In a 2006 International Political Science Review article, entitled “Choosing to Go It Alone: Irish Neutrality in Theoretical and Comparative Perspective,” Neal G. Jesse argues that Irish neutrality is best understood through a neoliberal rather than a neorealist international relations theory framework. This article posits an alternative “critical social constructivist” framework for understanding Irish neutrality. The first part of the article considers the differences between neoliberalism and social constructivism and argues why critical social constructivism's emphasis on beliefs, identity, and the agency of the public in foreign policy are key factors explaining Irish neutrality today. Using public opinion data, the second part of the article tests whether national identity, independence, ethnocentrism, attitudes to Northern Ireland, and efficacy are factors driving public support for Irish neutrality. The results show that public attitudes to Irish neutrality are structured along the dimensions of independence and identity, indicating empirical support for a critical social constructivist framework of understanding of Irish neutrality.
Acock, Alan, Clarke, Harold W. and Stewart, Marianne C. (1985). "A New Model for Old Measures: A Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Efficacy," Journal of Politics47(4): 1062-84.
2.
Adler, Emanuel (1997). "Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics," European Journal of International Relations3(3): 319-63.
3.
Adler, Emanuel (2002). "Constructivism and International Relations," in W. Carlsnaes et al. (eds), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.
4.
Agius, Christine (2006). The Social Construction of Swedish Neutrality: Challenges to Swedish Identity and Sovereignty. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
5.
Almond, Gabriel (1960). The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.
6.
Althaus, Scott (2003). Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Anderson, Christopher (1998). "When In Doubt, Use Proxies: Attitudes toward Domestic Politics and Support for European Integration," Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569-601.
8.
Andrén, Nils (1978). "Looking at the Superpowers," in Bengt Sundelius (ed.), The Neutral Democracies and the New Cold War. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9.
Arbuckle, James and Wothke, Werner (1999). AMOS 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.
10.
Bardes, Barbara and Oldendick, Robert (1978). "Beyond Internationalism: A Case for Multiple Dimensions in the Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes ," Social Science Quarterly59(3): 496-508.
11.
Bjereld, Ulf and Ekengren, Ann-Marie (1999). "Foreign Policy Dimensions: A Comparison between the United States and Sweden," International Studies Quarterly43: 503-18.
12.
Blank, Thomas et al. (2001). "Patriotism" - A Contradiction, a Possibility or an Empirical Reality?ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Grenoble, France, April 6-11.
13.
Burchill, Scott (2001). "Realism and Neo-realism," in Theories of International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
14.
Byrne, Barbara M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. New Jersey: LEA Publishers.
15.
Calvocoressi, Peter (1996). World Politics since 1945. New York: Longman.
16.
Checkel, Jeffery (1998). "The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory," World Politics50(2): 324-48.
17.
Checkel, Jeffery (2004). "Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay," Review of International Studies30: 229-44.
18.
Chittick, William et al. (1995). "A Three Dimensional Model of American Foreign Policy Beliefs," International Studies Quarterly39: 313-31.
19.
Dahl, Ann-Sofie (1997). "Not If but How: Sweden's Future Relations with NATO," NATO Review, 3, May/June.
20.
Der Derian, James (1997). "Post-theory: The Eternal Return of Ethics in International Relations," in M.W. Doyle and G.J. Ikenberry (eds), New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
Dessler, David (1999). "Constructivism within a Positivist Social Science ," Review of International Studies25: 123-37.
22.
Devine, Karen (2006). "The Myth of `the Myth of Irish Neutrality': Deconstructing Concepts of Irish Neutrality using International Relations Theories," Irish Studies in International Affairs17: 115-39.
23.
Doherty, Róisín (2002). Ireland, Neutrality and European Security Integration . Aldershot: Ashgate.
24.
Donnelly, Jack (2000). Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Dougherty, James and Pfaltzgraff, Robert (2001). Contending Theories of International Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
Eichenberg, Richard (1989). Public Opinion and National Security in Europe . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Eichenberg, Richard (2000). "NATO and European Security after the Cold War: Will European Citizens Support a Common Security Policy?" in Brigitte Nacos et al. (eds), Decisionmaking in a Glass House. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
28.
