In many parts of the world, fertility has declined in important ways in the past century. What are the consequences of this demographic change? Our study expands the empirical basis for understanding the relationship between number of siblings in childhood and social outcomes among adults. An important recent study found that for each additional sibling an individual grows up with, the likelihood of divorce as an adult declines by 3%. We expand this work by (a) determining whether the original pattern replicates in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health and (b) extending the analysis beyond divorce to consider whether growing up with siblings is related to prosocial adult behaviors (relationships with parents, friends, and views on conflict management with one’s partner). Our results confirm a negative association between number of siblings and divorce in adulthood. We find mixed results related to other prosocial adult behaviors.
AdamsB. N. (1968). Kinship in an urban setting. Chicago, IL: Markham.
2.
AlexanderK. L.EntwisleD. R.OlsonL. S. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72, 167-180.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BengtsonV. L.AcockA. C.AllenK. R.Dilworth-AndersonP.KleinD. M. (2006). Sourcebook of family theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BlakeJ. (1981). The only child in America: Prejudice versus performance. Population and Development Review, 7, 43-54.
6.
BlakeJ. (1989). Family size and achievement (Vol. 3). Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
BlakeJ.RichardsonB.BhattacharyaJ. (1991). Number of siblings and sociability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 271-283.
8.
Bobbitt-ZeherD.DowneyD. B. (2013). Number of siblings and friendship nominations among adolescents. Journal of Family Issues, 34, 1175-1193.
9.
Bobbitt-ZeherD.DowneyD. B.MerryJ. J. (2016). Number of siblings during childhood and the likelihood of divorce in adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 2075-2094.
10.
BrodyG. (2004). Siblings’ direct and indirect contributions to child development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 124-126.
11.
BuchmannC. (2000). Family structure, parental perceptions, and child labor in Kenya: What factors determine who is enrolled in school?Social Forces, 78, 1349-1378.
12.
CameronL.ErkalN.GangadharanL.MengX. (2013). Little emperors: Behavioral impacts of China’s one-child policy. Science, 339, 953-957.
ChernichovskyD. (1985). Socioeconomic and demographic aspects of school enrollment and attendance in rural Botswana. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33, 319-332.
16.
CicirelliV. (1978). The relationship of sibling structure to intellectual abilities and achievements. Review of Educational Research, 55, 353-386.
17.
CicirelliV. (1979). Social services for the elderly in relation to the kin network. Washington, DC: Andrus Foundation.
18.
CicirelliV. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
19.
CongerK. J.KramerL. (2010). Introduction to the special section: Perspectives on sibling relationships: Advancing child development research. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 69-71.
20.
CongerK. J.WilliamsS. T.LittleW. A.MasynK. E.ShebloskiB. (2009). Development of mastery during adolescence: The role of family problem-solving. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 99-114.
21.
DowneyD. B. (1995). When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60, 746-761.
22.
DowneyD. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation. American Psychologist, 56, 497-504.
23.
DowneyD. B.CondronD. J. (2004). Playing well with others in kindergarten: The benefits of siblings at home. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 333-350.
24.
GibbsB. G.WorkmanJ.DowneyD.B. (2016). The (conditional) resource dilution model: State- and community-level modifications. Demography, 53, 723-748.
25.
GilliganM.KarrakerA.JasperA. (2018). Linked lives and cumulative inequality: A multigenerational family life course framework. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10, 111-125.
26.
GilliganM.SuitorJ. J.NamS. (2015). Maternal differential treatment in later life families and within-family variations in adult sibling closeness. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70, 167-177.
27.
GilliganM.SuitorJ. J.NamS.RouthB.RurkaM.ConG. (2017). Family networks and psychological well-being in midlife. Social Sciences, 6(3), 94. doi:10.3390/socsci6030094
28.
GomesM. (1984). Family size and educational attainment in Kenya. Population and Development Review, 10, 647-660.
29.
JensenA. C.WhitemanS. D.FingermanK. L. (2018). “Can’t live with or without them:” Transitions and young adults’ perceptions of sibling relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 32, 385-395.
30.
KposowaA. (1998). The impact of race on divorce in the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 529-548.
31.
KramerL. (2010). The essential ingredients of successful sibling relationships: An emerging framework for advancing theory and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 80-86.
32.
KramerL.BankL. (2005). Sibling relationship contributions to individual and family well-being: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 483-485.
33.
ShanahanM. J. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667-692.
34.
ShavitY.PierceJ. L. (1991). Sibship size and educational attainment in nuclear and extended families: Arabs and Jews in Israel. American Sociological Review, 56, 321-330.
35.
SteelmanL. C.PowellB.WerumR.CarterS. (2002). Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration: Recent advances and challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 243-269.
36.
StockerC. M.LanthierR. P.FurmanW. (1997). Sibling relationships in early adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 210-221.
37.
TrentK.SpitzeG. (2011). Growing up without siblings and adult sociability behaviors. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 1178-1204.
38.
TrollL. E. (1975). Early and middle adulthood. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39.
Von HippelP. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83-117.
40.
WhitemanS. D.BecerraJ. M.KillorenS. E. (2009). Mechanisms of sibling socialization in normative family development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 126, 29-43.
41.
YucelD.Bobbitt-ZeherD.DowneyD. (2016). Quality matters: Sibling relationships and friendship nominations among adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 11, 523-539.
42.
ZachariahK. C. (2001). Coping with demographic transition. Economic & Political Weekly, 36, 1938-1940.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
