Son Preference,Eldest Son Preference,and Educational Attainment: Evidence From Chinese Families

Abstract

Gender inequality has long been an important topic of concern. This article empirically measures whether there exists son preference and eldest son preference in China, from the perspective of an individual’s educational attainment, by using the data set of China Family Panel Studies in 2010. We find that (a) sons receive more education than daughters, and that the gender education gap for rural residents is greater than that of residents from urban areas; (b) regardless of the eldest or noneldest sons, the education received by sons is significantly higher than that of daughters, and there is no significant difference between the eldest and noneldest son’s education; (c) the gender education gap narrows over time, and expands as the number of sibling increases. Finally, we explore the multiple effect mechanisms.

Keywords

son preference eldest son preference siblings inequality gender education gap

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnold

Choe

M. K.

Roy

T. K.

(1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52, 301-315.

Arnold

Kishor

Roy

T. K.

(2002). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28, 759-785.

Bandura

Barbaranelli

Caprara

G. V.

Pastorelli

(2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187-206.

Barro

R. J.

Lee

J. W.

(2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184-198.

Becker

G. S.

Lewis

H. G.

(1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81, S279-S288.

Bernhardt

(1995). The inheritance rights of daughters: The song anomaly? Modern China, 21, 269-309.

Beutel

A. M.

Axinn

W. G.

(2002). Gender, social change, and educational attainment. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51, 109-134.

Black

S. E.

Grönqvist

Öckert

(2018). Born to lead? The effect of birth order on noncognitive abilities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100, 274-286.

(2018). Son preference, children’s gender and parents’ time allocation: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50(45), 1-17.

10.

Bray

(1997). Technology and gender: Fabrics of power in late imperial China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

11.

Buchmann

Diprete

T. A.

Mcdaniel

(2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319-337.

12.

Chen

Meng

(2013). Prenatal sex selection and missing girls in China: Evidence from the diffusion of diagnostic ultrasound. Journal of Human Resources, 48, 36-70.

13.

Choi

Hwang

(2017). Transition of son preference: Evidence from Korea. Retrieved from https://sole-jole.org/16232.pdf

14.

de Haan

. (2010). Birth order, family size and educational attainment. Economics of Education Review, 29, 576-588.

15.

Dong

Luo

Zhang

Liu

Bai

(2019). Intergenerational transmission of education: The case of rural China. China Economic Review, 53, 311-323.

16.

Dyson

Moore

(1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9, 35-60.

17.

Froiland

J. M.

(2015). Parents’ weekly descriptions of autonomy supportive communication: Promoting children’s motivation to learn and positive emotions. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 117-126.

18.

Froiland

J. M.

Davison

M. L.

(2014). Parental expectations and school relationships as contributors to adolescents’ positive outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 1-17.

19.

Gallagher

A. M.

Kaufman

J. C.

(2005). Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Zeng

X. Q.

(2011). The effect of marker discrimination on gender wage Gap in Urban China. Economic Research Journal, 46(6), 45-56. (In Chinese)

21.

Guo

Yan

(2015). Gender gap in labor market and the related regulations. Economic Research Journal, 50(7), 42-56. (In Chinese)

22.

Gustafsson

(2000). Economic transformation and the gender earnings gap in urban China. Journal of Population Economics, 13, 305-329.

23.

Hannum

Xie

(1994). Trends in educational gender inequality in china: 1949-1985. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 13(1), 73-98.

24.

Jayachandran

Pande

(2017). Why are Indian children so short? The role of birth order and son preference. American Economic Review, 107, 2600-2629.

25.

Kantarevic

Mechoulan

(2006). Birth order, educational attainment, and earnings: An investigation using the PSID. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 755-777.

26.

Kureishi

Wakabayashi

(2011). Son preference in Japan. Journal of Population Economics, 24, 873-893.

27.

Larsen

Chung

Gupta

M. D.

(1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52, 317-325.

28.

Lavely

Xiao

Freedman

(1990). The rise in female education in China: National and regional patterns. China Quarterly, 121, 61-93.

29.

