Oil and gas production is a major source of public revenue in many US regions, but uncertainty exists over the future of demand for hydrocarbons. We model how oil and gas production and related government revenue change in five western US basins depending on future oil and natural gas prices under three scenarios of climate policy ambition. We find that the Green River and San Juan basins experience production declines across all scenarios, while production in the Bakken, Permian, and Powder River basins are more dependent on prices. Government revenue generally follows the direction of production, but these relationships are not directly proportional. Under the lower price scenarios, revenue declines more steeply than production because it reflects both production and prices, which both decline. Long-term permanent funds, which are in place across all the states we examine, provide an important fiscal cushion for school districts, their primary beneficiary.
AgertonM.HartleyP.MedlockK.IIITemzelides.T.2015. “Employment Impacts of Upstream Oil and Gas Investment in the United States.” IMF Working Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
2.
AlexeevM.ConradR.2009. “The Elusive Curse of Oil.” Review of Economics and Statistics91: 586–8. doi:10.1162/rest.91.3.586.
3.
BartikA. W.CurrieJ.GreenstoneM.KnittelC. R. (2019). The Local Economic and Welfare Consequences of Hydraulic Fracturing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4): 105–155. doi: 10.1257/app.20170487
Blended Finance Taskforce and Centre for Sustainability Transitions. 2022. Making Climate Capital Work: Unlocking $8.5bn for South Africa’s Just Energy Transition. South Africa: Centre for Sustainability Transitions.
6.
bp. 2021. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021. London: bp.
7.
BrownJ.2014. Production of Natural Gas from Shale in Local Economies: A Resource Blessing or Curse?Kansas, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
8.
BrownJ.2015. “The Response of Employment to Changes in Oil and Gas Exploration and Drilling.” Economic Review100: 57–81.
9.
BrownJ. P.FitzgeraldT.WeberJ. G.2016. “Capturing Rents from Natural Resource Abundance: Private Royalties from US Onshore Oil & Gas Production.” Resource and Energy Economics46: 23–38. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.07.003.
10.
BrownJ. P.FitzgeraldT.WeberJ. G.2019. “Does Resource Ownership Matter? Oil and Gas Royalties and the Income Effect of Extraction.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists6: 1039–64. doi:10.1086/705505.
11.
BrownJ. P.ManiloffP.ManningD.2020. “Spatially Variable Taxation and Resource Extraction: The Impact of State Oil Taxes on Drilling in the US.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management103: 102354. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102354.
12.
CecireM.2019. “The POWER Initiative: Energy Transition as Economic Development.” CRS Report No. R46105. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
13.
ChaM.PastorM.WanderM.SaddJ.Morello-Frosch.R.2019. A Roadmap to an Equitable Low-Carbon Future: Four Pillars for a Just Transition. Climate Equity Network.
14.
ConsidineT.WatsonR.BlumsackS.2010. The Economic Impacts of the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Play: An Update. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
15.
ConsidineT.WatsonR.BlumsackS.2011. The Pennsylvania Marcellus Natural Gas Industry: Status, Economic Impacts, and Future Potential. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
16.
DeckK.2008. Projecting the Economic Impact of the Fayetteville Shale Play for 2008–2012. Fayetteville: Center for Business and Economic Research, University of Arkansas.
FeyrerJ.MansurE. T.SacerdoteB. .2017. “Geographic Dispersion of Economic Shocks: Evidence from the Fracking Revolution.” American Economic Review107: 1313–34. doi:10.1257/aer.20151326.
19.
FreemanD. G.2009. “The ‘Resource Curse’ and Regional US Development.” Applied Economics Letters16: 527–30. doi:10.1080/13504850601032107.
20.
GourleyP.MadoniaG. (2018). Resource booms and crime: Evidence from oil and gas production in Colorado. Resource and Energy Economics, 54: 37–52. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.07.001.
21.
GreensponJ.RaimiD.2022. “Matching Geographies and Job Skills in the Energy Transition.” Working Paper 22-25. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
22.
GulleyD. A.1982. “Models and Mitigation in Energy Boom-Towns.” Resources and Energy4: 87–104. doi:10.1016/0165-0572(82)90021-4.