Eichenberg, Richard and Dalton, Russell (1993). "Europeans and the European Community: The Dynamics of Public Support for European Integration," International Organization47(4): 507-34.
29.
Everts, Philip (2000). "Public Opinion after the Cold War: A Paradigm Shift," in Brigitte Nacos et al. (eds), Decisionmaking in a Glass House. New York : Rowman and Littlefield.
30.
Fanning, Ronan (1996). "Neutrality, Identity and Security," in Werner Bauwens et al. (eds), Small States and the Security Challenge in the New Europe. London: Brassey's.
31.
Farrell, Theo (2002). "Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program," International Studies Review4(1): 49-72.
32.
Fianna Fáil (1997). Election Manifesto. Dublin : Fianna Fáil.
33.
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn (2001). "Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics," Annual Review of Political Science4: 391-416.
34.
Fisk, Robert (1983). In Time of War: Ireland, Ulster and the Price of Neutrality 1939-45. London: Paladin.
35.
FitzGerald, Garret (1988). "Irish Neutrality," European Affairs28: 23-9.
Freymond, Jean (1990). "Neutrality and Security Policy as Components of the Swiss Model," in M. Milivojevic and P. Maurer (eds), Swiss Neutrality and Security. New York, Oxford and Munich: BERG.
38.
Gilland, Karin (2001). "Ireland and the International Use of Force," in Philip Everts and Pierangelo Isernia (eds), Public Opinion and the International Use of Force. London: Routledge/ECPR .
39.
Goetschel, Laurent (1999). "Neutrality, a Really Dead Concept?" Cooperation and Conflict34(2): 115-39.
40.
Gourevitch, Peter (1978). "The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics," International Organization32(4): 881-911.
41.
Gourevitch, Peter (2002). "Domestic Politics and International Relations ," in Walter Carlsnaes et al. (eds), Handbook of International Relations. London : Sage.
42.
Government of Ireland (1996). White Paper on Foreign Policy. Dublin: Stationery Office.
43.
Government of Ireland (2000). White Paper on Defence. Dublin: Stationery Office.
44.
Hart, David (1995). "The Politics of Opinion," University of Georgia Research Magazine, summer.
45.
Hill, Christopher (1993). "The Capabilities-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe's International Role," Journal of Common Market Studies31(3): 305-28.
46.
Holsti, Ole (1992). "Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus," International Studies Quarterly36: 439-66.
47.
Holsti, Ole (1996). Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
48.
Holsti, Ole and Rosenau, James (1986). "The Foreign Policy Beliefs of American Leaders: Some Further Thoughts on Theory and Method," International Studies Quarterly30: 473-84.
49.
Holsti, Ole and Rosenau, James (1990). "The Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes among American Leaders," Journal of Politics53(1): 94-125.
50.
Hopf, Ted (1998). "The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory," International Security23(1): 171-200.
51.
Hopf, Ted (2000). "The Promise of Constructivism," in Andrew Linklater (ed.), Critical Concepts in Political Science. New York: Routledge.
52.
Houghton, David Patrick (2007). "Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach," Foreign Policy Analysis3: 24-45.
53.
Hurwitz, Jon and Peffley, Mark (1987). "How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model," American Political Science Review81: 1099-120.
54.
Hurwitz, Jon and Peffley, Mark (1990). "Public Images of the Soviet Union: The Impact on Foreign Policy Attitudes," Journal of Politics52: 3-28.
55.
Irish Opinion Poll Archive (2006). URL (consulted February 4, 2006): http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/IOPA . Dublin: University of Dublin, Trinity College, Department of Political Science.
56.
Irish Times (1996). "DL Rejects Irish Role in Group Sponsored by NATO." March 29. Irish Times (1997). "FF Says Spring Undermining Neutrality ." April 16.
57.
Irish Times (1999). "Cabinet to Opt for Joining PfP Without Poll." October 5.
58.
Irish Times (2003). "Parties in Neutrality Debate." February 19.
59.
Irish Times (2006). "Battlegroup Development Welcome." February 10.
60.
Isernia, Pierangelo (2001). "Conclusions," in Philip Everts and Pierangelo Isernia (eds), Public Opinion and the International Use of Force. London: Routledge/ECPR.
