India has witnessed a dramatic expansion of higher education, and women have emerged as noteworthy winners in the process. This paper focuses on the role of female college education on four dimensions of marriage: age at marriage, autonomy in the choice of spouse, work and financial empowerment, and quality of marital relationship. The study uses a sample of 35,561 currently married women from the 2011-2012 wave of the nationally representative India Human Development Survey (IHDS). It demonstrates that higher education, particularly college education, enables women to lead lives substantively different from their less-educated peers. College-educated women marry at later ages, enjoy greater autonomy in choosing their husbands, and have a more egalitarian relationship with their spouses. Furthermore, the study finds that educational homogamy and hypogamy afford greater autonomy to women. Even without a concomitant increase in labor force participation, college education among women appears to have a transformative effect on marriage in India.
AllendorfK.PandianR. K. (2016). The decline of arranged marriage? Marital change and continuity in India. Population and Development Review, 42(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00149.x
2.
BanerjiM. (2008). Is education associated with a transition towards autonomy in partner choice? A case study of India. [Master thesis, University of Maryland].
3.
BanerjiM.DeshpandeA. S. (2021). Does ‘Love’ make a difference? Marriage choice and post-marriage decision-making power in India. Asian Population Studies, 17(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2020.1852713
4.
BanerjiM.MartinS. P.DesaiS. (2013). Are the young and the educated more likely to have “love” than arranged marriage? A study of autonomy in partner choice in India. IHDS Working Paper Series.
5.
BittmanM.EnglandP.SayerL.FolbreN.MathesonG. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/378341
6.
BoseS. (2012). A contextual analysis of gender disparity in education in India: The relative effects of son preference, women's status, and community. Sociological Perspectives, 55(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2012.55.1.67
7.
CaldwellJ. C. (1980). Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline. Population and Development Review, 6(2), 225–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972729
8.
ChananaK. (2000). Treading the hallowed halls: Women in higher education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(2), 1012–1022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4409055.
DesaiS.VannemanR. (2015). India human development survey-II (IHDS -II), 2011-12. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
12.
EsteveA.García-RománJ.PermanyerI. (2012). The gender-gap reversal in education and its effect on union formation: the end of hypergamy?Population and Development Review, 38(3), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00515.x
13.
EsteveA.SchwartzC. R.Van BavelJ.PermanyerI.KlesmentM.GarciaJ. (2016). The end of hypergamy: Global trends and implications. Population and Development Review, 42(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12012
14.
GoliS.SinghD.SekherT. V. (2013). Exploring the myth of mixed marriages in India: Evidence from a nation-wide survey. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 44(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.44.2.193
JefferyP.JefferyR. (1996). What’s the benefit of being educated? Girls’ schooling, women’s autonomy and fertility outcomes in Bijnor. In JefferyR.BasuA. M. (Eds.), Girls’ schooling, women's autonomy and fertility change in South Asia. Sage Publications.
17.
JejeebhoyS. J. (2000). Women's autonomy in rural India: Its dimensions, determinants, and the influence of context. In PresserH.SenG. (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 204–238). Oxford University Press.
18.
JejeebhoyS. J.SanthyaK. G.ZavierA. J. (2014). Demand for contraception to delay first pregnancy among young married women in India. Studies in Family Planning, 45(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00384.x
19.
JonesG. (2005). The “flight from marriage” in Southeast and East Asia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.36.1.93
20.
JonesG.GubhajuB. (2009). Factors influencing changes in mean age at first marriage and proportions never marrying in the low-fertility countries of East and Southeast Asia. Asian Population Studies, 5(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730903351487
JoshiA.DhapolaM.KurianE.PeltoP. J. (2001). Experiences and perceptions of marital sexual relationships among rural women in Gujarat, India. Asia Pacific Population Journal, 16(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.18356/b39b70ab-en
24.
KaurR. (2004). Across-region marriages: Poverty, female migration and the sex ratio. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(25), 2595–2603. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4415174.
25.
KlasenS. (2019). What explains uneven female labor force participation levels and trends in developing countries?The World Bank Research Observer, 34(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkz005
26.
LeVineR. A.LeVineS.SchnellB. (2001). Improve the women”: Mass schooling, female literacy, and worldwide social change. Harvard Educational Review, 71(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.71.1.154550622x3225u7
27.
LeVineR. A.LeVineS.Schnell-AnzolaB.RoweM. L.DexterE. (2011). Literacy and mothering: How women's schooling changes the lives of the world's children. Oxford University Press.
28.
LinT. C.AdseràA. (2013). Son preference and children’s housework: The case of India. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(4), 553–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9269-6
MarphatiaA. A.AmbaleG. S.ReidA. M. (2017). Women’s marriage age matters for public health: A review of the broader health and social implications in South Asia. Frontiers in Public Health, 5(269), 269–323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00269
32.
Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education (2019). All India survey on higher education 2018-19. Government of India.
33.
ModakP. (2019). Determinants of girl-child marriage in high prevalence states in India. Journal of International Women's Studies, 20(7), 374–394. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol20/iss7/24
34.
MoursundA.KravdalO. (2003). Individual and community effects of women’s education and autonomy on contraceptive use in India. Population Studies, 57(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472032000137817
NozakiY.AranhaR.Fix DominguezR.NakajimaY. (2009). Gender gap and women’s participation in higher education: Views from Japan, Mongolia, and India. In A. W. Wiseman & D. P. Baker (Eds.), International Perspectives on Education and Society: Vol. 10. Gender, Equality, and Education from International and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 217‐254). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
37.
OsellaC.OsellaF. (1998). Friendship and flirting: Micro-politics in Kerala, South India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034499
38.
RaleyS.BianchiS. M.WangW. (2012). When do fathers care? Mothers’ economic contribution and fathers’ involvement in child care. American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1422–1459. https://doi.org/10.1086/663354
39.
SahooS. (2017). Intra-household gender disparity in school choice: Evidence from private schooling in India. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(10), 1714–1730. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1265943
40.
SiddhuG. (2011). Who makes it to secondary school? Determinants of transition to secondary schools in rural India. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(4), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.01.008
41.
SinghR.MukherjeeP. (2018). “Whatever she may study, she can’t escape from washing dishes”: Gender inequity in secondary education–Evidence from a longitudinal study in India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1306434
42.
StillC. (2011). Spoiled brides and the fear of education: Honour and social mobility among Dalits in South India. Modern Asian Studies, 45(5), 1119–1146. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x10000144
43.
StromquistN. P. (2015). Women's empowerment and education: Linking knowledge to transformative action. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12137
44.
ThorntonA. (2001). The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0039
45.
VikramK.VannemanR. (2020). Maternal education and the multidimensionality of child health outcomes in India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 52(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932019000245
46.
VlassoffC. (1996). Against the odds: The changing impact of schooling on female autonomy and fertility in an Indian village. In BasuA. M.JeffreyR. (Eds.), Girls’ schooling, women’s autonomy and fertility change in South Asia (pp. 218–234). Sage.
47.
WalkerM.UnterhalterE. (2007). The capability approach: Its potential for work in education. In WalkerM.UnterhalterE. (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604810_1
48.
WoodheadM.FrostM.JamesZ. (2013). Does growth in private schooling contribute to education for all? Evidence from a longitudinal, two cohort study in Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.02.005
49.
ZimmermannL. (2012). Reconsidering gender bias in intrahousehold allocation in India. Journal of Development Studies, 48(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2011.629652
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
