Abstract
Exocrine pancreas is a source of several enzymes that are essential for the digestive process. The exocrine pancreatic secretion is tightly regulated by the neuroendocrine system. The endocrine pancreas is tightly integrated anatomically and physiologically with the exocrine pancreas and modulates its function. Compound-induced pancreatitis is not a common event in toxicology or drug development, but it becomes a significant liability when encountered. Understanding the species-specific differences in physiology is essential to understand the underlying pathobiology of pancreatic disease in animal models and its relevance to human disease. This review will mainly focus on understanding the morphology and physiology of the pancreas, unique islet–exocrine interactions, and pancreatitis.
Introduction
The pancreas is not the most common target organ in toxicological studies. However, pancreatitis can be a serious liability in drug development. Understanding the normal morphology and physiology is essential in order to appreciate the pathology of any organ system. In this article, I focus on the normal morphology and physiology of exocrine pancreas and the pathogenesis of pancreatitis.
Morphology
The pancreas develops from a common multipotent cell population within the foregut (dorsal and ventral buds) endoderm. The exocrine and endocrine pancreas arise from a common progenitor cell population expressing Pdx1, Ptf1a, and Sox9. These cells in the presence of other factors like Neurog3, Neurod1, Onecut1 and Pax4 contribute to the proliferation and differentiation of the endocrine pancreas. The absence of proendocrine factors and transcription factors like Ptf1a and Bhlha15 leads to the development of exocrine pancreas (Benitez, Goodyer, and Kim 2012; Reichert and Rustgi 2011). Overall, pathways associated with Hedgehog, Notch, and Wnt play critical roles in the development, differentiation, and proliferation of pancreas. The exocrine pancreas is morphologically mature at birth but attains functional maturity at weaning in most animals (Walthall et al. 2005).
There is species-specific variation in the organization of pancreatic tissue. In rabbits, the pancreatic tissue is diffusely distributed throughout the mesentery; but in primates, dogs, and hamsters, it is compact. While in rats and mice, it is intermediate since the tail (splenic portion) is relatively compact but the head is dispersed within the duodenal loop’s mesentery. The pancreas is the only organ in the body composed of exocrine and endocrine components intermixed within the parenchyma. In rats and mice, the pancreas may be anatomically divided into gastric lobe, duodenal head, and tail. The number of islets of Langerhans distributed within each of these regions appears to vary by strains. For example, in a 10-week-old CD1 mouse, on average there were 110 islets in the gastric lobe, 453 islets in the duodenal head, and 686 islets in the tail; whereas in a 10-week-old NOD mouse, on average there were 120 islets in the gastric lobe, 549 islets in the duodenal head, and 489 islets in the tail (El-Gohary et al. 2012). The exocrine pancreatic component comprises ∼90% of the pancreatic mass and is comprised of acinar, centroacinar, and ductal cells; the endocrine component islets of Langerhans comprise about 1 to 2% and the interstitium with the blood vessels, lymphatics, nerves, and fibrous connective tissue stroma comprises the remainder. The pancreas is covered by a thin layer of loose connective tissue that forms septa resulting in the division of the gland into lobules that contain numerous acini. In order to explain the organization of the exocrine pancreatic acini, 2 models have been proposed. One is the acinar model supported by Takahashi (1984), where the lobules are arranged in grape-like clusters interconnected by ducts, and the other is the reticular model supported by Bockman (1976), where the lobules bud off a network of anastomosing tubules (Bockman 1976; Takahashi 1984). There are proponents for both the models since they are backed up by data from morphological studies involving retrograde injection of dyes and latex, scanning electron microscopy, and 3-dimensional reconstruction of serial semithin sections (Motta et al. 1997). These models seem to support the morphology across several species and possibly the pathogenesis of some lesions within the exocrine pancreas. For example, the ductular morphology of the tubular complexes as well as the ductular phenotype seen in pancreatic adenocarcinoma seems to support the anastomosing model since in the dimethylbenzanthracene-treated rat model, the acinar cells lose their zymogen granules and attain a ductular phenotype and proliferate progressively to form ductular complexes and subsequently an adenocarcinoma with ductular phenotype (Bockman et al. 2003). The pancreatic acinus consists of a single layer of pyramidal acinar cells arranged concentrically around a lumen. The narrow apices of the pyramidal cells facing the lumen contain eosinophilic zymogen granules, and the broader base of the pyramidal cells is basophilic due to abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum and also contains the nucleus. Each pancreatic acinus is surrounded by a thin basal lamina, scant reticular stroma, and pancreatic stellate cells (similar to the hepatic stellate cells). The quiescent pancreatic stellate cells stain positive for vimentin, desmin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and nestin. When activated, these stellate cells express α-smooth muscle actin (Omary et al. 2007). The pancreatic stellate cells play important roles in the pathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Located centrally within the acinus, the centroacinar cells form an interface between the acinus and the intercalated duct. The intercalated duct continues into intralobular ducts formed by the ductular cells. The centroacinar cells and the duct cells have carbonic anhydrase and secrete bicarbonate and water that results in the flushing of acinar secretions into the pancreatic ducts. The intralobular ducts fuse to form the interlobular ducts that mainly open into the pancreatohepatic (biliary) duct or to a lesser extent directly into the duodenal lumen.
