American Cultural Insularity and Global Online Video: Are Netflix,Amazon Prime and Other Digital Streaming Platforms Broadening Americans’ Foreign Film Consumption Horizons?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022
American Cultural Insularity and Global Online Video: Are Netflix,Amazon Prime and Other Digital Streaming Platforms Broadening Americans’ Foreign Film Consumption Horizons?
The United States has long been characterized by American Cultural Insularity (ACI). According to a theory of ACI that I have developed in previous work (
Author 2019,
2020), compared to most people in most other countries, Americans tend to consume much more of their own cultural media products and much fewer cultural media products produced in other countries than people in other countries consume. This paper compares long-running and deeply-entrenched American resistance to foreign and non-English language film in movie theaters to the (lack of) popularity of foreign, non-American and feature film-length content originally produced in a language other than English on major digital online video streaming platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime and Google Video. It does so primarily via a discussion of, and analysis of, digital online video streaming platform popularity charts compiled by flixpatrol.com (Flixpatrol), a Netherlands-based online video streaming data collection and analysis web site/company. An analysis of Flixpatrol's Top Streaming in the United States popularity chart for 10 major digital online video streaming platforms from February 2020 to September 2021 shows little evidence of a movement among American-based consumers toward more consumption of foreign, non-English-language feature length films.
BiltereystD. (1991). Resisting American hegemony: A comparative analysis of the reception of domestic and US fiction. European Journal of Communication, 6(4), 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006004005
2.
Boyd-BarrettO., & MirrleesT. (Eds.). (2019). Media Imperialism: Continuity and Change. Rowman & Littlefield.
3.
ChalabyJ. (2006). American Cultural primacy in a new Media order: A European perspective. International Communication Gazette, 68(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048506060114
4.
CoatesC.PeasleeR. (2005). Demystifying the ‘Indie’: Transaction and transnational imagination in United States cinema. Paper presented at Union for Democratic Communication Conference -- Against the neoliberal tide: Media and democracy in the 21st century.
5.
CrothersL. (2011). The cultural roots of isolationism and internationalism in American foreign policy. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 9(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2011.550774
6.
CrystalD. (2001). The future of englishes. In BurnsA.CoffinC. (Eds.), Analyzing English in a global context (pp. 53–64). Psychology Press.
7.
Demont-Heinrich, C. (2019). New global music distribution system, same old linguistic hegemony? Analyzing English on Spotify in O. Boyd-Barrett and Tanner Mirrlees (eds) Media Imperialism: Continuity and Change. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
8.
Demont-Heinrich, C. (2020). When the exception to the rule proves the rule: Parasite's paradoxical Academy Awards best picture win and American Cultural Insularity in the Center (ACIC). Journal of Communication Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177.01968599221120087.
9.
DonovanP. (2004). Researcher says Americans are “deluded” regarding what they know about the rest of the world. University Buffalo News Center.
FlewT. (2020). Globalization, neo-globalization and post-globalization: The challenge of populism and the return of the national. Global Media and Communication, 16(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766519900329
12.
Video streaming market size, share & trends analysis report by streaming type, by solution, by platform, by service, by revenue model, by deployment type, by user, by region, and segment Forecasts, 2021–2028. Grand View Research. Retrieved fromhttps://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/video-streaming-market
JinD. Y. (2019). Globalization and media in the digital platform age. Routledge.
17.
KatzE.LiebesT. (1987). Decoding dallas: Notes from a cross-cultural study. Television: The Critical View, 419–433.
18.
KuiselR. (2003). Debating americanization: The case of France. In BeckU.SznaiderN.WinterR. (Eds.), Global America? The cultural consequences of globalization (pp. 95–113. Liverpool University Press.
19.
KupchanC. A. (2020). Isolationism: A History of America’s Efforts to Shield Itself from the World. Oxford University Press, USA.
MattelartA. (1979). Multinational corporations and the control of culture: The ideological apparatuses of imperialism (No. 26). Humanities Press, Harvester Press.
22.
MirrleesT. (2013). Global entertainment media: Between cultural imperialism and cultural globalization. Routledge.
23.
PhillipsonR. (2008). Lingua franca or lingua frankensteinia? English in European integration and globalisation 1. World Englishes, 27(2), 250–267.
24.
PieterseJ. (2003). Hyperpower exceptionalism: Globalization the American way. In BeckU.SznaiderN.WinterR. (Eds.), Global America? The cultural consequences of globalization (pp. 67–94). Liverpool University Press.
25.
RazzanteR. J.OrbeM. P. (2018). Two sides of the same coin: Conceptualizing dominant group theory in the context of co-cultural theory. Communication Theory, 28(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx008
26.
RitzerG.StillmanT. (2003). Assessing McDonaldization, americanization and globalization. In BeckU.SznaiderN.WinterR. (Eds.), Global America? The cultural consequences of globalization (pp. 30–48). Liverpool University Press.
27.
SchillerH. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. International Arts and Sciences Press.
28.
SchillerH. (2000). Living in the number one country: Reflections from a critic of American empire. Seven Stories Press.
29.
SegraveK. (2004). Foreign films in America: A history. McFarland.
30.
StraubhaarJ. D. (1991). Beyond media imperialism: Assymetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 8(1), 39–59.
31.
TananuraksakulN. (2010). An exploration of English as the medium and the message in the global village: A case study. International Journal of Communication, 4, 18.
32.
TimbergS. (2004). In an insular state of mind: Seen a foreign film or read a translated book lately?America seems to be closing its borders to international culture – and understanding. Los Angeles Times, Feb. 29.
WinterR. (2003). Global media, cultural change and the transformation of the local: The contribution of cultural studies to a sociology of hybrid formations. In BeckU.SznaiderN.WinterR. (Eds.), Global America? The cultural consequences of globalization (pp. 206–221). Liverpool University Press.
