This state of the art review focuses on bioethical questions and considerations from research findings and methodological issues, including design and recruitment of participants, in studies related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitation in Black individuals. Ethical concerns identified were applied to otolaryngology with recommendations for improving health inequities within subspecialties.
Data Sources
An internet search through PubMed, CINAHL, and socINDEX was conducted to identify articles on COVID-19 vaccine hesitation among the Black population between 2020 and 2021.
Review Methods
A systematic review approach was taken to search and analyze the research on this topic, which was coupled with expert analysis in identifying and classifying vital ethical considerations.
Conclusions
The most common COVID-19 vaccine hesitation factors were related to the development of the vaccine, mistrust toward government agencies, and misconceptions about safety and side effects. These findings raised bioethical concerns around mistrust of information, low health literacy, insufficient numbers of Black participants in medical research, and the unique positions of health professionals as trusted sources. These bioethical considerations can be applied in otolaryngology and other health-related areas to aid the public in making informed medical decisions regarding treatments, which may reduce health inequalities among Black Americans and other racial and ethnic minority groups.
Implications for Practice
Addressing ethical questions by decreasing mistrust, tailoring information for specific populations, increasing minority representation in research, and using health professionals as primary sources for communicating health information and recommendations may improve relationships with Black communities and increase acceptance of new knowledge and therapies such as COVID-19 vaccination.
AnaeleBIDoranCMcIntireR. Visualizing COVID-19 mortality rates and African-American populations in the USA and Pennsylvania. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021;8(6):1356-1363. doi:10.1007/s40615-020-00897-2
AndersonRMVegvariCTruscottJCollyerBS. Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination. Lancet. 2020;396(10263):1614-1616. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32318-7
4.
KrouseHJ. COVID-19 and the widening gap in health inequity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(1):65-66. doi:10.1177/0194599820926463
5.
LaurencinCT. Addressing justified vaccine hesitancy in the Black community. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021;8(3):543-546. doi:10.1007/s40615-021-01025-4
6.
MartinLRWilliamsSLHaskardKBDimatteoMR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005;1(3):189-199.
7.
HammondsEMReverbySM. Toward a historically informed analysis of racial health disparities since 1619. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(10):1348-1349. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305262
8.
HoffmanKMTrawalterSAxtJROliverMN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between Blacks and Whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(16):4296-4301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516047113
9.
AlsanMWanamakerM. Tuskegee and the health of Black men. Q J Econ. 2018;133(1):407-455. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx029
10.
VolschoTW. Sterilization racism and pan-ethnic disparities of the past decade: the continued encroachment on reproductive rights. Wicazo Sa Review. 2010;25(1):17-31. doi:10.1353/wic.0.0053
11.
BhattacharyaG. Contextualizing disparity reduction in rural health care: a call to action. J Fam Soc Work. 2013;16(1):86-100. doi:10.1080/10522158.2012.736079
12.
ScharffDPMathewsKJJacksonPHoffsuemmerJMartinEEdwardsD. More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21(3):879-897. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0323
13.
BergusGRLevinIPElsteinAS. Presenting risks and benefits to patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(8):612-617. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11001.x
14.
HershLSalzmanBSnydermanD. Health literacy in primary care practice. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92(2):118-124.
15.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
16.
CookTEGronkeP. The skeptical American: revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. J Polit. 2005;67(3):784-803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
17.
LeeCWhettenKOmerSPanWSalmonD. Hurdles to herd immunity: distrust of government and vaccine refusal in the US, 2002-2003. Vaccine. 2016;34(34):3972-3978. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.048
18.
MercadanteARLawAV. Will they, or won’t they? Examining patients’ vaccine intention for flu and COVID-19 using the health belief model. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(9):1596-1605. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.012
19.
WentzellERacilaAM. The social experience of participation in a COVID-19 vaccine trial: subjects’ motivations, others’ concerns, and insights for vaccine promotion. Vaccine. 2021;39(17):2445-2451. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.036
GatwoodJMcKnightMFiscusMHohmeierKCChisholm-BurnsM. Factors influencing likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination: a survey of Tennessee adults. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021;78(10):879-889. doi:10.1093/ajhp/zxab099
22.
WokoCSiegelLHornikR. An investigation of low COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans: the role of behavioral beliefs and trust in COVID-19 information sources. J Health Commun. 2020;25(10):819-826. doi:10.1080/10810730.2020.1864521
23.
Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Press; 2011. doi:10.17226/13058
PerrenoudBVelonakiV-SBodenmannPRameletA-S. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13(10):82-94. doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304
29.
CallaghanTMoghtaderiALueckJA, et al. Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. Soc Sci Med. 2021;272:113638. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113638
30.
NguyenLHJoshiADDrewDA, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake. MedRxiv. Published online February28, 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.02.25.21252402
31.
EarnshawVAEatonLAKalichmanSCBrousseauNMHillECFoxAB. COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(4):850-856. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaa090
32.
LatkinCADaytonLYiGColonBKongX. Mask usage, social distancing, racial, and gender correlates of COVID-19 vaccine intentions among adults in the US. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246970
33.
KutnerMGreenburgEJinYPaulsenC. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults. National Center for Education Statistics. Published 2006. Accessed June 18, 2021. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483.pdf
34.
StosselLMSegarNGliattoPFallarRKaraniR. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(9):1165-1170. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2046-0
35.
HershLSalzmanBSnydermanD. Health literacy in primary care practice. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92(2):118-124.
36.
HutchinsonNBairdGLGargM. Examining the reading level of internet medical information for common internal medicine diagnoses. Am J Med. 2016;129(6):637-639. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.008
37.
SafeerRSKeenanJ. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(3):463-468.
38.
