This article argues that high levels of state capacity are not a sufficient condition for consolidating autocratic rule. Rather, whether non-democratic rulers can harness the infrastructural power of the state to implement strategies of regime stabilization depends on three crucial factors: the state’s social embedding; the international context; and the extent of elite cohesion. The paper develops this argument through a case study of the military–bureaucratic regime in South Korea (1961–1987), which – despite a high-capacity ‘developmental’ state at its disposal – failed to maintain high levels of resilience.
AmsdenAlice Hoffenberg (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AndersenDavidMøllerJørgenSkaaningSvend-Erik (2014) The State-Democracy Nexus: Conceptual distinctions, theoretical perspectives, and comparative approaches. Democratization21(7): 1203–1220.
3.
BellinEva (2004) The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics36(2): 139–157.
4.
BernhardMichael (2016) The Moore Thesis: What’s left after 1989?Democratization23(1): 118–140.
5.
ChengTun-JenHaggardStephanKangDavid (1998) Institutions and Growth in Korea and Taiwan: The bureaucracy. The Journal of Development Studies34(6): 87–111.
6.
CroissantAurelHellmannOlli (n.d.) Introduction: State Capacity and Elections in the Study of Authoritarian Regimes. In: “State Capacity and the Survival of Electoral Authoritarianism”, Special Issue International Political Science Review (accepted).
7.
CroissantAurel (2001) Korea (Republic of Korea/South Korea). In NohlenDieterGrotzFlorianHartmannChristof (eds) Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook. Vol. II. Oxford, UK; and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 305–407.
8.
CroissantAurelKuehnDavid (2015) The Military’s Role in Politics. In GandhiJenniferRuiz-RufinRubén (eds) Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions. London: Routledge, 258–277.
9.
CumingsBruce (1984) The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences. International Organization38(1): 1–40.
10.
DeyoFrederic C (1987) State and Labor: Modes of political exclusion in East Asian development. In DeyoFrederic C (ed.) The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 182–202.
11.
DonerRichard FRitchieBryan KSlaterDan (2005) Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in comparative perspective. International Organization59(2): 327–361.
12.
EvansPeter B (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
FowlerJames (1999) The United States and South Korean Democratization. Political Science Quarterly114(2): 265–288.
14.
GandhiJenniferLust-OkarEllen (2009) Elections Under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science12: 403–422.
15.
GerschewskiJohannes (2013) The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization20(1): 13–38.
16.
GreeneKenneth F (2010) The Political Economy of Authoritarian Single-Party Dominance. Comparative Political Studies43(7): 807–834.
17.
HaggardStephanKangDavidMoonChung-In (1997) Japanese Colonialism and Korean Development: A critique. World Development25(6): 867–881.
18.
HaggardStephanMoonChung-in (1993) The State, Politics, and Economic Development in Postwar South Korea. In KooHagen (ed.) State and Society in Contemporary Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 51–93.
19.
HansonJonathan K.State Capacity and Authoritarian Resilience: Conceptualizing and Measuring the Institutional Underpinnings of Autocratic Power. In: State Capacity and the Survival of Electoral Authoritarianism, Special Issue International Political Science Review. DOI:10.1177/0192512117702523
20.
HuerJon (1989) Marching Orders: The Role of the Military in South Korea’s ‘Economic Miracle,’ 1961–1971. New York: Greenwood Press.
21.
ImHyug Baeg (2011) The Origins of the Yushin Regime: Machiavelli unveiled. In KimByung-KookVogelEzra F. (eds) The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 233–261.
22.
KimByung-Kook (2011) The Labyrinth of Solitude: Park and the exercise of presidential power. In KimByung-KookVogelEzra F. (eds) The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 140–167.
23.
KimHyung-A (2011) State Building: The Military Junta’s Path to Modernity Through Administrative Reforms. In KimByung-KookVogelEzra F. (eds) The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 85–111.
24.
KimInsoo (2013) Intra-Military Divisions and Democratization in South Korea. Armed Forces and Society39(4): 695–710.
25.
KimJae-onKohBC (1972) Electoral Behavior and Social Development in South Korea: An aggregate data analysis of presidential elections. The Journal of Politics34(3): 825–859.
26.
KohliAtul (1994) Where Do High Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese lineage of Korea’s ‘developmental state’. World Development22(9): 1269–1293.
27.
KohliAtul (2004) State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KooHagen (1991) Middle Classes, Democratization, and Class Formation. Theory and Society20(4): 485–509.
29.
KooHagen (1993) The State, Minjung, and The Working Class in South Korea. In KooHagen (ed.) State and Society in Contemporary Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 131–162.
30.
LeeSung-Chull (1999) Politics of Electoral Reforms and Practices: The case of Korean SNTV elections under the Yushin constitution. In GrofmanBernard (ed.) Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan Under the Single Non-transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 51–64.
31.
LeeYoung Jo (2011) The Countryside. In KimByung-KookVogelEzra F (eds) The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 345–372.
32.
LeftwichAdrian (1995) Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a model of the developmental state. The Journal of Development Studies31(3): 400–427.
33.
LevitskyStevenWayLucan A (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
LindbergStaffan I (2006) The Surprising Significance of African Elections. Journal of Democracy17(1): 139–151.
35.
LyneMona M (2007) Rethinking Economics and Institutions: The voter’s dilemma and democratic accountability. In KitscheltHerbertWilkinsonRichard I (eds) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–181.
36.
MagaloniBeatriz (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MagaloniBeatriz (2010) The Game of Electoral Fraud and The Ousting of Authoritarian Rule. American Journal of Political Science54(3): 751–765.
38.
MigdalJoel S (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
PalaisJames B (1974) ‘Democracy’ in South Korea, 1948–72. In BaldwinFrank (ed.) Without Parallel: The American-Korean Relationship since 1945. New York: Pantheon Books, 318–357.
40.
SchedlerAndreas (2015) The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
SeebergM B.Electoral authoritarianism and economic control, Special Issue International Political Science Review. DOI: 10.1177/0192512117692802.
42.
SeebergMerete Bech (2014) State Capacity and The Paradox of Authoritarian Elections. Democratization21(7): 1265–1285.
43.
SlaterDanFennerSofia (2011) State Power and Staying Power: Infrastructural mechanisms and authoritarian durability. Journal of International Affairs65(1): 15–29.
44.
VuTuong (2007) State Formation and The Origins of Developmental States in South Korea and Indonesia. Studies in Comparative International Development41(4): 27–56.
45.
WeissLinda (2005) The State-Augmenting Effects of Globalisation. New Political Economy10(3): 345–353.
46.
WelzelChristian (2013) Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Woo-CumingsMeredith Jung-En (1998) National Security and The Rise of the Developmental State in South Korea and Taiwan. In RowenHenry S (ed.) Behind East Asian Growth: The Political and Social Foundations of Prosperity. London: Routledge, 319–340.
48.
World Bank. World Bank Open Data, available at: http://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed: 22 December, 2016)
49.
YangSung Chul (1999) The North and South Korean Political Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Revised edition. Elizabeth, NJ; and Seoul, South Korea: Hollym.
