A 2005 national study surveyed 2,103 Troops to Teachers (T3) program completers and their school administrators using 21 research-based instructional practices and four effective classroom management strategies associated with increased student achievement to determine whether T3s were more effective in the classroom than traditionally prepared teachers with comparable years of teaching experience. Sixty-one percent returned completed surveys. Principals overwhelmingly (more than 90%) reported that T3s are more effective in classroom instruction and classroom management/student discipline—and have a more positive impact on student achievement—than traditionally prepared teachers. Moreover, T3s teach in high-poverty schools, teach high-demand subjects (special education, math, science), plan to remain in teaching, and increase the teaching pool's diversity.
Allen, M. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say?Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved July 2004 from http://www.teach-now.org/frmRsr_8Questions.asp
2.
Archer, J. (2002). Research: Focusing in on teachers. Education Week, 3(April), 36-39.
3.
Berry, B. (2001). No shortcuts to preparing good teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 32-36.
4.
Brown, D., Edington, E., Spencer, D., & Tinafero, J. (1989). A comparison of alternative certification, traditionally trained, and emergency permit teachers. Teacher Education and Practice, 5(2), 21-23.
5.
Curris, C. W. (2003, April). Testimony on the Troops to Teachers Program. Presented at the Joint Oversight Hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives Veterans Affairs Committee (Subcommittee on Benefits) and the U.S. House of Representatives Education and Workforce Committee (Subcommittee on 21st Century Competitiveness). Washington, DC. Retrieved July 21, 2005, from http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/schedule108/apr03/4-9-03/ccurris.pdf.
6.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved June 2002 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
7.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to “teacher certification reconsidered.”Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(36). Retrieved January 17, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/v10n36.html.
8.
Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57-77.
9.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A., & Klein, S. (1999). A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation on helping beginning teachers learn to teach. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
11.
Feistritzer, C. E. (2005a). Profile of alternative route teachers. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information. Retrieved June 17, 2005, from http://www.neci.com/PART.pdf
12.
Feistritzer, C. E. (2005b). Profile of Troops to Teachers. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information. Retrieved September 16, 2005, from http://www.ncei.com/NCEI_TT_v3.pdf
13.
Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the Black White test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap and can schools narrow the Black-White test score gap? (pp. 273-374). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14.
Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15.
Foster, L. (2004). Administrator and teacher recruitment and selection: Issues, challenges, and strategies. Journal of School Public Relations, 25(2), 220-232.
16.
Goebel, S. (1986). Alternative certification program final report. Austin: Texas Education Agency.
17.
Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching: Surveying the evidence on student achievement and teachers' characteristics. Education Next, 2(1), 50-55.
18.
Goldhaber, D., Brewer, D. J., & Anderson, D. (1999). A three-way error components analysis of educational productivity. Education Economics, 7(3), 199-208.
19.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396.
20.
Guyton, E., & Farokhi, E. (1987). Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, and subject-matter knowledge and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 37-42.
21.
Hallenger, P., & Heck, R. (2000). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness, 1980-1995. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Leadership.
22.
Hanushek, E. A. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, x100(1), 84-117.
23.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J., & Rivkin, S. G. (1998). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). How to improve the supply of high quality teachers. In D. Ravich (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy 2004 (pp. 7-25). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25.
Hawk, P., & Schmidt, M. (1989). Teacher preparation: A comparison of traditional and alternative programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 53-58.
26.
Hawley, W. D. (1990). The theory and practice of alternate certification: Implications for the improvement of teaching. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 3-34.
27.
Haycock, K. (2000). No more settling for less. Thinking K-16, 4(1), 3-8, 10-12. Washington, DC: Education Trust.
28.
Haycock, K., & Huang, S. (2001). Are today's high school graduates ready?Thinking K-16, 5(1), 10-12. Washington, DC: Education Trust.
29.
Humphrey, D. C., & Wechsler, M. E. (2005). Insights into alternative certification: Initial findings from a national study. Retrieved September 9, 2005, from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12145
30.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86(631), 16-31.
