Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Student physical activity is associated with lower stress. Research gaps remain regarding the types of stress management behaviors students use and how these behaviors are associated with students’ activity levels. This study examined associations between physical activity and stress management behaviors among students (18-35 years). Students with overweight/obesity (n = 405) attending universities in 2 urban locations enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to promote healthy weight and completed the following baseline measurements: perceived stress, stress management behaviors, accelerometer-measured physical activity, and demographic characteristics. Perceived stress did not differ by physical activity status or race. A greater proportion of students meeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity guidelines used physically active stress management behaviors compared to those not meeting guidelines (74% vs 56%; P = .006), and students using physically active stress management had lower stress scores (13.1 vs 15.5; P = .003). Among Black and White students only (n = 306), a greater proportion of White students used physically active stress management behaviors compared to Black students (77% vs 62%, P = .013). Results indicate differences in stress management behaviors by student activity level and race. During times of high stress, colleges/universities might support students by promoting stress management and physical activity in tandem, and tailoring messages to student activity levels and demographic characteristics.

Keywords

perceived stress stress management physical activity college/university student

Evidence suggests that engaging in physically active stress management (eg, walking, jogging, lifting weights) can lead to alterations in cognitive function and neurotrophic pathways that enhance stress resilience . . .

Stress among college/university students poses a significant concern in the United States. The Stress in America Survey, conducted in 2017 by the American Psychological Association, found that young adults ages 18 to 38 years reported the highest levels of stress compared to older age groups.¹ Commonly reported young adult stressors include financial hardships, pressures of majors or careers, challenges with roommates or relationships, and family demands.² Furthermore, Black youth report greater exposure to stressful life events that can affect future academic, behavioral, and health outcomes.^3-5 Black youth are also more likely to experience social and physical environments that exacerbate, rather than protect against, these stressors.^6,7

Physical activity (PA) is important for physical and mental health.⁸ Studies show self-reported reductions in stress following acute bouts of PA.^9,10 Lazarus and Folkman coined the Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping in which there is an appraisal of the stressor and a coping response.¹¹ This coping response to managing stress can take many forms including both cognitive and behavioral strategies. Evidence suggests that engaging in physically active stress management (eg, walking, jogging, lifting weights) can lead to alterations in cognitive function and neurotrophic pathways that enhance stress resilience,^9,12,13 and that physical activity can be influenced by stress if individuals are engaging in physically activity stress management as a form of behavioral activation.¹⁴ Yet disparities exist in the prevalence of PA by gender and race with only 45% of Black females aged 18 to 29 years reporting any moderate or vigorous PA compared to more than 67% of White peers,¹⁵ pointing to the potential for differential stress outcomes by race.

There is little consensus regarding the theoretical mechanisms linking physical activity to stress reduction.¹⁶ Some potential hypothesized mechanisms include distraction, sense of mastery, or through biological mechanisms. Furthermore, limited research exists describing the extent to which diverse student populations use physically active strategies to manage stress. Previous studies have been conducted in non–university populations and/or focus on depression/anxiety rather than perceived stress. Since there is ample evidence that (1) students are experiencing unprecedented levels of stress^17,18 and (2) stress is inversely related to PA,^9,12,13 it is important to understand whether students use PA as a way to manage stress.

This study had 2 primary aims. Primary Aim 1 was to examine whether university students who met moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) guidelines (≥150 MVPA min/week) reported lower stress scores than those who did not meet guidelines. Sub-aims included examination of (1a) whether meeting MVPA guidelines was associated with use of physically active stress management behaviors, and (1b) whether use of physically active stress management behaviors was associated with lower stress scores. It was hypothesized that students meeting MVPA guidelines would report lower perceived stress than those not meeting guidelines, that students meeting MVPA guidelines would use more physically active behaviors to manage stress than those not meeting the guidelines, and that students who used physically active stress management behaviors would report lower stress scores. Primary Aim 2 was to examine differences in key outcomes between Black and White students, given the existence of racial disparities in PA prevalence and stress exposure. It was hypothesized that White students would report lower stress scores than Black students and that Black students would be less likely to use physically active stress management behaviors compared to White peers.

