The effect of marriage pairings on fertility intentions is specific and has attracted increasing scholarly attention in recent years. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this study explored the impact of couples’ educational pairings, age pairings, and income pairings on women’s desired number of children and their preference for sons. The results showed that marital-educational pairing had a greater effect on women’s fertility intentions than age and income pairing. The effect of marital pairing on women’s fertility intentions is also influenced by women’s age and urban–rural differences. The study helps to understand the changes in women’s fertility intentions and the factors influencing them after the fertility policy transition in China and inspires scholars to pay more attention to the interaction process between couples in the study of fertility intentions.
BastenS. (2015). Understanding ultra-low fertility in Hong Kong. In RonaldR.RindfussK. C. (eds), Low and lower fertility (pp. 63–86). Springer.
2.
BeckerG. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1086/261880
DaiX. E.ChenJ.DaiM. (2023) Research progress on parentonomics (pp. 126–142). Economic Perspectives.
9.
DuanZ. Q.JinX. Y. (2020). Assortative-marriage among rural and urban population and its effects on the age at first marriage in China. Population Journal, 6, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.16405/j.cnki.1004-129X.2020.06.005
10.
GaoJ. (2023). Analysis of the factors influencing the low fertility intention of contemporary young women and the path to cracking it--Analysis of online public opinion feedback based on the perspective of identity invisibility. Journal of the Party School of Leshan Municipal, 25(02), 92–99.
11.
GlavinP.YoungM.SchiemanS. (2020). Labor market influences on women’s fertility decisions: Longitudinal evidence from Canada. Social Science Research, 88, 102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102417
12.
GoldscheiderF.BernhardtE.LappegårdT. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
13.
GreenwoodJ.GunerN.KocharkovG.SantosC. (2014). Marry your like: Assortative mating and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 104(5), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.348
14.
HashemzadehM.ShariatiM.Mohammad NazariA.KeramatA. (2021). Childbearing intention and its associated factors: A systematic review. Nursing Open, 8(5), 2354–2368. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.849
15.
HeL. H.ChenM. (2021). Bargain within couples and fertility: An explanation for the falling fertility rate in China. World Economic Papers, 4, 74–88.
16.
JiY. C.ZhengZ. Z. (2018). China’s low fertility rate from the perspective of gender and development. Social Sciences in China, (08),143–208.
17.
KerckhoffA. C.DavisK. E. (1962). Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089791
18.
KlobasJ. E. (2010). Social psychological influences on fertility intentions:A study of eight countries in different social, economic and policy contexts. Università Bocconi. Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics.
19.
KravdalØ.RindfussR. R. (2008). Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 854–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300508
20.
MäenpääE.JalovaaraM. (2015). Achievement replacing ascription? Changes in homogamy in education and social class origins in Finland. Advances in Life Course Research, 26, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2015.09.001
21.
MatysiakA.Węziak-BiałowolskaD. (2016). Country-specific conditions for work and family reconciliation: An attempt at quantification. European Journal of Population, 32(4), 475–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9366-9
22.
NitscheN.MatysiakA.Van BavelJ.VignoliD. (2018). Partners’ educational pairings and fertility across europe. Demography, 55(4), 1195–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0681-8
PienkowskiD. (2019). Is the economic mechanism of quantity-quality trade off sustainable?Problemy Ekorozwoju, 14(1), 185–198.
25.
PiotrowskiM.TongY. (2016). Education and fertility decline in China during transitional times: A cohort approach. Social Science Research, 55, 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.10.001
26.
QingS. S.DingJ. H. (2015). Couple's fertility intention difference across only child families: Evidence from matched-couple survey in Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 5, 81–93.
27.
RiedererB.Buber-EnnserI. (2019). Regional context and realization of fertility intentions: The role of the urban context. Regional Studies, 53(12), 1669–1679. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1599843
28.
SchneiderT. (2019). Partnership dissolution after childbirth in Ireland: On the importance of pregnancy intentions. Economic and Social Review, 50(3), 459–489.
29.
SeltzerN. (2019). Beyond the great recession: Labor market polarization and ongoing fertility decline in the United States. Demography, 56(4), 1463–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00790-6
30.
ShiZ. L.YangY. Y. (2014). Fertility intention and fertility behavior in Hubei Province under the New two-child policy. Population Research, 38(05), 27–40.
31.
SilA.DhillonP. (2023). Modelling determinants of deaths attributable to external causes among adults in India. Omega, 86(4), 1254–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228211009736
32.
SunS.ZhaoX. (2022). Hong Kong wives say no to a big family—educational pairings and fertility in Hong Kong. Journal of Demographic Economics, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2022.17.
TestaM. R. (2014). On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: Individual-and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research, 21, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.005
35.
TrimarchiA.Van BavelJ. (2017). Education and the transition to fatherhood: The role of selection into union. Demography, 54(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0533-3
36.
TrimarchiA.Van BavelJ. (2020). Partners’ educational characteristics and fertility: Disentangling the effects of earning potential and unemployment risk on second births. European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 36(3), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-019-09537-w
37.
UchudiJ. (2001). Spouses’ socioeconomic characteristics and fertility differences in sub-saharan Africa: Does spouse’s education matter?Journal of Biosocial Science, 33(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932001004813
38.
UpadhyayU.'D.GipsonJ. D.WithersM.LewisS.CiaraldiE. J.FraserA.HuchkoM. J.PrataN. (2014). Women’s empowerment and fertility: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 115, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.014
VeeversJ. E. (1988). The “real” marriage squeeze: Mate selection, mortality, and the mating gradient. Sociological Perspectives, 31(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389081
41.
WangJ.LiY. J. (2021). Educational assortative mating and marital satisfaction. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2, 52–127.
42.
WangJ.ShiR. B. (2021). Marginal opportunity cost of having the second child in China: Based on family economic status. Population & Economics, 4, 96–107.
43.
WangW.FamoyeF. (1997). Modeling household fertility decisions with generalized Poisson regression. Journal of Population Economics, 10(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050043
44.
WegbomA. I.BademosiA.EdetC. K.GreenK. I.Sapira-OrduL.FagbamigbeA. F. (2022). Rural-urban disparities in birth interval among women of reproductive age in Nigeria. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 17488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22142-y
45.
WellsY. O.DietschE. (2014). Childbearing traditions of Indian women at home and abroad: An integrative literature review. Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 27(4), e1–e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2014.08.006
WuF.YuanY. H.HsuC. T.ChengQ. W.LinC. S. (2022). Application of protoplast regeneration to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis in nicotiana tabacum. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2464, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2164-6_4
48.
YanZ.HuiL.WenbinJ.LiuxueL.YuemeiL.BohanL.LiliW. (2021). Third birth intention of the childbearing-age population in mainland China and sociodemographic differences: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 2280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12338-8
49.
YangX. Y.LiS. Z.ShangZ. J. (2011). Son preference or preference for having son and daughter? Chinese attitudes towards reproduction and policy implications. Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, 6, 27–34.
50.
YangY. N. (2020). The effect of delayed marriage age and couples age gap on the birth will in China. South China Population, 35(03), 21–32.
51.
YooS. H. (2014). Educational differentials in cohort fertility during the fertility transition in South Korea. Demographic Research, 30, 1463–1494. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2014.30.53
52.
ZhaoM. H. (2019). Fertility intentions for a second child in China: Female educational attainment and assortative marriage. Population Journal, 41(03), 16–27.
53.
ZhuM. B. (2017). Advances in the study of marriage matching. Economic Perspectives, 6, 121–131.
