This article outlines the logic and consequences of the classical theory of electoral governance. By empowering the executive with the administration of elections and the legislature with the certification of the vote tally, the theory expected elected officials to generate widely acceptable election results. This article argues that the classical theory breaks down when the same party controls the executive and the legislature. Developments in several presidential systems offer tentative support for its central hypothesis. Only when parties delegated election governance to an autonomous court system did election conflicts stop promoting political instability. Comparisons between us and Latin American separation of power systems also suggest that political developments in North and South America are much more similar than commonly assumed.
Alonso, P. (2000). Between revolution and the ballot box: The origins of the Argentine Radical Party in the 1890s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Ames, B. (1987). Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Archer, R. (1995). “Party Strengths and Weaknesses in Colombia's Besieged Democracy.” In Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America (S. Mainwaring and T. R. Scully, eds.), pp. 164-199. Stanford, ca: Stanford University Press.
4.
Argersinger, P.H. (1992). Structure, process, and party: Essays in American political history. Amork, ny: M. E. Sharpe.
5.
Bates, R.H. (2001). Prosperity and Violence: The Political Economy of Development. New York: W.W. Norton.
6.
Becerra, R. , P. Salazar and J. Woldenberg (2000). La mecánica del cambio político en México: Elecciones, partidos y reformas. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.
7.
Bergquist, C.W. (1978). Coffee and conflict in Colombia, 1886-1910. Durham, nc: Duke University Press.
8.
Berry, R.A. , R.G. Hellman, and M. Solaún (1980). Politics of compromise: Coalition government in Colombia. New Brunswick, nj: Transaction Books.
9.
Botana, N. (1979) El orden conservador: la política argentina entre 1880-1916. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.
10.
Bowman, K. (forthcoming). Militarization, Democracy, and Development in Latin America. University Park, pa: Penn State University Press.
11.
Burkhart, R.E. and M.S. Lewis-Beck (1994). “Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis.”American Political Science Review, 88(4): 903-911.
12.
Choe, Y. (1997). “How to Manage Free and Fair Elections? A Comparison of Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.”Göteborg University.
13.
Collier, R.B. (1999). Paths Toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Collier, D. and R.B. Collier (1991). Shaping the Political Arena. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Cox, G.W. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Cox, G.W. and J.M. Kousser (1981). “Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case.”American Journal of Political Science, 25(4): 646-663.
17.
Cruz-Coke, R. (1984). Historia electoral de Chile, 1925-1973. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
18.
Davidson, C. and B. Grofman (1994). Quiet revolution in the South: The impact of the Voting Rights Act, 1965-1990. Princeton, nj: Princeton University Press.
19.
Diamond, L. (1992). “Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered,” In Reexamining Democracy: Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset (G. Marks and L. Diamond, eds.), pp. 93-139. Newbury Park, ca: Sage Publications.
20.
Eisenstadt, T.A. (1998). “Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies, Electoral Institution-Building, and Political Opening.”ph.d. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
21.
Elklit, J. (1999). “Electoral Institutional Change and Democratization: You Can Lead a Horse to Water, But You Can't Make it Drink.”Democratization, 6(4): 28-51.
22.
Elklit, J. and A. Reynolds (2000). “The Impact of Election Administration on the Legitimacy of Emerging Democracies: A New Research Agenda.”96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (apsa), Washington, dc, 31 August-3 September.
23.
Gillespie, C.G. (1991). Negotiating Democracy: Politicians and Generals in Uruguay. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
González, L. (1991). Political structures and democracy in Uruguay. Notre Dame, in: University of Notre Dame Press.
25.
Gros Espiell, H. (1990). La Corte Electoral del Uruguay. San José: iidh.
26.
Hartlyn, J. (1988). The Politics of Coalition Rule in Colombia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hartlyn, J. (1998). The Struggle for Democratic Politics in the Dominican Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28.
Heise González, J. (1974) Historia de Chile: El período parlamentario, 1861-1925. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello.
29.
Issacharoff, S. , P.S. Karlan, and R.H. Pildes (1998). The Law of Democracy: Legal Regulation of the Political Process. New York: Foundation Press.
30.
Issacharoff, S. , P.S. Karlan, and R.H. Pildes (2001). When Elections Go Bad. Eagen, mn: West Group.
31.
Jaramillo, J. (1998). “Los órganos electorales supremos.” In Tratado de derecho electoral comparativo de América Latina (D. Nohlen, S. Picado, and D. Zovatto, eds.), pp. 205-249. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
32.
Klein, H.S. (1969). Parties and political change in Bolivia, 1880-1952. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Kousser, J.M. (1974). The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880-1910. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press.
34.
Lehoucq, F.E. (1995). “Institutional Change and Political Conflict: Evaluating Alternative Explanations of Electoral Reform in Costa Rica.”Electoral Studies, 14(1): 23-45.
35.
Lehoucq, F.E. (1998). Instituciones democráticas y conflictos políticos en Costa Rica. San José: euna.
36.
Lehoucq, F.E. (2000) “Institutionalizing Democracy: Constraint and Ambition in the Politics of Electoral Reform.”Comparative Politics, 32(4): 459-477.
37.
Lehoucq, F. (forthcoming). “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences.”Annual Review of Political Science.
38.
Lehoucq, F.E. and I. Molina (2002). Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Linz, J.J. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism.”Journal of Democracy, 1(1): 51-69.