Lee

(2008). Sibling size and investment in children’s education: An Asian instrument. Journal of Population Economics, 21, 855-875.

30.

Lee

M. H.

(2012). The one-child policy and gender equality in education in China: Evidence from household data. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33, 41-52.

31.

Lee

Y. J.

Parish

W. L.

Willis

R. J.

(1994). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in Taiwan. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1010-1041.

32.

Zhang

(2008). Investment and returns to human capital in China. Beijing, China: Peking University Press. (In Chinese)

33.

Zhang

Zhu

(2008). The quantity-quality trade-off of children in a developing country: Identification using Chinese twins. Demography, 45, 223-243.

34.

Song

Liu

(2014). The evolution of the gender wage gap of the staff of China’s cities and towns. Management World, 2014(3), 53-65. (In Chinese)

35.

Lin

I. F.

Goldman

Weinstein

Lin

Y. H.

Gorrindo

Seeman

(2003). Gender differences in adult children’s support of their parents in Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 184-200.

36.

Lin

M. J.

Liu

J. T.

Qian

(2014). More missing women, fewer dying girls: The impact of sex-selective abortion on sex at birth and relative female mortality in Taiwan. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12, 899-926.

37.

Luo

Zhou

(2010). The impact of birth order and gender on the human capital. Economic Science, 2010(3), 107-119. (In Chinese)

38.

Maccoby

E. E.

Jacklin

C. N.

(1974). Myth, reality and shades of gray-what we know and don’t know about sex differences. Psychology Today, 8(7), 109-112.

39.

Robitaille

M. C.

Chatterjee

(2018). Sex-selective abortions and infant mortality in India: The role of parents’ stated son preference. Journal of Development Studies, 54, 47-56.

40.

Rose

(1999). Consumption smoothing and excess female mortality in rural India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 41-49.

41.

Rose

(2000). Gender bias, credit constraints and time allocation in rural India. Economic Journal, 110, 738-758.

42.

Sen

(1990, December 20). More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Times Book Review, pp. 61-66.

43.

Strauss

Thomas

(1995). Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family decisions. In Behrman

Srinivasan

T. N.

(Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 3A, pp. 1883-2023). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

44.

Wang

(2005). Gender wage differentials in China’s urban labor market. Economic Research Journal, 2005(12), 35-44. (In Chinese)

45.

(2011). Son preferences, women’s intra-household bargaining power and its impacts on nutrition and health. China Economic Quarterly, 10, 869-886. (In Chinese)

46.

(2012). Gender gap in education in urban and rural China. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 32, 112-137. (In Chinese)

47.

Xie

(2014). The impact of education on health in China. China Economic Review, 29, 1-18.

48.

Xie

(2015). The sampling design of the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chinese Journal of Sociology, 1, 471-484.

49.

Xie

Shauman

K. A.

(2003). Women in science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

50.

W. H.

K. H.

(2006). Gender, sib-ship structure, and educational inequality in Taiwan: Son preference revisited. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1057-1068.

51.

Zeng

Hesketh

(2016). The effects of china’s universal two-child policy. Lancet, 388, 1930-1938.

52.

Zhang

Haddad

Torres

Chen

(2011). The reciprocal relationships among parents’ expectations, adolescents’ expectations, and adolescents’ achievement: A two-wave longitudinal analysis of the NELS data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 479-489.

53.

Zhang

Z. S.

Chen

(2013). College expansion and gender equalization in higher education: An empirical study based on 2008 Chinese General Social Survey. Sociological Studies, 28, 173-196. (In Chinese)

54.

Zheng

(2013). Sibling sex composition, intra-family resource allocation, and educational attainment: An explanation of educational gender inequality in China. Sociological Studies, 28, 76-103. (In Chinese)

55.

Zheng

(2018). Is it good to have a brother for a female? A study on gender discrimination in family human capital investment. China Economic Quarterly, 17, 277-298. (In Chinese)

56.

Zhong

Y. J.

Dong

(2018). Do more siblings lower educational attainment? Micro-evidence from Chinese families. Journal of Finance and Economics, 44(2), 75-89. (In Chinese)