This study examines the emotion work of non-migrant women as they seek to sustain family life across borders. We draw on in-depth interviews with 59 non-migrant women in Guanajuato, Mexico who had immigrant spouses in the USA to assess emotion work dynamics between partners. Our analysis reveals that non-migrant women do emotion work that entails imagining lives abroad and then tailoring emotional support that addresses the needs of spouses. We also discuss how the difficulties associated with prolonged separation leads women to suppress their own needs and feelings, which can lead to emotional burnout and marital conflict. Putting non-migrant women and their activities at the center of our analysis highlights the emotional costs of migration for those who remain behind and the ways in which emotion work is a highly gendered activity that reinforces inequality through communication. We highlight how women’s subordinated status in transnational Mexican families and the need to keep the remittances flowing help explain why emotion work falls largely on women.
AbregoL. J. (2014). Sacrificing families: Navigating laws, labor, and love across borders. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AliceaM. (1997). “A CHAMBERED NAUTILUS”: The Contradictory Nature of Puerto Rican Women’s Role in the Social Construction of a Transnational Community. Gender & Society, 11(5): 597–626.
3.
ArandaE. M. (2006). Emotional Bridges to Puerto Rico: Migration, return migration, and the struggles of Incorporation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
4.
AriasP. (2013). International Migration and Familial Change in Communities of Origin: Transformation and Resistance. Annual Review of Sociology39, 429–50.
5.
BaldassarL. (2007). Transnational Families and the Provision of Moral and Emotional Support: The Relationship between Truth and Distance. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power14(4): 385–409.
6.
BaldassarL. (2008). Missing Kin and Longing to be Together: Emotions and the Construction of Co-Presence in Transnational Relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies29(3): 247–266.
7.
BarajasM.RamirezE. (2007). Beyond Home-Host Dichotomies: A Comparative Examination of Gender Relations in a Transnational Mexican Community. Sociology Perspectives50(3): 367–392.
8.
BeverS. (2002). Migration and the Transformation of Gender Roles and Hierarchies in Yucatan. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems31(2): 199–230.
9.
BianchiS. M.SayerL. C.MilkieM. A.RobinsonJ. P. (2012) Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?Social Forces91(1): 55–63.
10.
BoehmD. A. (2012). Intimate migrations: Gender, family, and Illegality among transnational Mexicans. New York: NYU Press.
11.
CarlingJ. R. (2008). The Human Dynamics of Migrant Transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies31(8): 1452–1477.
12.
ChávezS.EdelbluteH.Korver-GlennE. (2016). Life on the Edge: Balancing Gendered and Occupational Identities among Unauthorized Migrant Roofers. Qualitative Sociology, 39(2), 125-146.
13.
CollinsP. H. (1994). Shifting the Center: Race, Class, and Feminist Theorizing about Motherhood. In Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency, edited by EGlennGChangLForceyNew York: Routledge
14.
CollinsR. (2004). Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15.
DamingerA. (2019). The Cognitive Dimension of Household Labor.American Sociological Review84(4): 609–633.
16.
DanielsA. K. (1987). Invisible Work. Social Problems, 34(5) 403–415.
17.
D’AubeterreB.EugeniaM. (1995). Tiempos De Espera: Emigración Masculina, Ciclo Doméstico Y Situación De Las Mujeres En San Miguel Acuexcomac, Puebla. pp. 255–297 in Relaciones De Género y Transformaciones Agrarias, edited by G. M. Y. V. Salles. México, D.F.: Colegio de Mexico.
18.
DevaultM. L. (1999). Comfort and Struggle: Emotion Work in Family Life. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science561(1): 52–63.
19.
di LeonardoM. (1987). The Female World of Cards and Holidays: Women, Families, and the Work of Kinship. Signs12(3): 440–453.
20.
DrebyJ. (2009). Gender and Transnational Gossip. Qualitative Sociology32(1):33–52.
21.
DrebyJ. (2010). Divided by borders: Mexican migrants and their children. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
DurandJ.MasseyD. S.ZentenoR. M. (2001). Mexican Immigration to the United States: Continuities and Changes. Latin American Research Review, 36(1), 107-127.
23.
EnglandP.2005. “Emerging Theories of Care Work. Annual Review of Sociology31: 381–399.
24.
EricksonR. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing Family Work: The Effect of Emotion Work on Perceptions of Marital Quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(4): 888–900.
25.
EricksonR. J. (2005). Why Emotion Work Matters: Sex, Gender, and the Division of Household Labor. Journal of Marriage and Family67(2): 337–351.
26.
Francisco-MenchavezV. (2018). The labor of care: Filipina migrants and transnational families in the Digital age. Urban: University of Illinois Press.
27.
FrankR.WildsmithE. (2005). The Grass Widows of Mexico: Migration and Union Dissolution in a Binational Context. Social Forces83(3),919–948.
28.
GoffmanE. (1966). Behavior in Public places: Notes on the social Organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
29.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
30.
HamiltonE. (2016). Changes in Transnational Family Structures of Mexican Farm Workers in the Era of Border Militarization. Demography53:1429–1451.
31.
HaysS. (1998). The cultural Contradictions of motherhood. Yale: Yale University Press.
32.
HerreraG. (2013). Gender and International Migration: Contributions and Cross Fertilizations. Annual Review of Sociology39: 47–89.
33.
