audience-Personal profile. Retrieved April 1, 2004, from http://advertising.wsj.com/CircAud/circaud_persprof.htm
48.
Wasburn, P. (2002). The social construction of international news: We're talking about them, they're talking about us. Westport, CT: Praeger.
49.
Waxman, S. (1994, June 28). Unspeakable truths for the French. The Washington Post, p. B1. Retrieved October 4, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic database.
50.
Wiley, T. (1996). What happens after English is declared the official language of the United States? In D. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp. 177-195). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
51.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (Eds.). (1999). The discursive construction of national identity (A. Hirsch & R. Mitten, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