Methods

Sample

Participants were enrolled in the Healthy Body Healthy U (HBHU) randomized controlled trial using digital interventions to aid university students in weight loss and maintenance.¹⁹ Main eligibility criteria included individuals aged 18 to 35 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 45 kg/m², enrolled in a university in the greater Washington, DC or Boston areas, regular Facebook user, fluent in English, and had access to regular text messaging. Participants were excluded if participating in other weight loss or PA studies or if trying to lose weight. For full inclusion and exclusion criteria, see Napolitano et al.¹⁹ Participants with complete baseline data for accelerometer-measured PA and survey questionnaires for perceived stress and stress management behaviors were included in these secondary analyses, which resulted in a final sample size of 405 participants. Baseline data were collected from May 2015 to January 2018. For analyses examining disparities in stress and stress management behaviors by race, only Black and White students were included (n = 306).

Measures

Stress

Perceived stress was measured using an abbreviated version of Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).²⁰ This 10-item scale used Likert-type responses to various scenarios occurring within the last week with answers that range from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Scores were summed, with a total possible score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicated higher stress levels.

Stress Management

This questionnaire was adapted from the 2014 Stress in America report of stress habits.²¹ Stress management was assessed using the following question: “Do you do any of the following to relieve or manage stress?” Response options included “lay awake at night,” “sleep or take a nap,” and “exercise, walk, or play sports.” An additional open-response item asked participants to describe other methods used to managing stress. Qualitative responses with MET values >2.0 were coded as physically active stress management behaviors^9,22: cooking/baking, yoga, sexual intercourse, playing with baby or pet, cleaning, traveling, gardening, hiking, going to church, judo, and stretching (see Table 1). Stress management behaviors were recoded into a dichotomous variable indicating use of physically active stress management behaviors if participants indicated any of the above-mentioned behaviors or selected exercise, walk, or play sports, regardless of whether they were in combination with sedentary stress management behaviors (Table 1).

Table 1.

Physically Active Versus Sedentary Stress Management Behaviors^a.

Physically active stress management behaviors
Close-ended survey responses
Exercise, walk, or play sports (n = 279)
Open-ended survey responses
Cooking/baking (n = 10)
Yoga (n = 6)
Sexual intercourse (n = 5)
Playing with baby or pet (n = 4)
Cleaning (n = 3)
Traveling (n = 1)
Gardening (n = 1)
Hiking (n = 1)
Going to church (n = 1)
Judo (n = 1)
Stretching (n = 1)

Participants were considered to engage in physically active stress management if they indicated any of the above physically active stress management behaviors, regardless of whether they were reported in combination with sedentary stress management behaviors; open-ended responses with MET value ≤2.0 (eg, listen to music, read, play video games, talk to someone) were considered sedentary stress management behaviors

Physical Activity

Participants wore an ActiGraph (wGT3X-BT) for at least 4 days of 10 hours. See Napolitano et al¹⁹ for methodological details. To account for variability in days of accelerometry data, weekly MVPA was calculated by multiplying the daily average by 7, which were summed for a weekly total. The continuous MVPA variable was recoded into a dichotomous MVPA guideline variable representing those meeting/exceeding current guidelines (≥150 MVPA minutes/week) and those not meeting guidelines (<150 MVPA minutes/week).⁸

Demographics

Baseline demographics collected included age, sex, race/ethnicity (ie, Black, non-Hispanic White, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, multiracial/refuse/unknown), academic year, and clinic-measured height and weight.

Statistical Analysis

Participant characteristics were summarized by means (± standard deviations) and frequencies. Independent sample t tests were conducted to examine (1) the relationship between PA and perceived stress, (2) the relationship between physically active stress management behaviors and perceived stress, and (3) the relationship between race and perceived stress. Chi-square tests were used to determine (1) whether those who met MVPA guidelines managed stress using physically active behaviors more often than those who did not meet guidelines and (2) whether differences existed in use of physically active stress management behaviors by race. IBM SPSS Statistics Version 26 and RStudio Version 1.3.1056 were used for analyses.

Results

Participants (n = 405) were mostly female (78.5%), 18 to 25 years (71.1%), and undergraduate (57.5%). The sample was predominantly White (55.3%), followed by Black (20.2%), and was evenly split between participants with overweight (49.6%) and obesity (50.4%). Most used physically active stress management behaviors (71.6%). The sample of Black and White students included 306 participants with similar characteristics (Table 2).

Table 2.

Demographic Characteristics of the Participants.