The exocrine pancreas is physiologically and morphologically compartmentalized into peri- and tele-insular regions. The peri-insular acinar cells are in the immediate proximity of the islets of Langerhans and are bigger with abundant cytoplasm, larger zymogen granules, and larger nuclei than the tele-insular acinar cells that are farther from the islets (Aughsteen and Kataoka 1993). Due to the differences in sizes of the peri- and tele-insular acinar cells, at lower magnification, the islets of Langerhans appear to be surrounded by “halos.” These physiologically normal size differences in the peri- and tele-insular exocrine acinar cells form the so-called “peri-insular halos” (Cosnier 1955). The difference in the size of peri- and tele-insular acinar cells is greater in mice than in rats, resulting in more prominent peri-insular halos in mice. The peri-insular acinar cells are more resistant (3 hr) to pilocarpine-induced degranulation than the tele-insular acinar cells (1 hr; Putzke and Said 1975). The size of peri-insular halos is markedly reduced in alloxan-induced diabetic pancreata compared to control nondiabetic rats. These features of the peri-insular halos are due to the hormones (mainly insulin and possibly other factors) secreted by islets of Langerhans that are locally enriched due to the islet–acinar capillary anastomoses or due to diffusion via the fenestrated capillaries (Wayland 1997). The peri-insular halos are not recorded in routine toxicity studies, but recording any alterations within these halos may provide important information about the chemicals affecting islet cells such as alloxan or about the chemicals directly affecting the secretions from exocrine pancreas like pilocarpine. Thus, it is important to be cognizant of the heterogeneity of exocrine pancreatic acini during routine toxicologic pathology studies since it may be useful in identifying chemicals that may target the islets of Langerhans (like alloxan) or the exocrine pancreas (like pilocarpine).
Islet–Acinar axis
The rat pancreas is supplied by the splenic, pancreatoduodenal, and other minor arteries arising from the celiac or superior mesenteric arteries and drain into the splenic, pancreatoduodenal, and other veins into the portal vein. There are about 5,000 or more lobules within the rat exocrine pancreas (Murakami and Fujita 1992). The lobular artery and vein enter the lobules near their base and form lobular capillary plexus and then drain into the lobular veins (Figure 1). The islets of Langerhans comprise ∼2% of the pancreas, but about 20% of the arterial blood entering the pancreas is supplied to the islets. In a typical rat pancreas, there are about 400 islets that may be located in almost equal numbers either within the exocrine lobules (intralobular) or between tissue spaces along the secretory ducts (interlobular; Murakami and Fujita 1992). The intralobular and interlobular afferents arise from lobular and interlobular arteries or their branches, respectively.

An artist’s rendering of the vasculature within the rat pancreas. The islets and acini have a tightly integrated blood supply. The islets may be located intralobular or interlobular and have corresponding blood supply. The blood draining from the intralobular islets pass through the exocrine acini before joining the venous system. The peptides from the islets contribute to the regulation of peri-islet acini (please see text for more details). Adapted from Murakami and Fujita (1992).
