This article explores the prospects of an increasingly debated democratic reform: assigning political offices by lot. While this idea is advocated by political theorists and politicians in favour of participatory and deliberative democracy, the article investigates the extent to which citizens and MPs actually endorse different variants of ‘sortition’. We test for differences among respondents’ social status, disaffection with elections and political ideology. Our findings suggest that MPs are largely opposed to sortitioning political offices when their decision-making power is more than consultative, although leftist MPs tend to be in favour of mixed assemblies (involving elected and sortitioned members). Among citizens, random selection seems to appeal above all to disaffected individuals with a lower social status. The article ends with a discussion of the political prospects of sortition being introduced as a democratic reform.
AchenChristopher H (2016) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
Andeweg, RudyB (1989) Institutional Conservatism in the Netherlands: Proposals for and resistance to change. West European Politics12(1): 42–60.
3.
BarnettAnthonyCartyPeter (1998) The Athenian Option: Radical Reform for the House of Lords. London: Imprint Academic.
4.
BedockCamille (2017) Reforming Democracy: Institutional Engineering in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BedockCamillePiletJean-Benoit (2020) Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to Be the Main Policymakers? A study of French citizens. Government and Opposition. Advance online publication 2 April 2020, doi:10.1017/gov.2020.1.
6.
BengtssonÅsaMattilaMikko (2009) Direct Democracy and its Critics: Support for direct democracy and ‘stealth’ democracy in Finland. West European Politics32(5): 1031–1048.
7.
BowlerShaunDonovanToddKarpJeffrey A (2002) When Might Institutions Change? Elite support for direct democracy in three nations. Political Research Quarterly55(4): 731–754.
8.
BowlerShaunDonovanToddKarpJeffrey A (2006) Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-interest, values, or ideology?Journal of Politics68(2): 434–446.
9.
BowlerShaunDonovanToddKarpJeffrey A (2007) Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quarterly60(3): 351–362.
10.
BuchsteinHubertusHeinMichael (2009) Randomizing Europe: The lottery as a decision-making procedure for policy creation in the EU. Critical Policy Studies3(1): 29–57.
11.
CallenbachErnestPhillipsMichael (1985) A Citizen Legislature. Berkeley: Bookpeople.
12.
CaluwaertsDidierBiardBenjaminJacquetVincentReuchampsMin (2017) What Is a Good Democracy? Citizens’ support for new modes of governing. In DeschouwerKris (ed.) Mind the Gap: Political Participation and Representation in Belgium. Colchester: ECPR Press.
13.
CaluwaertsDidierReuchampsMin (2018) The Legitimacy of Citizen-Led Deliberative Democracy. London: Routledge.
14.
CofféHildeMichelsAnk (2014) Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy. Electoral Studies35: 1–11.
DaltonRussell JWelzelChristian (2014) The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DaltonRussell JScarrowSusan ECainBruce E (2003) New Forms of Democracy? Reform and transformation of democratic institutions. In CainBruce EDaltonRussell J (eds) Democracy Transformed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–20.
18.
EscobarOliverElstubStephen (2017) Forms of Mini-Publics: An introduction to deliberative innovations in democratic practice. New Democracy Research and Development Note4: 1–13.
19.
GastilJohnWrightErik Olin (2018) Legislature by Lot: Envisioning sortition within a bicameral system. Politics & Society46(3): 303–330.
20.
GrönlundKimmoAndréBächtigerMaijaSetälä (2014) Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press.
21.
HeineltHubert (2013) Councillors’ Notions of Democracy, and Their Role Perception and Behaviour in the Changing Context of Local Democracy. Local Government Studies39(5): 640–660.
22.
JacquetVincent (2019) The Role and the Future of Deliberative Mini-Publics: A citizen perspective. Political Studies67(3): 639–657.
23.
JacquetVincentReuchampsMin (2017) Les ‘méthodologues’ de la démocratie délibérative. Entre activisme citoyen et recherche scientifique au sein du G1000 et du G100. Participations3(16): 45–65.
24.
JacquetVincentSchiffinoNathalieReuchampsMinLatinisDelphine (2015) Union sacrée ou union forcée? Les parlementaires belges face à l’impératif délibératif. Participations13(3): 171–203.
25.
JacquetVincentvan der DoesRamon (2020) The Consequences of Deliberative Minipublics: Systematic overview, conceptual gaps, and new directions. Representation. Advance online publication 18 June 2020, doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1778513.
26.
JacquetVincentDevillersSophieReuchampsMin (2020) Les listes citoyennes. In DodeigneJérémyCloseCarolineJacquetVincentMatagneGeoffroy (eds) Les élections locales du 14 octobre 2018 en Wallonie et à Bruxelles: une offre politique renouvelée?Genval: Vanden Broele, 59–78.
27.
LafontCristina (2019) Democracy Without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
LandaDimitriPevnickRyan (2020) Is Random Selection a Cure for the Ills of Electoral Representation?Journal of Political Philosophy. Advance online publication 26 May 2020, doi:10.1111/jopp.12219.
29.
LandemoreHélène (2013) Deliberation, Cognitive Diversity, and Democratic Inclusiveness: An epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives. Synthese190(7): 1209–1231.
30.
LeibEthan J (2010) Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
31.
MabilleXavier (2011) Nouvelle histoire politique de la Belgique. Bruxelles: CRISP.
32.
ManinBernard (1997) The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NebloMichael AEsterlingKevin MKennedyRyan PLazerDavid MJSokheyAnand E (2010) Who Wants to Deliberate—And why?American Political Science Review104(3): 566–583.
35.
NiessenChristoph (2019) When Citizen Deliberation Enters Real Politics: How politicians and stakeholders envision the place of a deliberative mini-public in political decision-making. Policy Sciences52(3): 481–503.
36.
NiessenChristophReuchampsMin (2019) Le dialogue citoyen permanent en Communauté germanophone. Courrier Hebdomadaire du CRISP2426(21): 5–38.
37.
NiessenChristophSchiffinoNathalieJacquetVincentDeschampsLudovic (2019) Critical Candidates: Elite attitudes towards the functioning of representative democracy. In VandeleeneAudreyDe WinterLievenBaudewynsPierre (eds) Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Patritocrcay. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 341–363.
SchiffinoNathalieJacquetVincentCogelsMaximilienReuchampsMin (2019) Les gouvernants face aux transformations de la démocratie. Le point de vue des ministres et des présidents de parti. Gouvernement et action publique2(2): 57–80.
43.
SeydBenCurticeJohnRoseJonathan (2018) How Might Reform of the Political System Appeal to Discontented Citizens?The British Journal of Politics and International Relations20(2): 263–284.
44.
SintomerYves (2007) Le pouvoir au peuple: Jurys citoyens, tirage au sort et démocratie participative. Paris: Découverte.
45.
SintomerYvesRöckeAnjaHerzbergCarsten (2016) Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Democracy and Public Governance. London: Routledge.
46.
SmithGraham (2009) Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
StonePeter (2011) The Luck of the Draw: The Role of Lotteries in Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
SuiterJaneFarrellDavidHarrisClodagh (2016) The Irish Constitutional Convention: A case of ‘high legitimacy’? In ReuchampsMinSuiterJane (eds) Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press, 33–51.
49.
SutherlandKeith (2008) A People’s Parliament: A (Revised) Blueprint for a Very English Revolution. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
50.
UmbersLachlan Montgomery (2018) Against Lottocracy. European Journal of Political Theory. Advance online publication 22 July 2018, doi:10.1177/1474885118783602.
51.
Van dammeJanJacquetVincentSchiffinoNathalieReuchampsMin (2017) Public Consultation and Participation in Belgium: Directly engaging citizens beyond the ballot box? In BransMarleenAubinDavid (eds) Policy-Analysis in Belgium. Bristol: Policy Press, 215–234.
52.
Van ReybrouckDavid (2016) Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: The Bodley Head.
53.
VandammePierre-ÉtienneJacquetVincentNiessenChristophPitseysJohnReuchampsMin (2018) Intercameral Relations in a Bicameral Elected and Sortition Legislature. Politics & Society46(3): 381–400.
54.
WebbPaul (2013) Who Is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research52(6): 747–772.
55.
ZakarasAlex (2010) Lot and Democratic Representation: A modest proposal. Constellations17(3): 455–471.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
