Trends in Mini-Publics Research: High Expectations,Mixed Findings,and Clear-Cut Challenges

Abstract

Mini-publics have been spreading, particularly in Western countries, with the aim of resolving some deficits of current democracies. An abundant literature focuses on the study of their theoretical expectations and empirical manifestations as well as on the main controversies faced by this deliberative institution. In this article, I review the academic conversation along the three core principles of mini-publics: the conditions and criteria for deliberation to produce informed public opinion; the conceptual and empirical difficulties to achieve inclusiveness, representativeness, and political equality; and the conditions for and challenges of having public influence.

Keywords

mini-publics legitimacy representation accountability democracy democratic innovations deliberative democracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beauvais

Warren

M. E.

(2019). What can deliberative mini-publics contribute to democratic systems? European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 893-914 [Abstr. 70.26].

Bedock

Pilet

J. B.

(2021). Who supports citizens selected by lot to be the main policymakers? A study of French citizens. Government and Opposition, 56(3), 485-504 [Abstr. 71.6514].

Binnema

Michels

(2022). Does democratic innovation reduce bias? The G1000 as a new form of local citizen participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(6), 475-485 [Abstr. 73.429].

Christensen

H. S.

Leino

Setälä

Strandberg

(2022). Knowledge, trust or perspectives? A causal mediation analysis of how a citizens’ jury affected voting intentions in the general public. Swiss Political Science Review, 28(3), 516-535 [Abstr. 73.2068].

Curato

Sass

Ercan

S. A.

Niemeyer

(2022). Deliberative democracy in the age of serial crisis. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 55-66 [Abstr. 72.4453].

Elstub

Carrick

Khoban

(2021). Democratic innovation in the Scottish Parliament: An evaluation of committee mini-publics. Scottish Affairs, 30(4), 493-521 [Abstr. 72.1825].

Farrell

D. M.

Suiter

Harris

(2019). ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: The 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 34(1), 113-123 [Abstr. 69.3632].

Farrell

D. M.

Field

(2022). The growing prominence of deliberative mini-publics and their impact on democratic government. Irish Political Studies, 37(2), 285-302 [Abstr. 72.5991].

Garry

Pow

Coakley

Farrell

O’Leary

Tilley

(2022). The perception of the legitimacy of citizens’ assemblies in deeply divided places? Evidence of public and elite opinion from consociational Northern Ireland. Government and Opposition, 57(3), 532-551 [Abstr. 72.7251].

10.

Goldberg

Bächtiger

(2023). Catching the ‘deliberative wave’? How (disaffected) citizens assess deliberative citizen forums. British Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 239-247 [Abstr. 73.4851].

11.

Grönlund

Herne

Jäske

Värttö

(2022). Can politicians and citizens deliberate together? Evidence from a local deliberative mini-public. Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(4), 410-432 [Abstr. 73.2160].

12.

Harris

Farrell

D. M.

Suiter

Brennan

(2021). Women’s voices in a deliberative assembly: An analysis of gender rates of participation in Ireland’s Convention on the Constitution 2012–2014. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(1), 175-193 [Abstr. 71.3902].

13.

(2023). Citizens’ Assemblies in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and Libya. In Reuchamps

Vrydagh

Welp

(Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies. De Gruyter.

14.

Himmelroos

Christensen

H. S.

(2020). The potential of deliberative reasoning: Patterns of attitude change and consistency in cross-cutting and like-minded deliberation. Acta Politica, 55, 135-155 [Abstr. 70.6322].

15.

Jacquet

(2019). The role and the future of deliberative mini-publics: a citizen perspective. Political Studies, 67(3), 639-657 [Abstr. 70.583].

16.

Keane

(2009). The Life and Death of Democracy. Simon and Schuster.

17.

Khoban

(2021). Interpretative interactions: An argument for descriptive representation in deliberative mini-publics. Representation, 57(4), 497-514 [Abstr. 72.3620].

18.

Knobloch

K. R.

Barthel

M. L.

Gastil

(2020). Emanating effects: The impact of the Oregon citizens’ initiative review on voters’ political efficacy. Political Studies, 68(2), 426-445 [Abstr. 70.7719].

19.

Knops

Vrydagh

(2023) Between hopes and systemic unsustainability: An analysis of citizens assemblies’ potential on climate change. In Reuchamps

Vrydagh

Welp

(Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, (p. 211). De Gruyter.

20.

Kuyper

J. W.

Wolkenstein

(2019). Complementing and correcting representative institutions: When and how to use mini-publics. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 656-675 [Abstr. 69.6000].

21.

Lafont

(2019). Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.

22.

Leydet

(2019). Which conception of political equality do deliberative mini-publics promote?. European Journal of Political Theory, 18(3), 349-370 [Abstr. 69.7479].

23.

Lindell

(2023). Internal dynamics at work. In Reuchamps

Vrydagh

Welp

(Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, (p. 257). De Gruyter.

24.

Niemeyer

Veri

Dryzek

J. S.

Bächtiger

(2023). How deliberation happens: Enabling deliberative reason. American Political Science Review, 1-18 [Abstr. “in progress”].

25.

McGovern

Thorne

(2021). Citizens assemble: a study on the impact of climate reporting in the Irish media ‘before,’ ‘during,’ and ‘after’ the Citizens’ Assembly on ‘how the state can make Ireland a leader in tackling climate change’. Irish Political Studies, 36(2), 214-234 [Abstr. 71.6695].

26.

Minsart

Jacquet

(2023). The impact of citizens’ assemblies on policymaking: Approaches and methods. In Reuchamps

Vrydagh

Welp

(Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, (p. 1, 283). De Gruyter.

27.

Mockler

(2021). Measuring the inclusiveness of deliberation: structural inequality and the discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1-20 [Abstr. 72.3693].

28.

Paulis

Pilet

J. B.

Panel

Vittori

(2021). The POLITICIZE dataset: An inventory of deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) in Europe. European Political Science, 20, 521-542 [Abstr. 72.199].

29.

Reuchamps

Vrydagh

Welp

(Eds.) (2023). De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies.

30.

Schiffbeck

(2020). Attrition in long-term deliberative processes. The neighbourhood consultative councils in Timisoara. In Democratic Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe, (pp. 94-110). Routledge.

31.

Sultanishvili

(2023). Shortfalls of deliberative democracy in Georgia: The analysis of the General Assembly of a Settlement. European Societies, 25(2), 326-345 [Abstr. 73.5114].

32.

Suiter

Muradova

Gastil

Farrell

D. M.

(2020). Scaling up deliberation: Testing the potential of mini-publics to enhance the deliberative capacity of citizens. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(3), 253-272 [Abstr. 71.4195].

33.

Suiter

M Farrell

Harris

Murphy

, (2022). Measuring epistemic deliberation on polarized issues: The case of abortion provision in Ireland. Political Studies Review, 20(4), 630-647 [Abstr. 73.2362].

34.

Vrydagh

(2023). Citizens’ assemblies: An introduction. In Reuchamps

Vrydagh

Welp

(Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies. De Gruyter.

35.

Walsh

C. D.

Elkink

J. A.

(2021). The dissatisfied and the engaged: Citizen support for citizens’ assemblies and their willingness to participate. Irish Political Studies, 36(4), 647-666 [Abstr. 73.3718].

36.

Welp

(2023) Citizens’ assemblies: Beyond utopian and dystopian approaches. In Reuchamps

Vrydagh

Welp

(Eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies. De Gruyter.

37.

Westphal

(2019). Overcoming the institutional deficit of agonistic democracy. Res Publica, 25(2), 187-210 [Abstr. 69.6112].