How is English in the global context constructed in the print media discourse of American-owned prestige press newspapers? The author zeroes in on examples of explicit reflection on the American “situation” vis-à-vis the global hegemony of English. These were drawn from a 275-text data pool generated for the author’s recently published doctoral dissertation. A number of different themes emerged in the texts and excerpts analyzed here, most prominently that of English monolingualism as potentially compromising American national security and economic competitiveness. Several texts also focused on a great paradox: tremendous American linguistic diversity and widespread English monolingualism in the United States. Perhaps the most interesting theme that emerged was what the author terms wistful regret: Americans reflecting with considerable melancholy on how they saw the hegemony of English as inhibiting their incentive and opportunity to become multilingual.
Ahmad, A. (1992). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. London: Verso.
2.
Alba, R., Logan, J., Lutz, A., & Stults, B. (2002). Only English by the third generation? Loss and preservation of the mother tongue among the grandchildren of contemporary immigrants. Demography, 39(3), 467-484.
3.
Annamalai, E. (2003). Reflections on a language policy for multilingualism. Language Policy, 2, 113-132.
4.
Bgoya, W. (2001). The effect of globalisation in African and the choice of language in publishing. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue Internationale de l’Education, 47(3-4), 283-292.
5.
Blackledge, A. (2002). The discursive construction of national identity in multilingual Britain. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(1), 67-87.
6.
Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In J. Blommaert (Ed.), Language ideological debates (pp. 1-38). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
7.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (Richard Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Carliner, G. (2000). The language ability of U.S. immigrants: Assimilation and cohort effects. International Migration Review, 34(1), 158-164.
9.
Cliett, V. (2000). Between the lines: Reconciling diversity and Standard English. In R. D. Gonzalez & I. Melis (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the Official English movement—Education and the social implications of official language (Vol. 1, pp. 297-317). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Cox, R. (1993). Gramsci, hegemony, and international relations: An essay in method. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, historical materialism, and international relations (pp. 49-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Crawford, J. (2000). At war with diversity: US language policy in an age of anxiety. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
12.
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Cummins, J. (2000). Foreword. In R. D. Gonzalez & I. Melis (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the Official English movement—Education and the social implications of official language (Vol. 1, pp. ix-xx). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Demont-Heinrich, C. (2003). English-language hegemony and the question of linguistic reciprocity in a globalizing world. Unpublished raw data.
15.
Demont-Heinrich, C. (2006). English by popular demand: American prestige press discourses on language and globalization in a post cold war world. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
16.
de Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17.
Dorfman, A. (1998, June 26). Two languages, double the fun. International Herald Tribune, p. 9-9. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
18.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
19.
Fowler, E. (1991, June 11). Managers lack fluency in languages. The New York Times, p. D6-D6. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
20.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. New York: Routledge.
21.
Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English: A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London: British Council.
22.
Graddol, D. (2006). English next: Why global English may mean the end of “English as a foreign language.” Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.britishcouncil.org/files/documents/learning-research-english-next.pdf
23.
Hall, S. (1975). Introduction. In A. C. H. Smith (Ed.), Paper voices: The popular press and social change 1935-1965 (pp. 11-24). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
Hall, S. (1980). Introduction to media studies at the centre. In S. Hallet al. (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 117-121). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
25.
Hall, S., Chritcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clark, J., & Roberts, B. (1981). The social production of news: Mugging in the media. In S. Cohen & J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news: Social problems, deviance and the mass media (pp. 335-367). London: Sage Ltd.
26.
Hayward, F., & Siaya, L. (2001). Public experience, attitudes, and knowledge: A report on two national surveys about international education. Retrieved May 3, 2002, from http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/2001-intl-report.pdf
27.
Holborow, M. (1999). The politics of English: A Marxist view of language. London: Sage Ltd.
28.
Honan, W. (1996, October 9). Language study shifts again: Chinese is up, Russian down. The New York Times, p. B9-B9. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
29.
Hyrkstedt, I., & Kalaja, P. (1998). Attitudes toward English and its functions in Finland: A discourse-analytic study. World Englishes, 17(3), 345-357.
