Abstract
Almost all popular and academic assessments of Thaksin Shinawatra label him a populist, with his time in power characterized by populism. Through an assessment of conceptual accounts of populism and a discussion of Thaksin’s political campaigning and his prime ministership, it is argued that this characterization is inaccurate. While electorally popular, Thaksin’s populism was slow to develop. Thaksin’s emergence as a populist reflected a configuration of political circumstances that forced him to rely increasingly on the support of an electoral base made up of the relatively less well-off. In failing to account for the development of Thaksin as a populist, an important element of Thaksin’s politics and of populism as a form of politics is missed. Thaksin was made a populist by elite opposition, military coup and the political demands by the red shirt mass movement wanting social and economic equality underpinned by electoral representation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
