Prime ministers are self-evidently important actors in the politics of parliamentary democracies. While there has been an ongoing debate about prime ministerial power in the political science literature, progress has been slow in a debate dating from the 1960s. This lack of progress is because of two connected factors. One is the lack of a theoretical framework to study prime ministerial power. A framework is less likely to be developed because of the lack of data on which hypotheses could be tested. This article reports in detail the methodology and results of an expert survey that was conducted to measure prime ministerial power. These data will provide a significant resource for the future study of prime ministers, cabinets, and the core executive.
Arian, Asher (1985). Politics in Israel: The Second Generation. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House .
2.
Bergman, T. , Müller, W.C. , Strøm, K. and Blomgren, M. (2003). “Democratic Delegation and Accountability: Cross National Patterns,” in K. Strøm , W.C. Müller and T. Bergman (eds), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
3.
Bowles, Nigel (1999). “Studying the Presidency,”Annual Review of Political Science2: 1–23 .
4.
Brichta, Avraham (1998). “The New Premier-Parliamentary System in Israel,”Annals, AAPSS555: 180–192 .
5.
Budge, I. , Klingemann, H-D. , Volkens, A. , Bara, J. and Tannenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping Political Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
6.
Campbell, Colin (1980). “Political Leadership in Canada: Pierre Elliot Trudeau and the Ottowa Model,” in R. Rose and E.N. Suleiman (eds), Presidents and Prime Ministers. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute .
7.
Castles, Francis G. and Mair, Peter (1984). “Left-Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgements,”European Journal of Political Research12: 73–88 .
8.
Curtis, Gerald L. (1999). The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press .
9.
De Swaan, Abram (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
10.
Elgie, Robert (1999). “Political Leadership: The President and the Taoiseach,” in M. Gallagher and J. Coakley (eds), Politics in the Republic of Ireland. London: Routledge and PSAI Press .
11.
Farrell, Brian (1987). “The Constitution and the Institutions of Government: Constitutional Theory and Political Practice,”Administration35(4): 162–172 .
12.
Farrell, Brian (1991). “The Role of the Chief Executive in Irish Government.” Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research, University of Essex.
13.
Granatstein, J.L. and Hilmer, Norman (1999). Prime Ministers: Ranking Canada's Leaders. Toronto: HarperCollins .
14.
Hart, John (1998). “Neglected Aspects in the Study of the Presidency,”Annual Review of Political Science1: 379–399 .
15.
Hayao, Kenji (1993). The Japanese Prime Minister and Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press .
16.
Helms, Ludger (2001). “The Changing Chancellorship: Resources and Constraints Revised,”German Politics10: 155–168 .
17.
Huber, John D. (1996). “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies,”American Political Science Review90(2): 269–282 .
18.
Huber, John D. and Inglehart, Ronald (1995). “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies,”Party Politics1: 73–111 .
19.
Jones, George W. (1965). “The Prime Minister's Power,”Parliamentary Affairs18: 167–185 .
20.
Jones, George W. , ed. (1991). West European Prime Ministers. London: Frank Cass .
21.
King, Anthony (1975). “Executives,” in N.W. Polsby and F.I. Greenstein (eds), Handbook of Political Science. Reading: Addison Wesley .
22.
King, Anthony (1994). “Chief Executives in Western Europe,” in I. Budge and D. McKay (eds), Developing Democracy. London: Sage .
23.
Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi (2000). “Iceland,” in R. Elgie (ed.), Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
24.
Laver, Michael and Hunt, W. Ben (1992). Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge .
25.
Laver, Michael and Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1996). Making and Breaking Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press .
26.
Lijphart, Arend (1993). “Israeli Democracy and Democratic Reform in Comparative Perspective,” in E. Sprinzak and L. Diamond (eds), Israeli Democracy under Stress. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
27.
McLeay, Elizabeth (1995). The Cabinet and Political Power in New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press .
28.
Mair, Peter (2001). “Searching for the Positions of Political Actors,” in M. Laver (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge .
29.
Metcalf, Lee Kendall (2000). “Measuring Presidential Power,”Comparative Political Studies33: 660–685 .
30.
Mulgan, Aurelia (2000). “Japan's Political Leadership Defi cit,”Australian Journal of Political Science35: 183–202 .
31.
Müller, W.C. , Bergman, T. and Strøm, K. (2003). “Parliamentary Democracy: Promise and Problems,” in K. Strøm , W.C. Müller and T. Bergman (eds), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
32.
Müller, W.C. , Philipp, W. and Gerlich, P. (1993). “Prime Ministers and Cabinet Decision-Making,” in J. Blondel and F. Müller-Rommel (eds), Governing Together. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
33.
O'Leary, Brendan (1991). “A Taoiseach: The Irish Prime Minister,” in G.W. Jones (ed.), West European Prime Ministers. London: Frank Cass .
34.
Palmer, Geoffrey (1987). Unbridled Power. Auckland: Oxford University Press .
35.
Palmer, Matthew S.R. (1994). “Collective Cabinet Decision-Making in New Zealand,” in M. Laver and K.A. Shepsle (eds), Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government. New York: Cambridge University Press .
36.
Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul , eds (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
37.
Savoie, Donald J. (1999). Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press .
38.
Schlesinger, Arthur M. (1997). “Rating the Presidents: Washington to Clinton,”Political Science Quarterly112: 179–190 .
39.
Sprinzak, Ehud and Diamond, Larry , eds (1993). Israeli Democracy under Stress. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
40.
Taylor, Michael and Laver, Michael (1973). “Government Coalitions in Western Europe,”European Journal of Political Research1: 205–248 .
41.
Theakson, Kevin and Gill, Mark (2005). “Rating 20th Century British Prime Ministers.” Paper presented at the Political Studies Association, University of Leeds, April 5–7.
42.
Tsebelis, George (2000). “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis,”Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration14: 441–474 .
43.
Weller, Patrick (1985). First Among Equals: Prime Ministers in Westminster Systems. Sydney: George Allen and Unwin .