Based on their size, the islets receive one or more afferent vessels and give out three or more efferent vessels (Figure 1). The intralobular efferents drain either into lobular capillaries or into venous branches in the lobules, and the interlobular efferents drain into venous branches in the interlobular spaces or along the secretory ducts. Thus, the islet–acinar axis forms a direct connection between the islet and the lobular capillaries. This islet–acinar portal system has been demonstrated in humans, monkey, horse, rabbit, dog, cat, mouse, and rat. However, there are some species differences in this regard. In humans (and monkey, pig, cattle, rabbit, dog, and cat), most of the islets are intralobular in location and emit only islet–acinar portal vessels, and very few islets within the interlobular spaces issue the islet–venous efferent vessels that are continuous with the interlobular veins. In contrast, in rat and mouse, the intralobular vessels drain into both islet–acinar portal vessels and intralobular veins, and the interlobular arteries drain into the interlobular veins (Murakami et al. 1993).
In the rat, the afferent arteries supplying the islets are first divided in the peripheral zone of the islet and then break into several capillaries resulting in a glomerular meshwork that penetrates the islets and converge to form the efferent supply that passes through the surrounding exocrine acini before joining the venous drainage. The vascular plexus within the islets is about five times denser than the acinar lobular plexus (Henderson and Moss 1985). The capillary network in islets has about 10 times more fenestrae than capillaries of the exocrine tissue (Henderson and Moss 1985). This unique anatomic arrangement of the islet–acinar portal system facilitates the interaction of several proteins secreted by the islets with the surrounding exocrine tissue.
Influence of the Islet–Acinar Axis on Exocrine Function
The islets of Langerhans are distributed within the exocrine pancreas, and this arrangement serves an important physiological function since several islet-derived hormones and peptides directly influence the exocrine function. In addition to these peptides and islet-derived hormones, neurotransmitters like acetylcholine and norepinephrine play an important role in the exocrine pancreatic homeostasis. Several unique cell types within the islets secrete corresponding hormones and peptides for influencing exocrine function. The α cells secrete glucagon, the β cells produce insulin and amylin, the δ cells produce somatostatin (SST), the ∊ cells produce ghrelin, and the pancreatic polypeptide (PP) or F cells produce PP and adrenomedullin. In addition, islets also contain several neuropeptides/cotransmitters that modulate exocrine pancreatic function. The stimulatory neuropeptides/cotransmitters include pituitary adenylate cyclase–activating peptide (PACAP), nitric oxide (NO), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and angiotensin II. The inhibitory factors for exocrine pancreatic secretion include SST, PP, ghrelin, pancreastatin, adrenomedullin, galanin, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and peptide YY (PYY; Barreto et al. 2010).
Insulin is one of the major islet hormones and the most well-characterized regulator of exocrine pancreatic function. Insulin positively influences pancreatic growth and exocrine function. Insulin binds to its own receptor on the acinar cells to stimulate and potentiate amylase secretion (Mossner et al. 1985). In addition, it also potentiates secretagogue-stimulated secretion of amylase. The role of glucagon on exocrine function is not clear due to contradictory data (Barreto et al. 2010). PACAP has a direct stimulatory effect on the exocrine pancreatic secretion as well as flow rate without affecting the secretin and VIP levels (Alonso et al. 1994). This stimulatory effect of PACAP is mediated by a cholinergic mechanism, and it has a synergistic effect with cholecystokinin (CCK; Kitagawa et al. 1995; Naruse, Suzuki, and Ozaki 1992). NO exerts a stimulatory effect of exocrine pancreatic secretion probably via the generation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate and the release of endogenous neurotransmitter in the pancreas (Ember, Yago, and Singh 2001; Yago et al. 2001). VIP shares structural similarity with secretin as well as glucagon. It has a stimulatory action on exocrine pancreatic secretion, especially with the increasing pancreatic secretion flow rate and secretin levels, suggesting that these effects are likely secondary to its effect on secretin levels (Alonso et al. 1994). The pancreas contains a local renin–angiotensin system, and the angiotensin II receptors AT1 and AT2 are expressed in pancreatic acinar cells, ducts, islets, and blood vessels (Leung and Carlsson 2001; Tsang, Cheng, and Leung 2004). Angiotensin II stimulates exocrine pancreatic secretion (Tsang, Cheng, and Leung 2004) but inhibits the synthesis and release of insulin from the islets (Lau, Carlsson, and Leung 2004).
