This study tested a dyadic theoretical model in which conflict resolution strategies have impact on couples’ marital adjustment. The study features a quantitative and transversal approach and a correlational and explanatory design. Participants included 231 heterosexual couples from different regions of Brazil, contacted after indication. The instrument composed of the Conflict Resolution Behavior Questionnaire (CRBQ) and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (R-DAS) was filled out in the residence of the participants. Data were submitted to dyadic analysis by the latent trait model. The results indicated that the strategies have a strong impact on the individual’s adjustment. Assessing the impact of one of the spouse’s strategies on the other, only the marital adjustment of the men was affected. The evidence suggests differences between husbands and wives regarding the impact of strategies on adjustment. The data are discussed in light of the literature and considering their applicability in the clinical area.
AndradeA. L.Cassepp-BorgesV.FerrerE.Sanchez-AragónR. (2017). Análises de dados diádicos: Um exemplo a partir da pesquisa com casais [Analysis of daily data: An example from the research with couples]. Temas em Psicologia, 25(4), 1571–1588. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2017.4-05
3.
BaucomB. R.McFarlandP. T.ChristensenA. (2010). Gender, topic, and time in observed demand-withdraw interaction in cross-and same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019717
4.
BlunchN. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS statistics and AMOS. SAGE Publications.
5.
BusbyD. M.ChristensenC.CraneD. R.LarsonJ. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x
6.
BusbyD. M.HolmanT. B. (2009). Perceived match or mismatch on the Gottman conflict styles: Associations with relationship outcome variables. Family Process, 48(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01300.x
7.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
8.
CostaC. B.CenciC. B.MosmannC. P. (2016). Conflitos conjugais e estratégias de resolução: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura [Marital Conflicts and Resolution Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Literature]. Temas em Psicologia, 24(1), 1–14, https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2016.1-22
9.
CostaC. B.FalckeD.MosmannC. P. (2015). Marital conflicts in long-term marriages: Motives and feelings. Psicologia em Estudo, 20(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v20i3.27817
10.
CostaC. B.MosmannC. P. (2015a). Estratégias de resolução dos conflitos conjugais: Percepções de um grupo focal [Strategies for resolving marital conflicts: Perceptions of a focus group]. Revista Psico, 46(4), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2015.4.20606
11.
CostaC. B.MosmannC. P. (2015b). Relacionamentos conjugais na atualidade: Percepções de indivíduos em casamentos de longa duração [Marital relationships in the present: Perceptions of individuals in long term marriages]. Revista da SPAGESP, 16(2), 16–31.
12.
CreswellJ. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: Métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto [Research project: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods]. (3rd ed.). Artmed.
13.
DelatorreM. Z.ScheerenP.WagnerA. (2017). Conflito conjugal: Evidências de validade de uma escala de resolução de conflitos em casais do sul do Brasil [Conjugal conflict: Evidence of the validity of a conflict resolution scale in couples in southern Brazil]. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 35(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.3742
14.
DelatorreM. Z.WagnerA. (2015). Estratégias de resolução de conflitos conjugais: Evidências de validade do CRBQ [Marital conflict resolution strategies: Evidence of validity of the CRBQ]. Avaliação Psicológica, 14(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2015.1402.08
DriverJ.TabaresA.ShapiroA. F.GottmanJ. M. (2016). Interação do casal em casamentos com altos e baixos níveis de satisfação. Estudos do Laboratório Gottman [Interaction of the couple in marriages with high and low levels of satisfaction. Gottman Laboratory Studies]. In WalshF. (Org.), Processos normativos da família: Diversidade e complexidade [Normal Family Processes: Diversity and complexity] (RosaS. M. M., Trad., 4a. ed., pp. 57–77). Artmed.
17.
FinchamF. D. (2003). Marital conflict correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01215
18.
FonsecaS. R. A.DuarteC. M. N. (2014). Do namoro ao casamento: Significados, expectativas, conflito e amor [From dating to marriage: Meanings, expectations, conflict and love]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 30(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722014000200002
19.
GomesI. R. R.FernandesS. C. S. (2018). A permanência de mulheres em relacionamentos abusivos à luz da teoria da ação planejada [The permanence of women in abusive relationships in the light of planned action theory]. Boletim: Academia Paulista de Psicologia, 38(94), 55–66.
