Scholarship on electoral authoritarianism has increasingly recognized state capacity as an element enhancing electoral control. Building on such arguments, I examine the interaction between state capacity and regime strength in authoritarian elections. Drawing on empirical evidence from Egyptian elections under Mubarak, I show that the degree to which official regime candidates were able to profit from state penetration depended on the strength of the ruling party. In urban settings where party structures were stronger, service provision by the state helped secure the dominance of the hegemonic National Democratic Party; in rural constituencies where the party was weak, by contrast, service provision strengthened local elites who often ran and won against the party’s official candidates. This suggests that variation in regime capacity to channel political support needs to be taken into account when examining the relationship between state capacity and electoral control under authoritarianism.
AndersenDavidMøllerJørgenRørbækLasse LykkeSkaaningSvend-Erik (2014) State Capacity and Political Regime Stability. Democratization21(7): 1305–1325.
2.
ApterDavid E (1955) The Gold Coast in Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3.
ArafatAlaa al-Din (2009) The Mubarak Leadership and Future of Democracy in Egypt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
AyubiNazih NM (1995) Over-Stating the Arab State Politics and Society in the Middle East. London: I.B. Tauris.
5.
BeattieKirk J (2000) Egypt during the Sadat Years. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
Ben NefissaSarahArafatAlaa al-Din (2005) Al-intikhabat wa-l-zaba’iniyya al-siyasiyya fi Masr [Elections and Political Clientelism in Egypt]. Cairo: Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies.
7.
BinderLeonard (1966) Political Recruitment and Participation in Egypt. In LaPalombaraJosephWeinerMyron (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 217–240.
8.
BinderLeonard (1978) In a Moment of Enthusiasm: Political Power and the Second Stratum in Egypt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BlaydesLisa (2011) Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrownleeJason (2007) Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BushRay (2007) Politics, Power and Poverty: Twenty years of agricultural reform and market liberalisation in Egypt. Third World Quarterly28(8): 1599–1615.
12.
CooperMark N (1982) The Transformation of Egypt. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
El-ShobakiAmr (2001) Al-Mustaqqilun wa-l-intikhabat [Independents and Elections]. In MustafaHala (ed.) Intikhabat Maglis Al-Sha’b 2000 [The 2000 People’s Assembly Elections]. Cairo: al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, 85–102.
14.
Fortin-RittbergerJessica (2014) The Role of Infrastructural and Coercive State Capacity in Explaining Different Types of Electoral Fraud. Democratization21(1): 95–117.
15.
GandhiJennifer (2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GeddesBarbara (1999) What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 115–144.
17.
HansonJonathan K (2017) The Insitutional Underpinnings of Power: State capacity and authoritarian regime stability. International Political Science Review, forthcoming.
18.
HarikIliya (1973) The Single Party as a Subordinate Movement: The case of Egypt. World Politics26(1): 80–105.
19.
HuntingtonSamuel P (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20.
HuntingtonSamuel PMooreClement Henry (1970) Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems. New York: Basic Books.
21.
KassemMaye (1999) In the Guise of Democracy: Governance in Contemporary Egypt. Reading: Ithaca.
22.
KoehlerKevin (2008) Authoritarian Elections in Egypt: Formal institutions and informal mechanisms of rule. Democratization15(5): 974–990.
23.
LaPalombaraJosephWeinerMyron (eds) (1966) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
LevitskyStevenMurilloMaría Victoria (2009) Variation in Institutional Strength. Annual Review of Political Science12(1): 115–133.
25.
LevitskySteven RWayLucan A (2012) Beyond Patronage: Violent struggle, ruling party cohesion, and authoritarian durability. Perspectives on Politics10(4): 869–889.
26.
LevitskySteven RWayLucan A (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Lust-OkarEllen (2006) Elections under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan. Democratization13(3): 456-471.
28.
MagaloniBeatriz (2008) Voring for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MannMichael (1986) The Sources of Social Power: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MasoudTarek E (2014) Counting Islam: Religion, Class, and Elections in Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MenzaMohamed Fahmy (2012) Neoliberal Reform and Socio-Structural Reconfiguration in Cairo’s Popular Quarters: The rise of the lesser notables in Misr Al Qadima. Mediterranean Politics17(3): 322–339.
32.
MooreClement Henry (1965) Tunisia since Independence: The Dynamics of One-Party Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
MooreClement Henry (1974) Authoritarian Politics in Unincorporated Society: The case of Nasser’s Egypt. Comparative Politics6(2): 193–218.
34.
Rabi’Amr Hashem (2006) Dalil al-nukhba al-barlamaniyya al-masriyya 2005: mu’asharat wa nata’ig [Guidebook to the Egyptian Parliamenary Elite 2005: Indicators and Results]. In Rabi’Amr Hashem (ed.) Dalil al-nukhba al-barlamaniyya al-masriyya 2005. Cairo: Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, 13–36.
35.
RoddenJonathan (2009) Back to the Future: Endogenous institutions and comparative politics. In LichbachMark IrvingZuckermanAlan S (eds) Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 333–357.
36.
SchachterRuth (1961) Single-Party Systems in West Africa. American Political Science Review55(2): 294–307.
37.
SeebergMerete Bech (2014) State Capacity and the Paradox of Authoritarian Elections. Democratization21(7): 1265–1285.
38.
SlaterDan (2010) Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SlaterDanFennerSofia (2011) State Power and Staying Power: Infrastructural mechanisms and authoritarian durability. Journal of International Affairs65(1): 15–29.
40.
SmithBenjamin (2005) Life of the Party: The origins of regime breakdown and persistence under single-party rule. World Politics57(3): 421–451.
41.
SolimanSamer (2006) Al-Nizam al-qawi wa-l-dawla al-da’ifa: Idara al-azma al-maliyya wa-l-taghir al-siyasi fi ‘ahd Mubarak [The Strong Regime and the Weak State: The Management of the Financial Crisis and Political Change under Mubarak]. Cairo: Dar li-l-nashr wa-l-tawsi’.
42.
SvolikMilan W (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WaldnerDavid (1999) State Building and Late Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
44.
WayLucan A (2005) Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave: The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics57(2): 231–261.
45.
WeberMax (1968) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
46.
WickhamCarrie Rosefsky (2013) The Muslim Brotherhood: Evolution of an Islamist Movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
47.
ZahranGamal (2006) Al-mustaqqilun wa-l-munashiqun [The Independents and the Splitters]. In Rabi’Amr Hashem (ed.) Al-Intikhabat Maglis Al-Sha’b 2005 [The 2005 People’s Assembly Elections]. Cairo: Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, 169–195.