31.
Jelmberg, J. (1996). College-based teacher education versus state-sponsored alternative programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 60-66.
32.
Kaplan, L., & Owings, W. (2003a). The politics of teacher quality. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 687-692.
33.
Kaplan, L., & Owings, W. (2003b). Teacher quality, teaching quality, and school improvement. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Press.
34.
Kaplan, L. S., Owings, W. A., & Nunnery, J. (2005). Principal quality: A Virginia study connecting Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium standards with student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89(643), 28-44.
35.
Lee, C. J. (2003). A question of quality: Minority teachers are a missing ingredient. Retrieved July 17, 2005, from www.post-gazette.com/localnews/20030205diversityrp2.asp
36.
Legler, R. (2002). Alternative certification: A review of theory and research. Naperville, IL: Education Policy, Learning Points Associates, North Central Regional Education Laboratory. Retrieved February 2, 2005, from http://www.ncrel.org/policy/pubs/html,altcert/bg;htm
37.
Levin, D., Honeggar, S., & Duncan, T. G. (2004). The secretary's third annual report on teacher quality.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
38.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
39.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. L., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
40.
McDiarmid, G. W., & Wilson, S. (1991). An exploration of the subject matter knowledge of alternate route teachers: Can we assume they know their subject?Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 93-103.
41.
Miller, J., McKenna, M., & McKenna, B. (1998). A comparison of alternatively and traditionally prepared teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 165-176.
42.
Mitchell, K. J., Robinson, D. Z., Plake, B. S., & Knowles, K. T. (Eds.). (2001) Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43.
Monk, D. H., & King, J. A. (1994). Multi-level teacher resource effects in pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: The case of teacher subject-matter preparation. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Choices and consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education (pp. 29-58). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
44.
Munro, J. (1999). Learning more about learning improves teacher effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2), 151-171.
45.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Participation in education: Racial/ethnic distribution of public school students. Retrieved July 26, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/progrms/coe/2005/section1/indicators04.asp
46.
National Education Association. (2004). Are male teachers on the road to extinction? Retrieved July 26, 2005, from http://www.nea.org/newsreleases/2004/nr040428.html
47.
Natriello, G., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Challenged to an alternative route to teacher certification. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The changing context of teaching (pp. 59-78). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
48.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (2004, February). Alternative certification: A review of theory and research. Retrieved February 13, 2005, from http://www.ncrel.org/policy/;pubs/html/altcert/re.htm
49.
Podgursky, M. (2003, October). Improving academic performance in U.S. public schools: Why teacher licensing is (almost) irrelevant. Paper presented at the Teacher Preparation and Quality: New Directions in Policy and Research conference, Washington, DC.
50.
Podgursky, M. (2004). Alternative routes into teaching: Defining challenges, devising strategies. Paper presented at the conference of the National Center for Alternative Certification, San Antonio, TX.
51.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2001). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement.Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
52.
Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
53.
Silberman, T. (2001). Preparing “instant” teachers. Retrieved July 18, 2001, from www.newsobserv…nt/News/Story/805625p.803731c.html
54.
Sunstrom, K., & Berry, B. (1989). Assessing the initial impact of the South Carolina Critical Needs Certification Program (CNCP). Report to the State Board of Education.
55.
Troops to Teachers Program. (2004a). Part C—Innovation for teacher quality, transitions to teaching. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Retrieved June 16, 2004, from http:www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg27.html
56.
Troops to Teachers Program. (2004b). Purpose. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved July 17, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/troops/indix.html
57.
Waters, T., Marzano, R., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
58.
Weglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
59.
Whitehurst, G. (2003). Scientifically based research on teacher quality: Research, preparation, and professional development. Retrieved September 19, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OPE/News/teacherprep/index.html
60.
Wright, P., Horn, S., & Sanders, W. (1997). Teachers and classroom hegemony: Their effects on educational outcomes. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57-67.