GottmanJ. M.DriverJ.TabaresA. (2015). Repair during marital conflict in newlyweds: How couples move from attack-defend to collaboration. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 26(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2015.1038962
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2009). Análise multivariada dos dados [Multivariate analysis of data] (6a ed.). Bookman.
24.
HeatheringtonL.FriedlanderM. L.DiamondG. M.EscuderoV.PinsofW. M. (2015). 25 years of systemic therapies research: Progress and promise. Journal Psychotherapy Research, 25(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.983208
25.
HollistC. S.FalcetoO. G.FerreiraL. M.MillerR. B.SpringerP. R.FernandesC. L. C.NunesN. A. (2012). Portuguese translation and validation of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(s1), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00296.x
26.
HoffmannE. F.CostaC. B. (2019). Associações entre religiosidade-espiritualidade e as relações conjugais: Estudo de revisão sistemática [Associations between religiosity - spirituality and marital relationships: systematic review study]. Contextos Clínicos, 12(2), 533–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4013/ctc.2019.122.07
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press.
31.
LeggettD. G.Roberts-PittmanB.ByczekS.MorseD. T. (2012). Cooperation, conflict, and marital satisfaction: Bridging theory, research, and practice. Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(2), 182–199.
32.
NevesA.DuarteC. (2015). Sintomas depressivos, resolução de conflitos e satisfação conjugal em indivíduos num relacionamento [Depressive symptoms, conflict resolution and marital satisfaction in individuals in a relationship]. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 16(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.15309/15psd160305
33.
NicholsM. P.SchwartzR. C. (2007). Terapia Familiar: Conceitos e métodos [Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods]. Artmed.
34.
NorgrenM. B. P.SouzaR. M.KaslowF.HammerschmidtH.SharlinS. A. (2004). Satisfação conjugal em casamentos de longa duração: Uma construção possível [Marital satisfaction in long term marriages: A possible construction]. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 9(3), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2004000300020
35.
Perrone-McGovernK. M.Oliveira-SilvaP.Simon-DackS.Lefdahl-DavisE.AdamsD.McConnellJ.HowellD.HessR.DavisA.GonçalvesO. F. (2014). Effects of empathy and conflict resolution strategies on psychophysiological arousal and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-013-9237-2
36.
RauerA.WilliamsL.JensenJ. (2017). Finer distinctions: Variability in satisfied older couples’ problem-solving behaviors. Family Process, 56(2), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12198
37.
RubensteinJ. L.FeldmanS. S. (1993). Conflict-resolution behavior in adolescent boys: Antecedents and adaptational correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0301_3
38.
SharlinA. S.KaslowF.HammerschmidtH. (2000). Together through thick and thin: A multinational picture of long-term marriages. The Haworth Clinical Practice Press.
39.
SilvaL. A.Scorsolini-CominF.SantosM. A. (2017). Casamentos de longa duração: Recursos pessoais como estratégias de manutenção do laço conjugal [Long-term marriages: Personal resources such as marital bond maintenance strategies]. Psico-USF, 22(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712017220211
40.
Veldorale-BroganA.LambertN. M.FinchamF. D.DeWallC. N. (2013). The virtue of problem-solving: Perceived partner virtues as predictors of problem-solving efficacy. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01421.x
41.
VerhofstadtL. L.BuysseA.De ClercqA.GoodwinR. (2005). Emotional arousal and negative affect in marital conflict: The influence of gender, conflict structure, and demand-withdrawal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.262
42.
WagnerA.MosmannC. P.ScheerenP.LevandowskiD. C. (2019). Conflict, conflict resolution and marital quality. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 29, e2919. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e2919
43.
WatzlawickP.BeavinJ. H.JacksonD. D. (1973). Pragmática da comunicação humana. Um estudo dos padrões, patologias e paradoxos da interação [Pragmatics of human communication. A study of patterns, pathologies and paradoxes of interaction]. Cultrix.
44.
YaşınF.SunalA. B. (2016). The mediator role of relationship satisfaction on the relation between time perspective and responses to romantic relationship dissatisfaction. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 31(78), 91–94.
45.
ZordanE. P.WagnerA.MosmannC. (2012). O perfil de casais que vivenciam divórcios consensuais e litigiosos: Uma análise das demandas judiciais [The profile of couples experiencing consensual and litigious divorces: An analysis of judicial demands]. Psico-USF, 17(2), 185–194.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