61.
Isernia, Pierangelo et al. (2002). "Foreign Policy and the Rational Public in Comparative Perspective," Journal of Conflict Resolution46(2): 201-24.
62.
Ispas (2001/02). Irish Social and Attitudes Survey, conducted by the Economic and Social Research Institute on behalf of UCD/TCD Department(s) of Political Science/ Politics.
63.
Jackson, Robert and Sørensen, Georg (2006). "Social Constructivism," in Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
Jacobsen, John Kurt (2003). "Duelling Constructivisms: A Post-mortem on the Ideas Debate in Mainstream IR/IPE," Review of International Studies29: 39-60.
65.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank et al. (2004). "Foreign and Domestic Policy Belief Structures in the US and British Publics," Journal of Conflict Resolution48(3): 287-309.
66.
Jesse, Neal G. (2006). "Choosing to Go It Alone: Irish Neutrality in Theoretical and Comparative Perspective," International Political Science Review27(1): 7-28.
67.
Jessup, Philip (1936). Neutrality: Today and Tomorrow. New York: Columbia University Press.
68.
Joenniemi, Pertti (1989). "The Underlying Assumptions of Finnish Neutrality ," in Joseph Kruzel and Michael Haltzel (eds), Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
Jørgensen, Knud Erik (1999). "Possibilities of a `Nordic' Influence on the Development of the CFSP?" in Mathias Jopp and Hanna Ojanen (eds), European Security Integration: Implications for Non-alignment and Alliances . Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
70.
Jupille, Joseph (2005). "Knowing Europe: Metatheory and Methodology in European Union Studies," in M. Cini and A. Bourne (eds), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
Karsh, Efraim (1988). Neutrality and Small States. London: Routledge.
72.
Keatinge, Patrick (1972). "Odd Man Out? Irish Neutrality and European Security ," International Affairs48: 438-49.
73.
Keatinge, Patrick (1973). The Formulation of Irish Foreign Policy. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration .
74.
Keatinge, Patrick (1978). A Place Among the Nations: Issues of Irish Foreign Policy. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
75.
Keatinge, Patrick (1984). A Singular Stance: Irish Neutrality in the 1980s . Dublin: Institute of Public Administration .
76.
Keatinge, Patrick (1989). "Neutrality and Regional Integration: Ireland's Experience in the European Community," in Joseph Kruzel and Michael Haltzel (eds), Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
Kelloway, Kevin (1998). Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
Kline, Rex (1998). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. London: Guildford Press .
79.
Knopf, Jeffrey (1998). "How Rational Is `The Rational Public'?" Journal of Conflict Resolution42(5): 544-71.
80.
Kronsell, Annical and Svedberg, Erika (2001). "The Duty to Protect: Gender in the Swedish Practice of Conscription," Co-operation and Conflict36(2): 153-76.
81.
Kubálková, Vendulka (2001). "A Constructivist Primer," in V. Kubálková (ed.), Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
82.
Kux, Stephan (1986). Europe's Neutral States: Partners or Profiteers in Western Security?London: Alliance Publishers for the Institute for European Defence and Strategic Studies.
83.
Larsen, Henrik (2004). "Discourse Analysis in the Study of European Foreign Policy," in Ben Tonra and Thomas Christiansen (eds), Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
84.
Lippmann, Walter (1955). Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
85.
McSweeney, Bill (1985a). "The Case for Active Irish Neutrality," in Bill McSweeney (ed.), Ireland and the Threat of Nuclear War: The Question of Irish Neutrality. Dublin: Dominican Publications.
86.
McSweeney, Bill (1985b). "Changing Perceptions of Irish Neutrality," in Bill McSweeney (ed.), Ireland and the Threat of Nuclear War: The Question of Irish Neutrality. Dublin: Dominican Publications.
87.
McSweeney, Bill (1999). Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88.
Marquis, Lionel and Sciarini, Pascal (1999). "Opinion Formation in Foreign Policy: The Swiss Experience," Electoral Studies18: 453-71.
89.
Moravcsik, Andrew (1997). "Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics," International Organization51(4): 513-53.
90.
Morgenthau, Hans (1978). Politics Among Nations, 5th edn. New York: Knopf.
