Caring for persons with disabilities is challenging, yet it is assumed that people would care for their relatives with disabilities because of a feeling of closeness. Using a convergent mixed methods design, this article examines attitudes towards older persons with disabilities in the context of home care using Trinidad as a case study. The analytical framework involves (a) measuring attitudes towards the inclusion of older persons with disabilities in the home and (b) identifying the reasons for these attitudes. This framework is applied to a representative sample of 868 adult Trinidadians as well as the subsamples of adult Trinidadians dwelling and not dwelling with older persons with disabilities. Not all adult Trinidadians agreed that older persons with disabilities should be included in the home, and integrated findings indicate the need for monitoring systems for both home care and at homes for the aged.
BarrettP.HaleB.GauldR. (2012). Social inclusion through ageing-in-place with care?Ageing and Society, 32, 361-378. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X11000341.
2.
BonsangE. (2009). Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe?Journal of Health Economics, 28, 143-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.002.
CooperC.SelwoodA.LivingstonG. (2008). The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: A systematic review. Age and Ageing, 37(2), 151-160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033857.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
CurryL.Nunez-SmithM. (2015). Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
de VausD. (1996). Children’s responsibility to elderly parents. Does the current policy reliance of families to provide support and care for older family members assume a society and set of values that no longer exist?Family Matters, 45, 16-21.
8.
DonmezL.GokkocaZ.DedeogluN. (2005). Disability and its effects on quality of life among older people living in Antalya city center, Turkey. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 40(2), 213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2004.08.006.
9.
EldemireD. (1996). Level of mental impairment in the Jamaican elderly and the issues of screening levels, caregiving, support systems, carepersons, and female burden. Molecular and Chemical Neuropathology, 28, 115-120. doi: 10.1007/BF02815212.
10.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134-2156. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
11.
FinchJ.GrovesD. (1980). Community care and the family: A case for equal opportunities?Journal of Social Policy, 9(4), 487-511. doi: 10.1017/S0047279400010126.
12.
FineM.GlendinningC. (2005). Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of ʻcareʼ and ʻdependencyʼ. Ageing and Society, 25, 601-621. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X05003600.
13.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. doi: 10.3102/01623737011003255.
14.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 195-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
IoergerM.MachiaL. V.TurkM. A. (2019). Self-other overlap: A unique predictor of willingness to work with people with disability as part of one's career. Plos One, 14(8), e0220722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220722.
16.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: a call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557-584. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557.
17.
LuiC.-W.EveringhamJ.-A.WarburtonJ.CuthillM.BartlettH. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116-121. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x.
18.
Ministry of the People and Social Development (2005). National policy on persons with disabilities. Trinidad and Tobago: Ministry of the People and Social Development.
19.
Ministry of the People and Social Development (2007). National policy on ageing for Trinidad and Tobago. Trinidad and Tobago: Ministry of Social Development and Family Services.
PennerL. A.DovidioJ. F.PiliavinJ. A.SchroederD. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.
22.
PerryT.ConnerA.ShelarD. (2008). Recreation student attitudes towards persons with disabilities: Considerations for future service delivery. The Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism, 7(2), 4-14. doi: 10.3794/johlste.72.136.
23.
RawlinsJ. M.SpencerM. (2002). Daughters and wives as informal care givers of the chronically ill elderly in Trinidad. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33(1), 125-137. doi: 10.3138/jcfs.33.1.125.
24.
RushF (2004). The Cambridge companion to critical theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
TrontoJ. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London, UK: Routledge.
26.
UngersonC. (2005). Care, work and feeling. The Sociological Review, 53, 188-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00580.x.
WilliamsF. (2001). In and beyond new labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467-493. doi: 10.1177/026101830102100405.
31.
WoolridgeJ. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