SST acts as a hormone and as a neurotransmitter. It acts as a hormone by inhibiting CCK or cerulein-stimulated amylase secretion and inhibits insulin secretion. SST binds to its own receptor on the acinar cells and reduces intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate and subsequent Ca2+ signaling (Ohnishi, Mine, and Kojima 1994). SST acts as a neurotransmitter by modulating vagal and sympathetic pathways or via the SST receptor 2 in the dorsal vagal complex (DVC). In addition, it can indirectly inhibit pancreatic secretion via the intrapancreatic cholinergic mechanism by inhibiting acetylcholine release in the peripheral nerve terminals (Heintges, Luthen, and Niederau 1994). PP inhibits exocrine pancreatic secretion during both the interdigestive and postprandial states. It has been demonstrated to inhibit CCK-stimulated release of amylase and by inhibiting the stimulatory effect of insulin on amylase secretion (Louie, Williams, and Owyang 1985). Ghrelin inhibits exocrine pancreatic secretion, but its precise mechanism of action is not known but is thought to be via intrapancreatic neurons (Zhang et al. 2001) or by inhibiting insulin secretion (Tong et al. 2010). Pancreastatin inhibits glucose-induced insulin secretion (Tatemoto et al. 1986). In addition, it also inhibits exocrine secretion irrespective of the stimulus used, and this is probably mediated by modulation of presynaptic acetylcholine release (Herzig et al. 1992) and/or reduction in local pancreatic blood flow (Migita et al. 1999). Adrenomedullin colocalizes with PP in the PP or F cells and inhibits insulin secretion (Martinez et al. 1996). Galanin inhibits the secretion of insulin (McDonald et al. 1985) and SST (Amiranoff, Lorinet, and Laburthe 1990). Its effect on amylase secretion is dependent on the stimulus, that is, it inhibited amylase secretion stimulated by cerulein at physiological concentrations, but it had no effect on carbachol-stimulated amylase secretion (Barreto et al. 2009). The cerulein-induced stimulation of amylase secretion is secondary to inhibition of insulin secretion and inhibition of postganglionic cholinergic nerves (Barreto et al. 2010). This indicates the close influence of endocrine pancreas on exocrine pancreatic secretion. CGRP–immunoreactive neurons within the pancreas may play a role in influencing exocrine secretion. CGRP inhibits exocrine secretions indirectly by stimulation and release of SST into systemic circulation (Mulholland et al. 1989) and by sympathetic noradrenergic efferent nerves via α-adrenergic receptor (Messmer, Zimmerman, and Lenz 1993). NPY dose-dependently inhibits CCK-stimulated exocrine pancreatic secretion but does not alter bicarbonate concentration in secretin-stimulated pancreatic secretions (Mulholland, Lally, and Taborsky 1991). The action of NPY on pancreatic exocrine secretions is likely indirect via alteration of intrapancreatic neurotransmission (Mulholland, Lally, and Taborsky 1991) or via its splanchnic vasoconstrictive effect (Sumi et al. 1991). PYY is structurally similar to PP and significantly inhibits secretin- and CCK-stimulated pancreatic exocrine secretion (Tatemoto 1982). PYY acts via intrapancreatic cholinergic nerves and is independent of adrenergic nerves or extrapancreatic nerves (Brodish et al. 1993, 1995; DeMar, Taylor, and Fink 1991). PYY acts via the Y1 receptor in rats and Y2 receptor in dogs (Grandt et al. 1995; Teyssen et al. 1996). Substance P binds to neurokinin receptors on acinar cells and modulates pancreatic neural signaling and blood flow that subsequently influence exocrine pancreatic secretion (Barreto et al. 2010).
Physiology of Exocrine Pancreatic Secretion
The function of the exocrine pancreas is tightly regulated by the neuroendocrine system. Please refer to the excellent reviews on the topic for more details (Konturek, Pepera, et al. 2003; Owyang 2009; Owyang and Logsdon 2004; Singer and Niebergall-Roth 2009; Wang and Cui 2007).
