This study examines the retention rates of new teachers in Texas given their initial certification type and initial school setting. The 5-year persistence rates of 175,664 teachers from 2000 to 2015 are analyzed using logistic regression to calculate the probability of new teacher persistence at the school, district, and state level. Main findings suggest that teachers’ certification type and initial school setting are statistically significant predictors of new teacher persistence, and traditionally licensed teachers initially placed in traditional public school are more likely to persist when compared with other preparation types or initial placements into charter schools.
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2017). Teacher churning: Reassignment rates and implications for student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 3-30.
2.
BarmbyP. (2006). Improving teacher recruitment and retention: The importance of workload and pupil behaviour. Educational Research, 48, 247-265.
3.
BennerA. D. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research.
4.
BoydD. J.GrossmanP. L.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 176-216.
5.
BoydD. J.GrossmanP. L.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 416-440. doi:10.3102/0162373709353129
6.
BrewerD. J.AhnJ. (2010). What do we know about teachers in charter schools? In BettsJ. R.HillP. T. (Eds.), Taking measure of charter schools: Better assessments, better policymaking, better schools (pp. 129-154). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
CarrollT. G. (2007). Policy brief: The high cost of teacher turnover. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED498001
8.
Cochran-SmithM.McQuillanP.MitchellK.TerrellD. G.BarnattJ.D’SouzaL.. . .GleesonA. M. (2012). A longitudinal study of teaching practice and early career decisions: A cautionary tale. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 844-880. doi:10.3102/0002831211431006
DavisJ.WilsonS. M. (2000). Principals’ efforts to empower teachers: Effects on teacher motivation and job satisfaction and stress. The Clearing House, 73, 349-353.
FeistritzerC. E.GriffinS.LinnajarviA. (2011). Profile of teachers in the US, 2011 (pp. 9-14). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
13.
GeigerA. (2017, October25). Many minority students go to schools where at least half of their peers are their race or ethnicity. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewrsr.ch/2yP9qaK
14.
GoldY.RothR. A. (1993). Teachers managing stress and preventing burn-out: The professional health solution. London, England: Falmer Press.
15.
GrayL.TaieS. (2015). Public school teacher attrition and mobility in the first five years: Results from the first through fifth waves of the 2007–08 beginning teacher longitudinal study (NCES 2015-337). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
16.
GutheryS.RichardsM. P. (2017, March). Dropping barriers to entry: A policy analysis of the Texas new teacher pipeline. Paper presented at Association for Education Finance and Policy, Washington, DC.
17.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326-354.
18.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2007). Pay, working conditions, and teacher quality. The Future of Children, 17, 69-86.
19.
HarveyJ. (2014). Getting beyond the blame game. Educational Leadership, 71,24-29.
20.
HolmeJ. J.JabbarH.GermainE.DinningJ. (2017). Rethinking teacher turnover: Longitudinal measures of instability in schools. Educational Researcher, 47, 62-75.
21.
ImazekiJ.GoeL. (2009). The distribution of highly qualified, experienced teachers: Challenges and opportunities (Teacher Quality Research & Policy Brief). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
22.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
23.
IngersollR. M. (2003). The teacher shortage: Myth or reality?Educational Horizons, 81, 146-152.
24.
IngersollR. M.PerdaD. (2008). The status of teaching as a profession. In BallantineJ. H.SpadeJ. Z.StuberJ. M. (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 106-118). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
LaddH. F.SorensonL. C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12 (2), 241-279.
26.
MalloyC. L.WohlstetterP. (2003). Working conditions in charter schools: What’s the appeal for teachers?Education and Urban Society, 35, 219-241.
27.
MaxwellL. A. (2014, August20). U.S. schools become “majority minority.”Education Week, 34(1), pp. 1, 12, 14-15.
National Education Association. (n.d.). Research spotlight on alternative routes to teacher certification. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/tools/16578.htm
PodgurskyM.BallouD. (2001). Personnel policy in charter schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED456567
32.
ReddingC.SmithT. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates?American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1086-1125.
33.
RivkinS. G.HanushekE. A.KainJ. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458.
34.
SimonN. S.JohnsonS. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1-36.
35.
SmithT. M.IngersollR. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41, 681-714.
36.
StuitD. A.SmithT. M. (2012). Explaining the gap in charter and traditional public school teacher turnover rates. Economics of Education Review, 31, 268-279.
WalshK.JacobsS. (2007). Alternative certification isn’t alternative. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED498382
39.
WalshK.O’TracyC. (2005). Increasing the odds: How better policies can yield good teachers. Washington, DC: National Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from https://www.nctq.org/nctq/images/nctq_io.pdf
40.
WatlingtonE.ShockleyR.GuglielminoP.FelsherR. (2010). The high cost of leaving: An analysis of the cost of teacher turnover. Journal of Education Finance, 36, 22-37.
