Heterosexual unions and parenthood are key contributors to gender inequality in housework. Over the last two decades, the social meaning of partnership and parenthood has changed. This study investigated whether this change in the narrative of partnership and parenthood status influenced changes in the housework gender gap. Using the American Time Use Survey 2003–2005 and 2013–2015, the findings show that housework gender gap was larger for people in a couple relationship than for singles. For nonparents, the gender gap in housework was no difference between those married and those cohabiting. Gender inequality in housework persisted among married parents but decreased among cohabiting parents, mainly because of the increase in cohabiting fathers’ housework time. These findings suggest a heterosexual union, particularly marriage, reproduces conventional gender roles. Men’s gendered behaviors were not uniform but diverse across partnership and parenthood status.
BatalovaJ. A.CohenP. N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 743-755.
2.
BaxterJ.HaynesM.HewittB. (2010). Pathways into marriage: Cohabitation and the domestic division of labor. Journal of Family Issues, 31(11), 1507-1529.
3.
BaxterJ.HewittB.HaynesM. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 259-272.
4.
BianchiS. M.MilkieM. A.SayerL. C.RobinsonJ. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191-228.
5.
BerkS. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum Press.
6.
BianchiS.LesnardL.NazioT.RaleyS. (2014). Gender and time allocation of cohabiting and married women and men in France, Italy, and the United States. Demographic Research, 31, 183-216.
7.
BittmanM.EnglandP.SayerL.FolbreN.MathesonG. (2003). When does gender Trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186-214.
8.
Blair-LoyM. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BloodR. O.WolfeD. M.(1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
10.
BoyeK.HalldénK.MagnussonC. (2017). Stagnation only on the surface? The implications of skill and family responsibilities for the gender wage gap in Sweden, 1974-2010. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(4), 595-619.
11.
BrinesJ. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 652-688.
12.
BumpassL.LuH.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29-41.
13.
CharlesM.GruskyD. B.(2004). Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford University Press.
14.
CherlinA. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84(3), 634-650.
15.
CherlinA. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of american marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848-861.
16.
CiabattariT. (2004). Cohabitation and housework: The effects of marital intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(1), 118-125.
17.
ColtraneS. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208-1233.
18.
CookeL. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112(2), 442-472.
19.
CotterD.HermsenJ. M.VannemanR. (2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 259-289.
20.
CovermanS. (1985). Explaining husbandsʼ participation in domestic labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1), 81-97.
21.
CraigL.MullanK. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 834-861.
22.
DavisS. N.GreensteinT. N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1260-1271.
23.
DavisS. N.GreensteinT. N.Gerteisen MarksJ. P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor. Journal of Family Issues, 28(9), 1246-1272.
24.
DeutschF. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
EdinKathrynMariaKefalas(2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. University of California Press.
26.
EdinK.NelsonT. J.(2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. University of California Press.
27.
EnglandP. (2010). The gender revolution. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149-166.
28.
EnglandP.FarkasG.(1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. Aldine Publishing Company.
29.
FuwaM.(2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 751-767.
30.
FuwaM.CohenP. N.(2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research, 36, 512-530.
31.
GeistC.(2005). The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review, 21(1), 23-41.
32.
GeistC.RuppannerL. (2018). Mission impossible? New housework theories for changing families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 242-262.
33.
GersonK.(1994). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to family and work. Basic Books.
34.
Gibson‐DavisC. M.EdinK.McLanahanS. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1301-1312.
35.
GoldsteinJ. R.KenneyC. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for US women. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 506-519.
36.
GoughM.KillewaldA. (2011). Unemployment in families: The case of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(5), 1085-1100.
37.
GuptaS. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on menʼs performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 700-711.
38.
GuptaS. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women?s Earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 399-417.
39.
GuzzoK. B. (2014). Trends in cohabitation outcomes: Compositional changes and engagement among never-married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 826-842.
40.
HaysS.(1998). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
HillerD. V. (1984). Power dependence and division of family work. Sex Roles, 10(11–12), 1003-1019.
42.
HofferthS. L.AndersonK. G. (2003). Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 213-232.
43.
HookJ. L.(2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639-660.
44.
IshizukaP. (2018). The economic foundations of cohabiting couplesʼ union transitions. Demography, 55(2), 535-557.
45.