The exocrine pancreatic secretions are elicited via a complex interplay of neural, humoral, and paracrine mediators (Figure 2). The islets and the exocrine tissue are richly innervated with central and autonomic nervous system with afferent and efferent signaling. The vagus nerve serves a major role in the regulatory pathway. In addition, enteropancreatic neurons between the pancreas and the gastrointestinal tract mediate the vagovagal enteropancreatic reflexes that are important in the intestinal phase of the exocrine pancreatic secretion. The vagovagal enteropancreatic reflex consists of the afferent and efferent fibers of the vagus nerve that coordinate responses to the gut stimuli via the DVC. The intrapancreatic postganglionic neurons are activated by efferents arising from the duodenal mucosa that is in contact with chyme (intestinal phase). Acetylcholine released by these neurons acts on the M1 and M3 muscarinic receptors on the acinar cells to elicit exocrine secretions (Singer and Niebergall-Roth 2009).

Cholecystokinin (CCK) stimulation of the exocrine pancreas is species dependent. In rodents, CCK released from the I cells within the intestine enter the circulation and directly stimulate the CCK1 receptors on the exocrine acini to stimulate secretions. In addition, CCK can also activate the sensory nerve fibers resulting in the activation of long vagovagal and short enteropancreatic cholinergic reflexes. However, in humans, the latter process is the most accepted physiological process of exocrine stimulation. Adapted from Wang and Cui (2007).
Besides cholinergic nerves, the peptide CCK is a very important mediator of exocrine pancreatic secretory activity and also has a trophic effect on pancreas (Yamamoto et al. 2003). CCK is a heterogenous protein secreted by I cells in the small intestine and by neurons in the brain. The plasma CCK that originates from the small intestine is a mixture of several types of CCKs (CCK-58, -33, -22, and -8), but the prominent molecular forms in the blood are different in different species, that is, CCK-58 in rats and dogs, CCK-33 in humans, and CCK-22 in pigs (Cantor and Rehfeld 1989; Eysselein et al. 1987; Reeve et al. 2003; Rehfeld et al. 2001; Wang and Cui 2007). CCK, in addition, also inhibits gastric emptying, gastric acid secretion, and gall bladder contraction. Since physiological levels of CCK stimulate exocrine pancreatic secretion in humans and rodents, it was assumed that CCK stimulates CCK-A receptor. However, exocrine pancreatic secretion by physiological levels of CCK (but not supraphysiological levels) is inhibited completely by atropine, suggesting the importance of cholinergic stimulation in eliciting exocrine secretion (Konturek, Zabielski, et al. 2003). In addition, human pancreatic acini do not have any functional CCK receptors and are not responsive to physiological concentrations of CCK in vitro (Ji et al. 2001; Miyasaka et al. 2002). In contrast, rodent pancreatic acini are responsive to physiological concentrations of CCK in vitro owing to the presence of CCK-A receptors on the pancreatic acini. Thus, it is generally accepted that in humans, exocrine pancreatic secretion is almost exclusively mediated through the cholinergic stimulation of the acini, whereas in rodents, there is a dual mechanism of stimulation, both direct CCK-A receptor stimulation and indirectly via the cholinergic stimulation (Owyang 2009).
Independent of the action of CCK, the intestinal serotonin also mediates exocrine pancreatic secretion. Luminal factors such as osmolarity and disaccharides activate 5-HT3 receptors, whereas mechanical stimulation activates both 5-HT3 and 5-HT2 receptors on mucosal vagal afferent fibers in the intestine (Li et al. 2001). Activation of these serotonin receptors stimulates exocrine pancreatic secretion. The enterochromaffin cells within the intestinal mucosa are the richest source of serotonin in the gut. Serotonin may act as a paracrine substance and mediate exocrine pancreatic secretion via a cholinergic pathway similar to that of CCK, since acute vagotomy, and perivagal or luminal application of capsaicin, abolishes serotonin-induced pancreatic secretion (Zhu et al. 2001). CCK and serotonin may act at the level of the nodose ganglia to synergistically increase exocrine pancreatic secretion, and this is exemplified by the robust postprandial exocrine pancreatic secretion mediated by modest increases in plasma CCK levels (Owyang and Logsdon 2004).
Secretin is another major hormone that influences exocrine pancreatic secretion. It plays an important role in the secretion of bicarbonate-rich fluid that helps in flushing the pancreatic zymogens from the acinar lumen into the pancreatic ducts. In addition, secretin plays inhibitory roles in gastric acid secretion and gastric motility. Luminal acid–influenced release of secretin is mediated by a secretin-releasing peptide that in turn is dependent on vagal afferent pathways. Secretin’s action at physiological doses is abolished by atropine. Thus, similar to CCK, secretin’s actions are also mediated by vagal afferent cholinergic pathways (Li et al. 1990). Similar to serotonin, CCK and secretin also act at the level of the nodose ganglia to synergistically increase exocrine pancreatic secretion (Owyang 2009).
