Using two waves of the Generations and Gender Survey for eight European countries, we test under what conditions couples experience high levels of disagreement over time or separate. The results partly support the idea of relative resources, suggesting that a decrease in the status of men in couples (job loss) is significantly associated with high levels of conflict. The transition to high conflict is more frequent when there is a discrepancy between policy and behavior. Social policies designed to meet the needs of working parents in dual-earner couples together with the diffusion of gender egalitarian values can lead to a reduction in unhealthy levels of couple conflict.
Alonso-BorregoC.CarrascoR. (2017). Employment and the risk of domestic violence: Does the breadwinner’s gender matter?Applied Economics, 49(50), 5074–5091.
2.
AtkinsonM. P.TheodoreN. G.MollyM. L. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family67(5), 1137–1148.
3.
BloodR. O.Jr.WolfeD. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of family living. The Free Press.
4.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859.
5.
EvertssonM.NermoM. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm018
6.
GanzeboomH.De GraafP. M.TreimanD. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21 (1), 1–56.
7.
GerberT. P.Perelli-HarrisB. (2012). Maternity leave in turbulent times: Effects on labor market transitions and fertility in Russia, 1985–2000. Social Forces, 90(4), 1297–1322.
8.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.
9.
GraciaE.MerloJ. (2016). Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 27–30.
10.
HatchL. R.BulcroftK. (2004). Does long-term marriage bring less frequent disagreements? Five explanatory frameworks. Journal of Family Issues, 25(4), 465–495.
11.
HeatonT. B.BlakeA. M. (1999). Gender differences in determinants of marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 20(1), 25–45.
12.
HobsonB. (1990). No exit, no voice: Women’s economic dependency and the welfare state. Acta Sociologica, 33(3), 235–250.
13.
HornungC. A.McCulloughB. C.SugimotoT. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(3), 675–692.
KluwerE. S.HeesinkJ. A. M.Van De VliertE. (1997). The marital dynamics of conflict over the division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 635–653.
16.
MacmillanR.GartnerR. (2018). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(4), 947–958.
17.
MalyutinaS.BobakM.KurilovitchS.NikitinY.MarmotM. (2004). Trends in Alcohol Intake by Education and Marital Status in an Urban Population in Russia between the mid 1980s and the mid 1990s. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 39(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agh022
18.
McCoyK. P.GeorgeM. R. W.CummingsE. M.DaviesP. T. (2013). Constructive and destructive marital conflict, parenting, and children’s school and social adjustment. Social Development, 22(4), 641–662.
19.
NitscheN.GrunowD. (2016). Housework over the course of relationships: Gender ideology, resources, and the division of housework from a growth curve perspective. Advances in Life Course Research, 29, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2016.02.001
20.
PappL. M.CummingsE. M.Goeke-MoreyM. C. (2009). For richer, for poorer: Money as a topic of marital conflict in the home. Family Relations, 58(1), 91–103.
21.
Perry-JenkinsM.FolkK. (1994). Class, couples, and conflict: Effects of the division of labor on assessments of marriage in dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(1), 165–180.
22.
RadcliffeL. S.CassellC. (2015). Flexible working, work-family conflict, and maternal gatekeeping: The daily experiences of dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 835–855.
23.
RodmanH. (1972). Marital power and the theory of resources in cultural context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3(1), 50–69.
24.
RuppannerL. (2010). Cross-national reports of housework: An investigation of the gender empowerment measure. Social Science Research, 39(6), 963–975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.04.002
25.
SolazA.JalovaaraM.KreyenfeldM.MeggiolaroS.MortelmansD.PasteelsI. (2020). Unemployment and separation: Evidence from five European countries. Journal of Family Research, 32(1), 145–176. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-368
26.
TheissJ. A.LeustekJ. (2016). Marital conflict. In ShehanC. L. (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies (1st ed., pp. 1–4). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27.
van DammeM.DykstraP. (2018). Spousal resources and relationship quality in eight European countries. Community, Work and Family, 21(5), 541–563.
28.
VillarrealA. (2007). Women’s employment status, coercive control, and intimate partner violence in Mexico. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 418–434.
29.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (2016). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.
30.
WojnickaK. (2015). Men, masculinities and physical violence. Studia Humanistyczne AGH, 14(2), 15–17.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