91.
MRBI (1985). Market Research Bureau of Ireland Survey, April. Irish Times.
92.
MRBI (1992a). Market Research Bureau of Ireland Survey, May. Irish Times.
93.
MRBI (1992b). Market Research Bureau of Ireland Survey, June. Irish Times .
94.
Ogley, Roderick (1970). The Theory and Practice of Neutrality in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
95.
Page, Benjamin and Barabas, Jason (2000). "Foreign Policy Gaps between Citizens and Leaders ," International Studies Quarterly44: 339-64.
96.
Page, Benjamin and Shapiro, Robert (1992). The Rational Public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
97.
Peffley, Mark and Hurwitz, Jon (1985). "A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint," American Journal of Political Science29(4): 871-90.
98.
Poole, Ross (1999). Nation and Identity. London : Routledge.
99.
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian (2000). "Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism," in A. Linklater (ed.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science. London: Routledge .
100.
Putnam, Robert (1988). "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games," International Organization42(3): 427-60.
101.
Rengger, Nick and Hoffman, Mark (1990). "Modernity, Postmodernism and International Relations ," in J. Doherty (ed.), Postmodernism in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
102.
Reus-Smit, Christian (2001). "Constructivism," in Scott Burchill et al. (eds), Theories of International Relations, 2nd edn. Basingstoke : Macmillan.
103.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1991). "Public Opinion, Domestic Structures, and Foreign Policy," World Politics43, July: 479-512.
104.
Rosenau, James (1961). Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: An Operational Formulation. New York: Random House .
105.
Ruggie, John (1998). "What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge," International Organization52(4): 855-86.
106.
Salmon, Trevor (1982). "Ireland: A Neutral in the Community?" Journal of Common Market Studies20(3): 205-27.
107.
Salmon, Trevor (1989). Unneutral Ireland: An Ambivalent and Unique Security Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
108.
Schmidt, Peter and Heyder, Aribert (2000). "Authoritarianism and Ethnocentrism in East and West Germany," draft manuscript. URL (revised version consulted May 30, 2008): http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2006/3598/pdf/HeyderAribert-2006-08-30.pdf .
109.
Seville Declaration (2002). Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution Act , 2002. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
110.
Sinnott, Richard (1995a). "Bringing Public Opinion Back In," in Richard Sinnott and Oskar Niedermayer (eds), Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111.
Sinnott, Richard (1995b). "Knowledge of the European Union in Irish Public Opinion: Sources and Implications," Occasional Paper No. 5. Dublin: Institute of European Affairs .
112.
Sinnott, Richard (2001). Attitudes and Behaviour of the Irish Electorate in the Referendum on the Treaty of Nice. Dublin: European Commission Representation in Ireland.
113.
Sniderman, Paul (1993). "The New Look in Public Opinion Research," in A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC : AJPS.
114.
Sundelius, Bengt (1987). "Introduction," in Bengt Sundelius (ed.), The Neutral Democracies and the New Cold War. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
115.
Thalberg, Hans (1989). "The Role of Public Opinion in Neutral Policy ," in Joseph Kruzel and Michael Haltzel (eds), Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116.
Tooze, Roger (1996). "States, Nationalisms and Identities: Thinking in IR Theory," in J. Krause and N. Renwick (eds), Identities in International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
117.
Vukadinovic, Radovan (1989). "The Various Conceptions of European Neutrality ," in Joseph Kruzel and Michael Haltzel (eds), Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
118.
Wæver, Ole (1997). "Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms," in I.B. Neumann and O. Wæver (eds), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?London: Routledge.
119.
Wæver, Ole (2002). "Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy: Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory," in L. Hansen and O. Wæver (eds), European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States . London: Routledge .
120.
Waltz, Kenneth (1959). Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis . New York: Columbia University Press.
121.
Waltz, Kenneth (1995). "Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory," in C.W. Kegley (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. New York: St Martin's Press.
122.
Weber, Cynthia (2001). International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction . London: Routledge.
123.
Wendt, Alexander (1992). "Anarchy is What States Make of It," International Organization46(2): 391-425.
124.
Wittkopf, Eugene (1990). Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
125.
Zehfuss, Maja (2002). Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