EloyJALiSKasabwalaKAgarwalNHansberryDRBaredesSSetzenM. Readability of assessment of patient education materials on major otolaryngology association websites. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(5):848-854.
39.
KasabwalaKAgarwalNHansberryDRBaredesSEloyJA. Readability of assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(3):466-471.
40.
WongKLeviJR. Readability trends of online information by the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(1):96-102.
41.
WongKGiladACohenMBKirkeDNJalisiSM. Patient education materials assessment tool for laryngectomy health information. Head Neck. 2017;39:2256-2263.
42.
KongKHuA. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(2):272-278.
43.
CzechHDrumlCWeindlingP. Medical ethics in the 70 years after the Nuremberg Code, 1947 to the present. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018;130(suppl 3):159-253. doi:10.1007/s00508-018-1343-y
44.
EmanuelEJ. Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2004.
45.
DormanCPereraACondonC, et al. Factors associated with willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in a large convenience sample. J Community Health. 2021;46(5):1013-1019. doi:10.1007/s10900-021-00987-0
46.
BurgerAEReitherENMamelundSELimS. Black-white disparities in 2009 H1N1 vaccination among adults in the United States: a cautionary tale for the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine. 2021;39(6):943-951. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.069
SolerZMMaceJCLitvackJRSmithTL. Chronic rhinosinusitis, race, and ethnicity. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012;26(2):110-116. doi:10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3741
50.
PittmanCARouraRPriceCLinFRMarroneNNiemanCL. Racial/ethnic and sex representation in US-based clinical trials of hearing loss management in adults: a systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2021;147(7):656-662. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0550
51.
AllenJDAbuelezamNNRoseRFontenotHB. Factors associated with the intention to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine among a racially/ethnically diverse sample of women in the USA. Transl Behav Med. 2021;11(3):785-792. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab014
52.
BogartLMOjikutuBOTyagiK, et al. COVID-19 related medical mistrust, health impacts, and potential vaccine hesitancy among Black americans living with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021;86(2):200-207. doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000002570
53.
MalikAAMcFaddenSAMElharakeJOmerSB. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100495. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495
GopichandranVChetlapalliSK. Dimensions and determinants of trust in health care in resource poor settings—a qualitative exploration. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69170. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069170
56.
MuvukaBCombsRMAyangeakaaSDAliNMWendelMLJacksonT. Health literacy in African-American communities: barriers and strategies. Health Lit Res Pract. 2020;4(3):e138-e143. doi:10.3928/24748307-20200617-01
57.
BushMLKaufmanMRShacklefordT. Adherence in the cancer care setting: a systematic review of patient navigation to traverse barriers. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(6):1222-1229.
58.
ShenMJPetersonEBCostas-MunizR, et al. The effects of race and racial concordance on patient-physician communication: a systematic review of the literature. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018;5(1):117-140. doi:10.1007/s40615-017-0350-4.
59.
TruesdaleCMBaughRFBrennerMJ, et al. Prioritizing diversity in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: Starting a conversation. Otolarygol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164(2):229-233.
ChapmanA. Nurse navigator: the missing piece of the head and neck cancer continuum. ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2011;29(2):6-7.
62.
BerteraEM. Storytelling slide shows to improve diabetes and high blood pressure knowledge and self-efficacy: three-year results among community dwelling older African Americans. Educational Gerontology. 2014;40(11):785-800. doi:10.1080/03601277.2014.894381
63.
RikardRVThompsonMSHeadRMcNeilCWhiteC. Problem posing and cultural tailoring. Health Promot Pract. 2011;13(5):626-636. doi:10.1177/1524839911416649
64.
BroussardBRadkinsJBComptonMT. Developing visually based, low-literacy health education tools for African Americans with psychotic disorders and their families. Community Ment Health J. 2014;50(6):629-636. doi:10.1007/s10597-013-9666-7
65.
CarpianoRM. Demographic differences in US adult intentions to receive a potential coronavirus vaccine and implications for ongoing study. MedRxiv. Published September9, 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.09.07.20190058
66.
DalyMRobinsonE. Willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the US: longitudinal evidence from a nationally representative sample of adults from April-October 2020. MedRxiv. Published online November30, 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.11.27.20239970
67.
DohertyIAPilkingtonWBrownL, et al. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in underserved communities of North Carolina. MedRxiv. Published February23, 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.02.21.21252163
68.
FisherKABloomstoneSJWalderJCrawfordSFouayziHMazorKM. Attitudes toward a potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(12):964-973. doi:10.7326/m20-3569
69.
GuidryJPDLaestadiusLIVragaEK, et al. Willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine with and without emergency use authorization. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(2):137-142. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.018
70.
HuynhHPSengerAR. A little shot of humility: intellectual humility predicts vaccination attitudes and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2021;51(4):449-460. doi:10.1111/jasp.12747
71.
KhubchandaniJSharmaSPriceJHWiblishauserMJSharmaMWebbFJ. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in the United States: a rapid national assessment. J Community Health. 2021;46(2):270-277. doi:10.1007/s10900-020-00958-x
72.
KrepsSPrasadSBrownsteinJS, et al. Factors associated with US adults’ likelihood of accepting COVID-19 vaccination. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(10):e2025594. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25594
73.
LatkinCDaytonLAYiG, et al. COVID-19 vaccine intentions in the United States, a social-ecological framework. Vaccine. 2021;39(16):2288-2294. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.058
74.
PatilUKostarevaUHadleyM, et al. Health literacy, digital health literacy, and COVID-19 pandemic attitudes and behaviors in US college students: implications for interventions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3301. doi:10.3390/ijerph18063301
75.
UnroeKTEvansRWeaverLRusyniakDBlackburnJ. Willingness of long-term care staff to receive a COVID-19 vaccine: a single state survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(3):593-599. doi:10.1111/jgs.17022
