This study examines the social factors and bilingual education for the children of international couples in South Korea. Previous studies identified two negative factors for bilingual education based on destination and immigrant characteristics: resistance from local spouses and the immigrants’ need for assimilation. We further develop the concept of global language status, which may moderate these effects. Using the 2015 Korean Multicultural Family Survey, we conduct regression analyses to test the two factors based on the origin country of immigrant wives. The findings show that the global language status is a meaningful factor that impacts the direction of the local resistance and assimilation effects. Korean husbands’ decision-making power on children’s education is significantly associated with a decrease in bilingual education. Korean language proficiency and citizenship as markers of assimilation also affect bilingual education, but they show a decrease for Chinese wives but an increase for Southeast Asian wives.
ChaS. E.RyuJ. (2019). Asian migration background and psychosocial adaptation of adolescents in multicultural families: Migration background, barriers or resources?Korea Journal of Population Studies, 42(3), 55–81. (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.31693/kjps.2019.09.42.3.55
2.
Fernández KellyM. P.SchaufflerR. (1996). Divided fates: Immigrant children and the new assimilation. In PortesA. (Ed.). The new second generation (pp. 30–53). Russell Sage Foundation.
HojatM.ForoughiD.MahmoudiH.HolakoueeF. (2009). A desire to return to the country of birth as a function of language preference: An empirical study with Iranian immigrants in the United States. International Migration, 48(3), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00550.x
HwangS. S.KimD. S. (2019). Effects of spousal difference in relative educational status on marital satisfaction: Cases of transnational couples in Korea. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 42(2), 1–24. (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.31693/kjps.2019.06.42.2.1.
7.
International Organization for Migration (2020). The world migration report. International Organization for Migration.
8.
JonesG. W. (2012). International marriage in Asia: What do we know, and what do we need to know? In KimD. (Ed.), Cross-border marriage: Global trends and diversity (pp. 13–49). Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
9.
KimD. (2006). A conceptual scheme of the international marriage of Koreans and analyses of the marriage and divorce registration data. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 29(1), 25–56. (in Korean).
10.
KimH. M. (2007). The state and migrant women: Diverging hopes in the making of “multicultural families” in contemporary Korea. Korea Journal, 47(4), 100–199. https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2007.47.4.100
11.
KimD. (Ed.), (2008). Cross-border marriage: Process and dynamics. Institute of Population and Aging Research.
12.
KimN. H. J. (2012). Multiculturalism and the politics of belonging: The puzzle of multiculturalism in South Korea. Citizenship Studies, 16(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2012.651406
13.
KimM. (2013). Citizenship projects for marriage migrants in South Korea: Intersecting motherhood with ethnicity and class. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(4), 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxt015
14.
KimD. (2015). International marriage of Koreans and the adjustment of foreign spouses. Jipmundang. (in Korean).
15.
KimY.ChungH.LeeE.ChaeS. (2010). A study on use and succession of language and culture in multi-cultural families. Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. (in Korean).
16.
KimD.LeeS.LeeS. (2021). Ethnic identity and perception of discrimination of foreign mothers, and their plan to send children back to the homeland for studying: Conditional effects of mother’s native language. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 44(3), 43–70, (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.31693/KJPS.2021.09.44.3.43
17.
KimC.MinP. G. (2010). Marital patterns and use of mother tongue at home among native-born Asian Americans. Social Forces, 89(1), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0097
18.
KimS. K.YangK. M. (2012). The study on the factors which affect the ego-resiliency of students from multicultural families. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 19(11), 147–176. (in Korean).
19.
LeeH. K. (2008). International marriage and the state in South Korea: Focusing on governmental policy. Citizenship Studies, 12(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020701794240
20.
LevelsM.DronkersJ.KraaykampG. (2008). Immigrant children’s educational achievement in western countries: Origin, destination, and community effects on mathematical performance. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 835–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300507
21.
LutzA. (2006). Spanish maintenance among English-speaking Latino youth: The role of individual and social characteristics. Social Forces, 84(3), 1417–1433. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0057
PortesA.HaoL. (1998). E pluribus unum: Bilingualism and loss of language in the second generation. Sociology of Education, 71(4), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673171
25.
PortesA.HaoL. (2002). The price of uniformity: Language, family and personality adjustment in the immigrant second generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(6), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987022000009368
26.
RumbautR. G.MasseyD. S.BeanF. D. (2006). Linguistic life expectancies: Immigrant language retention in Southern California. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00132.x
27.
Statistics Korea (2019). Vital statistics: Marriage registry data, 2010-2018. Korean Statistical Information Service.
28.
SueC. A.TellesE. E. (2007). Assimilation and gender in naming. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1383–1415. https://doi.org/10.1086/511801
29.
van TubergenF.KalmijnM. (2005). Destination‐language proficiency in cross‐national perspective: A study of immigrant groups in nine western countries. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1412–1457. https://doi.org/10.1086/428931
30.
WooY. K.KimE. H. (2016). The impact of bilingual competence on resilience and cultural identity of multicultural children. Multicultural Education Studies, 9(3), 63–81. (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.14328/mes.2016.9.30.63
