The persisting gendered division of domestic labor in Western societies remains puzzling. Beyond standard economic and normative explanations, more recent approaches emphasize affective, cognitive, and incorporated aspects of housework and the production, reproduction, and negotiation of gendered expectations via social interactions. However, the relevant indicators for these more implicit mechanisms are not routinely included in social surveys. Based on a unique set of items and a representative sample of heterosexual couples (N = 1396) from pairfam (wave 10), we analyze the mutual effects of both partners’ enjoyment, quality standards, and reciprocally perceived competencies on the division of housework. Actor–partner interdependence models (APIM) are applied, which explicitly model the partner dyad. Both an actor’s own and their partner’s assessments of competences and preferences—and particularly men’s attributes and perceptions—prove to be powerful predictors of housework share. The results contribute quantitative evidence on processes of doing and undoing gender in context.
AassveA.FuochiG.MencariniL. (2014). Desperate housework: Relative resources, time availability, economic dependency, and gender ideology across Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 35(8), 1000–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14522248
2.
AdamsM.ColtraneS. (2005). Boys and men in families: The domestic production of gender, power, and privilege. In Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities (pp. 230–248). SAGE Publications, Inc.
3.
AhlanderN. R.BahrK. S. (1995). Beyond drudgery, power, and equity: Toward an expanded discourse on the moral dimensions of housework in families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/353816
4.
AllenS. M.HawkinsA. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/353894
5.
AltintasE.SullivanO. (2016). Fifty years of change updated: Cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research, 35(16), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2016.35.16
6.
AshrafN. (2009). Spousal control and intra-household decision making: An experimental study in the Philippines. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1245–1277. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1245
7.
BeckerG. S. (1993). A treatise on the family. Harvard Univ. Press.
8.
BerkS. F. (1985). The gender factory. Springer US.
9.
BianchiS. M.MilkieM. A.SayerL. C.RobinsonJ. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2675569
10.
BloodR. O.WolfeD. M. (1960). Husbands & wives: The dynamics of married living. The Free Press.
11.
BockG.DudenB. (2007[1980]. Labor of love - love as labor: On the genesis of housework in capitalism. In AltbachE. H. (Ed.), From Feminism to Liberation. Transaction.
12.
BrinesJ. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 652–688. https://doi.org/10.1086/230577
13.
BrüderlJ.DrobničS.HankK.NauckB.NeyerF. J.WalperS.AltP.BozoyanC.BuhrP.FinnC.GarrettM.GreischelH.GröplerN.HajekK.HerzigM.Huyer-MayB.LenkeR.MinkusL.MüllerB.WilhelmB. (2019). Beziehungs- und Familienpanel (pairfam).
14.
CarlsonM. W.HansJ. D. (2020). Maximizing benefits and minimizing impacts: Dual-earner couples’ perceived division of household labor decision-making process. Journal of Family Studies, 26(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2017.1367712
CarrieroR.TodescoL. (2018). Housework division and gender ideology: When do attitudes really matter?Demographic Research, 39(39), 1039–1064. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2018.39.39
17.
ColtraneS. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36(5), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096813
18.
ColtraneS. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x
19.
Cordero‐ComaJ.Esping‐AndersenG. (2018). The intergenerational transmission of gender roles: Children’s contribution to housework in Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 80(4), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12497
Federal Statistical Office (Ed.). (2015). Zeitverwendungserhebung [Time Use Survey]: Aktivitäten in Stunden und Minuten für ausgewählte Personengruppen [Activities in hours and minutes for selected groups of people]. 2012/2013.
23.
FerreeM. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251391012002002
24.
GeistC. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports about housework. In TreasJ.DrobničS. (Eds.), Studies in social inequality. Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 217–240). Stanford University Press.
25.
GeistC.RuppannerL. (2018). Mission impossible? New housework theories for changing families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12245
26.
GoldscheiderF.BernhardtE.LappegårdT. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
27.
Gorman-MurrayA. (2008). Queering the family home: narratives from gay, lesbian and bisexual youth coming out in supportive family homes in Australia. Gender, Place & Culture, 15(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690701817501
28.
GreensteinT. N. (1996). Husbands’ Participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/353719
29.
GroteN. K.NaylorK. E.ClarkM. S. (2002). Perceiving the division of family work to be unfair: Do social comparisons, enjoyment, and competence matter?Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.510
30.
GuptaS. (2006). The consequences of maternal employment during men’s childhood for their adult housework performance. Gender & Society, 20(1), 60–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205282554
31.
HochschildA. R.MachungA. (2003). The second shift. Penguins.
32.
HookJ. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003. American Sociological Association, 71(4), 639–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100406
33.
HookJ. L. (2017). Women’s housework: New tests of time and money. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 79(1), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12351
34.
HuininkJ.BrüderlJ.NauckB.WelperS.CastiglioniL.FeldhausM. (2011). Panel analysis of intimate relationships and family dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Journal of Family Research, 23(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-235
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford.
38.
LoscoccoK. A.SpitzeG. (1990). Working conditions, social support, and the well-being of female and male factory workers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31(4), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136816
39.
LundbergS.PollakR. A. (1996). Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage. Journal of Economic Perspective, 10(4), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.4.139
40.
OakleyA. (2018). The sociology of housework (reissue). Policy Press.
41.
OkunB. S.Raz-YurovichL. (2019). Housework, gender role attitudes, and couples’ fertility intentions: Reconsidering men’s roles in gender theories of family change. Population and Development Review, 45(1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12207
42.
ParsonsT.BalesR. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. The Free Press.
43.
PittmanJ.TengW.KerpelmanJ. L.SolheimC. A. (1999). Satisfaction With Performance of Housework. Journal of Family Issues, 20(6), 746–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251399020006002
44.
PoortmanA.-R.van der LippeT. (2009). Attitudes Toward Housework and Child Care and the Gendered Division of Labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00617.x
45.
PressJ. E.TownsleyE. (1998). Wives’ and husbands’ housework reporting: Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender & Society, 12(2), 188–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124398012002005
46.
RezeanuC. (2015). The relationship between domestic space and gender identity: Some signs of emergence of alternative domestic femininity and masculinity. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 6(2), 9–29.
47.
RidgewayC. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford Univ. Press.
48.
RobinsonJ. P.MilkieM. A. (1998). Back to the basics: Trends in and role determinants of women’s attitudes toward housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.2307/353452
49.
SayerL. C. (2010). Trends in housework. In TreasJ.DrobničS. (Eds.), Studies in social inequality. dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 19–38). Stanford University Press.
50.
SchulzF. (2020). Trends in children’s gendered housework performance. Time use evidence from Germany, 1991–2013. Child Indicators Research, 13(4), 1313–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09702-x
51.
StrattonL. S. (2012). The role of preferences and opportunity costs in determining the time allocated to housework. American Economic Review, 102(3), 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.606
52.
ThébaudS.KornrichS.RuppannerL. (2019). Good housekeeping, great expectations: Gender and housework norms. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119852395
53.
TichenorV. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53(3-4), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5678-2
54.
TrübnerM. (2022). Conflicts over the division of domestic work: A matter of gender-specific expectations and needs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(9), 2825–2846. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221089043
55.
van HooffJ. H. (2011). Rationalising inequality: Heterosexual couples’ explanations and justifications for the division of housework along traditionally gendered lines. Journal of Gender Studies, 20(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2011.542016
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