JacobsJ. A.GersonK. (2004). The time divide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
KennedyS.BumpassL. (2008). Cohabitation and childrenʼs living arrangements. Demographic Research, 19, 1663-1692.
47.
KiernanK. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues, and implications. In BoothA.CrouterA. C. (Eds), Just living together: Implication of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
KillewaldA. (2013). A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 96-116.
49.
KillewaldA. (2016). Money, work, and marital stability. American Sociological Review, 81(4), 696-719.
50.
KroskaA.ElmanC. (2009). Change in attitudes about employed mothers: Exposure, interests, and gender ideology discrepancies. Social Science Research, 38(2), 366-382.
51.
LichterD. T.BatsonC. D.BrownJ. B. (2004). Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review, 78(1), 2-25.
52.
LiefbroerA. C.DourleijnE. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European Countries. Demography, 43(2), 203-221.
53.
LundbergS.PollakR. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 139-158.
54.
LundbergS.PollakR. A. (2015). The evolving role of marriage: 1950-2010. The Future of Children, 25(2), 29-50.
55.
ManningW. D.StykesB. (2015). Twenty-five years of change in cohabitation in the U.S., 1987-2013. National Center for Family and Marriage Research.(FP-15-01)
56.
ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A.GiordanoP. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: adolescents? Expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 559-575.
57.
McLanahanS. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41(4), 607-627.
58.
MillerA.SasslerS. (2010). Stability and change in the division of labor among cohabiting couples. Sociological Forum, 25(4), 677-702.
59.
NockS. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16(1), 53-76.
60.
PercheskiC.WildemanC. (2008). Becoming a dad: Employment trajectories of married, cohabiting, and nonresident fathers. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 482-501.
61.
Perry‐JenkinsM.GerstelN. (2020). Work and family in the second decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 420-453.
62.
PiraniE.VignoliD. (2016). Changes in the satisfaction of cohabitors relative to spouses over time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 598-609.
63.
PresserH. B. (2003). Race-ethnic and gender differences in nonstandard work shifts. Work and Occupations, 30(4), 412-439.
64.
RaleyR. K.BumpassL. (2003). The topography of the divorce plateau. Demographic Research, 8, 245-260.Kelly
65.
RaleyR. K.SweeneyM. M.WondraD. (2015). The growing racial and ethnic divide in US marriage patterns. The Future of Children, 25(2), 89-109.
SanchezL.ManningW. D.SmockP. J. (1998). Sex-specialized or collaborative mate selection? Union transitions among cohabitors. Social Science Research, 27(3), 280-304.
68.
SasslerS.MillerA. J. (2011). Waiting to be asked: Gender, power, and relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 32(4), 482-506.
69.
SasslerS.MillerA. (2017). Cohabitation nation: Gender, class, and the remaking of relationships. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
70.
SayerL. C. (2016). Trends in womenʼs and menʼs time use, 1965-2012: back to the future? In: Gender and couple relationships, national Symposium on family issues (pp. 43-77). Cham: Springer.
71.
SayerL. C.BianchiS. M.RobinsonJ. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothersʼ and fathersʼ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 1-43.
72.
SchneiderD. (2011). Market earnings and household work: New tests of gender performance theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4), 845-860.
73.
SheltonB. A.(1992). Women, men, and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework, and leisure. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
74.
SheltonB. A.JohnD. (1993). Does marital status make a difference?Journal of Family Issues, 14(3), 401-420.
SmockP. J.ManningW. D.PorterM. (2005). “Everythingʼs there except money”: how money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 680-696.
77.
SoonsJ. P. M.KalmijnM. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141-1157.
78.
SouthJ.SpitzeG. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59(3), 327-347.
79.
StewartJ. (2013). Tobit or not tobit?Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 38(3), 263-290.
80.
StoneP. (2007). Opting out?: Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
81.
StoneP.LovejoyM.(2019). Opting back in: What really happens when mothers go back to work. University of California Press.
82.
SullivanO. (2013). What do we learn about gender by analyzing housework separately from child care? Some considerations from time-use evidence. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(2), 72-84.
83.
ThébaudS.KornrichS.RuppannerL. (2019). Good housekeeping, great expectations: Gender and housework norms. Sociological Methods & Research.
84.
UsdanskyM. L. (2011). The gender-equality paradox: Class and incongruity between work-family attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3(3), 163-178.
85.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
