To reduce fuel poverty and work towards a fair energy transition, it is important to know the ‘essential goods basket’ of each household. This is then used to determine the income needed to live decently, taking prices into account. One component of this essential basket is a decent level of energy for housing. The main objective of this study is to estimate, using French public data, the minimum quantity of energy that would enable each household to meet its basic needs in its home, depending on its characteristics, its home and its location. Estimating minimum energy levels obviously reveals significant differences depending on the thermal quality of the dwelling (measured by an EPC rating). The type of dwelling and its surface area also have an impact. Household composition, on the other hand, does not appear to be statistically significant.
AlasseurC.ChatonC.HubertE.2022. “Optimal Contracts under Adverse Selection for Staple Goods Such as Energy: Effectiveness of In-Kind Insurance.”Energy Economics106: 105785.
2.
BaudryM.BeckS.ChaputK., et al. 2017. “Bilan énergétique de la france pour 2017.”Technical Report, Commissariat général au développement durable – Service de la donnée et des études statistiques.
3.
BelaïdF.GarciaT.2016. “Understanding the Spectrum of Residential Energy-Saving Behaviours: French Evidence Using Disaggregated Data.”Energy Economics57: 204–214.
4.
Ben Rejeb-MzahI.BediouiM.LarhchimA.Ben JemaaY.2023. “Machine Learning to Predict French Residential Buildings’ Energy Performance.”SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4403187.
5.
Brand-CorreaL. I.SteinbergerJ. K.2017. “A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction from Energy Use.”Ecological Economics141: 43–52.
6.
BrounenD.KokN.QuigleyJ. M.2012. “Residential Energy Use and Conservation: Economics and Demographics.”European Economic Review56 (5): 931–45.
7.
CarpenterM. J.PerrierB.2023. “Yellow Vests: Anti-Austerity, Pro-Democracy, and Popular (Not Populist).”Frontiers in Political Science5: 1037942.
8.
ChatonC.2025. “Impact of Public Policies on the Dynamics of Energy Retrofit and Fuel Poverty in Mainland France.”Energy and Buildings332: 115348.
9.
ChatonC.GuillerminetM.-L.2025. “Une couverture contre la précaritéénergétique.”Revue économique76 (4): 567–623.
10.
DayR.WalkerG.SimcockN.2016. “Conceptualising Energy Use and Energy Poverty Using a Capabilities Framework.”Energy Policy93: 255–64.
11.
DeemingC.2010. “The Historical Development of Family Budget Standards in Britain, from the 17th Century to the Present.”Social Policy & Administration44: 765–88.
12.
DoyalL.GoughI.1991. A Theory of Human Need. Macmillan.
13.
DriscollD.2023. “Populism and Carbon Tax Justice: The Yellow Vest Movement in France.”Social Problems70 (1): 143–63.
14.
FisherG. M.2007. “An Overview of Recent Work on Standard Budgets in the United States and Other Anglophone Countries.”US Department of Health & Human Services-Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
15.
FullertonT. M.ResendezI. M.WalkeA. G.2015. “Upward Sloping Demand for a Normal Good? Residential Electricity in Arkansas.”International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy5 (4): 1065–72.
16.
GillesL.CovoloC.ConcialdiP.MathA.2014. “Budgets de référence onpes.” Technical Report, CREDOC, Ires.
17.
GiraudetL.-G.BourgeoisC.QuirionP.2020. “Efficacitééconomique et effets distributifs de long-terme des politiques de rénovation énergétique des logements.”Économie & prévision217 (1): 43–63.
18.
GivernetO.PiednoirS.2023. “Energy Sobriety: A Collective Effort.”Revue de l’Energie668: 5–12.
19.
GrossouvreM.GénotB.RaoufS.2023. Modèle de prédiction des dpe à l’adresse v1. Urban Retrofit Business Services (U.R.B.S.).
20.
GuoZ.ZhouK.ZhangC.LuX.ChenW.YangS.2018. “Residential Electricity Consumption Behavior: Influencing Factors, Related Theories and Intervention Strategies.”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews81 (1): 399–412.