Drug-induced Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis in humans may be manifested as a pain in the upper abdomen radiating to the back and nausea that aggravates with eating. It can be mild or fulminant with severe systemic effects. In general human population, the incidence of pancreatitis is about 2% but in certain cohorts like HIV patients, the incidence can be up to 40% (Trivedi and Pitchumoni 2005). The principal causes of pancreatitis in humans include alcoholism and biliary obstruction. However, the etiology of pancreatitis may be divided into several categories, such as toxic (alcoholism, pesticides, and drugs), obstructive (gallstones, tumors, worms, and congenital defects), metabolic (hyperlipidemia, hypercalcemia, and acidosis), infectious (parasitic, viral, and bacterial), and genetic (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor 1, serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 1, and cationic trypsinogen 1). The index of suspicion of drug-induced pancreatitis is very low, especially when compared to drug-induced liver injury due to the subclinical nature of early pancreatitis and the absence of pancreatic enzyme evaluation in routine clinical pathology. As a result, it is underdiagnosed and underreported. Even when it is suspected, it is difficult to establish a link between pancreatitis and the suspect drug due to the long latency of onset of the disease. In addition, even if pancreatitis is diagnosed, usually alcohol or biliary diseases are implicated, and the drug remains a silent actor and is never a suspect (Trivedi and Pitchumoni 2005). There have been several surveys aimed at identifying drugs associated with pancreatitis, and several algorithms have been proposed (Badalov et al. 2007; Mallory and Kern 1980; Trivedi and Pitchumoni 2005). In these surveys, several categories of drugs have been implicated to be associated with pancreatitis, such as antimicrobials (pentavalent antimonials, tetracycline, pentamidine, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and sulfasalazine), HIV drugs (didanosine and nefilnavir), diuretics (furosemide), grastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and mesalamine), immunosuppressive (
Even though supramaximal stimulation of the pancreas is not a common cause of pancreatitis in humans, secretagogue hyperstimulation models such as cerulein-induced hyperstimulation with or without sensitizers like ethanol and LPS are used to understand the pathophysiology of pancreatitis (Lerch and Gorelick 2013). The cerulein-hyperstimulation model is most widely used because of its ease of induction, noninvasiveness, and reproducibility. The pathogenesis of secretagogue-induced pancreatitis has been reviewed in several recent articles (Lerch and Gorelick 2013; Saluja et al. 2007; Van Acker et al. 2007). Several factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of secretagogue-induced pancreatitis. A detailed review is beyond the scope of this article. For more information on the pathogenesis of secretagogue-induced pancreatitis, please refer to the following reviews (Lerch and Gorelick 2013; Saluja et al. 2007; Van Acker et al. 2007). Briefly, at supramaximal doses, the pancreatic enzyme secretion is blocked resulting in co-localization of zymogens and lysosomes, activation of trypsinogen by cathepsin B, and subsequent activation of other zymogens by trypsin, the resulting acinar cell injury and release of chemokines and cyokines causes inflammation and infiltration of leukocytes. The leukocytes secrete more cytokines and potentiate a self-propagating inflammatory reaction and systemic disease (Saluja et al. 2007).
The CCK-A receptors in the rat pancreas exist in both high- and low-affinity states, and these contribute to some understanding of the pathogenesis of secretagogue-induced pancreatitis. CCK and its agonists cerulein or carbachol have biphasic or bell-shaped dose–response curves, that is, at physiological dose stimulation, there is an increase in amylase secretion; but at high (supramaximal) doses, the secretion of amylase is inhibited. In addition at supramaximal stimulation, pancreatitis is observed. A novel CCK agonist CCK-JMV-180 has a unique monophasic dose–response curve compared to CCK and its agonists in that, its stimulation curve is more or less a plateau at both low and high doses (Saluja et al. 1989). This indicates that exocrine pancreatic secretion at physiological doses of CCK and its agonists as well as CCK-JMV-180 is mediated by high-affinity receptors. In contrast, the inhibition of exocrine secretion and induction of pancreatitis at high doses of CCK and its agonists are mediated by low-affinity receptors. CCK-JMV-180 acts as an antagonist of the low-affinity receptors and prevents the inhibition of pancreatic exocrine secretion and also pancreatitis. Thus, the inhibition of enzyme secretion at high doses via the low-affinity receptors plays an important role in secretagogue-induced pancreatitis (Saluja et al. 2007).