Characteristic	Full sample (N = 405)	Black students (N = 82)	White students (N = 224)
Reported physically active stress management behaviors (n, %)	290 (71.6)	51 (62.2)	173 (77.2)
Weekly MVPA (minutes)	311.1	271.2	328.7
Students meeting MVPA guidelines (n, %)	343 (84.7)	79.3 (65)	199 (88.8)
Perceived stress score (range 0-40)	13.8	14.3	13.5
Age (years)	23.3	23.4	23.3
Female (n, %)	318 (78.5)	75 (91.5)	167 (74.6)
Race (n, %)
White	224 (55.3)	—	224 (100)
Black	82 (20.2)	82 (100)	—
Other	99 (24.4)	—	—
Undergraduate (n, %)	233 (57.5)	50 (61.0)	121 (54.0)
BMI (kg/m²)	31.1	32.7	30.5

Abbreviations: MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, BMI, body mass index; Meeting MVPA guidelines = weekly MVPA ≥150 minutes.

Physical Activity and Perceived Stress

An independent sample t test revealed that mean perceived stress scores were not significantly different between students meeting MVPA guidelines compared to those who were not (13.6 ± 6.8 vs 14.8 ± 5.7, P = .136).

Physical Activity and Stress Management Behaviors

A χ² analysis revealed significantly higher rates of physically active stress management behaviors for participants meeting or exceeding MVPA guidelines compared to those who were not (74% vs 56%; χ²[1, N = 405] = 7.411, P = .006).

Stress Management Behaviors and Perceived Stress

An independent sample t test revealed that mean perceived stress scores were significantly lower among students using physically active stress management behaviors compared to those who were not (13.1 ± 6.2 vs 15.5 ± 7.4, P = .003).

Race and Perceived Stress

Among Black and White students only, an independent sample t test revealed that Black students did not report significantly higher mean stress scores (14.3 ± 6.6 vs 13.5 ± 6.9, P = .373).

Race and Stress Management Behaviors

Among Black and White students only, χ² analysis revealed significantly higher rates of physically active stress management behaviors for White compared to Black students (77% vs 62%; χ²[1, N = 306] = 6.174, P = .013).

Discussion

This study revealed that a majority of university students use physically active strategies to manage stress, and that use of physically active stress management is associated with lower perceived stress scores. Although students in this sample who met MVPA guidelines did report lower levels of stress than students who did not meet guidelines (13.6 ± 6.8 vs 14.8 ± 5.7), the difference was not statistically significant. The stress scores reported in this sample were lower than those reported by young adults in 2009 but similar to scores reported by young adults in 1983.²³ It is possible that the significance of the current finding was attenuated by the nature of the sample, which included only students with overweight and obesity and who may experience stress differently from the general student population.²⁴

Our results indicate that Black students used physically active stress management behaviors at lower rates than White students. Lower rates of physically active stress management among Black students represent a clinically significant finding. Lower physical activity mediates the relationship between chronic stress and BMI among African American women,²⁵ and physical activity is also protective against depressive symptoms in Black adults.²⁶ However, there exist systemic barriers to exercise for Black Americans, including unique challenges with being physically active in public spaces.²⁷ Systemic-level factors impacting physically active stress management behaviors among Black students should be further explored.

In this sample, students who met MVPA guidelines did report using physically active stress management behaviors at significantly higher rates than students not meeting the guidelines. This is consistent with other research indicating that those who are regularly physically active tend to use physically active stress management behaviors to cope with stress.¹⁴ Although there is a logical association between physically active stress management and overall physical activity, these variables do measure distinct behaviors. Our findings indicate a potential mechanism for improving student physical activity: introducing physical activity as a stress management tool and delivering combined interventions to address both insufficient activity and stress management in tandem.

These findings have clinical significance. Stress is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease.^28,29 Several studies have posited that PA reduces stress via biological mechanisms.^12,30 It is also possible that using PA for stress management reduces exposure to maladaptive coping strategies (eg, rumination, worry), which have negative consequences on long-term stress resilience.³¹ Thus, engaging in PA may promote a positive feedback loop that enhances stress resilience over time and further incentivizes the individual to continue physically active routines.^14,32 In addition to biological explanations for this phenomenon (alteration of monoamines, endorphin activation), psychological mechanisms of action have also been proposed, including the distraction hypothesis, the mastery hypothesis, and the self-expansion theory.¹⁶ Finally, physical activity provides a protective effect on cardiovascular disease risk independent of stress,³³ making physical activity an important adjunct to daily life regardless of stress levels.