21.
HaasR.1997. “Energy Efficiency Indicators in the Residential Sector: What Do We Know and What Has to Be Ensured?”Energy Policy25: 789–802.
22.
KamenetzkyM.1981. “The Economics of the Satisfaction of Needs.”Human Systems Management2 (2): 101–111.
23.
KazaN.2010. “Understanding the Spectrum of Residential Energy Consumption: A Quantile Regression Approach.”Energy Policy38 (11): 6574–85.
24.
Kemp-BenedictE.2013. “Material Needs and Aggregate Demand.”The Journal of Socio-Economics44: 16–26.
25.
KikstraJ. S.MastrucciA.MinJ.RiahiK.RaoN. D.2021. “Decent Living Gaps and Energy Needs around the World.”Environmental Research Letters16 (9): 095006.
26.
Le médiateur national de l’énergie. 2023. “Baromètre énergie-info 2023.” Technical Report, Le médiateur national de l’énergie.
27.
Le médiateur national de l’énergie. 2024. “Baromètre énergie-info 2024.” Technical Report, Le médiateur national de l’énergie.
28.
Le SaoutR.MesquiB.RathleJ.-P.2022. “Le parc de logements par classe de consommation énergétique.”Observatoire national de la rénovation énergétique (ONRE).
29.
LeeS.-J.SongS.-Y.2022. “Determinants of Residential End-Use Energy: Effects of Buildings, Sociodemographics, and Household Appliances.”Energy and Buildings257: 111782.
30.
LelièvreM.2022. “Les budgets de référence en milieu rural, en ville moyenne et en métropole du Grand Paris – Nouvelles pistes pour l’inclusion sociale.”Conseil national des politiques de lutte contre la pauvreté et l’exclusion sociale (CNLE).
31.
Max-NeefM. A.ElizaldeA.HopenhaynM.1991. Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. Apex Press.
32.
Merly-AlpaT.2023. “Comment mesurer ? l’exemple de la rénovation énergétique des logements.”Statistique et Société11 (1): 11–22.
33.
Merly-AlpaT.RiedingerN.BaudryM.2020. “Le parc de logement par classe de consommation.” Technical Report, Ministère de la transition écologique.
34.
NarayanP. K.SmythR.PrasadA.2007. “Electricity Consumption in G7 Countries: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of Residential Demand Elasticities.”Energy Policy35 (9): 4485–94.
35.
ONPE. 2017. “Tableau de bord de la précaritéénergétique, édition 2017.” Technical Report, Observatoire National de la Précarité Energétique.
36.
ONPE. 2018. “Tableau de bord de la précaritéénergétique, édition 2018.” Technical Report, Observatoire National de la Précarité Energétique.
37.
ONPES. 2015. “Les budgets de référence : une méthode d’évaluation des besoins pour une participation effective à la vie sociale.” Technical Report, Observatoire national de la pauvreté et de l’exclusion sociale.
38.
PachauriS.SprengD.2004. “Energy Use and Energy Access in Relation to Poverty.”Economic and Political Weekly39 (3): 271–78.
39.
PaulA.BaumhöggerE.ElsnerA., et al. 2022. “Impact of Aging on the Energy Efficiency of Household Refrigerating Appliances.”Applied Thermal Engineering205: 117992.
40.
PreußeH.2012. “Budgets on Managing Household Finance.”International Journal of Consumer Studies36: 602–610.
41.
RaoN. D.BaerP.2012. “‘Decent Living’ Emissions: A Conceptual Framework.”Sustainability4: 656–81.
42.
RaoN. D.MinJ.2018. “Decent Living Standards: Material Prerequisites for Human Wellbeing.”Social Indicators Research138: 225–44.
43.
SenA.2014. “Development as Freedom (1999).” In The Globalization and Development Reader: Perspectives on Development and Global Change, edited by RobertsJ. T.HiteA. B.ChorevN.John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