Calcium signaling plays an important role in the molecular pathways of several metabolic cells. CCK and its agonists bind to G-protein-coupled transmembrane receptors on the basolateral surface of the pancreatic acinar cells and activate phospholipase C resulting in the cleavage of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate into diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3). IP3 causes the release of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (Thorn et al. 1993a, 1993b). Based on the type of stimulation, the duration of the intracellular Ca2+ oscillations or spikes can vary. These Ca2+ spikes result in a burst of exocytic activity causing the release of zymogens. With acetylcholine, these spikes are restricted to the secretary pole of the cell; whereas with CCK, the spikes are local followed by distribution to the entire cell. With physiological stimulation, the zymogens are released only from the secretory pole; whereas with supramaximal stimulation, there is a sustained increase in Ca2+ spikes resulting in a significant increase in zymogen release followed by sustained increase at a lower level (Matozaki et al. 1990; Thorn and Petersen 1993). Hypercalcemia has also been associated with pancreatitis, and increased serum calcium sensitizes the exocrine pancreas to secretagogue-induced pancreatitis (Frick et al. 1995; Mithofer, Fernandez-del Castillo, et al. 1995; Mithofer, Warshaw, et al. 1995). Hypocalcemia observed during pancreatitis is usually a sequela of pancreatitis and is likely related to precipitation and sequestration of calcium in soft tissues and alterations in calcitonin and parathyroid hormone (Bhattacharya et al. 1985; Edmondson 1952; Izquierdo et al. 1985; Norberg, DeRoos, and Kaplan 1975).
The subapical actin cytoskeleton is important for the secretion of zymogens after appropriate stimulation of the acinar cells. During supramaximal stimulation, the actin cytoskeleton and the associated intermediate filaments are ablated resulting in the prevention of apical exocytosis. However, treatment with CCK-JMV-180 prevents this process, suggesting that the low-affinity receptors may play a role in this process (O'Konski and Pandol 1993). Once the zymogen granules are not secreted, they accumulate within the acinar cell. Upon excess stimulation, these accumulated zymogen granules co-localize with lysosomal enzymes like cathepsin B (Saito et al. 1987; Saluja et al. 1987; Watanabe et al. 1984) and convert the inactive trypsinogen into trypsin, which in turn activates a host of other peptidases, nucleases, lipases, and hydrolases. The activation of these enzymes results in hyperamylasemia, hyperlipasemia, pancreatic edema, acinar cell degeneration, and necrosis.
Supramaximal stimulation by CCK results in a powerful, biphasic activation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB; Gukovsky et al. 1998). This activation of NF-κB was not noted during pancreatic stimulation with physiological levels of CCK or with JMV-CCK-180. In addition, JMV-CCK-180 is able to abolish cerulein-induced NF-κB activation (Gukovsky et al. 1998). NF-κB transcriptionally regulates the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 that recruit inflammatory cells to the site of hyperstimulation (Zaninovic et al. 2000). The recruited inflammatory cells secrete more inflammatory cytokine mediators such as tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and platelet-activating factor as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and IL-1R antagonist resulting in systemic inflammation and sepsis (Makhija and Kingsnorth 2002).
In summary, a thorough understanding of unique histological features and physiology of exocrine pancreas is essential in order to better understand the pathophysiology of pancreatitis. Inspite of the substantial strides made in understanding the pathophysiology of pancreatitis, it still remains a significant clinical problem mainly due to the myriad factors that are associated with the pathogenesis and diagnosis of pancreatitis.
Footnotes
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Drs. Robert Sills (NIEHS), Mark Cesta (NIEHS), Jerry Hardisty (EPL, Inc.), and Rodney Miller (EPL, Inc.) for their support and encouragement. In addition, the author also acknowledges Mr. David Sabio (EPL, Inc.) for the fine illustrations presented in this article.