30.
James, B. (2001, February 12). Online, and off, English’s hegemony is challenged globally. International Herald Tribune, p. 17-17. Retrieved October 7, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
31.
Kachru, B. (1992). Teaching world Englishes. In B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue (2nd ed., pp. 355-366). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
32.
Lambert, R. (1992/1993). Foreign language planning in the United States. In S. Jane & C. A. Morfit (Eds.), Language and international studies: A Richard Lambert perspective. College Park, MD: National Foreign Language Center.
33.
Macedo, D., Dendrinos, B., & Gounair, P. (2003). The hegemony of English. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
34.
McLane, D. (2001, January 28). A language fan loves to get lost in translation. The New York Times, Travel, p. 1-1. Retrieved October 15, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
35.
Mohn, T. (2000, October 11). All aboard the foreign language express. The New York Times, p. G1-G1. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
36.
Murphy, P., & Kraidy, M. (2003). International communication, ethnography, and the challenge of globalization. Communication Theory, 13(3), 304-323.
37.
Nunberg, G. (2001, December 9). The answer is on the tip of our many tongues. The Washington Post, p. B2-B2. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
38.
Parameswaran, R. (1999, Summer). Western romance fiction as English-language media in postcolonial India. Journal of Communication, pp. 84-105.
39.
Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
40.
Pennycook, A. (2001). English in the world/the world in English. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context (pp. 78-89). London: Routledge.
41.
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2003). Views of a changing world. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
Phillipson, R. (1997). Linguistic imperialism (4th ed.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
Phillipson, R. (2003). English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. London: Routledge.
44.
Phillipson, R. (2004, September). Figuring out the Englishisation of Europe. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, London.
45.
Schemo, D. J. (2001, April 16). Use of English as a world tongue is booming, and so is concern. The New York Times, p. A1-A1. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
46.
Schiffman, H. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.
47.
Schiller, H. (2000). Living in the number one country: Reflections from a critic of American empire. New York: Seven Stories.
48.
Schmidt, R. (2000). Language policy and identity politics in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
49.
Simon, P. (1980). The tongue-tied American: Confronting the foreign language crisis. New York: Continuum.
50.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education—Or worldwide diversity and human rights. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Stempel, G. (1961). The prestige press covers the 1960 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 38, 157-163.
52.
Tagliabue, J. (1998, July 19). In Europe, steps toward a common language. The New York Times, p. 4-4. Retrieved September 23, 2004, from ProQuest.
53.
Tagliabue, J. (2002, May 18). In Europe, going global means, alas, English. The New York Times, p. 15-15. Retrieved October 13, 2004, from LexisNexis.
54.
Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
Trimnell, E. (2003). Why you need a foreign language—And how to learn one: English-speaking professionals and the global challenge. Cincinnati, OH: Beechmont Crest.
56.
The Wall Street Journal print: Circulation/audience—U.S. edition and region circulation. (n.d.) Retrieved April 1, 2004, from http://advertising.wsj.com/CircAud/circaud_national.htm
57.
Wasburn, P. (2002). The social construction of international news: We’re talking about them, they’re talking about us. Westport, CT: Praeger.
58.
Welles, E. (2004). Foreign language enrollments in United States institutions of higher education. ADFL Bulletin, 35(2-3), 7-26.
59.
Who owns what. (n.d.). Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved, March 31, 2004, from http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/
60.
Wiley, T. (1996). What happens after English is declared the official language of the United States? In D. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp. 177-195). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamin.
61.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (1999). The discursive construction of national identity (A. Hirsch & R. Mitten, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
62.
The world agrees—Children need English to compete. (2003, June 9). U.S. Newswire. Retrieved February 8, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
63.
Yardley, J. (2001, April 23). Our lingua franca. The Washington Post, p. C2-C2. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic.
64.
Youngblood, R. (2001, March 5). Easy ways to get it almost right. International Herald Tribune, p. 14-14. Retrieved October 3, 2004, from LexisNexis Academic Database.
