Americans have positive views of adoption, yet many never consider adoption. This study examined characteristics that predict whether women ever consider adoption as a pathway to motherhood using an analytic sample of 876 childless women from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers. Using Risman’s theory of gender as a social structure as a framework, we focused on the role of the importance of motherhood and infertility in predicting adoption consideration. Women who held higher levels of importance of motherhood and engaged in medical help-seeking for infertility were more likely to consider adoption at both the bivariate and multivariate levels. Women currently considering adoption were more likely to have seen a doctor for infertility, to have a high importance of motherhood, to be African American, and were generally older. Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate how views of adoption and the importance of motherhood change over time for individual women.
BeckerG. (2002). Deciding whether to tell children about donor insemination: An unresolved question in the United States. In InhornM.BalenF. (Eds.), Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (119-133). Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
BeckmanL. J.HarveyS. M. (2005). Current reproductive technologies: Increased access and choice?Journal of Social Issues, 61(1), 1-20.
3.
BellA. (2009). It’s way out of my league. Low-income women’s experiences of medicalized infertility. Gender & Society, 23, 688-709.
4.
BriggsL. (2012). Somebody’s children: The politics of transracial and transnational adoption. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
ChandraA.MartinezG.MosherW.AbmaJ.JonesJ. (2005). Fertility, family planning and reproductive health of US women: Data from the 2002 national survey of family growth. Vital Health Statistics, 23, 1-174.
6.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2011). How many children were adopted in 2007 and 2008?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
7.
CowanC.CowanP. (1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
CurtinR.PresserS.SingerE. (2005). Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(1), 87-98.
9.
DalyK. (1988). Reshaped parenthood identity: The transition of adoptive parenthood. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17(1), 40-66.
10.
DanilukJ.Hurtig-MitchellJ. (2003). Themes of hope and healing: Infertile couples’ experiences of adoption. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 389-399.
11.
Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption. (2002). National Adoption Attitudes Survey: Research report. Columbus, OH: Author.
12.
DeVooghtK.MalmK.VandivereS.McCoy-RothM. (2011). Number of children adopted from foster care increases in 2009 (Fostering Connections Resource Center, Analysis, 4). Retrieved from http://www.fosteringconnections.org
13.
DraperJ. (2003). Blurring, moving and broken boundaries: Men’s encounters with the pregnant body. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 743-767.
14.
DutneyA. (2007). Religion, infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21, 169-180.
15.
EdinK.KefalasM. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
ElsonJ. (2004). Am I still a woman? Hysterectomy and gender identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
17.
FisherA. (2003). Still “not quite as good as having your own”? Toward a sociology of adoption. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 335-361.
18.
FisherB. (1992). Against the grain: Lives of women without children. IRIS: A Journal About Women, 2, 46-51.
19.
GillespieR. (2003). Childfree and feminine: Understanding the gender identity of voluntary childless women. Gender & Society, 17, 122-136.
20.
GreilA. (1991). Not yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21.
GrotevantH.van DulmenM.DunbarN.Nelson-ChristendaughterJ.ChristianM.FanX.MillerB. (2006). Antisocial behavior of adoptees and nonadoptees: Prediction from early history and adolescent relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 16(1), 105-131.
22.
GoldbergA.SmithJ. (2008). Social support and psychological well-being in lesbian and heterosexual preadoptive couples. Family Relations, 57, 281-294.
23.
HayfordS.MorganS. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86, 1163-1188.
24.
HagewenK.MorganS. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002. Population and Development Review, 31, 507-527.
25.
HollingsworthL. (2000). Who seeks to adopt a child? Findings from the national survey of family growth. Adoption Quarterly, 3, 1-23.
26.
InhornM. (2002). The “local” confronts the “global”: Infertile bodies and new reproductive technologies in Egypt. In InhornM.BalenF. (Eds.), Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 263-282). Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
IrelandM (1993). Reconceiving women: Separating motherhood from female identity. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
JenningsP. (2010). “God had something else in mind”: Family, religion, and infertility. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 215-237.
29.
JonesJ. (2008). Adoption experiences of women and men and demand for children to adopt by women 18-44 years of age in the United States, 2002. Vital and Health Statistics, 23, 1-36.
30.
LetherbyG. (2002). Childless and bereft? Stereotypes and realities in relation to “voluntary” and “involuntary” childlessness and womanhood. Sociological Inquiry, 72(1), 7-20.