23.
GylfasonT.2001. “Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development.” European Economic Review45: 847–59. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00127-1.
24.
HafsteadM. A. C.WilliamsR. C.ChenY.2022. “Environmental Policy, Full-Employment Models, and Employment: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists9: 199–234. doi:10.1086/716598.
25.
HaggertyJ.GudeP. H.DeloreyM.Rasker.R.2014. “Long-Term Effects of Income Specialization in Oil and Gas Extraction: The US West, 1980–2011.” Energy Economics45: 186–95. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.06.020.
26.
HaggertyJ. H.HaggertyM. N.RoemerK.RoseJ.2018. “Planning for the Local Impacts of Coal Facility Closure: Emerging Strategies in the US West.” Resources Policy57: 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.010.
27.
HintzO.UebelhorE.GoldE.2021. Inventory of State Solar Property Tax Treatments (No. 54). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy.
28.
International Energy Agency. 2022a. World Energy Employment. Paris, France: IEA.
29.
International Energy Agency. 2022b. World Energy Outlook 2022. Paris, France: IEA.
30.
IHS. 2012. America’s New Energy Future: The Unconventional Oil and Gas Revolution and the US Economy. London: IHS Markit.
31.
IHS Markit. 2020. The Future of Work: The Influence of New Technologies on Employment and Demographic Trends in the Oil, Natural Gas, and Petrochemical Industries. London: IHS Markit.
32.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
JacobsenG. D.ParkerD. P.2014. “The Economic Aftermath of Resource Booms: Evidence from Boomtowns in the American West.” The Economic Journal126: 1092–128. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12173.
34.
JamesA.2015. “US State Fiscal Policy and Natural Resources.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy7: 238–57. doi:10.1257/pol.20130211.
35.
JamesA.AadlandD.2011. “The Curse of Natural Resources: An Empirical Investigation of US Counties.” Resource and Energy Economics33: 440–53. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.05.006.
36.
JamesA. (2017). Natural resources and education outcomes in the United States. Resource and Energy Economics, 49: 150–164. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.04.004.
37.
Just Transition Centre. 2017. Just Transition: A Report for the OECD. Paris: Just Transition Centre.
38.
Just Transition Fund. 2020. National Economic Transition Platform. Just Transition Fund.
39.
KlasicM.SchomburgM.ArnoldG.YorkA.BaumM.CherinM.CliffS., et al. 2022. “A Review of Community Impacts of Boom-Bust Cycles in Unconventional Oil and Gas Development.” Energy Research & Social Science93: 102843. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102843.
40.
KrupnickA. J.EcharteI.2017. Economic Impacts of Unconventional Oil and Gas Development. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
41.
LashitewA. A.RossM. L.WerkerE.2021. “What Drives Successful Economic Diversification in Resource-Rich Countries?” The World Bank Research Observer36: 164–96. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkaa001.
42.
LookW.RobertsonM.HigdonJ.ProppD.2021. Labor Policies to Enable Fairness for Workers and Communities in Transition (No. 21– 06). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and Environmental Defense Fund.
43.
ManiloffP.MastromonacoR. (2017). The local employment impacts of fracking: A national study. Resource and Energy Economics, 49: 62–85. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.04.005
44.
MarchandJ.WeberJ. G.2020. “How Local Economic Conditions Affect School Finances, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement: Evidence from the Texas Shale Boom.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management39: 36–63. doi:10.1002/pam.22171.
45.
MichaelsG.2011. “The Long Term Consequences of Resource-Based Specialisation.” The Economic Journal121: 31–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02402.x.
46.
MorrisA. C.KaufmanN.DoshiS.2021. “Revenue at Risk in Coal-Reliant Counties.” Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy2: 83–116. doi:10.1086/711307.
47.
MuehlenbachsL.SpillerE.TimminsC.2015. “The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development.” American Economic Review105: 3633–59. doi:10.1257/aer.20140079.
48.
MuttittG.KarthaS.2020. “Equity, Climate Justice and Fossil Fuel Extraction: Principles for a Managed Phase Out.” Climate Policy20: 1024–42. doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1763900.
