Thailand fits the pattern of pernicious polarized politics identified in this volume, where a previously excluded group successfully gains political power through the ballot box, governs unilaterally to pursue radical reforms, and produces a backlash from the traditional power elites. In Thailand, elite conflict has been a major part of the story, but this article argues that political polarization there cannot be merely understood as “elite-driven”: conflict among the elites and the masses, and the interaction between them, produced polarized and unstable politics. Violent struggle is caused by class structure and regional, urban-rural disparities; elite struggle activates the existing social cleavages; and ideological framing deepens the polarization. While the Yellow Shirts and traditional elites want to restore and uphold the “Thai-style democracy” with royal nationalism, the Red Shirts espouse the “populist democracy” of strong elected government with popular nationalism and egalitarian social order.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames. 2006. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BakerChris. 2016. The 2014 Thai coup and some roots of authoritarianism. Journal of Contemporary Asia46 (3): 388–404.
3.
ChattharakulAnyarat. 2010. Thai electoral campaigning: Vote-canvassing networks and hybrid voting. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs29 (4): 67–95.
4.
ChaiwatThaneePhongpaichitPasuk. 2008. Rents and rent-seeking in the Thaksin Era. In Thai capital after the 1997 crisis, eds. PhongpaichitPasukBakerChris 249– 66. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
5.
ChambersPaulWaitoolkiatNapisa. 2016. The resilience of monarchised military in Thailand. Journal Of Contemporary Asia46 (3): 425–44.
6.
CrispinShawn.2012. Thailand’s classless conflicts. In Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a Divided Thailand, eds. MontesanoMichaelChachavalponqpunPavinChongvilaivanAekapol, 108–19 Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
7.
DresselBjörn. 2010. Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Considerations from recent events in Thailand.The Pacific Review23 (5): 671–91.
8.
Eugénie Mérieau. 2016. Thailand’s deep state, royal power and the constitutional court (1997–2015)Journal of Contemporary Asia46 (3): 445–66.
9.
FerraraFederico. 2015. The political development of modern Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Garcia-GuadillaMariaMallenAna2016. Polarized politics: The Experience of Venezuela under 21st-century socialism. Memo prepared for Polarized Politics Workshop, Georgia State University, March14–15, 2016. Atlanta, GA.
11.
HewisonKevin.2012. Class, inequality, and politics. In Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a divided Thailand, eds. Michael MontesanoChachavalponqpunPavinChongvilaivanAekapol 143–60. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
12.
HewisonKevinKitirianglarpKengkij. 2010. “Thai-style democracy”: The royalist struggle for Thailand’s politics. In Saying the unsayable. Monarchy and democracy in Thailand. eds. IvarssonSørenIsagerLotte179–202. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.
13.
HickenAllen. 2006. Party fabrication: Constitutional reform and the rise of Thai Rak Thai. Journal of East Asian Studies6: 381–407.
14.
KeyesCharles. 2014. Finding their voice. Northeastern villagers and the Thai state. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
15.
KongkiratiPrajak. 2013. Bosses, bullets, and ballots: Electoral violence and democracy in Thailand 1975–2011. PhD diss., Australian National University, Canberra.
16.
KongkiratiPrajak. 2014. The rise and fall of electoral violence in Thailand: Changing rules, structures and power landscapes, 1997–2011. Contemporary Southeast Asia36 (3): 386–416.
17.
KongkiratiPrajak. 2016a. Thailand’s failed 2014 election: The anti-election movement, violence and democratic breakdown. Journal of Contemporary Asia46 (3): 467–85.
KongkiratiPrajakKanchoochatVeerayooth. 2018. The Prayuth regime: Embedded military and hierarchical capitalism in Thailand. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia6 (2): 279–305.
20.
LaungaramsriPinkaew. 2016. Mass surveillance and the militarization of cyberspace in post- coup Thailand. ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies9 (2): 195–214.
21.
LintnerBertil. July/August2009. “The battle for Thailand: Can democracy survive?”Foreign Affairs.
22.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
McCargoDuncan. 2005. Network monarchy and legitimacy crises in Thailand. The Pacific Review18 (4): 499–519.
24.
McCargoDuncan. 2009. Thai politics as reality TV. The Journal of Asian Studies68 (1): 7– 19.
McCoyJenniferRahmanTahmina. 2016. Polarized democracies in comparative perspective: Toward a conceptual framework. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association conference, 23July–28July2016. Poznan:Poland.
27.
McCoyJenniferRahmanTahminaSomerMurat. 2018. Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist62 (1): 16–42.
28.
MuddeCasKaltwasserCristÓbal Rovira. 2011. Voices of the peoples: Populism in Europe and Latin America compared. Working Paper no.378. The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
29.
NostitzNick. 2014. The red shirts from anti-coup protestors to social mass movement. In “Good coup” gone bad: Thailand’s political developments since Thaksin’s downfall, ed. ChachavalpongpunPavin 170–98. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
30.
OuyyanontPorphant. 2008. The Crown Property Bureau in Thailand and the crisis of 1997. Journal of Contemporary Asia38 (1): 166–89.
31.
PhatharathananunthSomchai. 2008. The Thai Rak Thai Party and elections in Northeastern Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia38 (1): 106–23.
32.
PhongpaichitPasukBakerChris. 2009. Thaksin’s populism. In Populism in Asia, eds. MizunoKosukePhongpaichitPasuk, 66–93. Singapore: NUS Press.
33.
PhongpaichitPasukBakerChris. 2012. Thailand in trouble: Revolt of the downtrodden or conflict among elites? In Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a Divided Thailand, eds. MontesanoMichaelChachavalpongpunPavinChongvilaivanAekapol 214–29. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
34.
RobertsKenneth. 2006. Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in Latin America. Comparative Politics36 (2): 127–48.
35.
Satha-AnandChaiwat. 2006. Fostering “authoritarian democracy” with violence: The effect of violent solutions in Southern Thailand. In Empire and neoliberalism in Asia, ed. HadizVedi R., 169–87. London: Routledge.
36.
SathitniramaiApichartMukdawijitraYuktiPawakapanNiti. 2013. Phum mi that lae kanmueang khong kan phatthana chonnabot thai ruam samai [Landscape and politics of contemporary rural development] Chiang Mai: Public Policy Studies Institute.
37.
SomerMurat. 2016. Religious versus secular and power sharing versus hegemonizing politics and polarization in Turkey. Memo prepared for Polarized Politics Workshop, Georgia State University, March14–15, 2016. Atlanta, GA.
38.
SopranzettiClaudio. 2012. Burning red desires: Isan migrants and the politics of desire in contemporary Thailand. South East Asia Research20 (3): 361–79
39.
TejapiraKasian. 2006. Toppling Thaksin. New Left Review39:5–37.
40.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2010. Human security, today and tomorrow: Thailand human development report. Bangkok: UNDP.
41.
UngerDanny.2012. Flying blind. In Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a divided Thailand, Eds. MontesanoMichaelChachavalponqpunPavinChongvilaivanAekapol. 313–22. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
42.
WalkerAndrew. 2012. Thailand’s political peasants: Power in the modern rural economy. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
43.
WinichakulThongchai. 2016. Thailand’s hyper-royalism: Its past success and present predicament. Trends in Southeast Asia, no.7. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
44.
YoshifumiTamada. 2009. Democracy and populism in Thailand. In Populism in Asia, eds. MizunoKosukePhongpaichitPasuk94–111. Singapore: NUS Press.
45.
ZakariaFareed. 2007. The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
