Maintaining Gaps in Teacher Diversity,Preparedness,Effectiveness,and Retention? A Program Theory Evaluation of Mathematics Teacher Training in the New York City Teaching Fellows

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which the New York City Teaching Fellows (NYCTF) has delivered on its promise of improving mathematics teacher diversity, preparedness, effectiveness, and retention in hard-to-staff city schools. As a program theory evaluation study, it articulates the theory of action for selective alternative route programs and uses this to evaluate NYCTF’s program for secondary mathematics. The analysis draws on longitudinal data from 620 secondary mathematics teachers who began NYCTF in the prior decade. While the results point to potential improvements, it provides evidence that selective programs like NYCTF serve to maintain important gaps in teacher quality that they were designed to address.

Keywords

urban schools teacher retention and turnover teacher quality teacher preparation teacher education policy implementation evaluation and assessment educational policy alternative licensure and certification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auguste

Kihn

Miller

(2010). Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top-third graduates to careers in teaching. McKinsey and Co. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/closing-the-teaching-talent-gap

Boaler

Staples

(2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.

Boyd

Dunlop

Lankford

Loeb

Mahler

O’Brien

Wyckoff

(2012a). Alternative certification in the long run: A decade of evidence on the effects of alternative certification in New York City. In the annual meeting of the American Education Finance and Policy Conference, Boston, MA.

Boyd

Grossman

Hammerness

Lankford

Loeb

Ronfeldt

Wyckoff

(2012b). Recruiting effective math teachers: Evidence from New York City. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1008–1047.

Boyd

Grossman

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Rockoff

Wyckoff

(2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 793–818.

Brantlinger

(2020). The Meritocratic Mystique and Mathematical Mediocrity in Hard-to-Staff Schools: A Critique of the Best and Brightest Teacher Agenda. Urban Education 55(7), 1076–1104.

Brantlinger

Cooley

Brantlinger

(2010). Families, values, and class relations: The politics of alternative certification. In Apple

Ball

Gandin

(Eds.). The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education: Critical research for social justice (pp. 179–189). New York: Routledge.

Brantlinger

Griffin

(2019). Review of “The Effectiveness of Secondary Math Teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows Programs” (Institute of Education Sciences, September 2013). Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/tfa

10.

Brantlinger

Smith

(2013). Alternative teacher certification and the new professionalism: The preparation of mathematics teachers in the New York City Teaching Fellows Program. Teachers College Record, 115(7), 1–44.

11.

Brewer

T. J.

Kretchmar

Sondel

Ishmael

Manfra

M. M.

(2016). Teach for America’s preferential treatment: School district contracts, hiring decisions, and employment practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(15), n15.

12.

Brousselle

Champagne

(2011). Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 69–78.

13.

Clark

M. A.

Chiang

H. S.

Silva

McConnell

Sonnenfeld

Erbe

Puma

(2013). The effectiveness of secondary math teachers from teach for America and the teaching fellows programs. Mathematica Policy Research.

14.

Cooley

Brantlinger

Hannaford-Simpson

Shahid

(2019). Presumed proficiencies, credentialism, and the pedagogy of poverty: Mathematics teachers from selective alternative route programs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1–27.

15.

Darling-Hammond

(2016). Research on teaching and teacher education and its influences on policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83–91.

16.

Darling-Hammond

Chung

Frelow

(2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286–302.

17.

Dee

T. S.

(2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210.

18.

Egalite

Kisida

Winters

(2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52.

19.

Foote

Brantlinger

Haydar

Smith

Gonzalez

(2011). Are we supporting teacher success? Insights from an alternative route mathematics teacher certification program for urban public schools. Education and Urban Society, 43(3), 396–425.

20.

Garcia

Weiss

(2019). The teacher shortage is real, large and growing, and worse than we thought. Economic Policy Institute. epi.org/163651

21.

Gerdeman

Wan

Moefe

Bos

Zhu

Dhillon

(2017). Impact of TNTP’s Teaching Fellows in urban school districts. American Institutes of Research. http://www.air.org/resource/impact-tntp-s-teaching-fellows-urban-school-districts

22.

Goodnough

(2004). Ms. Moffett’s first year: Becoming a teacher in America. Public Affairs.

23.

Grant

A. A.

Brantlinger

(under review). Demography as destiny? How alternative certification mathematics teacher perceptions of high-minority schools drives their turnover. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. School of Education, Johns Hopkins University.

24.