49.
New Mexico State Investment Council. 2023. Land Grant Permanent Fund. Albequerque, NM: New Mexico State Investment Council.
50.
NewellR. G.RaimiD.2018a. “US State and Local Oil and Gas Revenue Sources and Uses.” Energy Policy112: 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.002.
51.
NewellR. G.Raimi.D.2018b. “The Fiscal Impacts of Increased US Oil and Gas Development on Local Governments.” Energy Policy117: 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.042.
52.
OuedraogoA.2012. “Local Economic Impact of Boom and Bust in Mineral Resource Extraction in the United States: A Spatial Econometrics Analysis.” Resources Policy50: 292–305. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.09.009.
53.
PapyrakisE.GerlaghR.2007. “Resource Abundance and Economic Growth in the United States.” European Economic Review51: 1011–39. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.04.001.
54.
PlumerB.2022. “Wealthy Nations Offer Indonesia $20 Billion to Curb Coal.” The New York Times, November11, 2022.
55.
PrestB. C.2022. “Supply-Side Reforms to Oil and Gas Production on Federal Lands: Modeling the Implications for CO2 Emissions, Federal Revenues, and Leakage.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists9: 681–720. doi:10.1086/718963.
56.
RaimiD.CampbellE.NewellR. G.PrestB.VillanuevaS.WingenrothJ.2022. Global Energy Outlook 2022: Turning Points and Tension in the Energy Transition. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
57.
RaimiD.CarleyS.KoniskyD.2022. “Mapping County-Level Vulnerability to the Energy Transition in US Fossil Fuel Communities.” Scientific Reports12: 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19927-6.
58.
RaimiD.GrubertE.HigdonJ.MetcalfG.PesekS.SinghD.2022. “The Fiscal Implications of the US Transition Away from Fossil Fuels.” Working Paper 22-3. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
RickmanD. S.WangH.WintersJ. V.2017. “Is Shale Development Drilling Holes in the Human Capital Pipeline?” Energy Economics62: 283–90. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.013.
61.
SachsJ. D.WarnerA. M.1995. “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth (No. w5398).” Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w5398.
62.
ScheerA.SchwarzM.HopkinsD.CaldecottB.2022. “Whose Jobs Face Transition Risk in Alberta? Understanding Sectoral Employment Precarity in an Oil-Rich Canadian Province.” Climate Policy22: 1016–32. doi:10.1080/14693062.2022.2086843.
63.
SegalP.2012. “How to Spend It: Resource Wealth and the Distribution of Resource Rents.” Energy Policy, Renewable Energy in China51: 340–8. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.029.
64.
UebelhorE.HintzO.GoldE.2021. Inventory of State Wind Property Tax Treatments (No. 55). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy.
65.
US Census Bureau. 2022. County Business Patterns: 2020. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
66.
WeberJ. G.2012. “The Effects of a Natural Gas Boom on Employment and Income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming.” Energy Economics34: 1580–88. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.013.
67.
WeberJ. G. (2014). A decade of natural gas development: The makings of a resource curse?Resource and Energy Economics, 37: 168–183. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.013.
68.
WeberJ. G.BurnettJ. W.XiarchosI. M.2016. “Broadening Benefits from Natural Resource Extraction: Housing Values and Taxation of Natural Gas Wells as Property.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management35: 587–614. doi:10.1002/pam.21911.
69.
WeberJ. G.HitajC.2015. “What Can We Learn about Shale Gas Development from Land Values? Opportunities, Challenges, and Evidence from Texas and Pennsylvania.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review44: 40–58. doi:10.1017/S1068280500010212.
70.
WeinsteinA. L.PartridgeM. D.TsvetkovaA.2018. “Follow the Money: Aggregate, Sectoral and Spatial Effects of an Energy Boom on Local Earnings.” Resources Policy55: 196–209. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.11.018.
ZuoN.SchiefferJ.BuckS.2018. “The Effect of the Oil and Gas Boom on Schooling Decisions in the US.” Resource and Energy Economics55: 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.10.002.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
