One third of college students do not achieve aerobic activity levels recommended for physical and mental health. The web-based “I Can Be Active!” intervention was designed to help college students increase their physical activity. The intervention was grounded in the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework which emphasizes translating intention into sustainable action.
Objective:
The primary purpose was to evaluate the feasibility of the intervention with insufficiently active young adult college students. The secondary purposes were to describe the preliminary effects of the intervention on: (1) the M-PAC constructs and (2) physical activity.
Methods:
Twenty-one college students, ages 18 to 24, were enrolled in the pre-post quasi-experimental study to test the 8-week intervention during Spring 2021. Data were collected via self-report questionnaires, web-analytics, and interviews. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, acceptability, practicality, and implementation. Preliminary efficacy outcomes were self-report M-PAC constructs and physical activity. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, t tests, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, Hedge’s g, and thematic analysis.
Results:
Recruitment and retention rates were 70% and 71%, respectively. Participants reacted positively to the program, content, and features, except the manual entry step tracker and private social media group. Positive trends and significant increases were found in the regulatory and reflexive M-PAC constructs (self-regulation, habit, and identity) and physical activity.
Conclusions:
Findings support the feasibility and preliminary effects of the intervention for insufficiently active college students and highlight implications for intervention refinement. Future research will test intervention effectiveness using a randomized controlled trial with a larger diverse sample of college students.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed.US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
2.
HartsonKRHallLAChoateSA.Stressors and resilience are associated with well-being in young adult college students. J Am Coll Health. 2023;71(3):821-829. doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1908309
3.
CorderKWinpennyELoveRBrownHEWhiteMSluijsEV.Change in physical activity from adolescence to early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(8):496-503. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097330
4.
American College Health Association. American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment III: Undergraduate Student Executive Summary Fall 2021. American College Health Association; 2022.
5.
MaselliMWardPBGobbiECarraroA.Promoting physical activity among university students: a systematic review of controlled trials. Am J Health Promot. 2018;32(7):1602-1612. doi:10.1177/0890117117753798
6.
RhodesREJanssenIBredinSSDWarburtonDERBaumanA.Physical activity: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health. 2017;32(8):942-975. doi:10.1080/08870446.2017.1325486
7.
RhodesRECoxASayarR.What predicts the physical activity intention-behavior gap? A systematic review. Ann Behav Med. 2022;1(56):1-20. doi:10.1093/abm/kaab044
8.
VillantiACJohnsonALIlakkuvanVJacobsMAGrahamALRathJM.Social media use and access to digital technology in US young adults in 2016. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e196. doi:10.2196/jmir.7303
9.
TongHLCoieraELaranjoL.Using a mobile social networking app to promote physical activity: a qualitative study of users’ perspectives. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(12):e11439. doi:10.2196/11439
10.
LiuSHusbandCLaH, et al. Development of a self-guided web-based intervention to promote physical activity using the multi-process action control framework. Internet Interv. 2019;15:35-42. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2018.11.003
11.
HartsonKRDellaLJKingKMLiuSNewquistPNRhodesRE.Application of the IDEAS framework in adapting a web-based physical activity intervention for young adult college students. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(4):700. doi:10.3390/healthcare10040700
12.
RhodesRE.Multi-process action control in physical activity: a primer. Front Psychol. 2021;12:797484. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797484
13.
AjzenI. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: JKuhlJBeckmann, eds. Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1985:11-40.
14.
HollmanHSuiWRhodesRE.A feasibility randomized controlled trial of a multi-process action control web-based intervention that targets physical activity in mothers. Women Health. 2022;62(5):384-401. doi:10.1080/03630242.2022.2072050
15.
CoxARhodesRE.Increasing physical activity in empty nest and retired populations online: a randomized feasibility study. J Aging Phys Act. 2023;31:909-922. doi:10.1123/japa.2022-0285
16.
WillmsARhodesRELiuS.Effects of mobile-based financial incentive interventions for adults at risk of developing hypertension: feasibility randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:e36562. doi:10.2196/36562
17.
HusbandCJWharf-HigginsJRhodesRE.A feasibility randomized trial of an identity-based physical activity intervention among university students. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2019;7(1):128-146. doi:10.1080/21642850.2019.1600407
18.