Green

(2008). Fewer Blacks, more Whites are hired as city teachers. The New York Sun. https://www.nysun.com/new-york/fewer-blacks-more-whites-are-hired-as-city/86580/

25.

Haertel

(2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores (14th William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture). Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/s/pdf/23497_Angoff%20Report-web.pdf

26.

Humphrey

Wechsler

Hough

(2008). Characteristics of effective alternative teacher certification programs. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 1–63.

27.

Johnson

S. M.

Birkeland

S. E.

(2008). Is fast-track preparation enough? It depends. In Grossman

Loeb

(Eds.), Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 101–128). Harvard Education Press.

28.

Kane

Rockoff

Staiger

(2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631.

29.

Kee

A. N.

(2012). Feelings of preparedness among alternatively certified teachers: What is the role of program features? Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 23–38.

30.

Kopp

(1994). Teach for America: Moving beyond the debate. The Educational Forum, 58(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729409335324

31.

Kraft

Marinell

Yee

(2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411–1449.

32.

Levy

(2000). Why the best don’t teach. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/09/opinion/why-the-best-don-t-teach.html

33.

McKenna

Brigham

Parenti

Hott

(2019). Foundational assumptions for successful transition: Examining alternatively certified special educator perceptions. In Special education transition services for students with disabilities. Emerald Publishing Limited.

34.

McKnight

P. E.

McKnight

K. M.

Sidani

Figueredo

A. J.

(2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. Guilford Press.

35.

Mead

Chuong

Goodson

(2015). Exponential growth, unexpected challenges: How Teach for America grew in scale and impact. Bellwether Educational Partners. http://bellwethereducation.org/

36.

Meagher

Brantlinger

(2011). When am I going to learn to be a mathematics teacher? A case study of a novice New York City Teaching Fellow. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(2), 96–13.

37.

Mikuta

Wise

(2008). Teachers for America. Education Next, 8(2). Retrieved May 10, 2019, from https://www.educationnext.org/teachers-for-america/

38.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2019). School and Staffing Survey (SASS). https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/tables/sass1112_482_t12n.asp

39.

New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE). (2006). RFP #R0018 Master’s and certification services to alternative route teachers. Author.

40.

New York City Teaching Fellows. (2019). Who we want. https://nycteachingfellows.org/who-we-want

41.

New York State Education Department. (2000). 52.21 Registration of curricula in teacher education. Retrieved from https://govt.westlaw.com/nycrr/Document/Ieca6da1bc22111dd97adcd755bda2840?viewType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem&contextData=(sc.Default)

42.

Pampel

F. C.

(2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Sage.

43.

Paredes-Scribner

J. P.

Heinen

(2009). Alternative teacher certification: A program theory analysis. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 179–197.

44.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

45.

Redding

Smith

T. M.

(2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates? American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1086–1125.

46.

Rogers

P. J.

Petrosino

Huebner

T. A.

Hacsi

T. A.

(2000). Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problems. New Directions for Evaluation, 2000(87), 5–13.

47.

Ronfeldt

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.

48.

Schonfeld

Feinman

(2012). Difficulties of alternatively certified teachers. Education and Urban Society, 44(3), 215–246.

49.

Smith

T. M.

Ingersoll

R. M.

(2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.

50.

Tamir

(2010). Capital, power and the struggle over teacher certification. Educational Policy, 24(3), 465–499.

51.

Teach For America (TFA). (2019). Website. https://www.teachforamerica.org

52.

The New Teacher Project (TNTP). (2005). Teaching for student achievement (TfSA) guidebook. The New Teacher Project, Inc.

53.

TNTP. (2019). About Us. https://tntp.org/about-tntp

54.

Value-Added Data for Teachers Research Team. (2008). Statement on the New York City teacher value-added model. https://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Statement_on_NYC_Teacher_Value_Added_Model_Final.pdf

55.

Veltri

(September, 2013). Cloaking Inequity: Huggly, Snuggly, Cuddly, Teach For America and Mathematica. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/huggy-snuggly-cuddly-teach-america-and-mathematic

56.

Walsh

Jacobs

(2007). Alternative certification isn’t alternative. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

57.

Weiss

C. H.

(2000). Which links in which theories shall we evaluate? New Directions for Evaluation, 2000(87), 35–45.

58.

White

(2016). Teach for America’s paradoxical diversity initiative: Race, policy, and Black teacher displacement in urban schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(16), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2100

59.

Zeichner

(2010). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance, and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the US. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1544–1552.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB