Mini-publics have been spreading, particularly in Western countries, with the aim of resolving some deficits of current democracies. An abundant literature focuses on the study of their theoretical expectations and empirical manifestations as well as on the main controversies faced by this deliberative institution. In this article, I review the academic conversation along the three core principles of mini-publics: the conditions and criteria for deliberation to produce informed public opinion; the conceptual and empirical difficulties to achieve inclusiveness, representativeness, and political equality; and the conditions for and challenges of having public influence.
BeauvaisE.WarrenM. E. (2019). What can deliberative mini-publics contribute to democratic systems?European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 893-914 [Abstr. 70.26].
2.
BedockC.PiletJ. B. (2021). Who supports citizens selected by lot to be the main policymakers? A study of French citizens. Government and Opposition, 56(3), 485-504 [Abstr. 71.6514].
3.
BinnemaH.MichelsA. (2022). Does democratic innovation reduce bias? The G1000 as a new form of local citizen participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(6), 475-485 [Abstr. 73.429].
4.
ChristensenH. S.LeinoM.SetäläM.StrandbergK. (2022). Knowledge, trust or perspectives? A causal mediation analysis of how a citizens’ jury affected voting intentions in the general public. Swiss Political Science Review, 28(3), 516-535 [Abstr. 73.2068].
5.
CuratoN.SassJ.ErcanS. A.NiemeyerS. (2022). Deliberative democracy in the age of serial crisis. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 55-66 [Abstr. 72.4453].
6.
ElstubS.CarrickJ.KhobanZ. (2021). Democratic innovation in the Scottish Parliament: An evaluation of committee mini-publics. Scottish Affairs, 30(4), 493-521 [Abstr. 72.1825].
7.
FarrellD. M.SuiterJ.HarrisC. (2019). ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: The 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 34(1), 113-123 [Abstr. 69.3632].
8.
FarrellD. M.FieldL. (2022). The growing prominence of deliberative mini-publics and their impact on democratic government. Irish Political Studies, 37(2), 285-302 [Abstr. 72.5991].
9.
GarryJ.PowJ.CoakleyJ.FarrellD.O’LearyB.TilleyJ. (2022). The perception of the legitimacy of citizens’ assemblies in deeply divided places? Evidence of public and elite opinion from consociational Northern Ireland. Government and Opposition, 57(3), 532-551 [Abstr. 72.7251].
10.
GoldbergS.BächtigerA. (2023). Catching the ‘deliberative wave’? How (disaffected) citizens assess deliberative citizen forums. British Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 239-247 [Abstr. 73.4851].
11.
GrönlundK.HerneK.JäskeM.VärttöM. (2022). Can politicians and citizens deliberate together? Evidence from a local deliberative mini-public. Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(4), 410-432 [Abstr. 73.2160].
12.
HarrisC.FarrellD. M.SuiterJ.BrennanM. (2021). Women’s voices in a deliberative assembly: An analysis of gender rates of participation in Ireland’s Convention on the Constitution 2012–2014. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(1), 175-193 [Abstr. 71.3902].
13.
HeB. (2023). Citizens’ Assemblies in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and Libya. In ReuchampsM.VrydaghJ.WelpY. (Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies. De Gruyter.
14.
HimmelroosS.ChristensenH. S. (2020). The potential of deliberative reasoning: Patterns of attitude change and consistency in cross-cutting and like-minded deliberation. Acta Politica, 55, 135-155 [Abstr. 70.6322].
15.
JacquetV. (2019). The role and the future of deliberative mini-publics: a citizen perspective. Political Studies, 67(3), 639-657 [Abstr. 70.583].
16.
KeaneJ. (2009). The Life and Death of Democracy. Simon and Schuster.
17.
KhobanZ. (2021). Interpretative interactions: An argument for descriptive representation in deliberative mini-publics. Representation, 57(4), 497-514 [Abstr. 72.3620].
18.
KnoblochK. R.BarthelM. L.GastilJ. (2020). Emanating effects: The impact of the Oregon citizens’ initiative review on voters’ political efficacy. Political Studies, 68(2), 426-445 [Abstr. 70.7719].
19.
KnopsL.VrydaghJ. (2023) Between hopes and systemic unsustainability: An analysis of citizens assemblies’ potential on climate change. In ReuchampsM.VrydaghJ.WelpY. (Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, (p. 211). De Gruyter.
20.
KuyperJ. W.WolkensteinF. (2019). Complementing and correcting representative institutions: When and how to use mini-publics. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 656-675 [Abstr. 69.6000].
21.
LafontC. (2019). Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.
22.
LeydetD. (2019). Which conception of political equality do deliberative mini-publics promote?. European Journal of Political Theory, 18(3), 349-370 [Abstr. 69.7479].
23.
LindellM. (2023). Internal dynamics at work. In ReuchampsM.VrydaghJ.WelpY. (Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, (p. 257). De Gruyter.
24.
NiemeyerS.VeriF.DryzekJ. S.BächtigerA. (2023). How deliberation happens: Enabling deliberative reason. American Political Science Review, 1-18 [Abstr. “in progress”].
25.
McGovernR.ThorneP. (2021). Citizens assemble: a study on the impact of climate reporting in the Irish media ‘before,’ ‘during,’ and ‘after’ the Citizens’ Assembly on ‘how the state can make Ireland a leader in tackling climate change’. Irish Political Studies, 36(2), 214-234 [Abstr. 71.6695].
26.
MinsartE.JacquetV. (2023). The impact of citizens’ assemblies on policymaking: Approaches and methods. In ReuchampsM.VrydaghJ.WelpY. (Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, (p. 1, 283). De Gruyter.
27.
MocklerP. (2021). Measuring the inclusiveness of deliberation: structural inequality and the discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1-20 [Abstr. 72.3693].
28.
PaulisE.PiletJ. B.PanelS.VittoriD.CloseC. (2021). The POLITICIZE dataset: An inventory of deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) in Europe. European Political Science, 20, 521-542 [Abstr. 72.199].
29.
ReuchampsM.VrydaghJ.WelpY. (Eds.) (2023). De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies.
30.
SchiffbeckA. (2020). Attrition in long-term deliberative processes. The neighbourhood consultative councils in Timisoara. In Democratic Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe, (pp. 94-110). Routledge.
31.
SultanishviliT. (2023). Shortfalls of deliberative democracy in Georgia: The analysis of the General Assembly of a Settlement. European Societies, 25(2), 326-345 [Abstr. 73.5114].
32.
SuiterJ.MuradovaL.GastilJ.FarrellD. M. (2020). Scaling up deliberation: Testing the potential of mini-publics to enhance the deliberative capacity of citizens. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(3), 253-272 [Abstr. 71.4195].
33.
SuiterJ.M FarrellD.HarrisC.MurphyP., (2022). Measuring epistemic deliberation on polarized issues: The case of abortion provision in Ireland. Political Studies Review, 20(4), 630-647 [Abstr. 73.2362].
34.
VrydaghJ. (2023). Citizens’ assemblies: An introduction. In ReuchampsM.VrydaghJ.WelpY. (Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies. De Gruyter.
35.
WalshC. D.ElkinkJ. A. (2021). The dissatisfied and the engaged: Citizen support for citizens’ assemblies and their willingness to participate. Irish Political Studies, 36(4), 647-666 [Abstr. 73.3718].
36.
WelpY. (2023) Citizens’ assemblies: Beyond utopian and dystopian approaches. In ReuchampsM.VrydaghJ.WelpY. (Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies. De Gruyter.
37.
WestphalM. (2019). Overcoming the institutional deficit of agonistic democracy. Res Publica, 25(2), 187-210 [Abstr. 69.6112].
