Electoral governance is a crucial variable in securing the credibility of elections in emerging democracies, but remains largely ignored in the comparative study of democratization. This article develops some basic analytical tools to advance comparative analysis and understanding of this neglected topic. It conceptualizes electoral governance as a set of related activities that involves rule making, rule application, and rule adjudication. It identifies the provision of procedural certainty to secure the substantive uncertainty of democratic elections as the principal task of electoral governance. It argues that electoral governance, while socially and institutionally embedded, matters most during the indeterminate conditions that typically attend democratization. Finally, it outlines a research agenda that covers the comparative study of the structures as well as the processes of electoral governance.
Bratton, M. and N. van de Walle (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Burnell, P. and A. Ware (1998). Funding democratization. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
3.
Choe, Y. (1997). “How to Manage Free and Fair Elections? A Comparison of Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.” Göteborg University.
4.
Choe, Y. and S. Darnolf (1999). “Evaluating the Structure and Functional Role of Electoral Administration in Contemporary Democracies.”95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (aspa), Atlanta, 2-5 September.
5.
Courtney, J.C. (ed.) (1991). Registering Voters: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge, ma: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
6.
Cox, G. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Eigen, P. (1996). “Combating Corruption Around the World.”Journal of Democracy, 7(1): 158-168.
8.
Eisenstadt, T.A. (1998). “Electoral Justice in Mexico: From Oxymoron to Legal Norm in Less Than a Decade.” Working Paper, Carter Center, Atlanta, ga.
9.
Elklit, J. and A. Reynolds (2000). “The Impact of Election Administration on the Legitimacy of Emerging Democracies: A New Research Agenda.”96th Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association (apsa), Washington, dc, 31 August-3 September.
10.
Elklit, J. and P. Svensson (1997). “What Makes Elections Free and Fair?”Journal of Democracy, 8(3): 32-46.
11.
Galtung, F. and J. Pope (1999). “The Global Coalition Against Corruption: Evaluating Transparency International.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, eds), pp. 257-282. Boulder, co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
12.
Geddes, B. (1999). “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?”Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 115-144.
13.
Gill, M.S. (1998). “India: Running the World's Biggest Elections.”Journal of Democracy, 9(1): 164-168.
14.
Gómez López, A. (2000). “Juegos políticos: Las estrategias del pan y del prd en la transición.” Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, phd dissertation, Mexico City.
15.
Goodin, R.E. (1998). “Keeping Political Time: The Rhythms of Democracy.”International Political Science Review, 19(1): 39-54.
16.
Gould, A.C. (1999). “Conflicting Imperatives and Concept Formation.”The Review of Politics, 16(3): 439-463.
17.
Grofman, B. , S.C. Lee, E.A. Winckler, and B. Woodall (eds) (1999). Elections in Japan, Korea and Taiwan Under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
Gyimah-Boadi, E. (1999). “Institutionalizing Credible Elections in Ghana.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, eds), pp. 105-121. Boulder, co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
19.
International idea (1997). “Code of Conduct: Ethical and Professional Administration of Elections.” International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm.
20.
Issacharoff, S. , P. Karlan, and R. Pildes (2001). When Elections Go Bad. New York, ny: Foundation Press.
21.
Jaramillo, J. (1998). “Los órganos electorales supremos.” In Tratado de derecho electoral comparativo de América Latina (D. Nohlen, S. Picardo, and D. Zovatto, eds), pp. 205-249. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
22.
Jones Luong, P. (2000). “After the Break-Up: Institutional Design in Transitional Societies.”Comparative Political Studies, 33(5): 563-592.
23.
Lehoucq, F.E. and I. Molina (forthcoming). Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Linz, J.J. and A. Stepan (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
López-Pintor, R. (n.d.). “Electoral Management Bodies as Institutions of Governance.” United Nations Development Programme, New York.
27.
Luhmann, N. (1983). Legitimation durch Verfahren. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
28.
Maley, M. (2000). “Administration of Elections.” In International Encyclopedia of Elections (R. Rose, ed.), pp. 6-13. Washington, dc: Congressional Quarterly Press.
29.
Maxfield, S. (1999). “A Brief History of Central Bank Independence in Developing Countries.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, eds), pp. 285-292. Boulder, co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
30.
McCubbins, M. and T. Schwartz (1984). “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.”American Journal of Political Science, 28(1): 165-179.
31.
Molina, J. and J. Hernández (1999). “La credibilidad de las elecciones latinoamericanas y sus factores: El efecto de los organismos electorales, el sistema de partidos y las actitudes políticas.”Cuadernos del CENDES, 41: 1-26.
32.
Mozaffar, S. and R. Vengroff (1999). “Institutional Choice as Nested Games in Emerging Democracies: The Case of Senegal.”95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (apsa), Atlanta, 2-5 September.
33.
Mozaffar, S. and R. Vengroff (forthcoming). “A `Whole System' Approach to the Choice of Electoral Rules in Democratizing Countries: Senegal in Comparative Perspective.”Electoral Studies.
34.
Neou, K. with J.C. Gallup (1999). “Conducting Cambodia's Elections.”Journal of Democracy, 10(2): 152-164.
35.
O'Donnell, G. (1996). “Illusions About Consolidation.”Journal of Democracy, 7(2): 34-51.
36.
O'Donnell, G. and P.C. Schmitter (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
Pastor, R.A. (1998). “Mediating Elections.”Journal of Democracy, 9(1): 154-163.
38.
Pastor, R.A. (1999a). “A Brief History of Electoral Commissions.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, eds), pp. 75-81. Boulder, co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
39.
Pastor, R.A. (1999b). “The Role of Electoral Administration in Democratic Transitions: Implications for Policy and Research.”Democratization, 6(4): 1-27.
40.
Pierre, J. and B.G. Peters (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.
41.
Przeworski, A. (1988). “Democracy as a contingent outcome of conflicts.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy (J. Elster and R. Slagstad, eds), pp. 59-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reform in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Przeworski, A. , M.E. Alvarez, J.A. Cheibub, and F. Limongi (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Przeworksi, A. and H. Teune (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiriy. New York: Wiley Interscience.
45.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, ma: Belknap Press.
46.
Schedler, A. (1999a). “Las comisiones y la pirámide: La recentralización conflictiva del poder en el ife.”Política y Gobierno, 6(1): 187-222.
47.
Schedler, A. (1999b). “Civil Society and Political Elections: A Culture of Distrust?”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 565: 126-141.
48.
Schedler, A. (1999c). “Conceptualizing Accountability.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, eds), pp. 13-28. Boulder, co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
49.
Schedler, A. (2000). “Incertidumbre institucional e inferencias de imparcialidad: El caso del Instituto Federal Electoral.”Política y Gobierno, 7(2): 383-421.
50.
Schedler, A. (2001). “Distrust Breeds Bureaucracy: Democratization and the Formal Regulation of Electoral Governance in Mexico.”Public Integrity, 3(2): 181-199.
51.
Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Taagepera, R. (1998). “How Electoral Systems Matter for Democratization.”Democratization, 5(3): 68-91.
53.
Taagepera, R. and M.S. Shugart (1989). Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press.
54.
Temin, J. (2000). “A compelling national election drama in Ghana.”The Sunday Boston Globe, 24 December.
55.
Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
Weber, M.(1988) [1919]. “Politik als Beruf.” In Gesammelte Politische Schriften (J. Winckelmann, ed.), pp. 505-560. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
