Abstract
The outcomes of economic sanctions should not be explained by ex ante information that has already been discounted by the interested parties when they decided to initiate or resist economic coercion. Therefore, contrary to much of the existing literature, only ex post information becoming available after the occurrence of sanctions should explain their results. This logic of strategic anticipation and selection applies to interstate interactions generally, such as those pertaining to the success of deterrence policy and the outbreak of war.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