BowenDJKreuterMSpringB, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452-457. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
19.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81-95. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
20.
AuxierBAnsdersonM.Social media use in 2021: a majority of Americans say they use YouTube and Facebook, while use of Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok is especially common among adults under 30. Published April 7, 2021. Accessed February 22, 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
21.
PetersenJMPrichardIKempsE.A comparison of physical activity mobile apps with and without existing web-based social networking platforms: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(8):e12687. doi:10.2196/12687
22.
FundingslandELJrFikeJCalvanoJBeachJLaiDHeS.Methodological guidelines for systematic assessments of health care websites using web analytics: tutorial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(4):e28291. doi:10.2196/28291
23.
RebarALMaherJPDoerksenSEElavskySConroyDE.Intention-behavior gap is wider for walking and moderate physical activity than for vigorous physical activity in university students. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(2):130-134. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.392
24.
RhodesREBlanchardCMMathesonDH.A multicomponent model of the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11(pt 1):119-137. doi:10.1348/135910705X52633
25.
ConnerMRhodesREMorrisBMcEachanRLawtonR.Changing exercise through targeting affective or cognitive attitudes. Psychol Health. 2011;26(2):133-149. doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.531570
26.
SniehottaFFScholzUSchwarzerR.Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health. 2005;20(2):143-160. doi:10.1080/08870440512331317670
27.
GardnerBAbrahamCLallyPDe BruijnG.Towards parsimony in habit measurement: testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):1-12. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-102
28.
de BruijnGJGardnerBvan OschLSniehottaFF.Predicting automaticity in exercise behaviour: the role of perceived behavioural control, affect, intention, action planning, and behaviour. Int J Behav Med. 2014;21(5):767-774. doi:10.1007/s12529-013-9348-4
29.
WilsonPMMuonS.Psychometric properties of the Exercise Identity Scale in a university sample. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;6(2):115-131. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2008.9671857
30.
GodinGShephardRJ.A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10(3):141-146.
31.
AmireaultSGodinGLacombeJSabistonCM.The use of the Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire in oncology research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:60. doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0045-7
32.
BraunVClarkeA.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
33.
JosephRPPekmeziDWLewisTDuttonGTurnerLWDurantNH.Physical activity and social cognitive theory outcomes of an internet-enhanced physical activity intervention for African American college students. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2013;6(2):1-18.
34.
KwanMFaulknerGBrayS.Evaluation of active transition, a website-delivered physical activity intervention for university students: pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(1):e16. doi:10.2196/resprot.2099
35.
GrimMHortzBPetosaR.Impact evaluation of a pilot web-based intervention to increase physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2011;25(4):227-230. doi:10.4278/ajhp.081216-ARB-307
36.
KaushalNRhodesRESpenceJCMeldrumJT.Increasing physical activity through principles of habit formation in new gym members: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51(4):578-586. doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9881-5
37.
Van LuchenePDelensC. The influence of social support specific to physical activity on physical activity among college and university students: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18(6):737-747. doi:10.1123/jpah.2020-0713
38.
Realyvásquez-VargasAMaldonado-MacíasAAArredondo-SotoKCBaez-LopezYCarrillo-GutiérrezTHernández-EscobedoG.The impact of environmental factors on academic performance of university students taking online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico. Sustainability. 2020;12(21):9194. doi:10.3390/su12219194
39.
BuFSteptoeAFancourtD. Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health. 2020;186:31-34. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036
40.
HaggerMS.Habit and physical activity: theoretical advances, practical implications, and agenda for future research. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:118-129. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.007
41.
SprangersMASchwartzCE.Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(11):1507-1515. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00045-3
42.
RhodesREBeauchampMRQuinlanADownsDSWarburtonDERBlanchardCM.Predicting the physical activity of new parents who participated in a physical activity intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2021;284:114221. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114221
43.
WrightCERhodesRERuggieroEWSheeranP.Benchmarking the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a metasynthesis. Health Psychol. 2021;40(11):811-821. doi:10.1037/hea0001118
44.
PrinceSAAdamoKBHamelMEHardtJGorberSCTremblayM.A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(1):56 . doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-56