31.
LinoM. (2011). Expenditures on children by families, 2010. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
32.
MaherJ. M.SaugeresL. (2007). To be or not to be a mother? Women negotiating cultural representations of mothering. Journal of Sociology, 43, 5-21.
33.
MarchK. (1995). Perceptions of adoption as social stigma: Motivation for search and reunion. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 653-660.
34.
MarchK.MiallC. (2000). Adoption as a family form. Family Relations, 49, 256-362.
35.
McCartyC.HouseM.HarmanJ.RichardsS. (2006). Effort in phone survey response rates: The effects of vendor and client-controlled factors. Field Methods, 18, 172-188.
McMahonM. (1995). Engendering motherhood: Identity and self-transformation in women’s lives. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
McQuillanJ.GrielA.ShrefflerK.TichenorV. (2008). The importance of motherhood among women in the contemporary United States. Gender and Society, 22, 477-496.
39.
McQuillanJ.GreilA.ShrefflerK.Wonch-HillP.GentzlerK.HathcoatJ. (2012). Does the reason matter? Variation in childlessness concerns among US women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 1166-1881.
40.
McQuillanJ.GreilA.WhiteL.JacobM. (2003). Frustrated fertility: Infertility and psychological distress among women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1007-1018.
41.
McQuillanJ.StoneR. T.GreilA. (2007). Infertility and life satisfaction among women. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 955-981.
42.
McQuillanK. (2004). When does religion influence fertility?Population and Development Review, 30(1), 25-56.
43.
MiallC.MarchK. (2005). Open adoption as a family form: Community assessments and social support. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 380-410.
44.
MillerW. (2003). The role of nurturent schemas in human reproduction. In RodgersJ. L.KohlerH. P. (Eds.), The biodemography of human reproduction and fertility (pp. 43-56). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
45.
ModellJ. (2002). A sealed and secret kinship: The culture of policies and practices in American adoption. New York, NY: Berhahn Press.
46.
MorellC. (2000). Saying no: Women’s experiences with reproductive refusal. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 313-322.
47.
MorganS.KingR. (2001). Why have children in the 21st century? Biological predisposition, social coercion, rational choice. European Journal of Population, 17, 3-20.
48.
NuackB. (2005). Changing value of children: An action theory of fertility behavior and intergenerational relationships in cross-cultural comparison. In WolfgangF.ChakkarathP.SchwarzB. (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research for the social science (pp. 183-202). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
49.
ParryD. C. (2005). Work, leisure, and support groups: An examination of the ways women with infertility respond to pronatalist ideology. Sex Roles, 53, 337-346.
50.
RismanB. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
ShostackS.FreeseJ.LinkB.PhelanJ. (2009). The politics of the gene: Social status and beliefs about genetics for individual outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 77-93.
52.
SimmelC.BarthR. P.BrooksD. (2007). Adopted foster youths’ psychosocial functioning: A longitudinal perspective. Child & Family Social Work, 12, 336-348.
53.
SmithD. (1993). The standard North American family: SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 50-65.
54.
ThompsonC. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
55.
TyebjeeT. (2003). Attitudes, interest, and motivation for adoption and foster care. Child Welfare League of America, 82, 685-706.
56.
UlrichM.WeatherallA. (2000). Motherhood and infertility: Viewing motherhood through the lens of infertility. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 323-336.
57.
van den AkkerO. B. A. (2001). Adoption in the age of reproductive technology. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 19, 147-159.
58.
VandivereS.MalmK.RadelL. (2009). Adoption USA: A chartbook based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health.
59.
WegarK. (2000). Adoption, family ideology, and social stigma: Bias in community attitudes, adoption research, and practice. Family Relations, 49, 363-370.
WhiteL.McQuillanJ. (2006). No longer intending: The relationship between relinquishing fertility intentions and distress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 478-490.
62.
WierzbickiM. (1993). Psychological adjustment of adoptees: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 447-454.
63.
WolfN. (2001). (Misconceptions). Truth, lies, and the unexpected on the journey of motherhood. New York, NY: Doubleday.
64.
ZhangY.LeeG. (2010). Intercountry versus transnational adoption: Analysis of adoptive parents’ motivations and preferences in adoption. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 75-98.