40.
Lipset, S.M. (1963). “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Democracy.”American Political Science Review, 53(1): 69-105.
41.
López-Pintor, R. (n.d.). “Electoral Management Bodies as Institutions of Governance.” United Nations Development Program (undp), New York.
42.
Loveman, B. (1994). The Constitution of Tyranny: Regimes of Exception in Spanish America. Pittsburgh, pa: University of Pittsburgh Press.
43.
Loveman, B. (1999). For La Patria: Politics and the Armed Forces in Latin America, Wilmington, de: Scholarly Resources.
44.
Lowenstein, D. (1995). Election Law: Cases and Materials. Durham, nc: Carolina Academic Press.
45.
Malloy, J.M. and E. Gamarra (1988). Revolution and Reaction: Bolivia, 1964-1985. New Brunswick, nj: Transaction Books.
46.
Markoff, J. (1996). Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change. Thousand Oaks, ca: Pine Forge Press.
47.
Merzer, M. (2001). The Miami Herald Report: Democracy Held Hostage. New York: St Martin's Press.
48.
Millar Carvacho, R. (1982). La Elección presidencial de 1920: Tendencies y práctices políticas en el Chile parlamentario. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.
49.
Molina, I. and F.E. Lehoucq (1999). “Political Competition and Electoral Fraud: A Latin American Case Study.”Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 30(2): 199-234.
50.
Molinar Horcasitas, J. (1987). El tiempo de la legitimidad: Elecciones, autoritarismo y democracia en México. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.
51.
Molinar Horcasitas, J. (1993). “Escuelas de intepretación del sistema político mexicano.”Revista Mexicana de Socología, 55: 3-56.
52.
Munro, D.G.(1967) [1917]. The Five Republics of Central America: Their Political and Economic Development and their Relation with the United States. New York: Russell & Russell.
53.
New York Times (2001). 36 Days: The Complete Chronicle of the 2000 Presidential Crisis. New York: Times Books.
54.
Nohlen, D. and D. Sabsay (1998). “El Derecho electoral.” In Tratado de derecho electoral comparativo de América Latina (D. Nohlen, S. Picado, and D. Zovatto, eds.), pp. 13-24. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
55.
Orozco Henríquez, J. (1998). “El contencioso electoral/la calificación electoral,” In Tratado de derecho electoral comparativo de América Latina (D. Nohlen, S. Picado, and D. Zovatto, eds.), pp. 708-807. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
56.
Pastor, R. (1999). “The Role of Electoral Administration in Democratic Transitions: Implications for Policy and Research.”Democratization, 6(4): 1-27.
57.
Perman, M. (2001). Struggle for Mastery: Disfranchisement of the South, 1888-1908. Chapel Hill, nc: University of North Carolina Press.
58.
Piven, F.F. and R. Cloward (2000). Why Americans Still Don't Vote: And Why Politicians Want It That Way. Boston: Beacon Press.
59.
Posada-Carbó, E. (2000). “Electoral Juggling: A Comparative History of the Corruption of Suffrage in Latin America, 1830-1930.”Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(3): 611-644.
60.
Posada-Carbó, E. (2001). “Legitimidad, representación y alternancia en España y América Latina: las reformas electorales, 1880-1930.” In Reformas electorales en España y América Latina, 1880-1930 (C. Malamud, ed.). Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
61.
Potter, A.L. (1981). “The Failure of Democracy in Argentina, 1916-1930: An Institutional Perspective.”Journal of Latin American Studies, 13(1): 83-109.
62.
Powell, R. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press.
63.
Przeworski, A. , M. E. Alvarez, J.A. Cheibub, and F. Limongi (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil (1988). Historia electoral Colombiana. Bogotá: Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil.
65.
Rock, D. (1975). Politics in Argentina, 1890-1930: The rise and fall of radicalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Rueschemeyer, D. , E. Stephens, and J. Stephens (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
Sabato, H. and E. Palti (1990). “¿Quién votaba en Buenos Aires? Práctica y teoría del sufragio, 1850-1880.”Desarrollo Económico, 30(119): 395-424.
68.
Schedler, A. (1999). “Las comisiones y la pirámide: La recentralización conflictiva del poder en el ife.”Política y Gobierno, 6(1): 187-222.
69.
Schedler, A. (2000). “Mexico's Victory: The Democratic Revelation.”Journal of Democracy, 11(4): 5-19.
70.
Schmidt, G.D. (2000). “Delegative Democracy in Peru? Fujimori's 1995 Landslide and the Prospects for 2000.”Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(1): 99-132.
Schmidt, G.D. (forthcoming b). From Tsunami to Pyrrhic Victory: Elections and Political Regimes in Fujimori's Peru. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
73.
Scully, T.R. (1992). Rethinking the center: Party politics in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Chile. Stanford, ca: Stanford University Press.
74.
Valenzuela, A. (1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
75.
Waisman, C. (1999). “Argentina: Capitalism and Democracy.” In Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, 2nd ed. (L. Diamond, J. Hartlyn, and J.J. Linz, eds.), pp. 71-130. Boulder, co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
76.
Walter, K. (1993). The regime of Anastasio Somoza, 1936-1956. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
77.
Washington Post, D. von Drehle, and E. Nakashima (2001). Deadlock: The Inside Story of America's Closest Election. New York: Public Affairs Press.