Our findings are particularly important in the context of recent and emerging pandemics, where students may be faced with environments and messages that do not promote PA (eg, reduced access to gyms and public spaces, fear-based media messages). Communication from colleges/universities to students may include simple suggestions for physically active stress management, such as going for a walk or jog in safe, open spaces; performing strength exercises at home; and joining virtual activity groups for accountability and connectivity.

Several limitations should be noted. First, the study measured perceived stress rather than physiological stress. Future studies may benefit from objective assessments of stress, such as serum cortisol levels.^34-36 Second, the sample majority was White and female with overweight/obesity and may not be representative of university student populations more generally. Future research on stress, stress management, and PA among college/university students should prioritize samples that represent racial/ethnic and gender diversity. Additionally, this sample included only students who were active on Facebook, which may limit generalizability of the findings. Third, students in this sample may have been using a combination of physically active and sedentary behaviors, which could attenuate beneficial associations between physically active stress management behaviors and perceived stress. It is also possible that participants’ physical activity behavior may have been influenced as part of the assessment battery for baseline data collection for the randomized controlled trial. Finally, this was a cross-sectional study of baseline data, which were collected prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and recent social justice events, and my not reflect current student stress responses.

Conclusions

This study investigated the relationship between PA and stress management behaviors in a sample of university students with overweight/obesity. Students meeting MVPA guidelines were more likely to manage stress using physically active behaviors compared to students not meeting the guidelines, and stress scores were lower among students using physically active stress management behaviors. In comparison to Black students, White students were more likely to manage stress using physically active behaviors. During the dual pandemics of COVID-19 and social justice, colleges/universities might support students by promoting stress management and PA in tandem, and tailoring messages to student activity levels and demographic characteristics.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Research reported in this article was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DK100916 to Melissa A. Napolitano. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Ethical Approval

All study procedures were approved by the institutional review boards of both the George Washington University and the University of Massachusetts Boston.

Informed Consent

Study participants provided written informed consent.

Trial Registration

The parent study for this analysis was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02342912.

ORCID iD

Melissa A. Napolitano

References

American Psychological Association. Stress in America: The State of Our Nation. American Psychological Association; November 1, 2017.

Bistricky

Harper

Roberts

, et al. Understanding and promoting stress management practices among college students through an integrated health behavior model. Am J Health Educ. 2018;49:12-27. doi:10.1080/19325037.2017.1377651

Morsy

Rothstein

Toxic stress and children’s outcomes. Published May 1, 2019. Accessed May 20, 2021. https://www.epi.org/publication/toxic-stress-and-childrens-outcomes-african-american-children-growing-up-poor-are-at-greater-risk-of-disrupted-physiological-functioning-and-depressed-academic-achievement/

Williams

DR.

Stress and the mental health of populations of color: advancing our understanding of race-related stressors. J Health Soc Behav. 2018;59:466-485. doi:10.1177/0022146518814251

Cheadle

Goosby

Jochman

, et al. Race and ethnic variation in college students’ allostatic regulation of racism-related stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:31053-31062. doi:10.1073/pnas.1922025117

Kramer

Hogue

CR.

Is segregation bad for your health?

Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:178-194. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxp001

Sampson

Loeffler

Punishment’s place: the local concentration of mass incarceration. Daedalus. 2010;139:20-31. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00020

US Department of Health and Human Services. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee scientific report. Published 2018. Accessed May 12, 2021. https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/PAG_Advisory_Committee_Report.pdf

Di Paolo

. Walk It Off! The relationship between physically active and passive coping style and perseverative cognition. Published December 2013. Accessed May 12, 2021. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/281

10.

Basso

Suzuki

WA.

The effects of acute exercise on mood, cognition, neurophysiology, and neurochemical pathways: a review. Brain Plast. 2017;2:127-152. doi:10.3233/BPL-160040

11.

Lazarus

Folkman

Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. Eur J Personality. 1987;1:141-169. doi:10.1002/per.2410010304

12.

Cahn

Goodman

Peterson

Maturi

Mills

PJ.

Yoga, meditation and mind-body health: increased BDNF, cortisol awakening response, and altered inflammatory marker expression after a 3-month Yoga and meditation retreat. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:315. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00315

13.