HirschJ. S. (2003). A Courtship after marriage: Sexuality and love in Mexican transnational families.Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
HirschJ. S.Muñoz‐LaboyM.NyhusC. M.YountK. M.BauermeisterJ. A. (2009). They “miss more than anything their normal life back home”: masculinity and extramarital sex among Mexican migrants in Atlanta. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(1), 23–32.
35.
HirschJ. S.WardlowH. (2006). Modern loves: The Anthropology of romantic Courtship & companionate marriage. London: Macmillan.
36.
HochschildA. R. (1979). Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.
37.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed Heart: Commercialization of Human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
Hondagneu-SoteloP. (1994). Gendered Transitions: Mexican experiences of Immigration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
39.
KanaiaupuniS. M. (2000). Sustaining families and communities: Nonmigrant women and Mexico-US migration processes. University of Wisconsin-Madison. CDE Working Paper No. 2000-13, Center for Demography and Ecology.
40.
KingM. C. (2007). Even Gary Becker Wouldn't Call Them Altruists! The Case of Mexican Migration: A Reply to Sana And Massey. SSQ June 2005. Social Science Quarterly88(3) 898–907.
41.
MahlerS. J. (2001). Transnational Relationships: The Struggle to Communicate Across Border. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 7(4), 583–619.
42.
MatthewsS. H. (2005). Crafting Qualitative Research Articles on Marriages and Families. Journal of Marriage and the Family67, 799–808.
43.
McKenzieS.MenjívarC. (2011). The Meanings of Migration, Remittances and Gifts: Views of Honduran Women Who Stay. Global Networks11(1), 63–81.
44.
MenjívarC.AgadjanianV. (2007). Men's Migration and Women's Lives: Views from Rural Armenia and Guatemala. Social Science Quarterly88(5), 1243–1262.
45.
MouwT.ChavezS.EdelbluteH.AshtonV. (2014). Binational Social Networks and Assimilation: A Test of the Importance of Transnationalism. Social Problems61(3): 329–359.
46.
NoblesJ. (2011). Parenting from Abroad: Migration, Nonresident Father Involvement, and Children’s Education in Mexico. Journal of Marriage and Family73, 729–746.
47.
NoblesJ.RubalcavaL.TeruelG. (2015). After Spouses Depart: Emotional Wellbeing among Nonmigrant Mexican Mothers. Social Science & Medicine132, 236–244.
48.
OakleyA. (1974). The Sociology of housework. New York: Pantheon Books.
49.
ParreñasR. S. (2001). Servants of Globalization: Women, migration, and Domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
ParreñasR. S. (2005). Children of Global migration: Transnational families and gendered Woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51.
PessarP. R.MahlerS. J. (2003). Transnational Migration: Brining Gender in. International Migration Review37(3), 812–846.
52.
PfefferC. A. (2010). “Women’s work”? Women partners of transgender men doing Housework and Emotion Work. Journal of Marriage and the Family72, 165–183.
53.
PribilskyJ. (2004). ‘Aprendemos A Convivir’: Conjugal Relations, Co‐parenting, and Family Life among Ecuadorian Transnational Migrants in New York and the Ecuadorian Andes. Global Networks4(3), 313–334.
54.
RosasA. E. (2014). Abrazando El Espíritu: Bracero families Confront the US-Mexico border. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
Salgado de SnyderV. N. (1993). Family Life Across the Border: Mexican Wives Left Behind. Journal of Behavioral Sciences15(3), 391–401.
56.
SchippersM. (2007). Recovering the Feminine Other: Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Hegemony. Theory and Society36(1), 85–102.
57.
SchmalzbauerL. (2011). “Doing Gender,” Ensuring Survival: Mexican Migration and Economic Crisis in Rural Mountain West. Rural Sociology76(4): 441–460.
58.
SchmalzbauerL. (2015). Temporary and Transnational: Gender and Emotion in the Lives of Mexican Guest Worker Fathers. Ethnic and Racial Studies,38(2), 211–226.
59.
SilverA. (2014). Families Across Borders: The Emotional Impacts of Migration in Origin Families. International Migration52(3): 194–220.
60.
ThomeerM. B.ReczekC.UmbersonD. (2015). Gendered Emotion Work Around Physical Health Problems in Mid-and Later-life Marriages. Journal of Aging Studies32: 12–22.
61.
TurnerJ. H. (2009). The Sociology of Emotions: Basic Theoretical Arguments. Emotion Review1(4): 340–354.
62.
UmbersonD.MiekeB.ThomeerM.LodgeA. C. (2015). Intimacy and emotion work in lesbian, gay, and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family77(2), 542–556.
63.
WaldingerR. (2015). The cross-border connection: Immigrants, Emigrants, and their Homelands. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
64.
WalterN.BourgoisP.LoinazH. M. (2004). Masculinity and Undocumented Labor Migration: Injured Latino Day Laborers in San Francisco. Social Science & Medicine, 59(6), 1159-1168.
65.
WestC.ZimmermanD. C. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender and Society1(2), 125–151.
66.
WhartonA. S.EricksonR. J. (1993). Managing Emotions on the Job and at Home: Understanding the Consequences of Multiple Emotional Roles. The Academy of Management Review18(3): 457–486.
67.
WilliamsD. G. (1988). Gender, Marriage, and Psychosocial Well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 9(4), 452–468.
68.
ZvonkovicA. M.SolomonC. R.HumbleA. M.MonoogianM. (2005). Family Work and Relationships: Lessons from Families of Men Whose Job Require Travel. Family Relations54(3), 411–422.
