This study examines oppositional culture among immigrant and majority adolescents in the Netherlands. Oppositional culture theory expects that immigrant adolescents would uphold positive attitudes towards education. The social exclusion theory predicts instead that immigrant adolescents develop an oppositional culture, particularly in ethnically concentrated schools. To test these ideas, we make use of one of the first large-scale studies on oppositional culture in the Netherlands, and in Europe more generally. Applying multilevel analyses to a survey across 340 schools among 11,215 adolescents aged 11 to 19, we find no clear evidence that immigrant adolescents support oppositional culture either more or less than majority adolescents. Results however showed that oppositional culture differs across schools and that in more ethnically concentrated schools, there is a higher tendency for ethnic minority adolescents to skip classes. Furthermore, oppositional culture finds more support among adolescents who are in a higher grade, male, and who attend a lower education track.
Ainsworth-DarnellJ. W.DowneyD. B. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536-553.
2.
Ainsworth-DarnellJ. W.DowneyD. B. (2002). The search for oppositional culture among Blacks. American Sociological Review, 67, 156-164.
3.
AlfaroE. C.Umaña-TaylorA. J.Gonzales-BackenM. A.BámacaM. Y.ZeidersK.H. (2009). Latino adolescents’ academic success: The role of discrimination, academic motivation, and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 941-962.
4.
CoendersM.LubbersM.ScheepersP.VerkuytenM. (2008). More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 269-285.
5.
DagevosJ.NieversE.AndriesenI.BoogI. (2007). Discriminatiemonitor niet-Westerse allochtonen op de arbeidsmarkt2007 (Discrimination of non-Western immigrants in the labour market 2007). The Hague/ Rotterdam: Netherlands Institute of Social Research.
6.
DeGamoD. S.MartinezC. R. (2006). A culturally informed model of academic well-being for Latino youth: The importance of discriminatory experiences and social support. Family Relations, 55, 267-278.
7.
DemanetJ.Van HoutteM. (2011). Social-ethnic school composition and school misconduct: Does sense of futility clarify the picture?Sociological Spectrum, 31, 224-256
8.
DemanetJ.Van HoutteM. (2012). School belonging and school misconduct: The differing role of teacher and peer attachment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 499-514.
9.
DowneyD. B. (2008). Black/White differences in school performance: The oppositional culture explanation. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 107-126.
10.
EcclesJ. S.WongC. A.PeckS. C. (2006). Ethnicity as social context for the development of African American adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 407-426.
11.
FarkasG.LlerasC.MaczugaS. (2002). Does oppositional culture exist in minority and poverty peer groups?American Sociological Review, 67, 148-155.
12.
FryerR. G.TorelliP. (2010). An empirical analysis of ‘acting white’. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 380-396.
13.
GijsbertsM.DagevosJ. (2009). Jaarrapport Integratie 2009. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of Social Research.
14.
HarrisA. L. (2006). I (don’t) hate School: Revisiting oppositional culture theory of Blacks’ resistance to schooling. Social Forces, 85, 797-834.
15.
HarrisA. L. (2008). Optimism in the face of dispair: Black-White differences in beliefs about school as a means for upward social mobility. Social Science Quarterly, 89, 608-630.
16.
HeathA. F.RothonC.KilpiE. (2008). The second generation in Western Europe: Education, unemployment, and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 211-235.
17.
HermansP. (2004). Applying Ogbu’s theory of minority academic achievement to the situation of Moroccans in the low Countries. Intercultural Education, 15, 431-439.
18.
KalmijnM.KraaykampG. (2003). Dropout and downward mobility in the educational career: An event-history analysis of ethnic schooling differences in the Netherlands. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 265-87.
19.
KaoG.ThompsonJ. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417-42.
20.
LuciakM. (2004). Minority status and schooling: John U. Ogbu’s theory and the schooling of ethnic minorities in Europe. Intercultural Education, 15, 359-368.
21.
LundyG. F.FirebaughG. (2005). Peer relations and school resistance: Does oppositional culture apply to race or to gender?Journal of Negro Education, 74, 233-245.
22.
MickelsonR. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61.
23.
National Institute for Budget Information (1994-2001). Nationaal Scholierenonderzoek [National Survey of Students in the Netherlands]. Data file retrieved from Dutch Archiving and Networking Services Web site, http://www.dans.knaw.nl.
24.
OgbuJ. U. (1991). Minority responses and school experiences. Journal of Psychohistory, 18, 433-456.
25.
OgbuJ. U.SimonsH. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities. A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Educational Quarterly, 29, 155-188.
26.
SnidermanP. M.HagendoornL. (2007). When ways of life collide—multiculturalism and its discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
SwindlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
28.
Van HoutteM. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30, 159-173.
29.
VelingW.SeltenJ-P.SusserE.LaanW.MackenbachJ. P.HoekH. W. (2007). Discrimination and the incidence of psychotic disorders among ethnic minorities in The Netherlands. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 761-768.