Sharma

Madaan

Petty

FD.

Exercise for mental health. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;8:106. doi:10.4088/pcc.v08n0208a

14.

Stults-Kolehmainen

Sinha

The effects of stress on physical activity and exercise. Sports Med. 2014;44:81-121. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0090-5

15.

Armstrong

Wong

Perrin

Page

Sibley

Skinner

Association of physical activity with income, race/ethnicity, and sex among adolescents and young adults in the United States: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2016. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:732-740. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1273

16.

Sharon-David

Tenenbaum

The effectiveness of exercise interventions on coping with stress: research synthesis. Studies in Sport Humanities. 2017;22:19-29. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0012.6520

17.

Hoyt

Cohen

Dull

Castro

Yazdani

“Constant stress has become the new normal”: stress and anxiety inequalities among US college students in the time of COVID-19. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68:270-276. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.030

18.

Saleh

Camart

Romo

Predictors of stress in college students. Front Psychol. 2017;8:19. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00019

19.

Napolitano

Whiteley

Mavredes

, et al. Using social media to deliver weight loss programming to young adults: design and rationale for the Healthy Body Healthy U (HBHU) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017;60:1-13. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.007

20.

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385-396.

21.

Anderson

Belar

Breckler

, et al. Stress in America: are teens adopting adults’ stress habits? Published February 2014. Accessed May 12, 2021. http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2013/stress-report.pdf

22.

Ainsworth

Haskell

Herrmann

, et al. 2011 Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1575-1581. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12

23.

Cohen

Janicki-Deverts

Who’s stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2012;42:1320-1334. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00900.x

24.

Odlaug

Lust

Wimmelmann

, et al. Prevalence and correlates of being overweight or obese in college. Psychiatry Res. 2015;227:58-64. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.029

25.

Moore-Greene

Gross

Silver

Perrino

CS.

Chronic stress and decreased physical exercise: impact on weight for African American women. Ethn Dis. 2012;22:185-191.

26.

Torres

Sampselle

Gretebeck

Ronis

Neighbors

HW.

Physical activity effects on depressive symptoms in Black adults. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2010;4:70-87.

27.

Ray

Black people don’t exercise in my neighborhood: perceived racial composition and leisure-time physical activity among middle class Blacks and Whites. Soc Sci Res. 2017;66:42-57. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.03.008

28.

Wirtz

von Känel

Psychological stress, inflammation, and coronary heart disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19:111. doi:10.1007/s11886-017-0919-x

29.

Dimsdale

JE.

Psychological stress and cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1237-1246. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.024

30.

Lin

Kuo

YM.

Exercise benefits brain function: the monoamine connection. Brain Sci. 2013;3:39-53. doi:10.3390/brainsci3010039

31.

Holahan

Moos

Holahan

Brennan

Schutte

KK.

Stress generation, avoidance coping, and depressive symptoms: a 10-year model. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:658-666. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.658

32.

Gucciardi

Lawc

Guerrerod

, et al. Longitudinal relations between psychological distress and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: a latent change score approach. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020;47:101490. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.02.005

33.

Lee

Shiroma

Lobelo

, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380:219-229. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9

34.

Coppens

Kempke

Van Wambeke

, et al. Cortisol and subjective stress responses to acute psychosocial stress in fibromyalgia patients and control participants. Psychosom Med. 2018;80:317-326. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000551

35.

Todorovic

Moyle

Jones

Using salivary cortisol as an objective measure of physiological stress in people with dementia and chronic pain: a pilot feasibility study. Biol Res Nurs. 2020;22:520-526. doi:10.1177/1099800420934543

36.

Dedovic

Duchesne

Andrews

Engert

Pruessner

JC.

The brain and the stress axis: the neural correlates of cortisol regulation in response to stress. Neuroimage. 2009;47:864-871. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.074

Physical Activity,Stress,and Physically Active Stress Management Behaviors Among University Students With Overweight/Obesity

Abstract

Keywords

Methods

Sample

Measures

Stress

Stress Management

Physical Activity

Demographics

Statistical Analysis

Results

Physical Activity and Perceived Stress

Physical Activity and Stress Management Behaviors

Stress Management Behaviors and Perceived Stress

Race and Perceived Stress

Race and Stress Management Behaviors

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Ethical Approval

Informed Consent

Trial Registration

ORCID iD

References